.Letter to the Editor: You Had One Job

Re: “Rail Fail” (GT, 5/12): To the Regional Transportation Commissioners: Disappointed is the least I can say, damn it!

I was shamed and desolated when six of you irresponsibly stalemated the due and proper vote of your peers to accept your staff’s planning document and refused to authorize a $17 million Caltrans grant for design, engineering, and environmental review.

You had one job on April Fool’s Day. You failed. You six renegades voted in collusion against the plain and simple public interest, the public good, and the public institution for which you are responsible.

You, Commissioners McPherson, Mulhearn, and Petersen up and flipped the votes you had cast just weeks before to accept your staff’s work toward a future electric passenger rail transit system.

Why? Tell us the truth. We’ve heard all your perfidiously coordinated talking points. We’re not impressed. Your obstinacy is spectacularly selfish, short-sighted, and contrary to our public policy framework. It sure looks like there are hidden agendas and ulterior motives at work.

secure document shredding

What did it take for the privateering Greenway Godfather to turn you against the public? Was it promises, or threats? Bribery, or extortion?

Reason is not involved. None of you tergiversators have articulated any compelling rationale not to proceed with your professional staff’s work. The results of that work would answer many of the objections anti-rail transit partisans have raised. And the State of California would have paid for it, not local taxpayers.

You should be supporting your staff in planning for a public rail transit system and its companion pedestrian/bicycle pathway, and Metro bus connections. This will be nothing but good for all of us. It will enhance local commerce, and local tax revenues. It will reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It will reduce neighborhood traffic. It will reduce parking demands.

It is plainly false to say, “We can’t afford it!” We haven’t even designed it yet. We know that most of the cost will be externalized by state and federal funding. If a 1/2-cent or less countywide sales tax increase is required to fund part of the cost, say in 2030, then the project will not proceed without a vote to approve it.

 Whatever offer you couldn’t refuse the Greenway Godfather may have made, I hope you three vote-flippers will consider the very distinct appearance of political corruption, and stop trying to subvert the long-term public interest in developing new passenger rail transit systems.

Get back on track, people, do the right thing!

Jim Weller | Capitola

This letter does not necessarily reflect the views of Good Times.

To submit a letter to the editor of Good Times: Letters should be originals—not copies of letters sent to other publications. Please include your name and email address to help us verify your submission (email address will not be published). Please be brief. Letters may be edited for length, clarity and to correct factual inaccuracies known to us. Send letters to le*****@go*******.sc


  1. I really can’t believe Good Times and TPG published this letter without fact-checking the source. Even the RTC had to publish for it’s first time in it’s history a clarification of the issues when people like Mr. Weller, a very well-paid land title consultant has continued to push these myths about Caltrans funding. From the RTC clarification statement:

    “Misunderstanding #1: The RTC has given up $17 million in funding offered by the State for environmental analysis of electric passenger rail on the Santa Cruz Branch Rail Line.
    In fact, the State has not awarded any funds to the RTC for environmental review of electric passenger or any other transit option on the Santa Cruz Branch Rail Line. The State expressed support for the RTC seeking such funding from State sources that are competitive.”

    The fact is, rail groups and their special interest benefactors have to admit it’s game over. The TCAA business plan showed there was no money for rail and the commission rightfully so called for an end to this endless cycle of studies to justify rail. It’s time to revitalize Metro, rail bank and open the corridor to active transportation and GET SANTA CRUZ MOVING.

  2. Thank you Jack—besides the other Myths FORT and supporters have been found to be pushing for the last few years and still. Jim Weller likes to impress with his Word Salad without really saying anything or stating facts. FORT knows that its over. Barry Scott has even said that Passenger Rail in Santa Cruz is circling the drain! LOL

    I wonder why Good Times never posted my response to FORT member Frank Rimicci Jr.’s erroneous Rail Support letter of May 12, 2021. It had similar Myths being perpetuated.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Good Times E-edition Good Times E-edition
music in the park san jose