Letter to the Editor: Mixed-up Use

In “Rental Vehement” (GT, 8/10), writer Todd Guild recognizes our housing affordability crisis, and cites Jessica De Witt, Santa Cruz housing and development manager, in her assessment that 730 units of housing are in the pipeline for downtown Santa Cruz. Part of this total includes the eight-story mixed-use project slated for Lot 4. That project’s design, unfortunately, actually limits the number of affordable units on the lot, because the largest footprint in the project belongs to a parking garage; a new library is glommed onto the garage like an appendage.

This mix is mixed up: it doesn’t maximize housing potential. Instead, build housing on Lot 7 on Front Street, the lot where the city plans to move the Farmers Market. Lot 7 can accommodate more units of housing on six floors than the mixed-use project’s eight because it doesn’t get mixed-up with other project elements.

Guild also cites housing activists Don Lane and Rafa Sonennfeld. They patiently ask folks in neighborhoods to grow accustomed to new multi-story housing near their homes. The lack of housing is “hurting families,” Lane says. Tragically true. So while neighborhoods adjust to their new reality, the city proposes an unpopular mixed-use project, moving the library away from Civic Center, moving the Farmer’s Market from its 20-year home to Lot 7 and building a parking garage that its own parking census data confirms isn’t necessary—all to build less affordable housing than the city could on Lot 7. What’s wrong with this picture? Doing none of that, and building housing on Lot 7, achieves more housing. That’s a better idea, one that voters can weigh in on November 8th.

Bob Morgan

Santa Cruz


These letters do not necessarily reflect the views of Good Times.To submit a letter to the editor of Good Times: Letters should be originals—not copies of letters sent to other publications. Please include your name and email address to help us verify your submission (email address will not be published). Please be brief. Letters may be edited for length, clarity and to correct factual inaccuracies known to us. Send letters to le*****@*******es.sc

Opinion: Two Years After a Tragedy

EDITOR’S NOTE

Steve Palopoli editor good times santa cruz california

Many of us had our nerves jolted last Friday when we heard about the fires at DeLaveaga and on Highway 17. There’s no denying that two years later, the specter of the CZU Lightning Complex fires hangs over the entire summer, but especially the middle of August. That’s where our cover package this week about the anniversary of the fires, and the state of Santa Cruz County’s recovery, begins. Drew Penner takes a look not only at how response to a CZU-like event could be improved, but also at the bigger change experts say we all need to make in how we think about wildfires.

Then Aiyana Moya checks in on how rebuilding is progressing—or not progressing—for hundreds of local residents who lost their homes in the fires. Her story raises important questions, especially when the math around the number of houses lost and permits in progress doesn’t even remotely match up.

Todd Guild reports on one major area that the Santa Cruz County Grand Jury identified as crucial to fixing immediately if we hope to avoid another CZU. And Erin Malsbury looks at some of the eye-opening ways that science is helping our local landscape recover from the devastating fires.

As I write this, it’s two years to the day since 11,000 lightning strikes set off hundreds of fires around California, including what would quickly grow to become the CZU fires. I remember how relentlessly brutal each development was as we struggled to get all the information out to locals as we could, as quickly as we could: where the flames were heading, where the evacuation points were, if and when firefighting reinforcements were on the way. It doesn’t feel like two years ago; it feels like yesterday, and every time I hear about a new fire like the one at DeLaveaga last week, I brace for the worst. I hope this issue—and all of our coverage on the subject—helps readers make sense of the long road back from CZU, and points the way to a future without another disaster like it.

STEVE PALOPOLI | EDITOR-IN-CHIEF


ONLINE COMMENTS

RE: EMPTY HOME TAX

The Empty Home Tax is about raising millions of dollars for affordable housing. It doesn’t tax where people live, including ADUs. Massive infill projects are happening, and the majority of the units (>80% in most cases) are market rate, which is out of reach for most of our community. Up to 17-story buildings have been zoned south of Laurel in the Downtown Plan Expansion.

The Empty Home Tax isn’t a silver bullet, and won’t solve the housing affordability crisis, but will help make a dent. It gives property owners like myself a chance to step up and spend five minutes a year to answer yes or no to using my property for 120 days a year.

I was part of the group that worked with an expert tax lawyer to write the initiative, and we modeled the declaration process after Vancouver to make sure home owners were not burdened and we could still raise millions from those that keep their property empty for more than 8 months. That includes the hundreds of unpermitted short-term rentals in the City of Santa Cruz. For those of us that live in our homes, we won’t pay, and can help raise money from those that aren’t living in their homes as their primary residence.

Affordable housing needs vastly exceed supply. We can use this money to convert or build new units to keep our friends, neighbors, family and community here in Santa Cruz instead of being pushed out. 

— Cyndi Dawson

PHOTO CONTEST WINNER

THE HIGHEST MAN IN SANTA CRUZ In his photo submission, the photographer wrote “This guy has definitely mast-ered his fear of heights!” Somewhere, a mic dropped. Photograph by Ross Levoy.

Submit to ph****@*******es.sc. Include information (location, etc.) and your name. Photos may be cropped. Preferably, photos should be 4 inches by 4 inches and minimum 250dpi.


GOOD IDEA

FOUNDER’S DAY

On Friday, Aug. 19, Santa Cruz Shakespeare will celebrate the life of Audrey Stanley in the grove named after her. Stanley, who died on May 15, was the founding artistic director of Shakespeare Santa Cruz, the forerunner of SCS. There will be a program from 2-3:30pm, and mingling and memories from 3:30-4pm. Limited capacity; to RSVP to attend in-person, or to request a Zoom link, email Anna at ko*****@*****st.net.


GOOD WORK

BUILDING: THE FUTURE

Elaine Johnson was hired Aug. 4 as the first-ever Executive Director for Housing Santa Cruz County (HSCC), a nonprofit working to increase affordable housing options. A Bronx native with a law degree, Johnson founded a diversion program that gave residents the option to make amends without carrying a criminal conviction. At HSCC, she says she hopes to continue working on leveling the playing field for everyone, regardless of background.


QUOTE OF THE WEEK

“In fire, you can plan everything out to the minute, and a minute before that, everything changes.”

— Dan Felix

Two Years After CZU: Overhauling Undergrowth

As Santa Cruz County faces increasing threats of wildfire–spurred by drought and climate change–county leaders and fire officials must launch extensive programs to remove the undergrowth that fuels destructive blazes and threatens structures in wooded areas.

But while the county has several organizations dedicated to fighting fires, none have adequately addressed that issue, leaving the county without an overarching plan for vegetation removal and potentially exposing residents to future destructive wildfires.

That’s the gist of a report released in June from the Santa Cruz County Grand Jury, which recommends that the Board of Supervisors should by September designate an agency to lead vegetation removal efforts, and by June 2023 have a comprehensive plan of doing so.

But it’s not clear which agency this would be—there are several tasked with varying and often overlapping aspects of fire safety, which often show differing priorities. 

This includes the Resource Conservation District of Santa Cruz County (RCD), the Office of Response, Recovery & Resilience (OR3), Santa Cruz County Fire Department, the Fire Department Advisory Commission (FDAC), The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Cal Fire), Santa Cruz Mountains Stewardship Network, the California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection and Santa Cruz County Fire Safe Council.

None of these, however, have posited a comprehensive plan for vegetation removal, the Grand Jury report says.

The Grand Jury acknowledges in the report that such removal can be expensive, with the bulk of what’s needed–roughly 23,000 acres–ringing in at an estimated $130 million. 

With grant funding limited and difficult to acquire, the county should focus its efforts on high-priority areas, the report says.

In addition to wreaking havoc on structures and forcing the evacuation of thousands, the fires also damaged or destroyed communication systems and utilities, leaving many residents unable to receive safety updates. The highest priority for any vegetation removal plan, then, should be in areas where water, gas, communications and electricity utilities exist, in addition to schools, hospitals and government buildings, the report says.

Such projects are even more vital in areas where people live in rural and wooded areas, described in the report as the Wildlife Urban Interface (WUI.)

Santa Cruz County, with well over 20,000 homes in its WUI, has 61 square miles of WUI, 59 percent of which is developed with residences. 

The report noted that some of the agencies are making positive strides in their efforts to address future fire risks.

The FDAC, for example, is updating its Santa Cruz County Fire Department Master Plan for the first time since 2015, an effort that will include evacuation maps, potential debris flows, Code Red notification, vegetation management, fire surveillance and increasing the number of volunteer firefighters.

Cal Fire has produced the Community Wildfire Prevention Plan (CWPP) and its strategic plan.

Santa Cruz Mountains Stewardship Network has completed a vegetation mapping project to categorize the wildfire risk level across the county.

A 10-year Public Works Plan from the Resource Conservation District lists multiple forest health and fuel reduction projects in areas of wildfire risk.

The Grand Jury also said that the Santa Cruz County Fire Department and the Santa Cruz County Office of Response, Recovery and Resilience should report every six months to the Board of Supervisors on vegetation reduction efforts. 


Read More: Two Years After CZU

Rethinking Wildfire Prevention

Most Fire Victims Who Want to Rebuild Legally are Still Waiting for Permits

Lasers, Mushrooms and Other Innovations Help Heal the Local Landscape

Two Years After CZU: How Science is Aiding Recovery and Prevention

After the CZU fires, the Santa Cruz Mountains Stewardship Network jumped into action. 

The collaboration between 24 organizations includes land trusts, public agencies like Cal Fire, universities like Stanford and UCSC, the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band, the Girl Scouts and logging companies like Big Creek Lumber. 

“There’s all these different organizations that do really different things in the region, and the purpose of the network was for them to all collaborate, especially on issues that cross boundaries like fire, climate change and invasive species,” says the Network’s manager Dylan Skybrook.

Their largest effort is a vegetation mapping project made up of LiDAR data collected from planes. This remote sensing method uses lasers to measure distance—similar to echolocation or sonar, but with light instead of sound.

The resulting information is paired with high-resolution imagery and ground-based vegetation classification to provide a detailed map of the forests.

The project spans all of Santa Cruz and Santa Clara Counties and expands work already completed in Sonoma, Napa, Marin and San Mateo.

The network is using the data to create a wildfire risk map for Cal Fire

“This will show generally where the priorities should be for fuel-reduction projects,” says Skybrook. “It’s literally going to save homes and lives.”

The project had collected LiDAR before the CZU fires. In the immediate aftermath of the fire, Cal Fire used the original LiDAR for hazard assessments and Santa Cruz County geologists used it to predict potential debris flows. 

“But once the fire came, that really changed the landscape,” says Skybrook. “So we went back and raised more money, and we have now collected LiDAR post-fire in the burn area, which will give an incredible amount of information for people who are working in this area to understand what the changes were.”

Fungi to the Rescue

While far smaller than the vegetation mapping project, one of the most innovative efforts comes from CoRenewal, a nonprofit working in post-fire ecological regeneration. The organization studies the potential for fungi and microbial communities to break down toxic material and stabilize soil after fires.

In 2020, CoRenewal set up five study sites in burn scars across the Central Coast, including the CZU. They inoculated wattles—erosion control materials—with a subspecies of oyster mushroom to break down burnt materials.

“The idea is to bring in fungi that have been known to be able to break down a number of different petroleum-based toxins. They can decompose them and make them less toxic,” says CoRenewal executive director Maya Elson. 

“The other thing that we’re trying to do is to sequester the heavy metals. Heavy metals can’t be broken down, but we were hoping to stop them from moving into the waterways below and concentrate them to bring them to a hazardous waste facility and get them out of the environment.”

While researchers know certain mushrooms have the ability to break down plastics and sequester heavy metals, this is the first large-scale study of its kind.

The organization is also trying to increase soil health using local microbial communities and mycorrhizal fungi, which bind soil together and reduce erosion risk.

Elson calls it a “probiotic for the soil.”

“If we can just bring the different pieces of the puzzle, nature can take care of itself,” she says. 

“It’s really not about playing god and deciding, ‘I know what’s best for this ecosystem all the time.’ It’s a process of deeply listening to the land and observing before taking action.”

But they only had so much time to listen before winter storms further threatened the land. 

“Often you’re in this incredible rush between when the fire happens and when the rains are predicted to come, so it’s a tricky thing to balance,” says Elson.

The three-year study, led by UC Riverside postdoctoral scholar Mia Maltz, will transition into a new phase soon. 

“There’s a lot of ways for people to get involved if they live locally,” says Elson. “We have a work party coming up August 26 and 27 and a workshop on August 28.

Forest Reset

Land stewardship in the Santa Cruz Mountains is made particularly complex by how many people live and work there.

“We have a very unique county in the sense that we have a really high population that lives in our forest. It’s called the ‘wildland-urban interface,’ and about 60% of the population lives in that area,” says Matt Abernathy, the forest health program specialist for the Resource Conservation District of Santa Cruz County.

The RCD is a state-mandated special district focused on stewardship.

“Our specific mission is to help people help the land,” says Abernathy. The district plans educational events, technical assistance and manages large projects. 

After the CZU fires, the RCD offered information, hosted a webinar series about recovery with local experts and offered individual site assessments.

“We had over 400 requests, some of those for individual homes, some of them for communities,” says Abernathy.

Now, the RCD focuses on long-term recovery efforts and making a more resilient landscape.

At one project site along Last Chance Road, the RCD is helping landowners encourage the regrowth of Monterey pines. 

“Historically, in California, we have three areas that naturally will grow Monterey pine,” says Abernathy. Año Nuevo has the northernmost stand, and it used to extend south through Big Basin along the coast. 

“Slowly over time, other species like Douglas fir and some hardwoods like our Coast Live Oak have grown over the Monterey pine. They’ve out-shaded it and taken over that space.” 

The fire, devastating as it was, provided a chance to start over. 

“The first thing that came back were all these little Monterey pine seedlings,” says Abernathy. “The seeds were just waiting for an opportunity to come back and to reoccupy this area. So it’s a cool chance to see how nature is super dynamic.”

See for Yourself

For those interested in watching forest recovery in action, Big Basin State Park recently reopened sections of the park and offers 84 day-use parking spaces and four ADA spaces each day. Visitors must reserve a space through thatsmypark.org/bigbasin.

The old growth loop and about 18 miles of backcountry fire roads are currently open.

“Our next push will be along the Skyline to Sea trail as it parallels North Escape Road. And we’ll just keep pushing out further into the backcountry to open more trails,” says California State Parks-Santa Cruz District Superintendent Chris Spohrer.

Park staff are trying to make the area safe and accessible quickly, which includes inspecting and removing hazard trees within more than 18,000 acres. But they don’t want to bulldoze blindly toward the single goal of reopening. 

“We want to be very thoughtful and try to be inclusive in our planning process,” says Spohrer. “So, we’ve started that reimagining process with the public as quickly as we could.” 

The recovery efforts have helped more than just the forests.

“A lot of our staff lost houses and lost all their possessions and lost their place to work along with many of our neighbors and community members,” says Spohrer. “Seeing them rally around the idea of being able to recover the park and work with the public on being productive—that’s been a great thing to watch.”

Full recovery will take years, but senior environmental scientist Joanne Kerbavaz says things are progressing as expected. Even with the added challenges of drought and higher temperatures, the redwoods are resprouting, chaparral areas are filling back in, and fire-followers like bush poppy and California lilac add pops of color to the understory. 

“In some cases, the length of time to return to what things looked like before the fire will probably be very long,” says Kerbavaz. “But even in the harshest, most difficult places, I’ve yet to see areas that aren’t regenerating.”

The Santa Cruz Mountains Stewardship Network’s vegetation-mapping data is publicly available at pacificvegmap.org.


Read More: Two Years After CZU

Rethinking Wildfire Prevention

Most Fire Victims Who Want to Rebuild Legally are Still Waiting for Permits

Grand Jury Report Says the County Needs to Step Up Its Plan for Removing Vegetation that Increases Wildfire Risk

Two Years After CZU: Rethinking Wildfire Prevention

On Friday, firefighting helicopters swooped through downtown Santa Cruz to suck water out of the San Lorenzo River, spraying onlookers and sending hats flying.

While both the flames in DeLaveaga Park and those up Highway 17 at Glenwood Cutoff were brought under control relatively quickly, it was a stark reminder for locals that, two years after the CZU Lightning Complex fire, wildfires remain an ever-present threat.

“As we can see from today’s event in DeLaveaga and other fires around the West, it is essential that we prepare for future fires and other disasters,” says Third District Supervisor Ryan Coonerty. “It is a major challenge, but the community has been great about stepping up.”

So how to prevent a repeat of 2020’s devastating blazes? It’s a tricky proposition, with a number of possible solutions to pursue.

Coonerty, whose North County constituents bore the brunt of the CZU fire, notes Santa Cruz County has been partnering with homeowners to remove brush and trees and take other steps to harden properties, on top of working to increase firefighting capacity.

While experts agree that shoring up our defenses on an individual level is one of the best ways to be proactive, some point to bigger shifts in our thinking that need to occur to ensure our communities remain safe from wildfires.

What action should be taken depends, in part, on how you define the problem. Unlike other recent fatal forest fires, the CZU Lighting Complex was an entirely natural phenomenon sparked by stormy weather and fueled by detritus that hadn’t been cleaned out by fire in decades. But it was supercharged thanks to climate change and the lack of state firefighting resources available when called upon.

Now, residents of smaller towns are taking matters into their own hands, gaining skills volunteering on Cal Fire work in other areas, and stocking up on tools that can be used the next time a wildfire hits the Santa Cruz Mountains.

The Ben Lomond community raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for an agile fire truck specifically designed to battle wildfires. A couple firefighters went and picked it up from Kansas a few weeks ago, and the department is currently outfitting it with equipment, says Ben Lomond Fire Protection District Chief Stacie Brownlee.

“When Cal Fire came and told us, ‘Just let it burn to the town,’ I was like, ‘No,’” she says, recalling the harrowingly quick spread of the CZU fires.

Brownlee says it’s not that the state agency didn’t want to help, but that it was strapped by budget cuts made years earlier.

“People in this area got mad that Cal Fire wasn’t able to fight that fire,” she said. “They were tapped out.”

That’s why Brownlee is a proponent of doing what you can to keep your own home from igniting. That means making sure hedges and potted plants are at least five feet away and removing dead leaves from roofs and eaves.

It’s particularly important, she says, given how hard it is to pick up the pieces afterwards.

“I think people need to understand that it’s extremely hard and expensive to rebuild your home in Santa Cruz County,” she says. “You have to follow the new fire codes.”

There were 30-35 homes that were destroyed by CZU in Ben Lomond in 2020. The first resident was just recently approved to return, to a property up Alba Road.

But with people moving to the area from Silicon Valley and elsewhere, Brownlee says it will be important to educate newcomers on the multiple evacuation routes available.

Last week, Zayante Fire Department Chief Dan Walter congratulated four of his firefighters on a job well done after two weeks of fighting the Oak Fire near Yosemite National Park and the McKinney Fire in Siskiyou County, as part of a Santa Cruz County strike team.

“They worked their butts off,” he says. “It was pretty steep terrain. There was a lot of hiking and dragging hoes.”

It didn’t used to be that way. Before so many low-level offenders were released from prison to reduce the chance of coronavirus outbreaks in state institutions, there were more incarcerated firefighters who worked on the crews. Many of those inmates handled jobs like digging that don’t require specialized training.

“We went from six crews down to one,” he said of the California Department of Corrections’ contribution to wildfire battles. “What used to be prisoner work is now firefighter work.”

But he says the state has been trying to hire additional crews, though that’s easier said than done.

“Nowadays the mentality seems to be, ‘If I can’t make it happen on my phone, I’m not really interested in it,’” he says. “Someone’s got to learn to use a shovel one day.”

While the CZU fire wasn’t sparked by power company equipment, PG&E has been responsible for other blazes, and Walter says he’s glad to see the company taking action to shut off power to prevent forest fires. But, he says, this has posed a critical new question—how do you let people know it’s time to go when the electricity has been turned off?

“Reverse 911 doesn’t work if you don’t have power,” he says. “The internet doesn’t have backup battery power systems.”

Walters says California needs new regulations to force providers to put such systems in place.

PG&E declined to comment for this story.

Andrew S. Mathews, the chair of the Department of Anthropology at UCSC, says humans have inadvertently been designing more fire-prone landscapes around the globe for years.

“We need to learn what ‘good’ fire is, to build a culture of good fire, so we don’t have ‘bad’ fire,” he says. “And that means restoring fire in the places it’s helpful.”

Wet-season “good” fires that reduce the chance of out-of-control “bad” fires in hot months should be seen as necessary and constructive, he says.

“I’ve done research in Mexico and Italy,” he says. “Fire use in both places is very stigmatized, very forbidden.”

The beneficial effects of fire on the landscape, something known to both California’s Indigenous populations and American ranchers, are just now beginning to dawn on state leaders and residents, he says.

“The history of making fire illegal means it’s only quite recently that people are able to talk about prescribed burning,” he says. “The 20th century has been a history of shutting down fire. The combination of long-term fire suppression and climate change means changing our understanding of fire—and how we use fire—is happening pretty much everywhere in the world.”


Read More: Two Years After CZU

Most Fire Victims Who Want to Rebuild Legally are Still Waiting for Permits

Grand Jury Report Says the County Needs to Step Up Its Plan for Removing Vegetation that Increases Wildfire Risk

Lasers, Mushrooms and Other Innovations Help Heal the Local Landscape

Two Years After CZU: Still Tangled in Red Tape

When we last spoke in March, Bonny Doon resident Ann McKenzie, whose home burned down in the CZU Lightening Complex fires, was waiting on the county permits so she could start rebuilding her home—and life—after the fires.   

Not much has changed. 

McKenzie is going on her third year of living without a permanent home. She shares an RV with her husband on the property where their home once stood, and she expects it will be nearly another year before they are able to move into their rebuilt home.  

One of the most frustrating parts, says McKenzie, is that they haven’t even been able to break ground. That’s due to the permitting process, which she says has been slow and tedious. McKenzie and her husband originally applied to get pre-clearance permits on April 14, 2021. They finally received them in May of 2022, over a year after they started the process.

McKenzie is now waiting on different permits—and so are the majority of CZU fire survivors.

Two years after the fires, 187 permits are still being processed, and the county has issued 152 pre-clearances

Out of the 911 homes that were destroyed in the fires, only 11 have been rebuilt.  

That leaves a gap of almost 600 homes that are not currently in the process of rebuilding legally. The remaining homeowners could still apply for permits, but in March, Good Times spoke with multiple people who were fed up with the lengthy permitting process—after living for two years in tents or mobile homes, in many cases—and admitted they planned to rebuild illegally, without permits. 

County officials say the county has tried to pare down the process as much as possible, by cutting permitting costs, setting up the Office of Response Recovery as a resource to help homeowners rebuild, and hosting informational town halls to help with the permitting process. 

As for why only 11 homes have been reconstructed, a county official speculates that contractor scarcity and supply chain issues could be to blame for the large discrepancy between people with permits in hand and finalized homes. CZU fire survivors are looking at higher residential construction costs, a labor shortage problem in construction and building material shortages. 

McKenzie’s story illustrates another reason: that even after all pre-clearance permits are issued, there’s still lag time to receive the other necessary permits.

After pre-clearances, owners like McKenzie submit applications for their dwelling units building permit, which includes construction documents, geotechnical engineering report, along with any other required technical material. 

McKenzie’s designers submitted those additional permits to 4Leaf, the county’s permitting agency, on July 29. 

But to her dismay and frustration, 4Leaf notified her that the Single Family Dwelling permit must be submitted separately from the Additional Dwelling Unit permit, a detail she says no one mentioned beforehand. Her designers are still separating the documents. 

The whole permitting process was riddled with small (and not-so-small) setbacks like this one, according to McKenzie. 4Leaf has a processing timeline of 10 days, but McKenzie says the reality tends to be closer to a few weeks, and even sometimes a month.  

McKenzie’s story is not unique, especially because the areas hit the hardest by the fires were in the more rural parts of Santa Cruz County. Bonny Doon, Ben Lomand and other areas of the Santa Cruz Mountains were home to the majority of the 911 houses that were burned during the fires. 

Those communities have struggled the most to get up to code, according to Michael Renner, Executive Director of 4Leaf. Pre-clearances take into consideration fire access, environmental health-sewage disposal and potential geologic hazards. But the requirements to receive those permits have changed in the time that these more rural communities developed, and many people have lived in the area’s homes for generations.  

McKenzie just hopes that she can get all the permits soon—as the rainier months loom, she knows getting the foundation done as soon as possible will be crucial, so that construction can continue throughout winter.  

The day she does break ground, McKenzie plans on celebrating—even though it marks the start of another months-long journey,  

“I’m gonna have a ceremony and a ribbon cutting, and I’m gonna stand there with a shovel,” she says. 


Read More: Two Years After CZU

Rethinking Wildfire Prevention

Grand Jury Report Says the County Needs to Step Up Its Plan for Removing Vegetation that Increases Wildfire Risk

Lasers, Mushrooms and Other Innovations Help Heal the Local Landscape

Coastal Commission Stifles RV Ordinance—Again

The City of Santa Cruz’s Oversized Vehicle Ordinance (OVO) is once again in limbo. 

At its July 14 meeting, the California Coastal Commission agreed to review the OVO following a Coastal Commission Staff Addendum that states the ordinance would have a “substantial” impact on public access to the area’s beaches.

“By taking that action, the Commission took jurisdiction over the coastal permit application for the project,” California Coastal Commission Coastal Program Analyst, Kiana Ford, wrote to GT in an email. 

The OVO was passed in November 2021 by the Santa Cruz City Council in a 5-2 vote, with councilmembers Sandy Brown and Justin Cummings dissenting. It prohibits any vehicle 20 feet or longer, 8 feet or taller and 7 feet or wider from parking on city streets between the hours of midnight and 5am. Parking permits for up to 72 hours are also available to purchase, but only for neighborhood residents.

While the Coastal Commission initially did not find any substantial issue with the OVO, the recent staff addendum followed an appeal filed by local individuals and organized groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union and Santa Cruz Cares.

“This ordinance is very clumsy,” says Reggie Meisler, cofounder of Santa Cruz Cares. “It’s developed by people who want to push the unhoused out of the city.” 

Santa Cruz Cares was founded last November in response to the OVO. Their appeal—which was filed in May—contested one particular part of the ordinance which calls for a 24-hour, no-parking oversized vehicle buffer zone within 100 feet of “crosswalks, intersections, boulevard stop signs, official electric flashing devices and approaches to any traffic signals.”

The addendum argued the city already implements a 20-foot no parking buffer zone in these areas. It states if the 24-hour, 100-foot ban was to take effect, it would eliminate “parking options for oversized vehicles on 28 miles (at least) of City coastal zone streets (a 54% loss of such parking areas).” This is a significant reduction in coastal access—as mandated by the Coastal Act and Local Coastal Program, two sets of rules that dictate what local governments can do around the state’s beaches—for all oversized vehicles, including tourist RVs, the addendum states.

“If the City intends to continue to pursue that buffer parking restriction, then they are going to need to develop data to support it,” writes Ford. 

However, city officials say the 100-foot zone is already part of California policy. 

“It’s a public works issue,” explains Lee Butler, the city’s planning and community development director.

He cites the California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) Highway Design Manual, which calls for a sight distance of 100 feet while stopping at speeds of 15 miles per hour.

“The issue is regarding sight distance and safety around those issues,” he says. 

Ford writes that the next step is for Coastal Commission staff to “evaluate the City Coastal permit application in light of the Coastal Act and the LCP” and then develop a recommendation on it. 

“We will continue to work with the city on these issues as we develop a recommendation,” Ford says. 

The recent ruling is the latest obstacle the city has faced in trying to rework its rules around where, when and for how long RVs can park.

In 2015, the city council approved an ordinance—commonly referred to as the “RV ban”—that halted oversized vehicle parking in selected areas between the hours of 8pm and 8am. But that rule was overturned by the Coastal Commission a year later, following an appeal from local advocates for people experiencing homelessness.

As it did in last month’s ruling, the commission determined that the 2015 ordinance restricted coastal access.

“I continue to tell city staff that the resources we are investing [in the OVO] are not going to make a darn bit of difference,” Brown tells GT. “It’s really focused on appeasing a narrow constituency, I believe.” 

She says that the OVO’s enforcement-based approach does nothing to address issues of safe parking or even why people are living out of their vehicles in the first place. Instead, she believes it only further continues the poverty cycle many residents living out of their vehicles already face.

“Without alternatives, people will be ticketed, towed and possibly lose their survival vehicle, which results in more people on the street,” she says. 

Difficult Road

“We create a system where we don’t give people a chance to better their situation because they’re facing constant criminalization,” says Stacey Falls. 

Falls, a teacher at Santa Cruz High School for the last 17 years, is one of the citizen appellants to the OVO. After being served an eviction notice from their rental home of 11 years, she and her husband lived out of their RV from April 2019 until March of this year.

Falls considers herself and her husband two of the lucky ones. When they were panicking over where to park their vehicle both during the day and at night, a friend who owns a home came to their aid and offered to let them park it in the backyard. 

“We ended up buying a house in March,” says Falls, who believes the only reason they were able to save money is by living in an RV without the worry of harassment.

Even so, Falls says they received a cease and desist letter from the City of Santa Cruz and had to prove to officials they were within the law on their friend’s private property.

“My problem with the OVO is that people pushing it don’t understand the desperation most renters are feeling,” she says. “They can’t understand why somebody might resort to living in an RV and aren’t accommodating to this alternative form of housing in this crazy expensive city that’s now the second-hardest rental market in the country.”

The Coastal Commission Staff Addendum also notes that individuals who use oversized vehicles “constitute an environmental justice community.” It’s a growing concern as climate change progresses and communities are displaced like in 2020 during the CZU Lightning Complex, which forced more than 25,000 people to evacuate their homes.

The staff report says the OVO contains language for the city to open more safe parking areas, but lacks specific language as to when and where they will be opened, and how many spaces could be available.

In her emailed response to GT, Ford says this will have a crucial impact on the Coastal Commission’s decision. 

“We believe that this aspect of the city’s proposal needs to be further fleshed out for the Commission to properly consider the program as a whole,” she writes.

The City of Santa Cruz currently operates two safe-parking sites exclusively for overnight parking. The first is Lot 4, between Lincoln and Cathcart streets and the second is an emergency lot at the Santa Cruz Police Station. 

“We have the ability to open up various other locations as well, but haven’t had the demand,” states Butler.

Still, he says the city is working on opening a third tier to their safe-parking program. Located in front of the Armory, this will operate as an all-day lot that will provide inhabitants with 24-hour parking.

“We have a contract approved with the Association of Faith Communities and the Free Guide to operate a 24-7 facility,” he says. “It will also provide services to connect individuals to housing, county services and benefits they might be eligible for.” 

He says authorities are hoping to have it operating “within a month or so.”

But OVO opponents believe real progress can only be made by looking at the issue in an entirely different way.

“I do get it, there are some negative impacts of having RVs parking on the street,” Falls admits. “But we can mitigate those negative impacts by actually having support and infrastructure without criminalizing people.” 

Council Adds Hotel Tax Increase to November Ballot

Roughly one month after a sales tax increase failed to pass by a mere 50 votes, the Santa Cruz City Council approved plans to once again ask voters to increase taxes—this time on stays at hotels and short-term rentals—in order to provide the city with additional revenue officials say it needs to offset a looming budget deficit.

In a unanimous vote at its Aug. 9 meeting, the council placed a transient occupancy tax (TOT) hike on the Nov. 8 ballot. If approved, patrons staying at hotels, motels, inns and other commercial lodging facilities will see the TOT percentage increase from 11% to 12%. Taxes for those staying in short-term rentals would rise three percentage points to 14%.

The city has not increased its TOT rates since 2013.

The city says the increase could bring in around $1.38 million annually to the general fund. It would go into effect at the start of the new year if approved by voters.

It will cost the city between $91,402 and $146,244 to place the item on the ballot.

The measure, named Measure P, was brought forth by the council’s ad-hoc budget and revenue committee spearheaded by Mayor Sonja Brunner, Vice-Mayor Martine Watkins and councilmember Sandy Brown. Brunner said that the committee saw the tax as a way to use the city’s large tourism industry as a revenue source to fund city services.

The new TOT rates would bring the city in alignment with the County of Santa Cruz, which in the June election received approval from voters to increase the rates for hotels and short-term rentals in the unincorporated parts of the county.

The fact that the county’s increase was overwhelmingly approved—roughly 70% of voters elected to increase the TOT rates—was a factor in the committee’s decision to bring the measure before the council, Brunner said.

“It creates a fair and leveled playing field across the region,” Brunner said. “It also helps to ensure that visitors and tourists pay their fair share for city services.”

Brown said that the city had previously weighed bringing a TOT increase before voters in 2019, but backed off the next year because of the pandemic.

“It’s been 10 years since the TOT has been raised,” Brown said. “Given the challenges that the hotel industry has faced, and that history, this is a very measured proposal moving forward.”

Santa Cruz County Chamber of Commerce CEO Casey Beyer was one of four people who spoke about the measure at the meeting. He said that while the chamber does not oppose the increase, they do question the timing.

“There’s a need to get additional revenue streams, we get that. We understand that the city has to find revenue to provide city services that the community wants,” he said. “My [question is] did you do any outreach to the hotel industry before making this decision, and, if not, I would encourage you to before you put this on the ballot that you have that engagement … It’s critically important that they be a part of the conversation.”

Brunner said that she, along with city staff, spoke to “a couple” of hoteliers, but admitted that outreach to the industry leading up to the Aug. 9 decision was limited.

City Manager Matt Huffaker and Economic Development Director Bonnie Lipscomb both said the timeline of bringing this tax increase forward has been atypical.

“This has been a condensed time frame,” Huffaker said. “We were waiting for final certification of the Measure F results, weighing the implications of that outcome and what would make the most sense for the city moving forward based on a number of variables. That didn’t lend itself to having the more robust dialogue that we would typically have. But, of course, we’re open to continuing those conversations.”

The measure will be one of three that will go before Santa Cruz voters in November. Measure N proposes levying a tax on residential properties that are in use for less than 120 days within a calendar year. Measure O, meanwhile, will ask voters to decide whether the city should proceed with plans to redevelop the parking lot on the corner of Cathcart and Cedar streets into a new library complex that would include at least 50 affordable housing units and a parking garage.

Supes to Stick with Current Term System

The Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors on Aug. 9 rejected a proposal to set term limits on their positions, saying that the current system of letting voters decide who fills the seats is sufficient.

The proposal by 4th District Supervisor Greg Caput would have set a three-term cap on the elected positions, although anyone who reached that limit could run again after waiting four years.

If the supervisors had approved the cap, it would have been placed on the November ballot.

Caput said that incumbents often have an unfair advantage during elections, with increased name recognition and ability to raise funds.

“[Term limits] have been proven successful at the state and federal level—and also the county and city level—to encourage participation by newcomers, and to diversify the representation of the voting public,” said Caput, who has elected to not run for his fourth term, and will leave the board following the November election.

Supervisor Bruce McPherson, who oversees the 5th District, said that several California counties have similar policies, and that he would be open to discussing the issue.

But 2nd District Supervisor Zach Friend said he didn’t see a need for the policy in a county where almost nobody serves more than three terms.

“In the last 170 years, there have been a total of four supervisors that have actually served, by my estimation, longer than these 12 years,” he said. “I don’t know that this is even an issue.”

The term limits proposal failed 4-1. Caput was the lone vote in favor. 

Board Chair Manu Koenig, who beat out three-term incumbent John Leopold in 2020 for the 1st District seat, said voters already have the option to remove supervisors when their terms expire. He also said he is wary of creating a law when there is no existing problem.

“Ultimately, voters are happy to tell us when they’ve had enough of any of us,” he said. “And they have an opportunity to express those opinions in elections.” 

Tuesday’s vote was not the first time Caput has found himself at odds with his fellow supervisors as he sought to curtail the position. He previously introduced a two-term limit, which also failed. He has tried unsuccessfully several times to cap supervisor pay and benefits, and has donated portions of his own $134,710 paycheck to charity.

Rob Brezsny’s Astrology: Aug. 17-23

ARIES (March 21-April 19): Aries filmmaker Andrei Tarkovsky wrote, “All my life, I’ve been going around waiting for something—as if I were waiting in a railway station. And I’ve always felt as if the living I’ve done so far hasn’t actually been real life but a long wait for it—a long wait for something real.” If I could speak with Tarkovsky right now, I would cheerfully tell him that his wait will soon be over. I’d say that in the coming months, Aries people who have been postponing and postponing, who have been standing by and holding on and biding time, will have an excellent chance to begin inhabiting their full, rich destiny. I invite you to imagine what that will feel like.

TAURUS (April 20-May 20): Taurus poet Sherko Bekas wrote, “Each joy I wear, its sleeves are either too short or too long, too loose or too tight on me. And each sorrow I wear fits as if it were made for me wherever I am.” With this as our starting point, Taurus, I’m pleased to report some good news. In the next three weeks, you will have zero sorrows to try on and wear like a garment. And there will be at least three joys that fit just right. The sleeves will be the correct length, and the form will be neither too loose nor too tight.

GEMINI (May 21-June 20): Tips on how to get the most out of the coming weeks: 1. Create a big spacious realization by weaving together several small hunches. 2. Keep a little angel on your right shoulder and a little devil on your left shoulder. Enjoy listening to them argue, and don’t get attached to anything they say. 3. Do the unexpected until it becomes expected. Then abandon it and try a new, unexpected experiment. 4. Meditate expansively on the question, “How many careers can I have in one lifetime?” 5. Enhance your home so it feels even more comfortable.

CANCER (June 21-July 22): Be fluid and flexible while still being rooted and sturdy. Be soft and sensitive even as you are also firm and resolute. Be mostly modest and adaptable, but become assertive and outspoken as necessary. Be cautious about inviting and seeking out challenges, but be bold and brash when a golden challenge arrives. Be your naturally generous self most of the time, but avoid giving too much. Got all that, Cancerian? Carrying out the multifaceted assignments I just described might be nearly impossible for most of the other signs of the zodiac, but they are in your wheelhouse. You are a specialist in fertile complexity.

LEO (July 23-Aug. 22): “I’ve swung from ancient vines in the caves of Jamaica,” exults Hoodoo priestess Luisah Teish. “I’ve danced with delight around totem poles and pressed foreheads with Maori warriors. I’ve joked with the pale fox in the crossroads, then wrestled with the jaguar and won. I have embraced great trees between my thighs and spoken words of love to thunder while riding lightning bolts.” I offer Teish’s celebratory brag to inspire you as you formulate plans for the coming weeks and months. What exhilarating adventures will you give yourself? What expansive encounters will you learn from? What travels outside of your comfort zone will you dare? The time is right for upsurges and upturns and upgrades.

VIRGO (Aug. 23-Sept. 22): In his poem “The Pupil,” Virgo-born Donald Justice speaks of how he spent “a whole week practicing for that moment on the threshold.” I advise you to do the same, Virgo. The goal is to be as prepared as you can be for the upcoming rite of transition—without, of course, being neurotically over-prepared. It’s fine and natural to honor the tension of anticipation, using it as motivation to do your best. One other thing: As you get ready, please have as much fun as possible. Visualize the sense of accomplishment you’ll feel when you’ve reached the other side of the test.

LIBRA (Sept. 23-Oct. 22): “One is always at home in one’s past,” wrote author Vladimir Nabokov. But I encourage you to rebel against that theory, Libra. For now, find a way to NOT feel at home in your past. Question it, be curious about it, re-evaluate it. My hope is that you will then be motivated to change how your history lives in you. Now is an excellent time to reconfigure your life story, to develop a revised relationship with its plot twists and evolution. Revisit and update some of your memories. Re-evaluate the meanings of key events. Enchanting healings will materialize if you do.

SCORPIO (Oct. 23-Nov. 21): Of all the signs in the zodiac, you Scorpios are most likely to regard that old pop tune by the Animals as your theme song. “I’m just a soul whose intentions are good,” croons lead singer Eric Burdon, “Oh, Lord, please don’t let me be misunderstood.” But you may have less motivation to express that sentiment in the coming weeks, dear Scorpio. I suspect you will experience record-breaking levels of being seen and appreciated for who you are. For best results, do this: 1. Inform your deep psyche that you have no attachment to being misunderstood. 2. Tell your deep psyche that you would very much like to be well understood.

SAGITTARIUS (Nov. 22-Dec. 21): “Unless we are creators, we are not fully alive,” wrote Sagittarian author Madeleine L’Engle. She was referring to everyone, not just people in the arts. She believed that to be soulful humans, we must always make new things, generate fresh possibilities and explore novel approaches. The restless urge to transform what already exists can be expressed in how we do our jobs, our parenting, our intimate relationships and every other activity. You are now entering a phase, Sagittarius, when this initiatory energy will be especially available, needed and valuable.

CAPRICORN (Dec. 22-Jan. 19): In her poem “Valentine,” Capricorn poet Carol Ann Duffy tells a lover she won’t give her a “red rose or a satin heart.” Instead, her token of affection is an onion, a symbol of multi-layered complexity. “Its fierce kiss will stay on your lips,” Duffy writes, “possessive and faithful as we are, for as long as we are.” She adds that the onion will “blind you with tears like a lover.” OK. I understand the tough attitude expressed by Duffy. Romance isn’t a relentlessly sweet, sentimental romp through paradise. But I don’t recommend that you imitate her approach to your love life in the coming weeks and months. Appreciate the sometimes shadowy and labyrinthine convolutions, yes, but don’t make them more important than beauty and joy and love. How about invoking the symbol of a pomegranate? It represents fertility and rebirth out of the darkness.

AQUARIUS (Jan. 20-Feb. 18): Be extra expressive with the people and animals you care about. Be even more amusing and generous than usual. Dare to be abundantly entertaining and engaging and empathetic. Make it your goal to draw out your allies’ dormant potentials and inspire them to love themselves even more than they already do. I’ll tell you about the endearing terms that author Vladimir Nabokov called his wife. Consider using them with your dear ones: “My sun, my soul, my song, my bird, my pink sky, my sunny rainbow, my little music, my inexpressible delight, my tenderness, my lightness, my dear life, my dear eyes, kittykin, poochums, goosikins, sparrowling, bird of paradise.”

PISCES (Feb. 19-March 20): Sometimes, you may feel you’re under the influence of a debilitating spell or hindered by a murky curse. Pisceans are prone to such worries. But here’s a secret. More than any other zodiac sign, you have the power to escape from spells. Even if you have never studied the occult or read a witch’s grimoire, you possess a natural facility for the natural magic that disperses curses. From the depths of your psyche, you can summon the spiritual force necessary to cleanse the gunk and free yourself. Now is a perfect time to prove to yourself that what I’ve said here is true.

Homework: What injustice are you most motivated to correct? Newsletter.FreeWillAstrology.com.

Letter to the Editor: Mixed-up Use

A letter to the editor of Good Times

Opinion: Two Years After a Tragedy

GT looks at the slow recovery from CZU, and how to keep it from happening again

Two Years After CZU: Overhauling Undergrowth

Grand Jury report says the county needs to step up its plan for removing vegetation that increases wildfire risk

Two Years After CZU: How Science is Aiding Recovery and Prevention

Lasers, mushrooms and other innovations help heal the local landscape

Two Years After CZU: Rethinking Wildfire Prevention

Fire officials and experts look at how to avoid another CZU-like disaster

Two Years After CZU: Still Tangled in Red Tape

Despite promises of a fast-track process, most fire victims who want to rebuild legally are waiting for permits

Coastal Commission Stifles RV Ordinance—Again

When and where oversized vehicles can park on Santa Cruz streets remains unclear

Council Adds Hotel Tax Increase to November Ballot

Roughly one month after a sales tax increase failed to pass by a mere 50 votes, the Santa Cruz City Council approved plans to once again ask voters to increase taxes—this time on stays at hotels and short-term rentals—in order to provide the city with additional revenue officials say it needs to offset a looming budget deficit. In a unanimous...

Supes to Stick with Current Term System

Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors reject proposal to set term limits on their positions

Rob Brezsny’s Astrology: Aug. 17-23

Astrology, Horoscope, Stars, Zodiac Signs
Free will astrology for the week of Aug. 17
17,623FansLike
8,845FollowersFollow