IN PHOTOS: Punk Rockers Wavves Crash Felton Music Hall

It’s had been nearly two years since popular indie punk rockers Wavves had performed live in front of an audience. Like a pack of hungry lions, the L.A.-based group has been galloping across the country performing just about every night, feeding off their fans, fueled by that rock and roll energy that’s been dormant for so long. On Oct. 1, they hit the road hard, and they’ll keep going until Thanksgiving. 

Sunday, Nov. 14, brought Wavves to Santa Cruz County, where they made their Felton Music Hall debut. Good Times photog Tarmo Hannula was on hand to capture the group’s beautiful and infectious fury. 

Los Angeles-based openers, Cuffed Up, delivered polished punk rock highlighted by smoking lead guitar and vocals.
Wavves’ frontman Nathan Williams hypnotizes the audience.
Bassist Stephen Pope’s crop of hair follows the direction of the music.
That symbiotic energy flows back and forth between the band and the audience. Check out where Wavves perform next.

Capitola’s Temporary Outdoor Dining Program Could End Soon

Few people are taking advantage of Capitola’s outdoor dining program put in place to buoy restaurants during the pandemic.

According to a report by the city of Capitola, the 11 restaurants in the small Santa Cruz County tourist hub that participate in the outdoor dining program saw about 66 diners choose to sit outside over a four-day survey period. City staff, according to the report presented to Capitola City Council Wednesday, monitored customer traffic in the afternoon and evenings.

Weekends saw the largest number of customers enjoy their meals outdoors.

This report aims to give the city a better idea of just how necessary outdoor dining is for local restaurants. Based on the low numbers of outdoor diners, city staff recommends ending the temporary outdoor dining ordinance in January. A permanent outdoor dining program is in the works, with the city hoping to get it up and running by summer of 2022.

But City Councilman Jacques Bertrand raised concerns over outdoor dining programs taking up valuable parking space. With parking in high demand, seeing empty dining tables in parking spots is frustrating for residents and visitors, Bertrand said.

“People come and see unused parking spaces, and I think that sets the wrong image for Capitola,” Bertrand said.

Some restaurant owners and Capitola residents urged the council to keep the emergency ordinance in place past January 2022. They say applying for new permits, and adhering to new outdoor dining requirements will be costly and time-consuming.

“Now is not the time to increase operating costs of businesses. The service industry was one of the hardest hit industries in the pandemic. Outdoor dining is key to recovery,” wrote Doug and Ann Marie Conrad, owners of Capitola Wine Bar.

Capitola Mayor Yvette Brooks directed city staff to survey the restaurant owners who are part of the emergency outdoor dining program ahead of the city’s Nov. 23 meeting. It’s at that meeting that council members will decide whether to offer another extension for the emergency outdoor dining program and hear recommendations for the timeline and requirements for the permanent program.

Most Californians Say Economic Inequality is Getting Worse

By Melissa Montalvo, CalMatters

Seven in 10 Californians say the gap between rich and poor is getting larger, according to a statewide survey released Tuesday. 

The survey, conducted last month by the nonpartisan think tank, Public Policy Institute of California, polled 2,292 adult Californians about their opinions on the state’s economic outlook, financial security, job security, among other topics. 

“Solid majorities of Californians say the gap between rich and poor in their region is increasing and that children growing up in California today will be worse off than their parents,” said Mark Baldassare, PPIC president and CEO. 

Overall, Californians have mixed views of the state’s economic outlook for the next 12 months. About 47% said they think good times are ahead, while 52% say they foresee bad times. Taking a closer look at racial/ethnic groups, a majority of Latinos (57%) and Black Americans (54%) say good times are ahead, compared to about four in 10 Asian Americans (43%) and whites (39%).

Survey results also vary by region.

Half of residents in Los Angeles and the San Francisco Bay Area are optimistic, while majorities in the Central Valley, the Inland Empire, and Orange/San Diego are pessimistic. 

About 64% of survey respondents say they think inequality will be larger by the year 2030.

Californians share their views on employment, education, and financial security

The PPIC survey found that most Californians — about 78% — are satisfied with their current financial situation, and 21% said they are very satisfied. However, people of color, those with less formal education, and lower-income Californians are less likely to be very satisfied financially. 

While one in six say they are worse off than a year ago, most Californians say they are doing about as well as they were a year ago, and about one in five say they are better off.

About 16% of Californians say they or someone in their household has received food from a food bank in the past year, and 27% received unemployment benefits.

Those making less than $20,000 per year are nearly three times more likely than those making $80,000 or more to say they are worse off. 

The survey also asked numerous questions about job and financial security. 

More than one in four Californians say they or someone in their household has had their work hours reduced or pay cut, or 28%, and about two in 10 know someone who lost their job in the past 12 months, while nearly half — about 49% — have worked from home. 

Most Californians polled said the availability of well-paying jobs is a problem in their part of the state, and 22% consider it a big problem. Residents in the Inland Empire and Orange/San Diego are slightly more likely to say this is a big problem than those in other regions.

In California’s central San Joaquin Valley, about 61% of residents polled view the availability of well-paying jobs as “somewhat of a problem,” while 21% view the availability of well-paying jobs as a “big problem.” 

Most employees say they are at least somewhat satisfied with their jobs. About 37% of employed adults said they are very satisfied with their jobs, while 53% are somewhat satisfied. About 60% of adults say that their jobs provide opportunities for growth and advancement. 

Still, not everyone feels this way. 

“About one in five residents say the lack of well-paying jobs in their region is a big problem and is making them seriously consider moving out of state,” Baldassare said. 

More than one in four Californians, or 27%, worry daily or almost every day about saving for retirement and the cost of housing. Two in 10 Californians worry about the amount of debt they have, and 19% worry about health care costs for them and their family. 

The survey also asked questions about how Californians feel about worker organization. About eight in 10 adults completely (43%) or somewhat (38%) agree with the idea that it is important for workers to organize so that employers do not take advantage of them. 

While workers across the state participated in strikes during October, recent reporting by CalMatters found that few of California’s working poor get the chance to vote on unions.

Wide support for government safety net programs

Survey results show that an overwhelming majority of Californians support expanding safety net programs. About seven in 10 adults, or 72% and 71% of likely voters, favor expanding eligibility and payments of the earned income tax credit for lower-income working families and individuals. 

At the state and local levels, many groups have been advocating for the permanent extension of the child tax credit. 

There were several questions related to workplace benefits and training support. 

More than eight in 10 adults and likely voters favor increasing government funding for job training programs; solid majorities across partisan groups and regions favor this increase so that more workers have the skills they need for today’s jobs. 

Nearly two in three Californians—or 65% adults and 60% likely voters—support a government policy to make college tuition-free at both public two-year and four-year colleges. Furthermore, about six in 10 Californians support a government policy that would eliminate college debt. 

Support for these programs varies depending on racial/ethnic and ideological lines. Democrats and independents largely support these policies, while majorities of Republicans oppose both. Across racial/ethnic groups, whites are the least likely to support these policies, though nearly half are in favor. Support is lowest among college graduates, those 55 and older, and those with incomes of $80,000 or more. 

About three in four support the government offering a Medicare-like health insurance plan, where Americans can purchase instead of private insurance. An overwhelming majority of Californians, or 76%, favor increasing government funding to make childcare programs available for more lower-income working parents. 

Melissa Montalvo is a reporter with The Fresno Bee and a Report for America corps member. This article is part of The California Divide, a collaboration among newsrooms examining income inequity and economic survival in California.

How the Supreme Court’s Gun Case Could Affect California

By Soumya Karlamangla, The New York Times

(California Today)

The Supreme Court appears likely to rule against a New York law that imposes strict limits on who can carry guns in public, which could radically reshape the nation’s relationship with guns.

This is undoubtedly a big deal — the court’s first major Second Amendment case in more than decade — but you might be wondering what it has to do with California.

Well, California is one of a few states with concealed carry restrictions similar to New York’s. So the fate of our state’s law, which greatly limits the number of people here with weapons in public, hinges on the Supreme Court decision.

“If the New York law fails, then basically, automatically California’s law is also invalid,” Gabriel Chin, a law professor at the University of California, Davis, told me.

Such a change would probably lead to a major jump in the number of Californians able to carry guns in public, particularly in places where concealed carry permits are currently rare, such as the Bay Area, Los Angeles and San Diego.

How we got here

Since the early 1980s, states have been relaxing gun laws and making it easier for people to carry loaded weapons in public.

Most Americans now live in a state that either doesn’t require a permit to carry a concealed weapon or that grants one to anyone who meets basic criteria, such as passing a background check and being older than 21.

Between 1999 and 2016, the number of Americans with concealed carry permits skyrocketed to more than 14.5 million from 2.7 million.

But about seven states — home to a quarter of the U.S. population — have retained laws that make it tougher to obtain the permits.

In California and New York, for example, people who want to carry a weapon in public must show a specific reason they need a gun more than the average person, such as an ongoing threat to their safety. This “good cause” criteria gives officials discretion to deny concealed carry permits if they don’t think the applicant deserves one.

And that is what’s at issue in the Supreme Court case — whether New York’s limitations on who can obtain concealed carry permits violates the Second Amendment. The plaintiffs in the case received licenses to carry weapons for hunting but were denied permission to keep guns on them at all times because they couldn’t prove they had a special need for them.

Similar gun lawsuits have been taken up by lower courts in recent years, but the Supreme Court has declined to weigh in until now, following recent appointments of conservative justices.

“The question has to be, ‘Why did they do so now?’” Chin said. “And I think the answer is that now they’re confident about how it’s going to come out.”

How this could play out in California

Currently, about 120,000 Californians have concealed carry permits. But they’re heavily concentrated in San Bernardino, Shasta, Fresno, Orange, Sacramento and Kern counties.

That’s because law enforcement officials in each county determine who can receive a permit. In Fresno County, where more people are authorized to carry a weapon than anywhere else in the state, the sheriff sometimes carries the paper applications around and hands them out to encourage people to apply, according to The Fresno Bee.

By contrast, in San Francisco, there are only two active concealed carry permits in the whole city. And while Los Angeles County accounts for more than 25% of the state’s population, it’s home to less than half a percent of California’s concealed carry permits.

If the New York law (and therefore the California law) is found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, the California Legislature is likely to try to find other ways to regulate guns, experts say. Intense political will here has led California to enact more gun control laws than any other state.

But still, without a “good cause” provision, California counties would in most cases be unable to deny concealed carry permits to people who want them.

“The fact that there are just a handful of permits in San Francisco County and Los Angeles County isn’t because of a lack of desire for concealed carry permits — it’s because of the restrictive policy,” Chin said. “I think there’s a high probability that in the near future we’re going to have a lot more permits.”

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

Utility Regulator Turns Up Heat on PG&E After Recent Outages

A California energy regulator has become so vexed with troubled power provider PG&E following months of planned and unplanned outages it’s started to crackdown.

In a Nov. 1 letter to Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors Chair Bruce McPherson, California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) President Marybel Batjer says she’s requiring the company to supply more information about how it will fix problems caused by Fast Trip settings meant to prevent wildfires.

“I share your concerns and frustration about the significant impact that these outages are having on customers,” she said, adding she’s not happy about the poor job PG&E has been doing communicating with customers, either. “Fast Trip outages are more than a matter of inconvenience, they are a life and safety issue.”

PG&E says it likely caused the Dixie Fire, this year, when a tree came into contact with some of its equipment, and the utility pleaded guilty to 84 counts of involuntary manslaughter and one felony fire-starting count in connection to the 2018 Camp Fire.

Last week, the company announced it had reached a $125 million settlement with CPUC for the 2019 Kincade Fire that scorched 77,758 acres.

But in a Sept. 29 letter to the CPUC, McPherson, whose district includes areas of the Santa Cruz Mountains where hundreds of homes were destroyed in last year’s CZU Lightning Complex fires, says the county believes PG&E’s isn’t responding to wildfire risk properly.

“We understand that the Fast Trip sensors are a response to the justified pressure PG&E is receiving for their equipment triggering fires throughout the state, causing the loss of life and structures,” he wrote. “While we support efforts to improve safety, it is hard to believe this Fast Trip approach (and the extreme sensitivity that triggers shutoffs) is anything other than an overcorrection. We would instead encourage PG&E to prioritize hardening the lines in these areas including undergrounding.”

After the sparking of the Dixie Fire, PG&E announced it was going to bury several power lines, something it previously said was too expensive.

According to a recent Wall Street Journal article, this took CPUC by surprise, since no one in the agency had a conversation with anyone at the utility about the idea.

It would cost PG&E just as much to underground its power lines as the entire company is worth, according to the article.

PG&E has, however, been in talks with the regulator so it can charge customers more for electricity.

Since PG&E turned up the sensitivity on its lines in late July, there’ve been 69 outages attributed to the action across Santa Cruz County, which includes Los Gatos customers in the Santa Cruz Mountains (for circuits named “Camp Evers-2105,” “Camp Evers-2106,” “Big Basin-1102,” “Ben Lomond-0401,” “Rob Roy-2104,” “Green Valley-2101” and “Paul Sweet-2106”).

According to PG&E, the circuit that delivers electricity to Los Gatos customers at the Summit, “Camp Evers-2105,” accounted for 19 of these. The other circuit that serves Los Gatos, referred to as “Los Gatos-1106,” has experienced nine outages in that same time period.

So, there were 78 outages in Santa Cruz County and Los Gatos alone thanks to the new setting, which is officially called the Enhanced Powerline Safety Settings program.

But there haven’t been any of these outages since Oct. 22, since PG&E put its equipment back to normal settings just before the October storm. Afterward, company officials affirmed their decision to nix the program, for now, based on low fire danger.

The outages are only adding to the “trauma” Santa Cruz Mountains residents have faced since last year’s fires, McPherson said in his letter to CPUC, and are in addition to Public Safety Power Shutoffs, where PG&E blacks out a section of the grid it worries might not be able to survive a weather event without sparking a blaze.

“To make matters worse, PG&E’s leadership has failed to adequately communicate with residents about what is happening,” he said. “Only after more than six weeks of our repeated requests to host a community meeting with residents did the utility finally agree to host meetings on the afternoon and evening of Sept. 23.”

McPherson asked the CPUC to conduct an investigation of PG&E’s Fast Trip procedures, its “lack of adequate communication” and how the company plans to prevent “extreme” blackouts.

Batjer replied to say she’d sent a letter to PG&E on Oct. 25 to order the utility to “take immediate action to reduce and mitigate customer impacts and ensure that all communities who may be impacted by Fast Trip are better informed and supported.”

The company will provide additional details about the heightened-sensitivity grid in a 2022 Wildfire Mitigation Plan Update, she said.

“In addition, I am requiring PG&E to provide monthly reports to the Director of our Safety Enforcement Division,” she said. “The CPUC will also continue to gather and analyze information regarding PG&E’s implementation of, and communication on, Fast Trip and will take any enforcement actions as appropriate.”

In an Oct. 28 webinar with Santa Cruz County residents, Mark Quinlan, PG&E’s vice president of wildfire mitigation operations, said recent rains brought a much-needed reprieve from the threat of forest fires.

“We really, really needed it,” he said. “But if you were a customer who experienced a power outage during that event, thank you for your patience while our dedicated women and men out there worked around the clock to restore all our customers.”

He again touted a nearly 50% drop in the number of fires it caused since June, which he said proves the Fast Trip approach paid off.

“It came at a cost, and that cost was unacceptable reliability performance,” he said. “We owned that, and we pledged to get better. And we have gotten better.”

Quinlan admitted the company was getting power restoration time estimates wrong more than a quarter of the time, but he said it’s now giving accurate predictions 92% of the time. Plus, he added, outages are getting fixed 33% more quickly.

However, half of customers who message PG&E still aren’t getting a response after two days, according to company data.

Mayra Tostado, a PG&E spokesperson, says PG&E is taking feedback from the utility regulator seriously.

“We agree with the CPUC—and we have shared with our customers on public webinars—that our initial customer communications fell short, and reliability on some circuits has been unacceptably poor,” she said, adding PG&E is working to tweak its Fast Trip program for the future. “We have also taken proactive steps to improve reliability, while also maintaining the wildfire mitigation benefits the program offers.”

Barba, Quiroz-Carter Vie for Vacant Watsonville City Council Seat

WATSONVILLE—Hundreds of Watsonville voters in District 2 received a ballot at their home this week, officially kicking off the home stretch of the Dec. 7 special election that will determine who will fill the vacant Watsonville City Council seat.

Residents in that district will have two choices to represent their area: Frank Barba or Vanessa Quiroz-Carter.

Both candidates are relative newcomers to politics, but have deep roots in Watsonville. 

Barba, 42, is the son of Mexican immigrants and a longtime resident of Watsonville who holds an associate degree from Cabrillo College and works for Jacob’s Heart Children’s Cancer Support Services as a medical transport driver.

Quiroz-Carter, 35, is also a longtime Watsonville resident who serves as an adjunct professor at Hartnell College. She holds a bachelor’s degree in English literature from UC Berkeley and a master’s in communication from Cal State East Bay.

District 2 encompasses several neighborhoods east of Main Street through Beck Street—including the communities surrounding Watsonville High School—as well as portions of California Street and Palm and Hill avenues.

The victor will represent the district through 2024.

Backing

The election was set into motion after Aurelio Gonzalez stepped down because of a family health emergency in September. Gonzalez has since endorsed Quiroz-Carter, who he defeated in last year’s November election, as the candidate he would like to see fill the vacancy.

Quiroz-Carter has also been endorsed by five of the current Watsonville City Council members and numerous community leaders such as Santa Cruz County Office of Education Superintendent Faris Sabbah, retired Santa Cruz County Clerk Gail Pellerin and former Watsonville City Councilman and vice-mayor Ramon Gomez. She also holds endorsements from several democratic clubs and organizations throughout the county, including the Pajaro Valley Cesar Chavez Democratic Club (PV Dems) and the Santa Cruz County Democratic Party.

Barba says he has been endorsed by Santa Cruz County Supervisor Greg Caput, Watsonville City Councilwoman Ari Parker, Pajaro Valley Unified School District Trustee Oscar Soto and community leader Barbie Gomez. He also holds an endorsement from County Office of Education Trustee Ed Acosta, who is listed as treasurer for his campaign in the latest financial statements submitted to the Watsonville City Clerk’s Office.

As of Nov. 1, Barba has raised $650 for his campaign with small contributions coming from local residents such as Dan Carrillo, who owns Pajaro Valley Printing. 

As of Nov. 8, Quiroz-Carter has amassed $2,900 in campaign contributions. City Councilman Lowell Hurst, PV Dems co-chair Celeste Gutierrez and the PV Dems are her largest contributors, each giving $500. She has also received $250 from the chair of the Friends of the Rail & Trail board, Faina Segal.

Experience

Though neither candidate has held public elected office, both have spent time on the Watsonville Parks and Recreation Commission.

Barba, who says that he grew up with aspirations of holding office, says that experience has helped him understand how government works. It’s also helped mold his leadership skills, which he considers one of his biggest strengths.

“I think I’m more ready than ever [to be in office],” Barba said.

Along with her time on the Parks Commission, Quiroz-Carter has also been a part of the Santa Cruz County Women’s Commission and she is the vice-president of the board for nonprofit Families In Transition. She says that those roles have prepared her for the tasks that will be put before her if she is elected to the City Council.

“It’s already things that I’ve been doing for about a year,” Quiroz-Carter said. “I’m bringing a lot of leadership and a lot of that experience into this role.”

Housing and Economy

Barba says that while walking the neighborhood over the past two months residents have highlighted three key issues: traffic safety, parking and homelessness. For the latter, which he says is the most complex issue of the three, he says he would like to support more avenues for rehabilitation so that those who want to move into housing have a route to follow. He also said that homelessness is a product of the omnipresent housing crisis that is affecting every Watsonville resident.

If elected, he says he would promote programs and housing developments that would help Watsonville residents go from renting to homeownership. The low housing stock, he says, is a big reason why rents are too high and why owning a home is unattainable for many residents.

“I wouldn’t want people to rent for the rest of their life,” he said. “Let’s give them a path to become a homeowner so that we don’t lose those people to Los Banos, we don’t lose those people to Salinas, we don’t lose them to Soledad, we don’t lose them to Hollister.”

When asked about housing, Quiroz-Carter said that the city must update and clarify its planning documents so that developers can confidently move forward with their projects and build needed housing. She also said that the city must take advantage of some of the recent state bills that streamline housing development such as Senate Bill 35, which takes away some of local government’s power, so that affordable housing projects can be constructed.

“We need to do things that attract different developments that benefit our existing residents,” Quiroz-Carter said.

It will also be key, Quiroz-Carter says, to place that housing close to services, businesses and public transportation—particularly in downtown—to promote a strong economy and allow the city to reinvest added revenue into programs helping youth and small businesses.

“We can build a Watsonville that promotes sustainability, builds a strong sense of community, creates and attracts jobs and really builds a city where we can comfortably work and thrive,” she said.

Barba says he is “very pro-business” and would like to cut down on restrictions placed upon businesses. He is also in favor of welcoming large employers, such as Costco, that will boost revenues and bring jobs. He says that he often hears people complain about the lack of businesses within city limits, particularly in downtown.

“A lot of people still have to go out of town to buy stuff,” he said. “We can’t shop here because we don’t have the stores that we need … The trends that are going on, we’ve kind of stayed behind while other towns are progressing.”

Public Safety

Barba says that he is against taking funds away from the police department, and would instead like to invest more funding into the city’s police officers so that Watsonville Police Department can increase its retention rate. 

He did say, however, that he is all for having a third-party auditor look at WPD’s finances to see how they can improve the department.

“We need police officers. I know there has been a movement, but we’re a different community,” he said. “We want to pay our bills, pay our utilities, pay our water, but we want safety. We want to be protected. If we have an issue, we want to be able to call and have them arrive.”

Quiroz-Carter says that police departments should have the support of city leaders, but that it is key to not hand officers responsibilities that they are not trained for. She highlighted the work of the Ad-Hoc Committee on Policing and Social Equity for continuing the conversation around what role police should play in a community, and finding ways to improve the department.

She says she would like to implement several of the committee’s recommendations and continue those conversations around policing.

“I really want to find creative solutions for funding and projects that invest in community programs that provide community members with more jobs, more skills and more of a sense of community—investing back into the community,” she said. “I think that, most of all, this shouldn’t be an either-or debate as it has been framed by some in the past.”


For information about the Dec. 7 special election, visit votescount.com or bit.ly/3c8OT3c.

Esperanza de Valle Celebrates 40 Years

Four decades ago, Janet Johns came to Watsonville as a new teacher, hoping to start a dance company with her former roommate from San Jose State, Frances Urbina. 

It wasn’t long before Johns’ fellow teachers in the Pajaro Valley Unified School District expressed interest in learning how to teach traditional Mexican dances. Johns and Urbina began teaching through an after school program at Hall District Elementary.

“Then we were like, ‘Why don’t we also perform?’” recalled Johns. “Make this a real group.”

Esperanza de Valle (EDV), as it is now called, received a grant from the Arts Council Santa Cruz County in 1980. With the funds, the folklórico group started purchasing outfits and planning for its first show.

Over the past 40 years, the group has increased in numbers and influence. It is entirely run by volunteers, who also raise funds to pay for outfits, travel and bring in more instructors. In 1996, they received a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation, which allowed them to take a team of dancers to work with dance communities in Veracruz, Mexico.

“That was amazing,” said Johns, who is now the group’s artistic director along with assistant director Ruby Vasquez. “They chose one group from New York City, one from Mexico City … and us, in Watsonville.”

This weekend, EDV will celebrate its 40th Anniversary with two special performances. The Cabrillo College Dance Department, where Johns currently teaches, will present the show at the Crocker Theater in Aptos on Saturday and Sunday, highlighting four decades of Esperanza’s artistic programming in Santa Cruz County. 

Johns began dancing at San Jose State, where she met master instructors from Mexico, some of whom would return to teach EDV students. Many of the group’s signature danzas, sones and huapangos were choreographed and taught by the masters. 

“My first master … learning from him, that’s where I really discovered the importance of working with masters to keep things authentic,” Johns said. “Everything we learned was due to bringing in masters of these traditions, or we have traveled to meet them ourselves.”

This is why the troupe has decided to dedicate its 40th celebration to these instructors, Johns said.

“We really want to dedicate this show to them,” she said. “Two of whom we lost last year during Covid. They passed within months of each other; it was devastating. They taught us so much.”

The show will feature music, dance and storytelling from various regions and states of Mexico, including an original choreo-drama, “Los Dos Hermanos” which fuses dance and drama through traditional and cultural themes, directed by Eduardo Robledo. Cuatro Con Tres will provide live music.

Johns said that Covid closures were difficult on the group. They Zoomed every week, and member Alex Santana compiled a series of videos of the dancers performing at home. Once things began opening up, they filmed outdoor projects at Santana’s home with other organizations such as the Watsonville Film Festival.

“We were just waiting for when we could get back into a dance studio,” she said. “Now we’re finally back together, learning and creating these beautiful dances. We’re all masked … which is a different way to dance, but at least we’ll be wearing our beautiful outfits.”

EDV is continuing its 40th anniversary celebration into 2022, working with the city of Watsonville to hopefully hold an outdoor performance at the plaza. 

“We’re just looking forward to dancing together again for everyone,” Johns said.

“Celebrando 40 Años de Esperanza” will be held at the Crocker Theater, 6500 Soquel Dr. (lower campus), Saturday at 8pm and Sunday at 3pm. Tickets are $20 for general admission, $16 for seniors, $10 for students and $10 for children. Click here for information.

New Book Chronicles History of Local Lumber Industry

It was a moment of sheer luck that historian and author Derek R. Whaley, while doing research for his own book, discovered the work of the late Ronald G. Powell. 

Whaley owns local publishing company Zayante Publishing and is the author of the Santa Cruz Trains series, which documents the rise and fall of the railroading industry in Santa Cruz County. He’d been having a difficult time finding history of the Loma Prieta Branch that ran from Aptos through the Forest of Nisene Marks. So, he reached out to UC Santa Cruz Librarian Emeritus Stanley D. Stevens, who sent over a large PDF containing one of Powell’s manuscripts.

“I was like, ‘What is this thing?’” Whaley said. “Powell was so incredibly thorough, so detailed. I was like, ‘This is crazy!’ And I immediately asked Stanley for more.”

“The Reign of the Lumber Barons” chronicles the golden age of the lumber industry in the hills above Aptos and Corralitos at the end of the 19th century. Through first-hand accounts, newspaper clippings, and more, the text examines how tens of thousands of old-growth trees were systematically harvested to use in the development of the Bay Area, starting in the 1860s.

Powell, a historian and author himself, was often found in the UCSC library in the 1980s and ‘90s, poring over maps and texts, compiling histories as he went. The manuscript was intended to be part of Powell’s history series about Martina Castro’s Rancho Soquel Augmentation, a Mexican land grant given in 1833 that covers present-day Santa Cruz County. 

Whaley, who in 2014 had just moved to New Zealand to work on his PhD in Late Medieval French Chronicles, saw an opportunity to preserve Powell’s work and do research for his own book.

“What Powell wrote was a chronicle, which is what I’d been working on for the past four years for my thesis,” Whaley explained. “And here’s a guy who did it 30 years ago, about Santa Cruz history.”

Whaley published the first of Powell’s manuscripts as “The Tragedy of Martina Castro” last year, focused primarily on mid-county history. “The Reign of the Lumber Barons” uncovers stories of people living in the logging towns in places such as Loma Prieta and Valencia, pulling in history from Aptos, Corralitos and parts of Watsonville.

Could Scotts Valley be Reunified?

A decade after Scotts Valley was split in two by redistricting, that city could be “reunified” under a proposal introduced to the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors Tuesday.

The proposal is among several recommendations the board is considering as the county redraws its supervisorial boundaries during its decennial redistricting process. 

During redistricting, jurisdictions use the recent census to see how their populations have grown over the past 10 years, and then redraw the supervisors’ boundary lines to make the populations equal in each district. County officials are looking to make changes to the five districts to evenly distribute its population of 271,350.

The maps originally presented to the supervisors did so by placing 54,270 residents in each district. The maps suggested moving 491 people in Watsonville’s Apple Hill District from the 2nd to the 4th District, and 613 people from the 3rd to the 1st District in the area of Brommer Street and East Harbor.

But those maps could change under the proposal to reunify Scotts Valley, which was suggested by Scotts Valley Mayor Derek Timm and forwarded by 2nd District Supervisor Zach Friend. The latter said the move would meet redistricting guidelines of keeping “communities of interest” intact.

“I think that from a populational standpoint it makes sense,” Friend said.

If approved, the shift in Scotts Valley would move about 2,300 people from the 1st to the 5th District, said Assistant County Administrator Elissa Benson.

Timm’s proposal also moves a small wedge of Midtown Santa Cruz into the 1st District from the 3rd.

Timm says that the last redistricting process split Scotts Valley along Highway 1, and came despite outcry from its citizens. He says the move has been perplexing for the small city, which suddenly had lines drawn through its police and fire department boundaries, as well as its water and school districts.

“One of the missions of redistricting is to keep communities of interest together,” he said. “If you’re going to try to achieve the purpose of redistricting, the experiment around chopping Scotts Valley up hasn’t served any purpose.”

The shift also left Scotts Valley with two separate supervisors, Timm said, despite its small size. The importance of having just one became apparent, he says, during last year’s CZU Lightning Complex fires when the city became a staging area for emergency crews battling the blaze.

“Splitting a portion of our residents from the 5th District only serves to dilute our ability to select a Supervisor to represent our community,” Timm said.

Supervisor Manu Koenig, whose district includes half of Scotts Valley, says reunification was one of the biggest issues he heard during his campaign, and agrees with the proposal.

“Mayor Timm’s proposal ultimately does a pretty great job of balancing communities’ interest and population equality,” Koenig said. 

Under state law, jurisdictions when redistricting must hold at least four public hearings, and give residents an opportunity to weigh in. In addition, any draft maps must be made public seven days before they are brought to the Board of Supervisors for adoption. The meetings must be public and must be recorded.

The matter will return to the supervisors on Nov. 16, when the supervisors will consider adopting the final map.

Watsonville Mayor Opposes Affordable Housing Project

The Watsonville City Council approved an agreement with the County of Santa Cruz on a proposed 80-unit affordable apartment complex that, if approved by the county supervisors, would break ground in early 2022.

MidPen Housing, a nonprofit developer, is leading the project between Atkinson Lane and Brewington Avenue on land in the unincorporated county near the city limits. It is the second phase of the Pippin Orchards development that was completed off Atkinson Lane in 2019.

The decision before the City Council Tuesday was not whether it would support the construction. The memorandum of understanding (MOU) only laid out which jurisdiction—the county or city—would be responsible for the services provided to the development and who would collect certain fees.

If approved by the county supervisors, the city, according to the MOU, would collect more than $1 million in impact fees in exchange for providing its services such as police, fire, water and solid waste. The MOU also states that the city would annex the property when completed.

The project, according to MidPen Director of Housing Development, Joanna Carmen, would also bring roughly $500,000 in fees to the Pajaro Valley Unified School District.

County staff said the item will likely go before the supervisors on Dec. 7.

Of the 80 units, 39 of them would be deed-restricted to farmworker families, 37 would be filled through vouchers from the county’s Housing Authority and all of them would be listed between 30-60% of the area’s median income.

The majority of the council supported the project, but Mayor Jimmy Dutra, whose 6th District represents neighborhoods on both sides of the proposed construction, had several concerns about its development and cast the lone ‘no’ vote against the agreement.

He had apprehensions about the additional traffic flowing through Brewington Avenue, a sleepy neighborhood of mostly upscale, single-family homes, the small amphitheater planned for the center of the property and the ongoing costs to provide services to those residents, among other things.

Dutra said that a resident in the Brewington Avenue area has told him she would put her home up for sale if the project is approved.

“This is a really tough decision, to be really impacting the traffic in that area but I guess [it’s] what we live in now,” he said.

Plans to develop that area of the city into affordable housing date back more than a decade. Initial plans set by the county and city had set out to build hundreds of units on land currently used for farming adjacent to Brewington Avenue. But a lawsuit from the Santa Cruz County Farm Bureau and a subsequent settlement reached between that agency and the city in 2011 restricted the scope of the development area to only four parcels.

Two of those parcels were developed into the first phase of Pippin Orchards, and the third and fourth parcels would be used for this proposed development.

The project received a unanimous recommendation for approval from the county’s planning commission in late October.

If approved by the county supervisors in December, the project would be the third affordable housing development greenlit in the Atkinson Lane area, including the aforementioned first phase of Pippin Orchards and the 53-unit complex on the corner of Atkinson Lane and Freedom Boulevard recently approved by the City Council.

Councilmember Lowell Hurst, who has been on the City Council off and on since the late-80s, said that these plans have been in place for several decades and that he did not want to hold up the construction any longer. The project, he said, should serve as an example of why the city needs to expand and grow.

“We don’t have a whole lot of land to build anything on and this is what it kind of comes down to if we’re going to supply the kind of housing we need for farmworkers and disabled folks and others that really need housing,” Hurst said.

Councilmember Rebecca Garcia said that in Watsonville, which is home to much of the Pajaro Valley’s farmworker community, the “need for affordable housing outweighs any sacrifices that we need to make.”

Dutra said that to address that need the city and county must start working with farmers to build farmworker housing on their property, and highlighted the bill penned by local Assemblymember Robert Rivas and approved by Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2019.

City Manager Search Continues

In other action, the City Council did not make a final decision on the possible appointment of an interim city manager, City Attorney Alan Smith reported out of closed session.

It was the second time the City Council talked about the issue behind closed doors—public bodies conduct closed sessions to discuss private matters such as lawsuits, employees and the purchase or lease of real property.

Earlier in the day, outgoing City Manager Matt Huffaker was appointed as Santa Cruz’s chief executive. He will take over as that municipality’s city manager on Jan. 3, 2022.

IN PHOTOS: Punk Rockers Wavves Crash Felton Music Hall

'Good Times' photographer Tarmo Hannula captures punk trio Wavves' Felton Music Hall show in all its ribcage-rattling rock glory

Capitola’s Temporary Outdoor Dining Program Could End Soon

Capitola outdoor dining
A report from the city of Capitola found that few were taking advantage of the city's outdoor dining program put in place during the pandemic

Most Californians Say Economic Inequality is Getting Worse

Seven in 10 Californians say the gap between rich and poor is getting larger, according to a statewide survey released Tuesday

How the Supreme Court’s Gun Case Could Affect California

Supreme Court likely to rule against New York law that imposes strict limits on who can carry guns in public

Utility Regulator Turns Up Heat on PG&E After Recent Outages

California energy regulator starting crackdown on power provider PG&E following months of planned and unplanned outages

Barba, Quiroz-Carter Vie for Vacant Watsonville City Council Seat

The election was set into motion after Aurelio Gonzalez stepped down because of a family health emergency in September

Esperanza de Valle Celebrates 40 Years

PERFORMANCES SCHEDULED FOR THIS WEEKEND AT CABRILLO

New Book Chronicles History of Local Lumber Industry

'The Reign of the Lumber Barons' delves into the golden age of the lumber industry in the hills above Aptos and Corralitos at the end of the 19th century

Could Scotts Valley be Reunified?

The Santa Cruz Board of Sups is considering the recommendation as the county redraws its supervisorial boundaries during its decennial redistricting process

Watsonville Mayor Opposes Affordable Housing Project

Mayor Jimmy Dutra has apprehensions about the additional traffic flowing through the area and the ongoing costs to provide services to the residents
17,623FansLike
8,845FollowersFollow