.Letter to the Editor: No Repercussions

A letter to the editor of Good Times

As a resident of downtown Santa Cruz, I find it increasingly difficult to feel compassion and empathy for much of the county’s homeless population, despite my strenuous effort to do so. There is no doubt in my mind that city and county residents should be responsible for assisting a certain percentage of the local homeless, such as persons with diagnosed mental disorders, families, elderly and veterans. However, the 2022 homeless census found a 282 percent increase—yes, that is correct, a 282 percent increase—in individuals identifying as having a substance abuse disorder since 2019. This accounts for approximately half of the county’s homeless. As a frequent passer-by of the Benchlands, it’s easy to understand why this incredible increase. We have managed to create a responsibility-free zone; that is, a place where one need not take any responsibility for themselves. We (you) provide everything needed to live reasonably comfortably (food, tents, electricity, port-a-potties, water, clothes). At the same time the homeless are ensured no repercussions for littering (food, needles, feces, tents, propane tanks, chairs, etc.), getting high in public, or camping anywhere they like. If we stay on this path, one can envision another 282 percent increase in individuals with a substance abuse disorder by 2025, many of which will undoubtedly migrate to our city. Ask any substance abuse counselor and they will tell you that the only way for someone to overcome a substance abuse issue is for them to make the decision to do so on their own. 

Chad Mitcham

Santa Cruz

These letters do not necessarily reflect the views of Good Times.To submit a letter to the editor of Good Times: Letters should be originals—not copies of letters sent to other publications. Please include your name and email address to help us verify your submission (email address will not be published). Please be brief. Letters may be edited for length, clarity and to correct factual inaccuracies known to us. Send letters to le*****@go*******.sc


  1. I am a therapist here in Santa Cruz and treating substance use is in my scope of practice. While I agree people have to choose to change, I think you are taking this out of context. If people don’t have the material conditions for basic survival, they are much less likely to be successful at treating an addiction. In fact, substance use is often used as a way to cope with their daily fight to survive and the alienation from society. Providing people care, services, and basic needs is pivotal to addressing substance use issues.

  2. Thank you, Jasmeen. I teach research and writing to social work students (who often are simultaneously working with clients who have substance use issues and mental health challenges). I have not seen anything in the literature that suggests that receiving services encourages substance use. Quite the contrary appears to be true: the “social determinants of mental health and health”–economic stability or instability; education and employment opportunities (or the lack thereof); safe or unsafe housing; food safety and security (or insecurity), etc.–appear to determine health or illness, sobriety or addiction, and mental health or illness. Of course people have to take responsibility and make good personal choices, but these are only possible in a context of support.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Good Times E-edition Good Times E-edition