How the Hush of Pandemic Lockdown Changed Wildlife Behavior

For several months of the Covid-19 pandemic, bustling streets around the world cleared, and traffic jams became a memory. As humans went into lockdowns and quarantines, the Earth vibrated less. The “anthropause,” as some researchers are calling it, provided an unexpected opportunity to study some of the subtler ways that we alter the world around us. 

During the pandemic, the world got quieter. So much quieter, in fact, that scientists were able to put numbers to it. When stay-at-home orders began taking effect around the world, the reduction in noise was so drastic that seismologists saw a decrease in rumblings deep in the earth’s crust. The decline lasted for months and could be measured 1,300 feet underground. In some areas, the ground noise fell by up to 50%—the equivalent of going from a conversation to a quiet whisper.

Scientists were not the only ones to notice this shift. Animals across the globe changed their behavior in response to the newfound quiet. Locally, researchers saw shifts in everything from mountain lions to songbirds to whales.

Whose Territory?

One of the most noticeable changes was that silent streets encouraged animals to venture closer.

“Since things were quieter, wildlife was able to encroach more into our territory—which, you know, is sort of their territory—but into human territory,” says Amy Red Feather, a wildlife technician at Native Animal Rescue of Santa Cruz County. The rescue and rehabilitation center received an influx of calls from residents during the stay-at-home orders. 

“A lot of that, I think, is because more people are home,” says Red Feather of locals’ alarm at seeing raccoons, coyotes, opossums, bobcats, hawks and owls near their homes. “A lot of people are surprised to know that they do live here, that it’s completely natural to see them in the wild during the day and at night.”

The timing of lockdowns also meant people saw more babies and young animals.

“We had coyote pups getting born right on school properties,” she says. “A lot of dens are being occupied where normally it just would have been too noisy for the animals to safely be there.”

As wildlife interactions increased, so did the number of people trying to keep animals illegally.

“We got a lot of animals that grew up, started biting people, and they needed to find a place for, which is terrible,” says Red Feather. “The animal, if it becomes imprinted, can never live in the wild. It will start biting you once its hormones kick in, and once it matures, it’s not going to be happy with you and it won’t be able to live in the wild. A lot of these animals end up having to be euthanized.” 

PANDEMIC PATTERNS

Mountain lions also ventured closer during the shelter-in-place orders. Scientists at the Santa Cruz Puma Project have been studying mountain lions and the way they respond to human-made noise since 2008. Using speakers in the forest and GPS tracking collars, the group studies how adding sound to habitat scares away mountain lions. During the shutdowns, the scientists could study the opposite. 

“Mountain lions have always responded negatively to houses on the landscape, and they still continue to do so through Covid,” says Chris Wilmers, a professor at UCSC and the lead scientist on the Santa Cruz Puma Project. “But before Covid, mountain lions had the additional fear of cities, and that additional fear completely disappeared with the shutdown.”

Without the noise of traffic and daily life, the pumas quickly adjusted their ranges to include previously busy areas. It happened within weeks—and in some cases, days—of the shutdown. 

“Animals like mountain lions make their decisions based on what they hear,” says Wilmers. “And so if, all of a sudden, they’re not hearing people in a particular place, then it makes sense they might respond quite quickly.”

As things started opening back up and traffic resumed, the group saw the mountain lions recede just as quickly.

“What this study shows is that even human mobility itself can have influences on the environment and animal behavior that are sustained, in addition to all the other ways that humans influence ecosystems,” says Wilmers.

A group of scientists found that white-crowned sparrows in the Bay Area changed the volume and pitch of their songs during the pandemic.

Changing Their Tune

While some animals changed their geographic range during the shutdown, others changed their vocal range. One group of scientists found that birds in the Bay Area altered their songs in response to the newfound quiet. 

The team has recorded the effects of noise pollution in white-crowned sparrows—a small, native songbird—since 2012. Once the shelter-in-place orders began, they expected to hear a change. 

But, “we were surprised to find that it was quite a large shift,” says Elizabeth Derryberry, an ecology and evolutionary biology associate professor at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville and main author on the study. 

“In fact, in some of the areas in San Francisco, we saw—or we heard—songs that hadn’t been heard since the ‘70s… those songs have changed in ways where they now sounded like they did when they were recorded back during the summer of love.”

The birds sang softer than normal, but the notes reached more than four times as far. Before the pandemic, their songs could only be heard from about 15 feet away. During the shutdowns, they could communicate with birds more than 65 feet away. 

“Because noise went away, they don’t have to shout to be heard,” says Derryberry.In addition to singing more softly, the songbirds also changed their pitch. Lots of human-generated sounds are loud at low frequencies, so birds in urban areas tend to sing higher-pitched songs in order to cut through the noise. 

Without the din of traffic, the birds sang lower and increased the overall pitch range of their songs. Songs with more variation do a better job attracting mates.

“So not only could they be heard further, but they also essentially sounded sexier,” says Derryberry. “We can imagine that reducing that noise pollution would allow their population set to do better and for other native species, which have been excluded from more urban areas, to maybe come back in.”

whale-anthropause
Scientists are hoping to better understand how noise pollution affects the stress levels of humpback whales in the Monterey Bay through data gathered during the pandemic.

Within the Pod 

The extent of our noise reaches far beyond what we might expect. In the ocean, noise pollution travels for miles and disrupts normal life

“Sound travels really well in water—far and fast,” says John Ryan, a biological oceanographer at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI). “So nature has evolved to take advantage of that transparency of the ocean to sound.” 

Marine animals tend to rely on sound more than other senses. Noise pollution from boats, military activity and oil exploration limits their communication, navigation and hunting. 

“It can shrink their world,” says Ryan.

He and collaborators from around Monterey Bay monitor an underwater microphone placed almost 3,000 feet below the surface of the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary. They noticed a significant drop in low-frequency noise during the pandemic compared to other years—likely due to reduced shipping.

“We’re in the middle of a sanctuary, and these ships never get very close to our recorder. But we heard the changes crystal clear,” says Ryan. 

As the world re-opens, the researchers are watching the clamor ramp back up. This past spring, shipping noise was even louder than pre-pandemic levels. 

“Things tend to oscillate before they settle back into typical,” says Ryan. “We had the drop, we had the rise, we’ve had the overshoot—and theoretically, it will settle into typical.” 

These recordings are helping scientists study how noise pollution affects the stress levels of whales. Through the pandemic, researchers at UCSC took small blubber samples from humpback whales in Monterey Bay to test their stress hormones. The samples are about the size of a pen cap and don’t harm the whales.

The scientists will collect the same information over the next year and compare hormone levels. They expect to see the drop in noise pollution corresponding to less stress. In quieter oceans, animals don’t have to work as hard. 

“It may be that with more noise in the environment, the amount of information that gets exchanged between you and other animals gets diminished,” says Ari Friedlaender, an ecologist at the Institute for Marine Sciences at UCSC who leads the project. “And that might mean that your social interactions might change.”

The ruckus we make usually doesn’t kill animals directly. “But if it means that you don’t reproduce as frequently or you’re not as healthy, then your population may suffer as a consequence,” says Friedlaender. 

Comfortable Silence

Both Ryan and Friedlaender hope for quieter solutions that won’t push people out of the water.

“What I don’t want our research to ever sound like it’s doing is putting blame on people and telling people how to change what they’re doing,” says Friedlaender. “What I’d rather have come out of this is showing that if we can do things that make the ocean a quieter place, it can be a positive for the animals that are out there.” 

Container ships won’t be leaving our waters anytime soon, but researchers say solutions for reducing our noise footprint in the oceans already exist.

Healthier marine ecosystems means more opportunities for people to interact with ocean life, he explains.

“It doesn’t necessarily mean less people on the water and fewer boats. It might just mean, ‘Let’s come up with a quieter way to be on the ocean,’” he says. He uses electric cars as an example of quieter transportation.

Ryan offers a few other ideas: “Slow down ships. Change ship design. Move to fewer, larger ships, maybe that put out even lower frequency sound—below the communication channel of the animals.” 

Many of the solutions for reducing our noise footprint already exist. And in addition to helping wildlife, these changes could also benefit people. 

“Biodiversity enriches our lives in so many ways that we can see, and in some ways we cannot see immediately unless we look more deeply,” says Ryan.

During the anthropause, many people rediscovered the life in their own neighborhoods. 

“With reduction of noise levels, it wasn’t just the animals that were benefiting,” says Derryberry. Noise pollution drives up stress and anxiety in humans, too. Quieter streets, skies and seas could lead to better sleep and better mental health. 

“There’s a lot of things about the anthropause that were horrible,” says Derryberry. “But I think we also learned a lot about how we can change some of the ways that we operate.”

To report hurt or orphaned wildlife, call 831-462-0726 or visit nativeanimalrescue.org.

Civil Grand Jury Grills County, Cal Fire on Wildfires

The Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury has released the results of its eight latest investigations, which typically delve into the inner workings of county and city governmental operations.

While the subjects of the investigations are required to submit responses, they do not have to make any changes recommended in the reports. Most are required to respond publicly within 30 to 60 days.

The Grand Jury, made up of 19 county residents, this year reviewed three of its investigations from 2017-18 and found that many of their recommendations have been implemented. The reports are often telling portraits-in-time of public perception of how taxpayer dollars are being used, and how various aspects of government are being run.

This year’s reports cover the county’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic, and how the city of Santa Cruz addresses wildfire danger. The Grand Jury also looked at how Pajaro Valley Unified School District (PVUSD)—the county’s largest district—dealt with the pandemic.

The Grand Jury also looked at the Santa Cruz County Jail system, including several inmate deaths and violence, in addition to criminal conduct—including sexual assaults—by correction officers.

Additionally, the reports look at how the county is providing broadband internet service to residents, and how the county government responded to the CZU Lightning Complex fires from August 2020.

Chasing Covid 

The report titled “Chasing the Pandemic,” looks at the effectiveness of the county’s Covid-19 testing and contact tracing efforts, and describes the Santa Cruz County Public Health Division as “well-trained, skilled and knowledgeable professionals,” who protected residents during the pandemic.

But the county’s website does not sufficiently help residents find Covid-19 testing sites. Furthermore, the Save Lives Santa Cruz County website does not adequately inform the public of the work being done to manage the crisis, and fails to convey the scope of the pandemic, the report shows.

The Public Health Division should therefore update its website and shore up its public outreach, including providing weekly updates and video reports, the jury recommends.

CZU Response Ripped

In the scathing report titled “The CZU Lightning Complex Fire – Learn…or Burn?,” the Grand Jury focused on how the County Board of Supervisors and the county administration supported residents of Bonny Doon, Davenport, Last Chance and Boulder Creek in the aftermath of the county’s worst blaze.

“The residents whose lives have been devastated were, and are, justifiably indignant over the lack of leadership from their elected leaders,” the report states. “Our county’s residents rightly continue to express doubt and dismay about their devastating experiences and the ability to withstand future fires.”

The report says that the supervisors have not recognized that they are responsible to adequately address residents’ concerns over wildfire preparedness. 

In addition, the Grand Jury excoriated Cal Fire for the disparate “lessons learned” presentations that occurred in Santa Cruz and San Mateo counties. The one in Santa Cruz lasted for just nine minutes, while San Mateo’s went on for 40 minutes. The supervisors did not hold Cal Fire accountable for this lack of analysis, the report says. In addition, there are no provisions in the contract between the county and Cal Fire to provide such analyses.

“This discrepancy is disappointing and not acceptable,” the report says.

The county was also drilled for its response to a 2020 Grand Jury investigation that looked at the county’s preparedness to wildfire risk. The responses, the report states, “show a lack of engagement with the material and a lack of understanding of their role as advocates for the county” and should be revisited.

In its recommendations, the Grand Jury says that the supervisors should question Cal Fire about its readiness for future fires. The board should also develop a policy for receiving and logging residents’ questions and concerns.

In addition, county policy should require “timely after-action reports” for major fire events, and should advocate for additional resources from the state for fire prevention and protection.

Bringing Broadband

The challenges of providing broadband internet service throughout the county—a goal 10 years in the making—are manyfold. This includes cutting through mountains of red tape and assessing safety and infrastructure issues that come from fire danger.

While the county has a plan to do so, it has committed the technological sin of allowing that plan to become obsolete. 

The county should immediately update its 2015 Broadband Master Plan to reflect regulatory changes on the state and federal levels, the Grand Jury says in the report titled “Turn On, Tune In, and Drop Out.” These changes, the report says, should reflect the difficulty of bringing the service to the rural parts of Santa Cruz County, and the challenges brought by the CZU Complex.

The jurors recommended that the county apply for funding to help pay for increased broadband service, and look into the possibility of the county owning and maintaining its own broadband system. 

In addition, the county should work with the Santa Cruz County Office of Education to continue providing internet service for the 2022-23 school year.

A Look at Main Jail

In its required annual look at the county’s jail system, the Grand Jury focused on allegations of sexual assault and illegal sexual conduct by corrections officers that occurred in 2017 and 2020, both of which resulted in convictions.

The report titled “Justice in the Jail” also looked at several separate incidents involving inmates, including one self-mutilation and an assault—both in 2018.

Jurors also looked at a suicide and a homicide, both of which happened within a two-day period in October 2019, and the death of a mentally ill inmate in May 2020.

The Grand Jury also investigated a power outage that lasted for more than 24 hours in September 2019, including the backup power system.

“In the end it comes down to issues of management, having enough resources, and a need for more effective oversight and public transparency,” the report says.

The Grand Jury recommends either appointing an Inspector General or Sheriff oversight board or placing the issue before voters. 

In addition, the report states that the county should increase staff at the jail, since short staffing and mandatory overtime are “detrimental to performance, staff morale, and contribute to human error which can threaten the health and safety of staff and inmates.”

The jail should also revisit its policies of providing razors to inmates, the report says, and should hold monthly status meetings regarding the state of the facilities.

Illegal Camping Threat

The city saw 75 outdoor fires as of May 20, many of which are caused by illegal camping and warming fires from homeless encampments. 

Despite this, the city has cleared these encampments only in “extreme emergency situations,” instead of proactively, the report titled “Wildfire Threat to the City of Santa Cruz” says. 

The Grand Jury recommends that City Council should craft an ordinance to help mitigate these issues.

Furthermore, the grand Jury calls the coordination between the city and the county “insufficient,” and says it is not transparent to the public.

To help ameliorate this problem, the county needs accurate data, including the numbers of homeless people living in the city. 

The report also calls for an outreach campaign for communities with eucalyptus trees—known to be more flammable than others—to help with vegetation management. 

The city should also establish a “firewise community” in every neighborhood that abuts natural areas, known as Wildland Urban Interfaces.

City leaders should also revisit budget priorities surrounding fire safety, and should re-evaluate how state and federal dollars are used, and should look at how the city works with state offices such as CalTrans in dealing with homeless encampments. 

PVUSD Leads the Way

PVUSD earned the Grand Jury’s only laudatory report with its swift response to the pandemic, which included quickly closing schools as the pandemic began to take hold, and then creating a distance learning program. 

When an employee at Rio Del Mar Elementary School tested positive for Covid-19 in March 2020, Pajaro Valley Unified School district closed the school for a deep cleaning.

Just three days later, as case rates began to climb, the district’s Board of Trustees, in an emergency meeting, voted to close all schools in the district.

On April 1, the trustees voted to close the schools for the remainder of the 2019-20 school year

Soon after that, the district updated its webpage, issued Chromebook computers to the majority of its students and created a distance learning program. PVUSD also created a “safe space” program for students unable to participate in distance learning, or who are struggling under that system. 

The district’s response, the Grand Jury said in the report titled “Distance Learning During the Pandemic in the Pajaro Valley Unified School District,” should be documented and built upon, since distance learning is likely here to stay. 

Pesticide Notifications

The county requires that growers must inform the public when they will be applying pesticide to their crops. But the process of doing so is cumbersome, and the locations provided often cannot be located on a map. This is largely because many farms don’t have an address, and others are made up of several fields, or are oddly shaped. 

That’s according to the Grand Jury’s investigation on the Santa Cruz County Agricultural Commission, and how that agency interacts with the Board of Supervisors and the public. The report is titled “Santa Cruz County Agricultural Commissioner’s Office Can Get By with a Little Help from Its Friends.”

The Grand Jury says that changes at the state level—with the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR)—must be informed by the County Board of Supervisors, since they wield more influence than the local Agricultural Commissioner.

On Oct. 27, 2020, the Watsonville City Council issued a resolution urging the Agricultural Commissioner to post online in advance of the pesticide use. But at that same meeting, Agricultural Commissioner Juan Hidalgo told the council that doing so would burden his staff that was already stretched thin.

The report suggests that, within six months, the Agricultural Commissioner should create a pilot program to teach farmers how to use the CalAgPermits software that helps inform the public about pesticide application. This should come with suggestions about improving the software’s efficiency.

In addition, the supervisors should mandate a notification system for pesticide application, including text and email. The board should also urge the DPR and other state officials to include specific location information on pesticide application forms.

To see the reports in their entirety, and those from previous years, visit bit.ly/3jsH0KL.

Coalition Calls for Rule Changes on Pesticides

When Melissa Dennis began teaching third grade at Ohlone Elementary School, she noticed that an unusual number of her students at the school in the rural Royal Oaks community just south of Watsonville had health issues.

She says she finds it alarming how many children at the school have severe asthma. She also consistently sees learning issues “above and beyond what you might expect for a class of, say, 24 students.” 

But the most devastating pattern, she says, is the prevalence of childhood cancer in the community. Over the last six years, she and other teachers counted six young children with cancer. The school has less than 500 students.

“Having worked in Santa Cruz at Santa Cruz City schools, and then coming down to work in Watsonville, I saw a big difference,” she says.

Dennis believes the health issues are linked to pesticide exposure. So she started working with the community coalition Safe Ag Safe Schools (SASS) to advocate for safer and more transparent pesticide practices.

Recently, SASS joined Californians for Pesticide Reform (CPR) and various other community groups in a statewide call for online warnings about agricultural pesticide applications.

“We don’t have any idea when or what is being applied around us,” Dennis says. “That kind of information should just be public for anyone to know, because it affects the public.”

Planning Protection

In order to use a high-toxicity group of chemicals known as California Restricted Materials, growers must submit notices-of-intent (NOIs) to the county agricultural commissioner at least 24 hours in advance. These NOIs include what pesticide farmers plan to spray and where. But the information doesn’t become available to the public until after the application. 

“That doesn’t help anyone once it’s already been applied,” says Héktor Calderón, the Monterey Bay Area community organizer for CPR. “What we’re asking is for it to be in real time, so that then those folks can take those preventative steps and not be affected.”

Simple precautions such as closing windows and taking clothes off drying lines can help reduce exposure, Calderón says. With sufficient warning, people might also choose to stay inside or wear protective equipment.

“Doctors and nurses would be able to use this information as well,” says Calderón. If someone goes to a hospital with poisoning symptoms, for instance, knowing whether they were exposed to a particular pesticide could help medical professionals treat them effectively, he says.

Community Calls

So far, the cities of Watsonville, Greenfield and Soledad, as well as Pajaro Valley Unified School District and Greenfield Union School District, have passed resolutions that urge Monterey and Santa Cruz counties to post NOIs online.

On May 27, advocates gathered outside County Agricultural Commissioner offices in Salinas, Bakersfield, Modesto and Tulare. They held press conferences and hosted an online rally. A petition for advance notice garnered more than 23,000 signatures.

After holding a press conference, the group in Salinas knocked on the office door of Monterey County Agricultural Commissioner Henry Gonzales.

“The door was locked, and no one came to open it,” says Ann López, founder and director of the Center for Farmworker Families. “So we just started chanting, ‘We’ll be back. We’ll be back.’”

López has worked with farmworkers for more than 20 years. People sometimes call her from the field and describe symptoms—vomiting and fainting, among others—looking for ways to protect themselves.

“I think it’s a human right to know what you’re being exposed to,” she says. López, like many others in the community, is worried about the long-term harmful effects of pesticide exposure. 

“It’s disgraceful. I mean, we’re poisoning children, we’re poisoning the environment. We’re causing species to go extinct,” she says. “This is absolute stupidity. There’s no amount of money or profit that is worth this kind of carnage.”

County Responses

Santa Cruz County Agricultural Commissioner Juan Hidalgo says the county doesn’t plan to start posting the information online in advance or in real time.

“Posting actually requires a lot more staff to be able to manage that information,” he says. “Moreover, it’s not just about posting the information … Once you put that information up, people are going to have questions. Having staffing to answer those questions from the public is another issue—and something that, currently, I just don’t have the staffing to be able to do.”

The Monterey County Agricultural Commissioner’s office did not respond to requests for comment.

Hidalgo wants the public to know that the state and county heavily regulate pesticide use. 

“There’s a lot of oversight over the use of these pesticide products,” he says. The California Department of Pesticide Regulation conducts air quality monitoring, and “so far our region has been doing really well,” he adds.

But some are not convinced the current regulations are enough.

“There’s a lot of pesticides that they use, and later on—like 10 years, 15 years later—say, ‘Oh, sorry, we’re not going to use this pesticide no more. We’ll use another one,’” says Horacio Amezquita, the manager for the San Jerardo Housing Cooperative in Salinas. He has lived in the co-op, surrounded by crop fields, since 1979. “The public is the one that ends up paying the price,” he says.

He gives the example of chlorpyrifos. It has been one of the most heavily-used pesticides in the U.S. since its introduction in 1965. The chemical kills pests by disrupting their nervous systems. It’s also toxic to humans and linked to developmental delays and disorders. The EPA banned chlorpyrifos this year.

A Safer Future

In the absence of county transparency, the California Department of Pesticide Regulation announced plans to develop a $10 million statewide notification program. But outlining the process will take until mid-2024.

“What we’re looking for is to have something happen now,” says Calderón. “We know ag commissioners can do it. It’s very simple and low cost. And they’re refusing to do it.”

Several of the advocates find the county responses dissatisfying.

“Once you set up a system, you can even make it automatic,” says Amezquita. “I don’t think the excuses they’re using are true. Besides, the health of the residents is what matters most.”

Amezquita and several of the other advocates hope to eventually see more sustainable farming methods take hold in the Pajaro Valley.

“There’s a better way for farming,” he says, before listing a few organic agricultural practices. “We need to find a way that the farmers and the Department of Pesticide Regulation protect the people first and then [worry about] the pests.”

Rob Brezsny’s Astrology: July 7-13

Free will astrology for the week of July 7

ARIES (March 21-April 19): Poet Joshua Jennifer Espinoza writes, “i name my body girl of my dreams / i name my body proximity / i name my body full of hope despite everything.” I love her idea that we might give playful names and titles and descriptors to our bodies. In alignment with current astrological omens, I propose that you do just that. It’s time to take your relationship with your beautiful organism to a higher level. How about if you call it “Exciting Love River” or “Perfectly Imperfect Thrill” or “Amazing Maze”? Have fun dreaming up further possibilities!

TAURUS (April 20-May 20): The English language, my native tongue, doesn’t ascribe genders to its nouns. But many languages do. In Spanish, the word for “bridge” is puente, which is masculine. In German, “bridge” is Brücke, which is feminine. A blogger named Tickettome says this is why Spanish speakers may describe a bridge as strong or sturdy, while German speakers refer to it as elegant or beautiful. I encourage you to meditate on bridges that possess the entire range of qualities, including the Spanish and German notions. In the coming weeks, you’ll be wise to build new metaphorical bridges, fix bridges that are in disrepair and extinguish fires on any bridges that are burning.

GEMINI (May 21-June 20): Académie Française is an organization devoted to preserving the purity and integrity of the French language. One of its ongoing missions is to resist the casual incorporation of English words, which the younger generation of French people is inclined to do. Among anglicisms that don’t have the Académie’s approval: podcast, clickbait, chick-lit, deadline, hashtag, marketing, timelapse and showrunner. The ban doesn’t stop anyone from using the words, of course, but simply avoids giving them official recognition. I appreciate the noble intentions of the Académie, but regard its crusade as a losing battle that has minimal impact. In the coming weeks, I advise you to refrain from behavior that resembles the Académie’s. Resist the temptation of quixotic idealism. Be realistic and pragmatic. You Geminis often thrive in environments that welcome idiosyncrasies, improvisation, informality and experimentation—especially now.

CANCER (June 21-July 22): Cancerian author Vladimir Mayakovsky wrote a poem about how one morning he went half-mad and conversed with the sun. At first he called the supreme radiance a “lazy clown,” complaining that it just floated through the sky for hours while he, Mayakovsky, toiled diligently at his day job painting posters. Then he dared the sun to come down and have tea with him, which, to his shock, the sun did. The poet was agitated and worried—what if the close approach of the bright deity would prove dangerous? But the visitor turned out to be friendly. They had a pleasant dialog, and in the end the sun promised to provide extra inspiration for Mayakovsky’s future poetry. I invite you to try something equally lyrical and daring, dear Cancerian.

LEO (July 23-Aug. 22): A blogger named Bunny-Gal writes, “I almost completely forgot who I was there for a while. But then I dug a hole and smelled the fresh dirt and now I remember everything and am okay.” I recommend you follow her lead, Leo—even if you haven’t totally lost touch with your essence. Communing with Mother Earth in the most direct and graphic way to remind you of everything you need to remember: of the wisdom you’ve lost track of and the secrets you’ve hidden too well and the urgent intuitions that are simmering just below the surface of your awareness.

VIRGO (Aug. 23-Sept. 22): I can’t understand the self-help gurus who advise us to relentlessly live in the present moment—to shed all awareness of past and future so as to focus on the eternal NOW. I mean, I appreciate the value of doing such an exercise on occasion for a few moments. I’ve tried it, and it’s often rejuvenating. But it can also be downright foolish to have no thoughts of yesterday and tomorrow. We need to evaluate how circumstances will evolve, based on our previous experience and future projections. It can be a deadening, depleting act to try to strip ourselves of the rich history we are always embedded in. In any case, Virgo, I advise you to be thoroughly aware of your past and future in the coming days. To do so will enhance your intelligence and soulfulness in just the right ways to make good decisions.

LIBRA (Sept. 23-Oct. 22): Psychotherapist and author Clarissa Pinkola Estés poetically refers to the source of our creativity as “the river under the river.” It’s the deep, primal energy that “nourishes everything we make”—our “writing, painting, thinking, healing, doing, cooking, talking, smiling.” This river beneath the river doesn’t belong to any of us—is potentially available to all—but if harnessed correctly it works in very personal ways, fueling our unique talents. I bring this to your attention, Libra, because you’re close to gaining abundant new access to the power of the river beneath the river. 

SCORPIO (Oct. 23-Nov. 21): In formulating personal goals, Scorpio author Brené Brown urges us to emphasize growth rather than perfection. Trying to improve is a healthier objective than seeking flawless mastery. Bonus perk: This practical approach makes us far less susceptible to shame. We’re not as likely to feel like a failure or give up prematurely on our projects. I heartily endorse this strategy for you right now, Scorpio.

SAGITTARIUS (Nov. 22-Dec. 21): In a letter to Jean Paul Sartre, author Simone de Beauvoir described how she was dealing with a batch of challenging memories: “I’m reliving it street by street, hour by hour, with the mission of neutralizing it, and transforming it into an inoffensive past that I can keep in my heart without either disowning it or suffering from it.” I LOVE this approach! It’s replete with emotional intelligence. I recommend it to you now, since it’s high time to wrangle and finagle with parts of your life story that need to be alchemically transformed and redeemed by your love and wisdom.

CAPRICORN (Dec. 22-Jan. 19): In one of his poems, Capricorn-born Kenneth Rexroth complains about having “a crooked guide on the twisted path of love.” But in my view, a crooked guide is the best kind. It’s unwise to engage the services of a love accomplice who’s always looking for the simplest, straightest route, or who imagines that intimate togetherness can be nourished with easy, obvious solutions. To cultivate the most interesting intimacy, we need influences that appreciate nuance and complexity—that thrive on navigating the tricky riddles and unpredictable answers. The next eight weeks will be an excellent time for you Capricorns to heed this advice.

AQUARIUS (Jan. 20-Feb. 18): Aquarian singer Etta James (1938–2012) won six Grammy Awards and is in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, Grammy Hall of Fame and Blues Hall of Fame. She testified, “Most of the songs I sing have that blues feeling in it. They have that sorry feeling. And I don’t know what I’m sorry about.” Wow! I’m surprised to hear this. Most singers draw on their personal life experience to infuse their singing with authentic emotion. In any case, I urge you to do the opposite of Etta James in the coming weeks. It’s important for the future of your healing that you identify exactly what you’re sorry about.

PISCES (Feb. 19-March 20): “Sometimes you win, sometimes you learn,” writes Piscean self-help author John C. Maxwell. His statement is useful, but it harbors a problematic implication. It suggests that you can experience either winning or learning, but not both—that the only time you learn is when you lose. I disagree with this presumption. In fact, I think you’re now in a phase when it’s possible and even likely for you to both win and learn.

Homework: Send word of your most important lesson of the year so far. Ne********@***************gy.com

Beauregard Vineyards Opens Slow Coast Wine Bar

Rachel and Ryan Beauregard have opened their new Slow Coast Wine Bar by Beauregard Vineyards in Davenport, right on scenic Highway 1. Rachel will be running the show, and she has already stocked the wine bar with Tabitha Stroup’s Friend in Cheeses jams, chocolates by Marini’s, sweet goodies by Ashby Confections, Deerhaven Soaps; and Wild Poppies olive oil–all locally made. The Beauregards’ tasting room in Bonny Doon has an abundance of customers daily, so the Davenport spot gives them another venue. It’s also a great space to hold private events.

“Our business plan for this space is to operate as an auxiliary tasting room, a wine bar, and a place for people to host private events,” says winemaker Ryan Beauregard. “Our estate winery has become so busy recently that we cannot always serve guests adequately. A second nearby location is a way to accommodate guests with our new appointment-only, seated tastings with table service.”

Open Thursday-Monday from 1pm, with a last call at 7:30pm.

Slow Coast Wine Bar by Beauregard Vineyards, 450 Highway 1, Davenport, 831-600-7402. Da***************@*****************ds.com.

Victor Hugo Winery

The name Victor Hugo immediately brings to mind two of the writer’s most famous novels, The Hunchback of Notre-Dame and Les Misérables. But in this case, I am writing about Victor Hugo Winery in the Paso Robles area.

Hugo the writer most certainly gave us plenty of literary gems, and Victor Hugo the winery gives us exceptional libations worthy of poetic allure.

Victor Hugo’s 2017 Paso Robles Opulence, Templeton Gap District, is a captivating blend of 33% Merlot, 27% Cabernet Franc, 20% Petit Verdot, 13% Malbec, and 7% Cabernet Sauvignon.

Kudos to owner and winemaker Victor Hugo Roberts for making this intense red wine brimming with black cherries and dark chocolate. This is Opulence at its best! And it’s not surprising that two of Victor Hugo’s other wines are named Les Mis and Hunchback. There’s also one called Contemplations, named after Hugo’s collection of poetry.

Victor Hugo Winery, 2850 El Pomar Drive, Templeton. 805-434-1128. Victorhugowinery.com. Open by appointment.

Red Apple Café Delivers Quality, Service and Hospitality

Red Apple Café is an Aptos gem that has had multiple generations come through its doors since it opened in 1988. Their philosophy is focused on quality food and delivering service and hospitality that sets them apart. Open seven days a week from 7am-3pm, they serve breakfast and lunch all day—so yes, you can get a hamburger in the morning or pancakes in the afternoon. In 2009, owner Gracia Krakauer had been living in Santa Cruz and looking for a local restaurant to buy, so she and her husband jumped at the opportunity to purchase what was already their favorite breakfast spot in town. She spoke to GT recently, highlighting some of their favorite food fare.

What are your best breakfast dishes?

GRACIA KRAKAUER: Any of our eggs benedict are great, the hollandaise is made fresh every day. The traditional freshly sliced ham is popular, but my personal favorite is the Maryland Blue Crab. The fresh crab flavor really stands out. And our potato dishes are good hearty portions—we have six options. The customer favorites are the bacon pots and the veggie pots. All these options are sautéed together then topped with scrambled eggs and cheese. Our most unique pancake choice is our Bacon Cheddar Stack, which has fresh crumbled bacon and cheddar cheese baked into the pancake. It’s the perfect combination of salty and sweet; guests are usually surprised at first, but once they have a taste it’s like they’re in heaven.

What lunch dishes stand out?

I definitely want to highlight our burgers, we have six options that are all half-pound Angus beef, all cooked to order and fresh, never frozen. My favorite is the California burger, which is topped with avocado, bacon and jack cheese. All burgers are also served with soup, salad, or French fries. Another popular item is our Baja Chicken sandwich. It has fresh grilled chicken breast underneath onions, jalapeños, red bell peppers, and melted jack cheese. If guests are looking for a nice hot lunch, we have our Mahi Mahi fish platter. The grilled filets are topped with macadamia nut butter and served over rice with grilled seasonal vegetables. It’s very popular and is a great option for those trying to avoid red meat.

783 Rio Del Mar Blvd #15, Aptos, 831-685-1224; redappleaptos.com.

Bad Animal Brings Back its Cafe

I always surrender to the orange wine at Bad Animal, and last week was no exception. Carolyn and I both chose a peach-tinted Greek wine called Pleiades ($15), served in beautiful stemware. At the corner table of the wrap-around banquette we had a view of all the action at the reopened book/cafe. The shelves glowed with volumes of poetry and literature. The wine bar was filled with locals happy to be back out in this charismatic space. And the sidewalk cafe out front hosted diners at tables bordered with handsome Persian carpets. Great to be back, we told co-owner Andrew Sivak, who looked quite happy about the whole thing. Glad to be free of our masks, Carolyn and I caught up on the last year whilst shamelessly indulging in Bad Animal’s bread and butter plate ($5). The slabs of succulent sourdough are from Manresa Bakery! The soft unsalted butter is laced with crunchy flakes of sea salt. Yes, unsalted butter that is salted. Five dollars never brought so much pleasure. Carolyn went all Left Bank and ordered the creamy salmon rillettes that arrived along with more of the fantastic bread ($11). Packed into a white ceramic ramekin, the spiced salmon was especially good with olives (a little bowl of mixed Lucques and Kalamatas, $5). The Bad Animal menu offers a perfect short list of flavors destined for wine. Charcuterie with cornichons, cheeses with dried apricots, grilled cheese with pesto, an addictive kale salad with walnuts, parmesan and lemon, and that signature house schnitzel. I went for the schnitzel ($20), which arrived hot, aromatic and perfectly breaded. A squeeze of lemon and a slick of the sour cream with tarragon made each bite memorable. The roast potatoes on the side were a happy surprise. And yes, the orange wine was perfect with the thin pork cutlet, the wine laced with minerals, a bit of saltiness and some indefinable aura of bay leaves. Bad Animal’s eclectic wine list includes (by the glass) a Portuguese sparkler, a Provençal Chardonnay, Rhone reds, and another orange blend from Chile. The list of bottles is long and suggests that you join another couple and sample a bottle together. And they’ve got the sparkling water of the moment, the very bubbly Topo Chico ($4). The reawakened Bad Animal is a blend of Latin Quarter bistro, academic salon, and Viennese wine bar. Start with the wine and appetizer plates, stay for the endless delights that line the shelves. Bad Animal, 1011 Cedar St. Bar opens at 2pm, cafe at 5pm Wed-Sun. badanimalbooks.com.

Appetizer of the Week Grilled peaches at Gabriella Cafe. Meaty slices of ripe peaches, grilled into prime juiciness, topped with creamy burrata and a minty balsamic reduction ($15) proved one of the stars of our dinner last week. On a hot day the peach appetizer, joined by a Spanish Sauvignon Blanc, were exceptional. My dinner of rack of lamb—outstanding!— arrived glazed with a chili oil and raisin sauce. My companion went for the pan-roasted local salmon, a lavish portion topped with lemon fennel butter, carrots, broccoli and cauliflower, and that terrific polenta that Gema Cruz’s kitchen does so well. Gabriella is serving indoors, patio, and out on the parklet, and the response has been vigorous. Dining with friends again is such a pleasure. And if you’re finding the spritz a welcome cocktail on warm summer evenings, as I am, be sure to get over to Bantam where the refreshing orange-infused cocktail made with cappaletti is done with style, and especially fine with a plate of burrata, peppers, figs, and rocket. Always bold flavor combos at this Westside beacon.

California Finally Has Date For Gov. Gavin Newsom’s Recall Election: Sept. 14

By Shawn Hubler, The New York Times

The Republican-led, pandemic-fueled campaign to recall Gov. Gavin Newsom of California got an official election date Thursday, as the state’s lieutenant governor announced that voters will head to the polls on the issue on Sept. 14.

The date, just 75 days away and the soonest that county officials said they could manage to pull together a special election, was released shortly after the California secretary of state formally certified the recall petition. And it came after Newsom’s fellow Democrats in the state Legislature decided to expedite the process.

California is overwhelmingly Democratic and Newsom is widely expected to prevail, particularly as the state has emerged from the coronavirus crisis. The conventional wisdom among his advisers and allies has been that he will benefit from a swift decision, while Californians are still basking in relief from the reopening of the state’s economy, and before the autumn wildfires begin in earnest.

The timeline, set by a fellow Democrat, Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, also severely restricts the ability of prospective challengers to get onto the ballot, leaving only about two weeks for them to join the race to replace Newsom. More than 50 candidates are already on the ballot, with a handful of well-funded Republicans seriously campaigning.

Expected to cost some $276 million, the special election will mark the second time in state history that Californians have voted on whether to recall a sitting governor. The first resulted in the ouster of Gray Davis and the election of Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2003.

Newsom and his supporters, who have derided the recall campaign as a last-ditch ploy for relevance by right-wing extremists, said Thursday that they welcomed the decision of voters.

“This Republican recall is a naked attempt by Trump Republicans to grab control in California — powered by the same Republicans who refused to accept the results of the presidential election,” said Juan Rodriguez, the leader of the governor’s campaign organization.

Kevin Faulconer, the former mayor of San Diego and one of the Republican contenders, countered that “this movement is powered by Californians from every community — Democrats, Republicans and independents.”

Faulconer added, “Change is coming for California and retirement is coming for Gavin Newsom.”

Recall attempts are not uncommon in California, with every governor since 1960 facing at least one. But getting a recall onto the ballot is rare.

The campaign against Newsom languished for months before a series of pandemic-influenced missteps, judicial decisions and voter fury landed the governor — a liberal in a Democratic state who was elected in 2018 in a landslide — in a perfect political storm.

Copyright 2021 The New York Times Company

House, Setting a Marker for Talks, Passes $715 Billion Infrastructure Bill

By Jonathan Weisman, The New York Times

WASHINGTON — The House on Thursday laid down its marker for this month’s infrastructure negotiations, approving a five-year, $715 billion transportation and drinking water bill that would do more to combat climate change than the Senate’s bipartisan measure embraced by President Joe Biden.

Democratic leaders see the bill as a baseline for talks with the Senate aimed at producing the largest investment in infrastructure since President Dwight D. Eisenhower began the interstate highway system. The House measure, which would authorize a 50% increase over current spending levels, passed by a vote of 221-201, largely along party lines, a break from past infrastructure bills and a mark of how polarized Congress has become.

It would devote $343 billion to roads, bridges and safety. Its $109 billion for transit would increase federal spending by 140%. An investment of $168 billion in funds for wastewater and drinking water includes a new program to forgive the unpaid water bills of Americans struggling through the pandemic, and then to help pay bills in the future, much as the government helps pay home heating and air-conditioning costs.

But with heat records being set from Arizona to Seattle, House Democrats emphasized the billions that would go toward electric vehicle charging stations, zero-emission transit vehicles and shoring up roads, bridges, tunnels and rail lines to withstand severe weather and rising seas driven by a changing climate. Funding for Amtrak would be tripled, to $32 billion, and high-speed rail planning would be underwritten.

“We have to rebuild in ways that we never even thought about before,” said Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., chair of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, adding, “This is the moment. We have to be bold.”

Just how the House Democratic vision of infrastructure will be melded with the deal struck by five Republicans and five Democrats in the Senate is anything but clear. The House bill and the Senate deal are not far apart in spending numbers on traditional infrastructure. Both efforts take up Biden’s call to replace all of the country’s lead drinking water pipes.

But while the Senate framework only lays down broad categories of spending, the House bill extends surface transportation policies and user funds that are set to expire Oct. 1. It also establishes new policies like water bill assistance, “Buy American” requirements and a pilot program for low-income transit access.

“I‘m suggesting that substantial amounts of the policy in our bill should be negotiated by the White House and the Senate and the House to be part of that bipartisan proposal,” DeFazio said, adding that he was encouraged by the movement in the Senate.

Another wrinkle: It is the first bill in a decade to include home-district projects, known as earmarks, 1,473 of them totaling nearly $5.7 billion. House members in both parties will be loath to lose them.

One major thing missing in the House bill, however, was Republican support — even from those who won coveted projects for their districts. Only two GOP lawmakers, Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Christopher H. Smith of New Jersey, crossed party lines to support it.

House Republicans blistered the bill as overly political, slanted toward “green new deal” social engineering that would outstrip funds available from gas and diesel taxes and other user fees long dedicated to infrastructure spending. With many House Republicans denying the established science of climate change and rural lawmakers feeling shortchanged by the shift toward mass transit and rail, the bill did not get the bipartisan support usually afforded to such measures.

“There is no denying that Congress must take action to improve our nation’s crumbling infrastructure, but, sadly, bipartisan negotiations have hit a roadblock,” Rep. Ben Cline, R-Va., said. “Instead of focusing on traditional infrastructure, Democrats have chosen to prioritize the left’s Green New Deal agenda.”

Democrats, some of whom donned green baseball caps on Thursday emblazoned with the words “Green New Deal,” conceded that their bill was no ordinary pavement, bridge and tunnel measure. Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California called it transformative. But with roads buckling under the heat in Oregon, permafrost melting in Alaska and blackouts rolling across Texas, they argued it was time to shift the nation to a new, zero-emissions economy.

The climate provisions are substantial: $4 billion for electric vehicle charging stations, $8.3 billion for reducing carbon pollution and $6.2 billion to make infrastructure resistant to extreme weather. Answering Biden’s call for equity, the bill would dedicate $3 billion to tearing down bridges and overpasses that separate communities of color from their cities.

Republican leaders called it the “Green New Deal and Inflation Transportation Act,” and on one issue, they had a point. To avoid breaking Biden’s pledge not to raise taxes on middle-income Americans, House Democrats would not raise the gas tax to cover the increased spending from the Highway Trust Fund.

DeFazio said the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee would produce separate legislation later to pay for the infrastructure spending, but House Democrats voted for the spending without seeing the other side of the ledger.

Copyright 2021 The New York Times Company

Elkhorn Slough Foundation Acquires 34-acre Wetlands

MOSS LANDING—The Elkhorn Slough Foundation recently acquired a key wetland property along Moro Cojo Slough, a major tributary of the larger Elkhorn Slough. 

The 34-acre tract expands the foundation’s holdings in that area to 450 acres. The foundation has protected more than 4,200 acres of conservation lands in the Elkhorn Slough watershed.

Coastal Conservation and Research and the Central Coast Wetlands Group at Moss Landing Marine Labs helped in the acquisition.

Those organizations will now work to restore habitat, and implement water quality improvements on the newly acquired property. The California Ocean Protection Council will aid the project with funding.

The wetlands are located in Moss Landing and Castroville, south of Elkhorn Slough, adjoining Sea Mist Farms, a division of Ocean Mist Farms. 

The extended Tottino family agreed to sell the property for the wetland restoration. The family is known for helping to establish the artichoke industry in Castroville and the lower Salinas Valley.

This project brings the conservation and farming communities together to improve water quality flowing into Monterey Bay.

Coastal Conservation and Research and Central Coast Wetlands Group have worked with Ocean Mist Farms for the past decade and a half to improve inflows to the wetlands of Moro Cojo Slough and the lower Salinas River.

Elkhorn Slough Foundation Executive Director Mark Silberstein said the acquisition will lead to improved water quality, habitat restoration, increased percolation and carbon capture and storage.

“The Elkhorn Slough Foundation is convinced that the collaboration of farmers, scientists and conservationists is the most productive path to meeting our mutual needs,” he said.

Wetlands are known to filter and clean water from contaminants such as nitrates and other nutrients that come from farm runoff before it reaches Monterey Bay. They also trap amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

In addition, wetlands provide critical habitat for a wide variety of fish and wildlife. 

The Elkhorn Slough Foundation is currently restoring 20 acres of degraded tidal marshlands in the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve to accommodate rising sea levels.

For information, visit elkhornslough.org

How the Hush of Pandemic Lockdown Changed Wildlife Behavior

Researchers find big shifts in mountain lions and songbirds

Civil Grand Jury Grills County, Cal Fire on Wildfires

civil-grand-jury
Investigations also lead to calls for increased jail oversight, improved pesticide notifications

Coalition Calls for Rule Changes on Pesticides

pesticides
Agricultural fields are currently fumigated without having to notify nearby residents

Rob Brezsny’s Astrology: July 7-13

Astrology, Horoscope, Stars, Zodiac Signs
Free will astrology for the week of July 7

Beauregard Vineyards Opens Slow Coast Wine Bar

slow-coast-wine-bar
The Davenport location will serve as auxiliary tasting room and event space

Red Apple Café Delivers Quality, Service and Hospitality

red-apple-cafe
The Aptos gem has served multiple generations since 1988

Bad Animal Brings Back its Cafe

bad-animal
Reopened book/cafe features “endless delights”

California Finally Has Date For Gov. Gavin Newsom’s Recall Election: Sept. 14

The state is overwhelmingly Democratic and Newsom is widely expected to prevail.

House, Setting a Marker for Talks, Passes $715 Billion Infrastructure Bill

house-infrastructure
The House on Thursday approved a five-year, $715 billion transportation and drinking water bill.

Elkhorn Slough Foundation Acquires 34-acre Wetlands

elkhorn-slough-wetlands
The 34-acre tract expands the foundation’s holdings in that area to 450 acres.
17,623FansLike
8,845FollowersFollow