Inside the New Draft of the Parks Master Plan

0

Donna Meyers has a vision for Santa Cruz of walkable narrow green spaces that ribbon from one end of the city to another—along the coast, for instance.

“I like the idea of East Cliff and West Cliff and the river being linear parks,” says Meyers, who as chair of the Santa Cruz Parks and Recreation Commission is preparing for a joint study session with the City Council to look at the new Draft Parks Master Plan 2030.

City leaders have already created one linear park along the San Lorenzo River, but the idea of strengthening it and creating new ones along East Cliff and West Cliff drives has been inching forward. Councilmember David Terrazas, who served on the subcommittee to study for the Parks Master Plan, would like to see an official coastal park that stretches from Natural Bridges State Beach to the Santa Cruz Harbor.

“The question is: how do we make the most impact? This a tremendous opportunity to make linkages between downtown and the beach area that stretch the entire width and length of the city,” Terrazas says.

The master plan lays out a framework for how to meet the city’s recreation needs, and poses some interesting questions, like how to meet the needs of a town with a larger retired population than many other communities of the same size. To that end, Meyers has suggested installing more fitness areas at local parks with easy step-by-step instructions.

Another part of accommodating that population, says Parks Director Mauro Garcia, is in having a long list of seasonal recreational activities. He says city staffers will keep a close eye on new trends like pickleball, a racquet and net game played on special courts that’s soaring in popularity.

“It’s not as hard on one’s body [as tennis], but it still requires a lot of finesse,” Garcia says, adding that parks officials are also looking at places to add another ADA-accessible walking path, like the Arana Gulch Multi-Use Trail, which opened two years ago.

Santa Cruz’s pickleball community—readers will be forgiven for not previously knowing that such a group existed—has also been one of the most vocal groups in the master plan process, as they clamor for a dedicated facility to call their own. With dozens of tennis courts around the city, pickleballers normally lug their nets over to some tennis facilities at Sergeant Derby Park on the Westside a few days a week that they say were under-utilized.

The disagreements between pickleballers and tennis players—like any spat between paddle boarders and surfers—mostly boils down to a limited resource: turf.

The Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors last November approved a $35,000 contract to retrofit some tennis courts at Brommer Park for pickleball. Terry Long, hardcore pickleball enthusiast, is hoping the city does something similar, perhaps at Derby Park.

“Pickleball is growing. And there are plenty other tennis courts on the Westside,” Long says. “Neary Lagoon has tennis Courts, Meder Street has tennis courts. Wrigley’s has tennis courts. UCSC has courts. Santa Cruz High has tennis courts on the weekends.”

The 216-page Draft Master Plan highlights a number of possible areas that could use funds, including courts for pickleball and tennis—which still dwarfs pickleball in terms of users, according to survey data included in the plan. It also identifies everything from trash cans and restrooms to community gardens to trails for hikers and mountain bikers, too.

Mountain bike lovers have stepped up and been the other vocal group at master plan meetings as they ask the city to consider new bike-only trails, which would have to go in either Pogonip or DeLaveaga Park.

It’s something Terrazas is receptive to, partly because the Emma McCrary Trail at Pogonip has been so successful and partly because the Mountain Bikers of Santa Cruz have partnered with the city in maintaining trails and proved entrepreneurial in raising funds. He suggests groups could use MBOSC as a model when looking for facilities.

Terrazas, perhaps the council’s most detail-oriented analyst, says overwhelming data in the master plan—the first for city parks in 40 years—will help guide greenspace decisions for years to come. He is personally excited about an idea buried in section three to have park rangers live onsite at community parks, allowing them to serve as hosts and caretakers while staying in workforce housing.

The draft plan calls for more hiking trails and a multi-use playing field, although staffers will have to examine all the possible site options in the future before deciding where any of that could go.

After the Feb. 7 evening study session, which starts at 7 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, the plan will go back to the Parks and Recreation Commission for about three more meetings. Then Garcia and parks staff will go to work on environmental documents and try to get the City Council a final version of the plan by the end of the year.

Part of the exciting challenge, Meyers says, is forecasting new trends.

“No one would have imagined mountain biking 50 years ago,” she says, “and then here it is today.”

Cannabis Tax May Not Cure Ailing State Budget

1

Gov. Jerry Brown released his $180 billion fiscal 2017 budget last month, identifying a $1.6 billion deficit—the result, he said, of slower than anticipated growth in the California economy.

The first deficit since 2012 comes in the aftermath of the state’s historic “yes” vote on Proposition 64, legalizing adult use of recreational cannabis.

State agencies that have studied the initiative have reported that future excise taxes could funnel between $1 billion and $1.4 billion annually into state coffers. But before you say “tax bonanza,” it’s important to underscore that the pot tax can’t be used to close a budget gap, unless the legislature revisits it.

“The state government would certainly like to do that,” says Hezekiah Allen of the California Growers Association, a cannabis industry group. But they are hampered by the legally binding language in Prop. 64, which says that no taxes collected on cannabis sales can be directed into the state’s general fund. Moving forward, “the real limiting factor here is going to be how much wiggle room does the legislature have?” Allen says.

Even if Brown could close the deficit with pot revenue, the state won’t have its new cannabis tax regime in place until next January, when licensed growers will pay a cultivation tax of $9.25 per ounce of buds and $2.75 per ounce of leaves. Another 15 percent sales tax will be applied to the retail price of all cannabis products, and some localities are cooking up local taxes of their own.

One problem for localities with enforcement issues to fund, says Allen, is that Prop. 64 set a higher rate of tax than was even contemplated by the legislature, which will make it difficult for localities to add an additional levy. “There is no room for additional taxes,” Allen says.

Those taxes are mainly earmarked for law enforcement and anti-drug efforts in schools. According to a statement from Brown, state pot taxes can be used for “regulatory costs, youth substance-use programs, environmental clean-up resulting from illegal cannabis growing, programs to reduce driving under the influence of cannabis and other drugs and to reduce negative impacts on public health or safety resulting from the legalization of recreational cannabis.”

In the short term, the emergent recreational cannabis industry may actually wind up contributing to a future deficit, as Brown’s budget would send $53 million to regulators to help square up the regulatory regime in the recreational and medical cannabis industries.

“Right now, there’s going to be a lot of pain before there is any gain,” says attorney Aaron Herzberg, a partner at CalCann, a California medical cannabis real estate investment firm. But Allen says the $53 million proposal “is an open question.” He notes that policymakers and the industry “are thinking that we should maybe move a little slower and take an incremental, balanced approach.”

Brown’s office has reported that the $1.6 billion budget shortfall this year will be closed via a slowdown on planned outlays for K-12 education and on the elimination of some discretionary spending.

As Herzberg observes, most of the cannabis sold in the state is on the black market, and for every additional tax the state adds, it’s more likely that those growers will stay in the shadows and not participate in the licensing process. The more tax-heavy the recreational industry becomes, he says, the more probable it is that recreational users will get a medical card to beat the local or state sales tax. There’s a lot of work to be done, and Herzberg is convinced that $53 million won’t cut it. 

Film Review: ‘Julieta’

0

Living a long life means dwelling on a stage with numerous trapdoors. Players vanish or reappear, as part of some grand design that becomes all the more baffling as time passes.

Three stories by the Nobel laureate Alice Munro, from her 2004 collection Runaway, were the source for Pedro Almodóvar’s latest film, the serious but never somber Julieta. Here the Spanish master presents a “tearless melodrama,” in which a woman copes with the inexplicable vanishing of her daughter, Antía. Having no explanation for the rift, Julieta corrodes inside, living with the guilt of whatever it was that she did to cause her daughter to leave her.

The loss essentially changes her into two separate people. The “before” picture is Julieta as a perky, substitute classics teacher (Adriana Ugarte) with one of those dandelion-like haircuts that came around when punk rock went uptown. (The hairstyle helps, but we can also guess at the date. Julieta’s students, reaching for someone to compare to the beauty of Ulysses’ Calypso, pick Kim Basinger. One recalls the actress’ turn as Vicki Vale in 1989’s Batman.)

The older, solitary Julieta of today (played by Emma Suàrez) shows the cracks of age. Julieta is about to leave her home in Madrid, when she gets the news that an old friend has seen Antía with three children of her own, somewhere on the shore of Italy’s Lake Como. With grace and sureness, Almodóvar flashes back through Julieta’s history, stopping long enough to show us the tryst she had with a stranger on a train—Antía’s father. The stranger, Xoan (Daniel Grao), has a sad story; he’s a fisherman whose wife is in a multi-year coma.

When Julieta learns she’s pregnant with Antía, she tracks Xoan down. At his house, he deals with his rudely possessive housekeeper Marian, played by Almodóvar regular Rossy de Palma. De Palma, who has as arrogant a nose as an actress ever looked down, seems to be honoring the memory of mean Mrs. Danvers in Rebecca. Marian’s lack of discretion, and her serious conservatism toward anyone who isn’t Xoan, is key to how Julieta loses the man in her life, and her daughter as well.

Julieta’s color is phenomenal. The richness of this film shows how superficial the saturated primary colors were in the neo-musical La La Land, as affectless as the plastic brightness of a children’s book. Julieta’s opening shot of deep crimson satin folds suggests perfect rose petals, or what people meant when they used to say “the cockles of the heart.” The entire family of red gleams, from wine, to magenta, to scarlets so rich they’re almost black. Jean-Claude Larrieu’s photography is hypnotic, even in ordinary transitional shots: a tiny red car gleaming like a gem in an aerial shot of mountain roads.

Instead of Munro’s native Huron County, Ontario, Almodóvar shoots in coastal Galicia; Xoan’s seaside house looks out at the Rio Ferrol Estuary, a landscape strongly resembling Point Reyes. It may be that Almodóvar had in mind a mainstream hit, the recreation of what the studios in California did so well 60 years ago. He was originally thinking of making this in English, in Vancouver with Meryl Streep. Canada is the place where melodrama went to retire, a home for the depraved expressionist melos of Guy Maddin and Atom Egoyan’s superficially calm and emotionally devastating stories of sundered families.

It’s hard to guess how this director’s taste for dramatic flamboyance would have run up against Streep’s precision. Over the course of a four-decade career, Almodóvar gave us numerous screwball comedies as well as ridiculously good horror (The Skin I Live In). But the extremes in Julieta are well within the bounds of the elegant Hollywood melodrama, outside of that zone of breakdowns or tears—the best of these women’s pictures had but one tear, usually. That restraint is what makes Julieta so well-turned, such a balance of smooth women and jagged feelings. That’s what makes it so absorbing, with its imagery of ethereal lost love, in the jigsaw puzzle of a torn photograph, or soft red lips kissing a still tender, freshly tattooed heart on a man’s shoulder.


Julieta

Written and directed by Pedro Almodóvar. Based on stories from ‘Runaway’ by Alice Munro. Starring Adriana Ugarte, Emma Suàrez and Rossy de Palma. Rated R. 99 min.

Music Picks Feb 1—7

0

 

WEDNESDAY 2/1

INDIE-POP

KENDRA MCKINLEY

A skilled songwriter and vocalist with a talent for sharing rich visuals through her lyrics, Kendra McKinley is a rising star of the Bay Area music scene. She pulls from a range of influences, from jazz vocals, chamber music and bossa nova to indie-rock and mainstream pop. Balancing catchy melodies with a unique delivery, McKinley—who graduated from UCSC—weaves her voice in and around her songs rather than simply bobbing along the top of them. CAT JOHNSON

INFO: 9 p.m. Crepe Place, 1134 Soquel Ave., Santa Cruz. $10. 429-6994.

INDIE ROCK

ALO

Local to the Bay Area, ALO (short for Animal Liberation Orchestra) was initially founded after a failed middle school talent show. The lineup features bass, guitar, keys, accordion, ukulele, drums and vocals, for a smooth and laid-back blend of poppy indie rock. The band’s new Love Songs EP dropped Jan. 27, just in time for its annual “Tour d’Amour”—this year marks the 11th iteration. It kicks off at Moe’s, with a double set by ALO and no opener. From there, the band continues on through the West Coast, supported by the Brothers Comatose, Rabbit Wilde, Moon Hooch and Twiddle. KATIE SMALL

INFO: 9 p.m. Moe’s Alley, 1535 Commercial Way, Santa Cruz. $20/adv, $25/door. 479-1854.

ROCK

BILL CALLAHAN

While recording under the band name Smog, Bill Callahan developed a reputation for writing somewhat trance-inducing, slow, simple tunes that wrap listeners and all their woes up in a warm blanket of commiseration. Now playing under his own name, the baritone-voiced Callahan—whose music bridges Americana, indie-rock, dark humor and hallucinatory poetry—furthers his unique style of free-form songwriting and storytelling. One of the underexposed gems of the rock landscape, Callahan is one of those artists who require repeat listens in a quiet room to appreciate fully. CJ

INFO: 8 p.m. Don Quixote’s, 6275 Hwy. 9, Felton. $22/adv, $25/door. 335-2800.

 

FRIDAY 2/3

ROCK

DAVID LINDLEY

In 2005, Acoustic Guitar magazine ran a cover story on David Lindley. The writer referred to him as a “maxi-instrumentalist,” as opposed to the “multi-instrumentalist” term normally applied to diverse, eclectic players like Lindley. The distinction is important. Lindley employs the use of just about every string instrument on the planet. He makes good use of all of these oddball instruments with a range of styles which include folk, blues, rock, and world music. If there’s any doubt of his talent, folks only need check out his session work with such vastly different artists as Curtis Mayfield, Dolly Parton and Warren Zevon. AARON CARNES

INFO: 7:30 p.m. Kuumbwa Jazz Center, 320 Cedar St. #2, Santa Cruz. $25/gen, $40/gold. 427-2227.

 

SATURDAY 2/4

REGGAE

SISTER CAROL

The Grammy-nominated Sister Carol is a giant of reggae—a pioneering woman, a talented singer and DJ, a humanitarian and more. Born in Kingston, Jamaica, Carol got an early introduction to the genre, accompanying her father, a Radio Jamaica Rediffusion DJ, to the studio of legendary producer, Clement Coxsone Dodd. Her own hit songs include “Call Me Sister Carol” and “Cinderella.” When she was a teen, Carol moved from Kingston to Brooklyn, where she continued her rise as a reggae ambassador. On Saturday, she makes her first trip to Santa Cruz in five years. Sharing the bill with Sister Carol is vocalist and DJ Ranking Joe. CJ

INFO: 9 p.m. Moe’s Alley, 1535 Commercial Way, Santa Cruz. $17/adv, $20/door. 479-1854.

HIP-HOP

MARTY GRIMES

Berkeley rapper Marty Grimes got a lot of attention last year as opener for G-Eazy on his U.S. tour. The two grew up together, so of course Eazy was excited to share some of his success with Grimes. More recently, Grimes has been making an effort to step out of Eazy’s shadows with a string of excellent singles. He has a knack for low-key bangers with trippy futuristic vibes about them. Grimes is so determined to make a name for himself, he’s been taking the stage as headliner as of last year. His style balances a grimy Bay Area sound with sick pop-friendly production. There’s no telling how big he can get. AC

INFO: 9 p.m. Catalyst, 1011 Pacific Ave., Santa Cruz. $12/adv, $15/door. 429-4135.

 

SUNDAY 2/5

ROCK

LEMON TWIGS

Long Island duo Lemon Twigs takes what is a tad bit over-the-top about the likes of Queen, Supertramp, Wings, and Billy Joel and spins it into pop gold. The group is the brainchild of teen brothers Brian and Michael D’Addario, who hail from Hicksville, New York. Their crazy retro hairdos and outfits might seem a bit contrived, but all you need to do is give their record a listen to know their music is as heartfelt as it is outrageous. AC

INFO: 8:30 p.m. Catalyst, 1011 Pacific Ave., Santa Cruz. $12/adv, $15/door. 429-4135.

 

MONDAY 2/6

JAZZ

BRANFORD MARSALIS & KURT ELLING

What happens when one of jazz’s most commanding male vocalists joins forces with one of the most formidable quartets? Judging from Kurt Elling’s recent album with Branford Marsalis, Upward Spiral, the collaboration takes them both into gorgeous new musical realms. Whether interpreting standards like “Blue Gardenia,” Oscar Brown Jr.’s “Long As You’re Living” or Fred Hersch’s “West Virginia Rose,” they make taut, dramatic and emotionally expansive music. Featuring pianist Joey Calderazzo and bassist Eric Revis, two masters who have recorded extensively as leaders, and the brilliant 25-year-old drummer Justin Faulkner, the rhythm section plays as tough and tender as any on the scene. ANDREW GILBERT

INFO: 7 and 9 p.m. Kuumbwa Jazz, 320-2 Cedar St., Santa Cruz. $60/adv, $65/door. 427-2227.


IN THE QUEUE

GREAT AMERICAN TAXI

Americana jam band out of Colorado. Thursday at Moe’s Alley

HENRY KAPONO

Grammy-nominated Hawaiian singer-songwriter. Friday at Don Quixote’s

LAURA LOVE

Genre-defying singer-songwriter. Sunday at Don Quixote’s

LORDI

Heavy metal out of Finland. Monday at Catalyst

REBELUTION

California reggae. Tuesday and Wednesday at Catalyst

Giveaway: Tickets to Pamela Rose at Kuumbwa

0

 

In 2010, singer Pamela Rose launched “Wild Women of Song,” a multi-media show celebrating the lives and music of the women songwriters of the Tin Pan Alley era. The show toured nationally for six years. Now Rose is back with “Blues is a Woman,” a “theatrical concert” celebrating women blues artists. Paying tribute to a rich lineage from Ma Rainey to Bonnie Raitt, “Blues is a Woman” features stories, rare film footage and music from West Coast musicians Tammy Hall on piano, Ruth Davies on bass, Pat Wilder on guitar, Daria Johnson on drums and vocals, and Kristen Strom on saxophone. 


INFO: 7 p.m. Thursday, Feb. 16. Kuumbwa Jazz, 320-2 Cedar St., Santa Cruz. $25/adv, $30/door. 427-2227. WANT TO GO? Go to santacruz.com/giveaways before 11 a.m. on Friday, Feb. 10 to find out how you could win a pair of tickets to the show.

Love Your Local Band: Dos Osos

0

The five members of Dos Osos are involved in a variety of other local bands, including Ancestree, the Redlight District, Dan Juan, and the Post Street Rhythm Peddlers, to name a few. If you recognize any of those names, you’ll appreciate the unique blend of genres the members bring to the table: reggae, blues, rock, country, swing. In Dos Osos, all of that somehow combines into gritty funk, with an emphasis on their groovy rhythm section.

The name was bestowed upon them at an early Shanty Shack Brewing beer-pairing two years ago. At that time, the group existed solely as a jazz-guitar duo of founders Tyler Larson and Ravi Lamb. The pair was nameless, and asked the tipsy audience to submit ideas. Through regular gigging at house shows, Dos Osos grew and eventually evolved into its current lineup last summer.

“Our style of music is not conducive to minimalism. We needed to fill out our lineup, to lay the groundwork for solos,” says lead vocalist Larson. And with each song veering at some point into a dynamic jam, every member gets plenty of solo time onstage. Larson and Lamb are both lead guitarists in their side projects, so they switch off on bass and guitar, joined by Joe Coberly on drums, Dave Faulkner on organ and keys, and Cole Colon on tenor sax.

Despite their other engagements, Dos Osos has learned to balance their projects and not set unrealistic expectations on each others’ time and commitment level. “The whole project was never forced to begin with; all the first dozen times we played publicly together, we were just having a blast,” says Lamb. “And that’s what music should be. For a lot of projects there’s so much business involved.”


8:30 p.m. Thursday, Feb. 2, Crow’s Nest, 2218 East Cliff Drive, Santa Cruz. $5/door. 476-4560.

How Losing Obamacare Could Set Back County’s Mental Health Gains

3

Hugh McCormick was a standout UC San Diego student in 2001 when he first heard the voice in his head, and his mental collapse began. His started thinking he controlled the stock market. He thought the world revolved around him, and he was responsible for any disasters.

Then 9/11 happened. It pushed him over the edge. He drove to a Mexican desert, and talked to the wind and the birds for two weeks.

McCormick returned to Santa Cruz, his hometown, and was hospitalized. In the next four years, he was hospitalized 13 times, and shuffled between nearly every mental health center in Santa Cruz. He became a ward of the state.

He cycled through countless psychiatrists and therapists. He gained 150 pounds. He was medicated and went to group therapy. That was the extent of his treatment, he says.

“In all the facilities I was in, there was no hope. There was no mention of recovery. Recovery was not even an option,” says McCormick. “You manage your symptoms.”

Things changed when he got Section 8 housing and was able to live independently. He discovered the Santa Cruz chapter of the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), an advocacy and education group, where he still volunteers, 10 years later.

Now he’s a success story—he has a car, an apartment, a girlfriend, and a job. He’s studying journalism at Cabrillo College, and is transferring to UCSC.

For the past decade, he’s received psychiatric care from Santa Cruz County’s Health Services Agency, a publicly funded mental health program for low-income people with Medi-Cal.

His care at the county system has greatly improved in the past two years, he says.

In the past, he says, the county had a constant turnover of psychiatrists. Now it seems doctors are sticking around; for the first time, he’s had the same psychiatrist for 18 months, he says.

“It’s a far cry from what it’s been. It was ridiculous,” says McCormick. “For a while, every three months I’d get a new psychiatrist, and every other month my psychiatrist would cancel.”

McCormick isn’t alone. Change is sweeping across the county’s public and private mental health sectors, and now, reliable mental health care is accessible to more locals than ever before.

 

A NEW WORLD

Like much of the state and nation, Santa Cruz County has had a shortage of psychiatrists for years. In the past, residents who didn’t qualify for Medi-Cal couldn’t attend the county’s publicly funded mental health system, and had to wait six to 12 months to see one of the handful of local private-practice psychiatrists.

And because of an archaic insurance system which treats mental illnesses differently than other health care, psychiatric care hasn’t been covered, forcing most residents with private insurance to pay out of pocket.

But now, the traditional model has flipped upside-down. Instead of relying on a handful of local psychiatrists to serve the majority of the population, the lion’s share of mental health care is now administered by dozens of primary care doctors, advised by a handful of psychiatrists. Primary care doctors are treating illnesses like depression and prescribing psychiatric medications, and if they have questions, or a case is more severe, they can refer patients to therapists, psychiatric nurses, groups or a psychiatrist.    

This new “integrated mental health” model has rolled out in the last three years in primary care clinics across the county: at the Palo Alto Medical Foundation clinics in Santa Cruz, Aptos and Watsonville; the Santa Cruz Women’s Health Center; Santa Cruz’s East Cliff Family Health Center; the three new Kaiser Permanente offices in Santa Cruz, Scotts Valley and Watsonville; Planned Parenthood; Watsonville’s Salud Para La Gente and the county Health Services Agency’s primary care offices. But even as unprecedented progress has been made in a short time, the Trump administration’s plan to cripple, if not outright eradicate the Affordable Care Act, means thousands may be denied access to mental health care locally.

 

CHANGING THE MODEL

Dr. Bruce Block, a pediatrician, helped build the new pilot program at Santa Cruz County’s Palo Alto Medical Foundation (PAMF) clinics. Block and his team were tasked with designing a financially self-sustaining system that would provide mental health services to all 950,000 patients in the PAMF system, from Burlingame to Watsonville.

A pilot program launched in 2015 in Santa Cruz County, and has served 16,000 locals so far. Around 10 therapists and psychiatric nurses were added to four local primary care clinics, so referrals could be made on the spot. And for the first time in its 64-year history in Santa Cruz, two psychiatrists were hired by the foundation to handle severe cases and offer guidance to the 76 primary care doctors.

Something remarkable happened as a result—private insurance companies changed their policies, and covered mental health care performed at PAMF primary care clinics. Medi-Cal and MediCare enrollees who are already primary care patients were also able to access mental health care at the PAMF clinics. They make up nearly half of mental health patients seen thus far.

“Honestly, if you want to look really big picture, the shift that’s happened over the last three or four years—some of this is because of Obamacare. Some of this is because people are becoming enlightened, maybe,” says Block. “It’s that people recognize that mental health care is the same as what’s going on in other parts of your body. There’s no really good reason for differentiating between your mental health care. And that, in fact, is behind a lot of the programs developing like ours: the primary place where you should be getting your mental health care is with your primary care doctor.”

The system will spread to other PAMF clinics this year.

It still has gaps, says Block. It’s designed for people with short-term mental health needs that can be addressed in less than a dozen visits. If someone needs long-term psychiatric care, they’re better served elsewhere. People in crisis or with substance abuse disorders would also fall through the cracks, he says.

But it’s a major step. Before, when primary care doctors saw depressed patients, they’d often prescribe antidepressants they weren’t that familiar with, and felt like that was the best they could do, Block says.

“That happened a lot, where we were just clearly inadequate, and the best we could do is say, ‘Contact your insurance company and see what services are available,’” Block says. “For some people, particularly low-income or Medi-Cal, we would try to refer them to the county, and the county’s resources were woefully inadequate for a long, long time.

“One of the blessings of the last few years [is that] at the exact same time we have done this, multiple other organizations and agencies have been doing the exact same thing, and that’s been a benefit to all of us.”

 

BREAKTHROUGHS IN PUBLIC CARE

Erik Riera heads the Santa Cruz County Health Services Agency’s mental health and substance abuse division, the county’s largest mental health provider, which serves mostly low-income Medi-Cal patients.

Since arriving in Santa Cruz in 2013 from New Hampshire, where he headed the state’s mental health program, he’s driven a complete overhaul of Santa Cruz County’s services.

The program is more visible in the community, with new initiatives such as the mobile emergency response team, which sends mental health workers to city parks, schools, and sometimes people’s homes, to respond to crisis calls.

More than 35,000 Santa Cruz County residents risk losing their health insurance if the Affordable Care Act is repealed.

“We have much less reliance on having people come in to see us, and more of an approach where we’re out in the community to see them,” says Riera.

The long list of improvements under Riera’s tenure includes adding mental health workers to staff the sheriff’s office and Santa Cruz’s and Watsonville’s police departments. Often, police are the first responders to mental health crises, and a trained clinician is equipped to handle these situations.

Also, in April the county system switched from paper to electronic patient records, a big improvement, says Riera. Now patients with complex issues can receive coordinated care from multiple doctors and clinicians, because a shared common health record is used.

In 2013, the county opened its Crisis Stabilization Program on Soquel Avenue, which evaluates people who are typically brought in by police for mental health services. Before it opened, police would bring people in mental health crises to Dominican Hospital’s emergency room, which had a longer wait and wasn’t set up to manage these crises.

More improvements are coming for the county’s mental health division. It recently received a $2.5 million grant from the Central California Alliance for Health to build an outpatient mental health center on Freedom Boulevard in Watsonville.

Riera’s team is also proposing to expand its supported housing program from 42 to 55 beds, for people with mental illnesses who need in-home support. The proposal includes health monitoring devices, which would relay a patient’s vital signs to a nurse and alert health care teams to any abnormalities.

But perhaps the most significant change—because it’s part of the turning tide that’s sweeping the region—is the integrated mental health program that the county has ramped up at its primary care clinic, on Emeline Street in Santa Cruz, since 2014.

Now the county’s integrated mental health program has 15 new full-time mental health workers, including psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers, who receive 1,000 mental health visits a month. That allows the county’s health department to serve mild and moderate mental health cases, in addition to the severe cases that it traditionally handles.

“Part of the [mental health] crisis in Santa Cruz, in my opinion as a professional, has been that there has not been a lot of emphasis in growing our workforce and having viable positions for licensed clinical social workers.” — Holly Hughes, Director of Behavioral Health for the Santa Cruz Community Health Centers

“If a [primary care] physician has a patient in their exam room and they want a consultation [from a psychiatrist], those patients don’t have to wait,” says Riera. “We will see them immediately with the physician. So we have the capacity of bringing the psychiatrist and the therapist into the exam room with the patient and the physician, and to work out a plan with them. We call it a warm hand-off. So we can see them same day, same time.”

Primary care doctors can now refer patients to psychiatrists, and vice versa, says Riera.

“So you have that kind of seamless system for our patients, which I think is really important,” says Riera. “We don’t have to [send them elsewhere]. We can keep them within the system and they can also keep their same provider as well. We can add or subtract services, depending on the person’s need.”

 

THE TRUMP EFFECT

More Santa Cruz County residents have access to mental health services than ever before, partly due to an improved system, but largely because more residents have health insurance. The Affordable Care Act expanded Medi-Cal to low-income people, beyond just disabled people, and now 70,000 Santa Cruz County residents receive Medi-Cal. That’s one-quarter of the county’s population.

How that will change under Donald Trump’s presidency is yet to be determined, with Trump’s promise to repeal the Affordable Care Act.  

Since Trump’s win, Santa Cruz doctor Larry deGhetaldi has been quietly meeting with Santa Cruz County Supervisors and others to discuss the local repercussions of a possible repeal of the Affordable Care Act. DeGhetaldi, who is president of the PAMF’s Santa Cruz division, says the outlook is “bleak” and the community must respond collaboratively.  

More than 35,000 Santa Cruz County residents risk losing their health insurance if the Affordable Care Act is repealed, says deGhetaldi. That includes residents with Covered California insurance, some with Medi-Cal or MediCare, undocumented children, low-income seniors and people with disabilities who have both MediCare and Medi-Cal.

“This is going to be a tough struggle. It’s not going to happen overnight, but clearly we have to watch,” says deGhetaldi. “The greatest concern here is medical access for the 70,000 patients [in Santa Cruz County who are insured by Medi-Cal], which of those patients will lose access to healthcare.”

Santa Clara and Monterey counties might weather this better than our county,” he added in an email. “We lack a county hospital to backfill the [people who would lose their insurance]. People will suffer.”

Holly Hughes, director of behavioral health for the Santa Cruz Community Health Centers, is also worried.

Her clinics, the Santa Cruz Women’s Health Center and the East Cliff Family Health Center, serve 11,000 low-income patients, who are usually on Medi-Cal or are uninsured. These clinics, like Planned Parenthood and Watsonville’s Salud Para La Gente, receive federal reimbursements for each visit.

Hughes says that when the Affordable Care Act floodgates opened in 2014, adding 21,000 Santa Cruz County residents to Medi-Cal that year, her clinics changed their models to ensure that these new patients could access mental health care.

The first change was increasing the number of mental health providers within the primary care clinics, from less than one full-time mental health provider, to a ratio of one mental health provider for every two primary care doctors. These include therapists and social workers, to treat problems such as unstable housing or social isolation.

“All of those problem areas, now there will be a direct intervention, not from a medical provider, but from someone for whom that is their specialty, in real time,” Hughes says. “We step into the exam room and we address those problems right then and there.”

Santa Cruz Community Health Centers also hired its first psychiatrist last year, who advises the staff of primary care doctors.

The key to the model’s success is the way that community health clinics are funded—for every visit, regardless of whether the patient sees a doctor, a therapist or a social worker, the clinic is reimbursed the same amount.

“The behavioral health providers cover their salaries in two shifts per week, and so all the rest is revenue,” says Hughes. “[Social workers] are contributing more revenue to the centers than the medical providers are.”

That means that adding more mental health providers not only helps fill a gap in the community, but also creates a financially solvent model. Hughes, who sees patients as a licensed clinical social worker in addition to her director role, says her caseload has quadrupled since 2012, and the same goes for the other mental health providers at her clinics.

“I don’t think a lot of people understand that this is happening,” says Hughes. “And part of the [mental health] crisis in Santa Cruz, in my opinion as a professional, has been that there has not been a lot of emphasis in growing our workforce and having viable positions for licensed clinical social workers. Because if you look at San Francisco or San Jose or Los Angeles or San Diego, there are far more licensed clinical social worker positions.”

If the Affordable Care Act is repealed as promised under the Trump administration, those newly insured Medi-Cal residents stand to lose not only their coverage, but their access to the county’s new and improved mental health system, says Hughes.

“There’s a blind spot around the people who were really, really suffering and struggling, who did impact all of us when it comes to cost,” says Hughes. “So it’s not just my values that say that people deserve access to health care, it’s also the even more conservatively-minded folks who care about cost.

“This was a really big win in terms of that—saving costs. People aren’t going to the ER for their [mental health] needs. They’re now being better served in the primary care setting.”

Riera says that without the Affordable Care Act, the county mental health division will be unable to care for the residents who lose Medi-Cal coverage. The way the funding model works now, the federal government covers 98 percent of the costs to care for the people who are newly-insured by Medi-Cal, those who are low-income, with mild or moderate illnesses. The county only covers 2 percent of the cost.

“If the Affordable Care Act is repealed, unless people become eligible for Medi-Cal, they’ll lose their insurance completely,” says Riera. “And it doesn’t change the fact that they have significant health issues or mental health issues. But they’re likely not to be receiving services anymore because the county doesn’t have funding to serve [them].”

WILPF Honors Raging Granny Jan Harwood’s Activism

1

Looking at Jan Harwood’s silver-and-white-streaked hair, kind eyes and wrinkles (some of them from decades of smiling), an unsuspecting passerby might take the 85-year-old for a typical grandmother type.

She is a grandmother, but she’s anything but typical.

“I think I’ve been arrested 11 times,” says Harwood, with a hearty laugh. A majority of those arrests were at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, where she and others annually protest on the anniversary of the bombing of Hiroshima.

For more than 50 years, Harwood has been a vocal activist in the fight for nuclear abolition and peace—a history that will be recognized Sunday, Feb. 5, when the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF) celebrates her larger-than-life story, in an event entitled “Hats On to Jan Harwood: A Celebratory Tribute to an Unconventional Activist.”

Harwood is also a founding member of the Santa Cruz Raging Grannies, a self-described “gaggle” of women dressed in long skirts and flowery hats, who satirize popular songs to reflect progressive issues, local and nationwide.

“We started singing when life was so grim under George W. Bush,” she reminisces. “So we started singing songs with a humor in them to cheer people, and ourselves, up.”

The Grannies still perform as needed, at protests and gatherings, or sometimes on a whim, singing at the farmers market or throughout downtown. The songs pack a powerful message, but not all of them are humorous—such as the Grannie’s somber tune, “Bring ‘Em Home.”

“That one is set to the tune of ‘Country Roads,’” Harwood explains with a heavy-hearted sigh. “We sang that one a lot during the Iraq War.”  

Others know Harwood for her work with the local chapter of WILPF, which is throwing Sunday’s celebration. For the past two decades she has been an active member of the century-old organization, spending the past seven years as the local chapter’s newsletter editor.   

For a sliding scale of a minimum $15, attendees get a seat at the De Anza Park Clubhouse party, which has sing-a-longs, tribute speeches, and even a comedic roast of the always-laughing activist—plus a copy of  WILPF’s tribute book to Harwood.

“You’ve gotta keep on singing and dancing if you want a revolution,” exclaims longtime WILPF member, local activist and friend of Harwood’s, Patricia Schroeder. “And that’s our Jan! She’s always singing and will even do a two-step for you.”

For her part, Harwood says she’s “grateful to have been singled out.”

“There are so many people working forever on these important issues, trying to make the world a little better,” she says.

Harwood still maintains her blog, grannyjansantacruzblog.com, where she has already posted two songs about President Donald Trump. And she showed up in full force for the Santa Cruz installment of the Women’s March on Washington. “It was the greatest thing I’ve ever seen in Santa Cruz,” she says.

Born in 1931, Harwood began her life of activism at the age of 30. At the time, she was living with her then-husband, a sculptor, along with their three children on an isolated farm in New Jersey. To pass the time, she would read progressive magazines such as The Nation and I.F. Stone Weekly, which regularly featured articles on the growing threat of nuclear annihilation during the Cold War, something that weighed heavily on her conscience as she thought about her growing children.

She soon contacted the Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy and began her own committee chapter. A year later, Harwood went to Washington D.C. to picket the White House, during the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis. “I still tense up when I think about it,” she says with a pained sigh. “The congressmen and senators we talked to in Washington were feeling just as hopeless and scared as we were.”

After she and her husband moved to California and later divorced, Harwood decided on a career in social work. In 1969, at the age of 38, Harwood graduated from UC Berkeley with a master’s degree in social welfare and began a 30-year career in mental health care, spending 17 of those years with Santa Clara County and continuing her life of anti-nuclear activism along the way.

In 1995 she retired and moved to Santa Cruz the following year. “After retirement I’ve been able to do exactly what I’ve wanted to do,” says Harwood. “And it’s been just marvelous.”

That includes joining WILPF—which has a rich history dating back to the Women’s Suffrage Movement—as well as tabling with the Santa Cruz chapter and, of course, penning political parody songs.

A few years into the President Bush administration, Harwood joined other WILPF members in founding the Santa Cruz chapter of the Raging Grannies, which has Canadian origins dating back to the 1980s. To date, the Santa Cruz Raging Grannies have sung more than 500 politically charged, satirized songs, with Harwood as the main lyricist.

“It turns out I’m pretty good at writing them!” she laughs. “And it’s so much fun to go out and educate with our songs while bringing humor into gloomy subjects.”

Her active lifestyle and constant involvement led Harwood to write a novel in 2011, for her 80th birthday, of fictionalized mysteries involving the Raging Grannies, titled Dangerous Women: A Raging Granny Mystery with an accompanying CD of a handful of the Grannies songs. Three years later, she released the sequel, An Unconventional Murder: A Raging Granny Mystery.    

But even with all of the important issues of today’s world, such as global warming, facing humanity, Harwood still sees nuclear annihilation as the greatest hazard.

“The nearest [issue] to my heart is still getting rid of these damned nuclear weapons,” she says, emphatically. “They could wipe us out in a half an hour and then there’s no need to worry about the other stuff.”

Even though the Cold War has ended and there hasn’t been a major threat of nuclear war in years, Harwood warns the peril is still very real. During President Barack Obama’s administration, he announced $1 trillion in new spending to modernize and increase America’s nuclear arsenal over the next three decades.

“There’s a lot of old, rusting missiles around, with new ones being built,” she says. “And anyone of them can have an accident at anytime.”


‘Hats On to Jan Harwood’ is from 2 to 4 p.m., Sunday, Feb. 5 at the De Anza Clubhouse at 2395 Delaware Ave., Santa Cruz. People are encouraged to wear hats.

Could Bugs Be the Protein of the Future?

0

The Food & Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations estimates that by the year 2050, 9 billion people will call the Earth home—and that current food production will need to almost double in order to meet the nutritional needs of the population. The FAO estimates that around 1 billion people worldwide are currently chronically hungry. When you add in challenges like water shortages, climate change, overfished oceans, dwindling land availability, and increased meat production costs, the prospect of feeding future generations seems increasingly dire.

It’s time to get innovative, and one possible solution could be … insects? In 2013, the FAO released a report advocating for their consumption by humans. “Above all, it is our hope that this publication will raise awareness of the many valuable roles that insects play in sustaining nature and human life,” states the report, “and will also serve to document the contribution insects already make to diversifying diets and improving food security.”

Not only do researchers think that insects were a major dietary part of early human history (and thus perhaps the ultimate Paleo protein), the FAO also estimates that they still form part of traditional diets for as many as 2 billion people worldwide. And even though this might make most Americans bug-eyed with disgust, we eat plenty of the creepy crawlers too—without realizing it. The United States Food & Drug Administration (FDA) allows for certain amounts of insects and insect parts to be in our food. For instance, chocolate is allowed to have up to 60 insect fragments per 100 grams, peanut butter up to 30, and wheat flour up to 75 insect fragments per 50 grams. “The FDA set these action levels because it is economically impractical to grow, harvest, or process raw products that are totally free of non-hazardous, naturally occurring, unavoidable defects,” states their website. It’s impossible to completely remove all the insects from our food, especially without the use of harmful chemicals and pesticides.

If you’re still having trouble with the thought, consider that we already love to eat “sea bugs” like lobster, crab and shrimp, which along with insects, are all in the Arthropoda phylum of animals. Although the FAO has identified about 1,900 different varieties of edible insects, crickets are the most commonly consumed in America and are often thought of as the “gateway bug.” Many different companies are now offering products like protein powders, flours, energy bars, and even tortilla chips that contain cricket protein. In 2014, the business magazine Fast Company estimated that edible insects were already a $20 million industry in the U.S.—a figure predicted to grow, given their swarm of benefits for both the consumer and environment.

Nutritionally, insects are about 70 percent protein by dry weight, which is more than double that of chicken or beef. They are also a great source of fiber, vitamins and minerals like iron, zinc, and calcium, and even contain significant amounts of healthful omega-3 fatty acids. Additionally, insect exoskeletons contain chitin, a prebiotic nutrient that encourages the growth of healthy bacteria in our gut.

In terms of impact on the environment, insects far outshine traditional animal protein sources. For one thing, insects are consumed whole, so there is no waste. And although sustainability projections vary especially in a fledgling industry like this one, the farming of edible insects like crickets has the potential to be significantly more sustainable than that of pork, chicken or beef. Some industry estimates are that insects grow about 10 times faster and require 10 times less food than cattle, require hundreds or even thousands of times less water and land to grow, and also emit far fewer greenhouse gases.

However, in 2015 researchers at UC Davis published a study that examined cricket protein-to-feed ratios and found mixed results, leading them to conclude that some of the sustainability claims had been exaggerated. They said that the key to future cricket sustainability would depend largely on if farmers were able to find cost-effective ways to feed the orchestras (the name for a group of crickets) that didn’t compete with traditional livestock feed and instead used underutilized organic waste such as processed food waste and other sustainable side streams.

Review: Jewel Theatre Company’s ‘The Book Club Play’

0

When playwright Karen Zacarias worked in the retail book industry in the late ’90s, she noticed sales went through the roof every time Oprah picked a title for her TV book club. Zacarias’ response to this modern phenomenon was The Book Club Play, a brisk comedy about books, life, friendship, and attempted culture as told through the regular meetings of a neighborhood book club. Workshopped at various theatrical festivals, and popular on the regional theater circuit, Zacarias’ play now comes to Santa Cruz in an entertaining new production from Jewel Theatre Company.

The suburban living room in which the play is set becomes a microcosm for middle-class America “circa now.” The five book club members, who trade off selecting titles to read, meet to discuss their books over wine and nibblies, while their collective life begins to imitate the art of the stories they read: secrets are revealed, passions ignite, battle lines are drawn, relationships take unexpected turns. As one character observes, “Book Club is like Lord of the Flies with wine and dip!”

If you know the difference between Edith Wharton and Dan Brown, you’ll find plenty to laugh about in The Book Club Play. And even if you don’t, Kristen Brandt’s skillful direction and her adroit cast will keep you happily engaged.

This is one of the many smart and funny literary allusions in Zacarias’ text, many of whose jokes depend on our basic literary knowledge. But don’t worry, you don’t need to have actually read any of the books under discussion, and there won’t be a quiz. Basically, if you know the difference between Edith Wharton and Dan Brown, you’ll find plenty to laugh about in The Book Club Play. And even if you don’t, Kristen Brandt’s skillful direction and her adroit cast will keep you happily engaged.

To speed things along, Zacarias uses the device of an (unseen) video camera recording the book club meetings for a documentary film. Its camera eye is apparently located smack in the middle of the “fourth wall” (i.e.: the audience), giving each character a chance to introduce herself (or himself) to us. The club founder is Ana (a very funny Maryssa Wanlass), who writes a weekly column for the local paper. She’s a gracious hostess, a literary snob (she pouts when the club chooses to read Twilight), and a territorial martinet when it comes to book club “rules.”

Co-founder of the club is Will (Geoff Fiorito), Ana’s ex-fiancé, who’s remained close to Ana, and her husband, Rob (Brent Schindele)—whom Will considers his best bud. Will is on board with Ana’s literary pretensions—as the play begins, they’re meeting to discuss his recent choice, Moby Dick—while genial ex-college jock Rob is famous for never actually reading the club’s chosen books.

Newest member of the club is Lily (lively Tristan Cunningham), another columnist at the paper. Newly arrived in town, Lily is African-American, and a little more hip than the others (she reads ebooks), so Ana hopes she will make their reading selections more diverse. (The joke’s on Ana when Lily selects Twilight.) Rounding out the club is Jen (Sierra Jolene, in a sweet, wistful performance), a shy bookworm type with a surprisingly scandalous past who’s never gotten over her childhood crush on Heathcliff.

Tensions mount when Jen impulsively invites a neighbor she sees at the laundromat to a club meeting—even though Ana is livid that he hasn’t been properly “vetted.” Alex (Stephen Muterspaugh), a professor of comparative literature who’s fallen out of love with books and reading, plays devil’s advocate to Ana’s ideals: feeling out of touch with popular culture, he selects The Da Vinci Code.

The faux-video format is achieved with doc-style captions flashed above the stage, which also identify various non-club member interviewees (librarian; literary agent; stock manager at WAL-MART) who provide occasional commentary. As clubbers talk about “popular” vs. “quality,” and reach their various dramatic crises, the play is riddled with visual gags—from a rapt Jen mouthing all the words by heart when a juicy passage is read aloud, to the bananas served as snacks when they read Rob’s pick, The Return of Tarzan, to the way everyone preens for the camera.

All tech credits are up to the usual high JTC standard. This show is bound to be a bestseller, so get in line now.


The Jewel Theatre Production of ‘The Book Club Play’ will play through Feb. 19 at The Colligan Theater at The Tannery. Call 427-7506 or visit jeweltheatre.net.

Inside the New Draft of the Parks Master Plan

Santa Cruz recreation West Cliff Drive
A look at the possible future of recreation from pickleball to linear parks

Cannabis Tax May Not Cure Ailing State Budget

cannabis tax
Prop. 64 can’t close the deficit, and the new legislation raises other tax questions

Film Review: ‘Julieta’

film review Julieta
Almodóvar paints his Alice Munro-derived portrait of ‘Julieta’ in a bold, sweeping palette

Music Picks Feb 1—7

santa cruz live music - Lemon Twigs
Live music in Santa Cruz County for the week of February 1, 2017

Giveaway: Tickets to Pamela Rose at Kuumbwa

Pamela Rose
Win tickets to Pamela Rose presents "Blues is a Woman" at Kuumbwa on Thursday, Feb. 16

Love Your Local Band: Dos Osos

Dos Osos
The unique blend of genres that the members of Dos Osos bring to the table combines into gritty funk, with an emphasis on their groovy rhythm section.

How Losing Obamacare Could Set Back County’s Mental Health Gains

santa cruz mental health
A new model for treating mental health issues has transformed health care locally, but Santa Cruz County residents could lose it all

WILPF Honors Raging Granny Jan Harwood’s Activism

Jan Harwood with Raging Grannies activists protest at Santa Cruz Women's March
How Jan Harwood, a nuclear activist, found her voice as political songwriter

Could Bugs Be the Protein of the Future?

eating bugs crickets
Insects may be a more sustainable protein for future generations, with crickets leading the way

Review: Jewel Theatre Company’s ‘The Book Club Play’

Book Club Play, Jewel Theatre Company
Books, life, friendship and culture collide in entertaining ‘Book Club Play’
17,623FansLike
8,845FollowersFollow