Rob Brezsny’s Astrology: Feb. 17-23

Free will astrology for the week of Feb. 17 

ARIES (March 21-April 19): Atheists like to confront religious people with accusations like this: “If God is so good, why does he allow suffering in the world?” Their simplistic, childish idea of God as some sort of Moral Policeman is ignorant of the lush range of ruminations about the Divine as offered down through the ages by poets, novelists, philosophers and theologians. For example, poet Stéphane Mallarmé wrote, “Spirit cares for nothing except universal musicality.” He suggested that the Supreme Intelligence is an artist making music and telling stories. And as you know, music and stories include all human adventures, not just the happy stuff. I bring these thoughts to your attention, Aries, because the coming weeks will be a favorable time to honor and celebrate the marvelously rich stories of your own life—and to feel gratitude for the full range of experience with which they have blessed you. P.S.: Now is also a favorable phase to rethink and reconfigure your answers to the Big Questions.

TAURUS (April 20-May 20): Blogger Rachel C. Lewis confides, “I love being horribly straightforward. I love sending reckless text messages and telling people I love them and telling people they are absolutely magical humans and I cannot believe they really exist. I love saying, ‘Kiss me harder,’ and ‘You’re a good person,’ and, ‘You brighten my day.’” What would your unique version of Lewis’ forthrightness be like, Taurus? What brazen praise would you offer? What declarations of affection and care would you unleash? What naked confessions might you reveal? The coming days will be a favorable time to explore these possibilities.

GEMINI (May 21-June 20): It’s a good time to become more of who you are by engaging with more of what you are not. Get in the mood for this heroic exercise by studying the following rant by Gemini poet Adam Zagajewski (who writes in Polish), translated by Gemini poet Clare Cavanaugh: “Read for yourselves, read for the sake of your inspiration, for the sweet turmoil in your lovely head. But also read against yourselves, read for questioning and impotence, for despair and erudition, read the dry, sardonic remarks of cynical philosophers. Read those whose darkness or malice or madness or greatness you can’t yet understand, because only in this way will you grow, outlive yourself and become what you are.”

CANCER (June 21-July 22): You’re on the verge of breakthroughs. You’re ready to explore frontiers, at least in your imagination. You’re brave enough to go further and try harder than you’ve been able to before. With that in mind, here’s a highly apropos idea from Cancerian novelist Tom Robbins. He writes, “If you take any activity, any art, any discipline, any skill, take it and push it as far as it will go, push it beyond where it has ever been before, push it to the wildest edge of edges, then you force it into the realm of magic.” (I might use the word “coax” or “nudge” instead of “force” in Robbins’ statement.)

LEO (July 23-Aug. 22): In her story “Homelanding,” Margaret Atwood writes, “Take me to your trees. Take me to your breakfasts, your sunsets, your bad dreams, your shoes. Take me to your fingers.” I’d love you to express requests like that. It’s a favorable time for you to delve deeper into the mysteries of people you care about. You will generate healing and blessings by cultivating reverent curiosity and smart empathy and crafty intimacy. Find out more about your best allies!

VIRGO (Aug. 23-Sept. 22): You’re about to reach the end of your phase of correction and adjustment. To mark this momentous transition, and to honor your ever-increasing ability to negotiate with your demons, I offer you the following inspirational proclamation by poet Jeannette Napolitano: “I don’t want to look back in five years’ time and think, ‘We could have been magnificent, but I was afraid.’ In five years, I want to tell of how fear tried to cheat me out of the best thing in life, and I didn’t let it.”

LIBRA (Sept. 23-Oct. 22): It’s not a good time for you to be obsessed with vague abstractions, fear-based fantasies and imaginary possibilities. But it is a favorable phase to rise up in behalf of intimate, practical changes. At least for now, I also want to advise you not to be angry and militant about big, complicated issues that you have little power to affect. On the other hand, I encourage you to get inspired and aggressive about injustices you can truly help fix and erroneous approaches you can correct and close-at-hand dilemmas for which you can summon constructive solutions.

SCORPIO (Oct. 23-Nov. 21): “The most beautiful things are those that madness prompts and reason writes,” declared author André Gide. As a writer myself, I will testify to the truth of that formulation. But what about those of you who aren’t poets and novelists and essayists? Here’s how I would alter Gide’s statement to fit you: “The most beautiful things are those that rapture prompts and reason refines.” Or maybe this: “The most beautiful things are those that experimentation finds and reason uses.” Or how about this one: “The most beautiful things are those that wildness generates and reason enhances.” Any and all of those dynamics will be treasures for you in the coming weeks.

SAGITTARIUS (Nov. 22-Dec. 21): The poet Nayyirah Waheed has some advice I want you to hear. She writes, “Be easy. Take your time. You are coming home to yourself.” I will add that from my astrological perspective, the coming weeks will indeed be a time for you to relax more deeply into yourself—to welcome yourself fully into your unique destiny; to forgive yourself for what you imagine are your flaws; to not wish you were someone else pursuing a different path; to be at peace and in harmony with the exact life you have.

CAPRICORN (Dec. 22-Jan. 19): “The chief object of education is not to learn things but to unlearn things,” wrote author G. K. Chesterton. He was exaggerating for dramatic effect when he said that, as he often did. The more nuanced truth is that one of the central aims of education is to learn things, and another very worthy aim is to unlearn things. I believe you are currently in a phase when you should put an emphasis on unlearning things that are irrelevant and meaningless and obstructive. This will be excellent preparation for your next phase, which will be learning a lot of useful and vitalizing new things.

AQUARIUS (Jan. 20-Feb. 18): Sergei Rachmaninoff (1873–1943) ultimately became one of the 20th century’s most renowned composers. But his career had a rough start. Symphony No. 1, his first major work, was panned by critics, sending him into a four-year depression. Eventually he recovered. His next major composition, Piano Concerto No. 2, was well-received. I don’t anticipate that your rookie offerings or new work will get the kind of terrible reviews that Rachmaninoff’s did. But at least initially, there may be no great reviews, and possibly even indifference. Keep the faith, my dear. Don’t falter in carrying out your vision of the future. The rewards will come in due time.

PISCES (Feb. 19-March 20): Ancient Greek playwright Euripides was popular and influential—and remains so to this day, 2,400 years later. But there’s a curiously boring aspect in five of his plays, Andromache, Alcestis, Helen, Medea and The Bacchae. They all have the same exact ending: six lines, spoken by a chorus, that basically say the gods are unpredictable. Was Euripides lazy? Trying too hard to drive home the point? Or were the endings added later by an editor? Scholars disagree. The main reason I’m bringing this to your attention is to encourage you to avoid similar behavior. I think it’s very important that the stories you’re living right now have different endings than all the stories of your past.


States Are Expanding Access to Vaccines. The Supply Isn’t Keeping Up.

By Lucy TompkinsMelina DelkicKaren Zraick and Daniel E. Slotnik

Racing to ramp up COVID-19 vaccinations, states have opened mass inoculation sites and expanded eligibility. But a big problem remains: The supply isn’t increasing quickly enough.

The United States, facing a growing threat from more contagious and possibly deadlier virus variants, is gradually administering more doses every day, now up to an average of about 1.7 million, according to a New York Times database.

But states are also steadily widening access beyond the most vulnerable groups, front-line health care workers and nursing home staff and residents. Now, some state officials say they would be ready to administer thousands more shots every day — if they could get them.

New York state has used close about 85% of its first and second doses, Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Monday, but is forging ahead to expand eligibility to people with underlying health issues. He said his state would be vaccinating more people if it had more doses.

On Sunday, the first day that appointment sign-ups opened for New Yorkers with chronic health conditions, tens of thousands flooded websites and many were left waiting for appointment openings. Still, state officials said that they considered the expansion a success. They said that 250,924 people had successfully made vaccination appointments Sunday, more than any single day since the registration system was introduced in mid-January.

Those who are now eligible include adults who have certain health conditions that may increase their risk of severe illness or death from the coronavirus. Aside from obesity and hypertension, other conditions that qualify New Yorkers for the vaccine include pulmonary diseases and cancer, Cuomo said this month. He also made pregnancy a qualifying condition.

The expansion comes as concern grows about new variants circulating. In an interview with “Axios on HBO” that aired Sunday, Dr. Anthony Fauci, President Joe Biden’s chief medical adviser, warned Americans not to become complacent as more people are vaccinated.

“We still might have a stumbling block coming with the appearance of variants that would dominate the picture,” he said.

U.S. officials have said that the more contagious virus circulating in Britain, B.1.1.7, could become dominant in the United States by March. British government scientists are increasingly finding that variant to be linked to a higher risk of death.

Coronavirus vaccines appear to protect against B.1.1.7, but are less effective against the B.1.351 variant, which has become dominant in South Africa.

Last week, California announced that it would soon become one of just a handful of states to expand vaccine access to people of any age with underlying health issues or severe disabilities. But supply is short.

The mass vaccination site at Dodger Stadium shut over the weekend because Los Angeles had exhausted its supply, Mayor Eric Garcetti said. He said the city received just 16,000 doses last week — roughly a day’s worth.

“When vaccines do get to Los Angeles, we know how to administer them,” Garcetti told reporters. “We have a great infrastructure set up, of amazing people, and we will give them to folks efficiently and safely. But the problem is, we still aren’t receiving enough doses soon enough.”

Officials in Georgia say constrained supply is getting in the way of expanding eligibility. When the Atlanta Board of Education called on Gov. Brian Kemp earlier this month to make teachers eligible for vaccinations, the governor said the state was not getting enough doses for residents who were already eligible.

Many districts around Atlanta, he said, had stopped scheduling new vaccine appointments because federal deliveries were falling so far short of the demand.

Experts say expanding eligibility requires a delicate balance of prioritizing those most at risk and ensuring doses do not go to waste.

“I don’t think anyone would want to be the person to receive the vaccine at the expense of someone else who is higher risk,” said Dr. Sarita Shah, a public health researcher at Emory University in Atlanta.

Dr. Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, said expanding eligibility too quickly could backfire. “People are going to be angry when they are promised a second dose and don’t get it on time,” he said.

Some experts, like Dr. Robert Murphy, director of Northwestern’s Institute for Global Health, have called for more flexibility for places that have already vaccinated their most vulnerable residents.

“I think the dangerous thing is some places are too regimented with the current rules,” Murphy said. “If you’ve got an extra 50 vials, that’s 500 doses, and nobody is coming, and this thing is going to expire in a matter of days or weeks — give it out.”

Copyright 2021 The New York Times Company

California Shifts Vaccine Priorities Again: People with Health Conditions Are Eligible Next Month

Lea este artículo en español.

Californians with high-risk medical conditions will qualify for COVID-19 vaccines starting March 15, the state’s health secretary announced Friday.

Under the state’s previous guidelines, people with chronic conditions did not qualify for vaccinations until people 65 and older, first responders, food industry workers and educators were vaccinated.

Under the new guidelines, people ages 16 to 64 with serious health conditions — such as heart, lung or kidney disease, diabetes, cancer and weakened immune systems — or with disabilities will join older Californians and some essential workers beginning March 15.

State officials estimate that group could number between 4 and 6 million people, bringing the total number of vaccine-eligible Californians next month to between 17 and 19 million.

The move is “consistent with our response focused on saving lives, focused on promoting equity and, of course, getting to the other side of the pandemic,” Dr. Mark Ghaly, California’s secretary of health and human services, said at a press briefing Friday. 

Ghaly said delaying it for a month will allow the state to build its vaccine supply, develop ways to determine eligibility and figure out how to reach people who are homebound.

Disability advocates had mixed reactions to the state’s changing priorities. 

“The explicit inclusion of people with high risk disabilities is a welcome change in the administration’s position, but the piecemeal recognition of people with high risk health conditions, the failure to acknowledge the elevated exposure and health risks of Medi-Cal beneficiaries who need home and community-based services in their homes, and the unexplained delay until March 15 are disappointing for all, and will be deadly for some, people with disabilities,” said Silvia Yee, senior staff attorney for the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund.

Advocates had criticized Gov. Gavin Newsom for failing to prioritize some of California’s most vulnerable residents, saying he was sacrificing equity for speed.

The move comes as California speeds its previously sluggish pace of COVID-19 immunizations. More than 5.5 million doses have been administered to date, more than any other state. While California earlier ranked at the bottom of all states for its immunization rates, it now ranks 21st, according to federal data.

The newly eligible groups may be immunized by their medical provider or at mass vaccination clinics if their health permits, Ghaly said. Doctors will have discretion to vaccinate high-risk people who do not fall into the categories set by state officials.

California until last month had included people with disabilities or medical conditions in the same priority group as Californians between the ages of 65 and 74. They were listed in the tier just behind people aged 75 and older. But then the state moved to prioritize vaccinations primarily by age, targeting those 65 and older. That meant medically vulnerable people were left behind. 

State officials have listed the severe conditions in an advisory for providers, including:

  • Cancer, current with debilitated or immunocompromised state
  • Chronic kidney disease, stage 4 or above
  • Chronic pulmonary disease, oxygen dependent
  • Down syndrome
  • Immunocompromised state (weakened immune system) from solid organ transplant
  • Pregnancy
  • Sickle cell disease
  • Heart conditions, such as heart failure, coronary artery disease, or cardiomyopathies (excludes hypertension)
  • Severe obesity (body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2)
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus with hemoglobin A1c level greater than 7.5%

The federal Centers for Disease Control recommends that people with underlying conditions receive the vaccine alongside those aged 65 to 74. But states are allowed to adjust those priorities. 

Other states vary in how they prioritize people with health conditions.

New York started vaccinating people with high-risk conditions, including pregnancy and developmental disabilities, on Monday. Florida currently vaccinates people considered by hospital providers to be “extremely vulnerable” to COVID-19 along with those 65 and older. In contrast, Kansas has placed people under 65 with high-risk conditions behind people 65 and older, prisoners and those living in “congregate settings” that aren’t nursing homes. 

CalMatters COVID-19 coverage, translation and distribution is supported by generous grants from the Blue Shield of California Foundation, the California Wellness Foundation and the California Health Care Foundation.

CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.

Disasters, Evacuations Don’t Slow Santa Cruz Mountains Housing Market

On a sunny afternoon back in early December, Zoe Banks, a mother of two who works in communications, sent a prescient text to a friend in Boulder Creek. “Sad to let you know we’re moving out of the area,” she wrote. “Come for the fires, stay for the debris flow just isn’t on my mood board for 2021.”

After evacuating during the CZU Lightning Complex fire, and concerned about landslides following rains, Banks and her family put their home across the street from Boulder Creek Elementary—where she had envisioned sending her children to school—on the market. 

“When we bought the house I remember thinking, ‘Are we crazy to buy in the mountains right now?’ But it was two blocks from the fire station, and built in 1863. It stood this long. Neighbors said, ‘It’s close to the fire department; you’ll probably be fine.’”

Structurally, it is. The burn scar has not led to the debris flow that local officials feared—yet. But evacuating the CZU fire left emotional scars that couldn’t be reconciled. 

Banks remembers searching online from their temporary landing pads in Capitola and then Reno during the fire to see if their house was still there, and the difficulty that came with this uncertainty. “Every time there’s an evacuation, you’re checking Nextdoor and Facebook, hearsay, to try and see if the house is still standing, if there’s debris flow …  I don’t have it in me to keep putting my family through that,” she says. Living with her husband, mother, two toddlers and pets, not to mention dealing with all of this during a pandemic, made the thought of another evacuation just too much. 

“Looking ahead, do I want to do this all season long? The risk [of debris flow] is there for two to five years,” she says. She remembers being particularly disturbed by an L.A. Times article that predicted “these mountains could turn to jelly.”

“Whether there is a risk or not changes depending on who you talk to,” Banks says. “If debris flow wasn’t a thing, we’d still be there. We planned to raise our kids there.”

Banks looked at a map of the U.S., thinking, “Where can we go where we won’t be at risk of debris flow, wildfires, hurricanes or tornadoes?” and landed on Tucson, Arizona.

“No trees, no earthquakes, houses made of bricks,” she says.

 The family hit the road, toddlers and chickens in tow.

Boulder Creek Fire Chief Mark Bingham admits that with the lack of mudslides after the most recent storms, “we dodged a bullet.” 

“The weather moved off the Santa Cruz Mountains, where it was projected to hit hard. Salinas and Monterey had weather events we avoided,” he says.

Though Bingham emphasizes he’s “not a weather expert by any means,” he is deeply familiar with the area and its ecosystem, having grown up in Ben Lomond and moved to Boulder Creek at the age of 18. As both a first responder and resident, what he’s seeing now is different from what he remembers, a time when the rains began around Halloween and continued through March—the classic mild, wet winter of Mediterranean climates.

“It doesn’t seem to be that predictable anymore,” he says. Rains arrive less frequently and in higher concentrations. Bingham’s inclination from “growing up here and talking with local and national weather folks” is that the rains we could see will likely be “infrequent but heavy and major showers.”

In terms of risk to local residents and structures, what happened—or in this case, didn’t happen—during the last storm can’t be seen as a predictor of what may happen in the future. 

“The recent storm met or exceeded the debris flow rainfall intensity thresholds in some (but not all) areas in the burn scar,” Santa Cruz County Geologist Jeffrey Nolan tells GT via email, “but no debris flows were observed. The existing models aren’t well calibrated to the local area, so there was always some question as to how accurate the rainfall thresholds would be.”

As rainfall thresholds are reassessed, Nolan points to a partial reason the region escaped the dreaded debris flow this time around: “The ground was very dry prior to this recent storm, and the mountains soaked up the rainfall like a sponge.”  With the ground already wet, though, “it is possible that the future storms will produce a different result.” Nolan’s expectation, given changing weather patterns, “is to see more fire seasons like last summer going forward.”

New Reality

Because of that, the Boulder Creek Fire Protection District is preparing not only for the fires, but also the ongoing threat of debris flow in the aftermath.

“It’s a new discipline, a new type of rescue a lot of agencies haven’t been trained to do,” Fire Chief Bingham says. “We’ve had a couple of historical events where large pieces of land move. Human factors created those situations. The fire created this one. It’s a different picture, a larger and broader area. We saw that we’d better gear up for it. We gathered experts from around the United States: Southern California, the Anchorage [Alaska] Fire Department, the East Coast, to train all the Boulder Creek firefighters.”

In addition to training, new equipment is arriving at the station: dry suits, chest waders, Tyvek suits, “so we can layer up and down for whatever the operational need is, practicing how we would access, climb over or through a mudslide or debris flow once it stopped moving—a training experience we haven’t tackled before.” Four wheel drive and high-water vehicles have been procured, with sufficient clearance underneath to climb over mudflows that Type 1 Fire Engines could not. And emergency responders are training with K-9 teams, as dogs can cover “a lot more ground” during a rescue effort. 

Technology also aids in preparation and response: easy access to zone mapping online for residents, map editing and creating, and QR codes for maps to quickly orient responders coming from out of the local area. “If a neighborhood moved down and over, we’d be able to say where it should be, it shifted and moved down over here,” for search and rescue, Bingham explains. 

In this massive effort, Bingham appreciates all the agencies that have pulled together and the resources and time to plan for the threat of debris flow prior to an emergency situation. “A lot of events you could plan for,” he says, “but how many have scientific data with a high probability of happening?”

Residents are undertaking and aiding in preventive efforts, too, shoveling sand into bags the fire department provided and delivering these to three different sandbag bunker locations in the district, which are open to the public. “We’ve gone through six thousand bags,” Bingham says. “That’s the mountain folks being proactive, taking care of their land.”

Bingham’s advice for his neighbors, primarily, and above all: “If we make an evacuation order, we hope every resident would heed it.”

UNINSURED FUTURE

Some residents like Banks may have had enough, but Santa Cruz Redwood Homes realtor Logan Andren has seen that an influx of homebuyers to the Santa Cruz Mountains has not been discouraged, even as insurance is harder to come by. 

“I’ve seen stories on Boulder Creek Neighbors, the Facebook community we have up here, always on top of things and willing to lend a hand, of private insurance companies cancelling coverage and refusing to cover new homes,” Andren says. “I just purchased a small home, and had to go with the California FAIR plan to cover fire—an insurance association that offers coverage to high-risk homeowners and renters in the state” who have trouble obtaining it otherwise.

“Inventory is low and we’re in a seller’s market with limited competition,” Andren adds, with interest rates at historic lows and “many people working from home indefinitely.” Andren has continued to see many “who have high-tech jobs up north—Palo Alto, San Jose, Campbell, Redwood City” moving to the Santa Cruz Mountains for the “ability to own a home for half to a third of what they would be paying in Silicon Valley.” He points to the recent repaving of Highway 9 to Saratoga, with low commute-time traffic even pre-Covid, with its scenic commute as a further allure. A Felton home received 10 offers in a week, sold for above list price, all cash, close to $900,000, Andren says. “Fires and rain have not deterred them.”

It’s a phenomenon Banks experienced firsthand. She received two offers above asking price even though the first week the house was for sale there was no power, and mandatory evacuation was ordered in the second week. A neighbor’s house, she says, sold in four days. Banks understands the appeal. “It’s a desirable place to live if you can navigate those threats,” she says. “But I’m not willing to gamble my kids’ or mom’s safety, so if they say evacuate that’s what I’m going to do.”

Realtors are required to disclose if listings are in wildfire and debris flow zones, Andren says. “Homes below burn scars tend to be prevalent to mudslides,” he says, “and since so many trees were destroyed, those root systems that were holding up hilly areas have been compromised.” Andren also explains to prospective buyers the regular upkeep those moving in from more urban areas probably haven’t had to deal with—“from blowing the roof to getting the septic system pumped every three to five years.”

In It For the Long Term

One such Boulder Creek resident, Roopam Lunia, moved to the area in July 2020 with her husband and toddler during a high-risk pregnancy and got what she calls “a crash course in what can go wrong in the mountains in six months”—heat waves, power outages and fires. Neighbors who had lived in Boulder Creek for 40 years, Lunia says, told her they had never seen anything like it before. “We were probably pretty naïve when we moved to the area,” she says. “We were living in Silicon Valley, and we’d been looking for four years. We wanted to live here.”

Previously in an apartment, Lunia wanted land and space to raise a family, and had always loved the mountains. When Covid-19 hit and her husband began working from home, he didn’t have to be close to his workplace. “We started looking, the house popped up, it had been on the market for a while, and we moved,” Lunia says. 

A month and a half later, the heat wave hit. “I was pregnant, we had no air conditioning, it was 110 degrees outside. I thought, ‘This isn’t going to be as easy as we thought it was going to be.’ That was the first challenge we had.”           

Then came the fires. “I saw fire hit 236 at Big Basin and started packing a bag. Within a couple hours, we had to go.” They ultimately stayed with family in Fresno. Lunia’s house was safe on the opposite side of the scar zone. Soon, “winter hits, we have power outages, rainstorms. We’re not in the debris flow zone, we’re on the opposite side of the river on the east, but neighbors told us about the possibility of the river jumping its banks, and at eight-and-a-half months pregnant, we didn’t want that to happen.” They again evacuated to Fresno, grateful for having family relatively close by.

“It seems now as if we’re okay,” she says. “When we moved in, neighbors told us, ‘Clear out the fire hazards and get an alternate power source.’ We got the property cleared and invested in solar since we’re in this for the long term; we figured put money in now and make sure it works out. Our next thing is going to be getting an air conditioning unit put in because of last summer. We weren’t expecting that heat.” Lunia and family are taking it in stride. “The 5% of the time when it hits the fan, you have to roll with those storms, go with it.”

The silver lining in it all has been neighbors banding together. “I know more people out here in seven months than 10 years in Silicon Valley. The neighborhood comes together to support one another and make sure everyone has what they need to get through everything.”

Even though they haven’t been able to meet in person because of Covid-19, Lunia cites the amount of support and fear-assuaging her neighbors have provided online, such as offering to take her in their four-wheel drive if the bridge washed out when she had to get to the hospital to have the baby. They happily answer mountain-newbie questions—“‘Is this rain normal? Is 10 inches okay?”

“We listen to the chatter of the local Facebook group to find out what’s going on,” Lunia says. “Road closures, trees down—you rely on people, and that’s a change that suits us really well.” 

It’s a responsive group. A post soliciting experiences for this article to the same Boulder Creek Facebook community Andren and Lunia mention yielded a slew of rapid responses from residents both current and former, longtime and new. Their stories spanned generations, from those with deep roots in the region to the most recent arrivals. They shared why they left or chose to stay put. Some had recently bought homes, others lost longtime family properties to fire. One couple still plans to buy instead of rent when they can afford it. Another who left longs to return, saying she left her heart in the mountains. While it would be impossible to include every story here, the compendium provides a testament to a community grappling with unprecedented threats from nature and becoming even more tight-knit in the face of it all: wildfires, heat waves, heavy rainfalls, potential debris flow, and other events that are, based on what experts have said, only likely to increase in frequency over time.  

Training Days

What restoration ecologist Dr. Grey F. Hayes would like to see for these residents—along with more normal-times maintenance tasks like roof-blowing and septic-system pumping—is specific training on what living in wildfire and potential debris flow zones entails, and modes of responding. “The central tenet is to have people become indigenous to where they are living,” he says.

Recent debris flow evacuations “went a little broader than they needed to,” Hayes believes, in the wake of some of the fire evacuation orders coming too late. “Safety first, though,” he says.

The longtime North Coast resident, who lectures on land restoration and management at UCSC and publicly at the MAH (though those are currently on pause during Covid-19), points to the 2018 Montecito mudflows and cultural memory of the 1982 Love Creek landslide in Ben Lomond that killed 10 people as precedents for the degree of caution being taken now, along with governmental constructs like “evac periods’” to decide what to do.

“I make it my central focus to think about how people live on the land and respond to these kinds of things,” he says.

Hayes did not evacuate his home to the west of Boulder Creek, a few miles inland from Davenport, during the CZU Lightning Complex fire. But he is uniquely equipped to deal with these catastrophes. It’s a story he has documented in harrowing detail, replete with a timeline and photographs, in a post titled “CZU Lighting Fire Recap” at Molino Creek Farm’s website. Still, Hayes is reluctant to share his story out of concern that people without his background in fire and ecology might attempt similar feats: “I stayed put for the fire and protected my house, but it wasn’t in isolation,” he says. “I had a plan. My knowledge was backed up by the Bureau of Land Management fire chief and others who said, ‘You know what you’re doing.’ Do you stay or do you go? It’s dangerous stuff. People have egos that extend beyond their skill level.”

Hayes has trained with Cal Fire and worked on prescribed burns as a natural steward for UCSC, so was prepared for worst-case scenarios. Ultimately, he and a neighbor saved most of the structures on the property.  

But it didn’t come without cost, either. His shoulder still hurts from dragging the fire hose. His partners in fighting the fire struggle with PTSD.

Still, he says, we must learn to live with the particularities of a Mediterranean climate—atmospheric rivers, dry summers—which are particularly conducive to wildfires. Hayes compares Cal Fire’s operations to being “right up there with Australian and South African” firefighting forces, not coincidental as “Mediterranean climates are fire climates.”  

The large-picture issues are both environmental and systemic. Making conservative decisions about zoning and permitting isn’t part of a capitalist reality. Besides, “humans increase fire frequency wherever we go,” Hayes says. 

Solutions, Hayes says, rely on mitigation strategies now. “If we want any trees,” he says, the focus should be on landscape-level management, including “prescribed burns and physical labor to manipulate fuels, so when fires come it’s not as bad.” On the individual level, he suggests “training people to shelter in place” and for “reacting to fire, doing prescribed fire,” as the best course forward. 

“We need to become as indigenous as the native peoples were here. Native Americans would have known how to adapt to episodic disasters. We’re not there yet. We as a society should be smart toward reorienting people for safer lives,” says Hayes. That includes paying for relocation of those in the path of debris flow, and making zoning changes, he says.

Hayes mentions the Central Coast Prescribed Burn Association as a potential avenue for community involvement in mitigation. As described in a late-December 2020 Facebook post on the Resource Conservation District of Monterey County page, this project of the University of California Cooperative Extension in San Benito County, assisted by the Resource Conservation District of Monterey County, is “a new prescribed burning association … starting with some smaller prescribed fires and will hopefully build to larger, community-driven burns over time.”

Now settled in Tucson, Banks can put wildfire out of her mind, but she does anticipate feeling more heat. “Summer will be brutal,” she says, providing a reminder that nowhere, climatologically, gets off scot-free. “It might be 120 degrees.”

While there is no perfect place from which to face down the effects of climate change, and the lifelong Californian calls it “heartbreaking” to have left, “the relief of not having those worries in the background every time it rains … it’s a nice feeling to not have to be thinking about that in an existential way.” 

Aptos’ Kelsey Ferrell—aka Feral—Gets Brutally Honest on New Songs

While attending UC Berkeley, Aptos native Kelsey Ferrell—who releases music under the name Feral—wrote a song about a guy she was casually dating. He heard about it and immediately assumed she was head over heels for him. And he made sure that anyone he talked to knew that she was obsessed with him.

She was not obsessed with him. He’d been more of a literary device for the song than anything else. In fact, Ferrell hadn’t been impressed with most of the guys she dated in college. After ending a long-term high school relationship, she felt excited about being single again. Her friends told her how much fun she was going to have.

“I was like, so unbelievably disappointed by the kind of guys I was seeing. And it was just astounding to me that the bar was that low, and I had bought into this branch of feminism that promoted a ‘sex-positive culture,’ which I think started with good intentions, but ultimately is a naive take,” Ferrell says.

But that one guy in particular got under her skin, and she thought about what she would say to him if she ever confronted him. A refrain circled in her head: “You don’t matter that much/You’re not the only loser that I fucked.” This inspired “Loser,” a full-on rebuttal song to this guy, and all the other guys too arrogant to see what poor dating options they were.

“It’s like the perfect thing I would say if I had to talk to him again,” Ferrell says.

“Loser” is a feel-good, snarky rock ’n’ roll song in the vein of early Liz Phair. Ferrell released it at the beginning of the year, and dropped its follow-up, “Native Speaker,” on Valentine’s Day. She’ll release a third single, “Church,” on March 26.

Aside from a batch of “quarantine demos” she released in the early portion of the pandemic out of sheer boredom, these are the first Feral releases since her Trauma Portfolio LP back in 2018.

In March, at the beginning of lockdown, she moved back to her parents’ house in Aptos and finished her schooling online. She recorded these three new songs with Jim Greer at the Rondo House studio in Berkeley in November. They are some of her strongest and best-produced songs to date, a mix between rock, folk, and alternative, performed with a bit of grit.

“Loser” is also one of her funniest tracks, with such lines as, “Telling me Joe Rogan’s genius doesn’t make me wanna suck your penis.” These kinds of punchlines aren’t new; her music always had had a sense of humor mixed with blunt vulnerability. She likes to tell people her genre is “TMI,” and that, “I’m not just an open book, I’m an open wound.”

Ferrell started playing music at a young age, but when she began college, she dove headfirst into songwriting, dealing with her recent heartbreak by joining a songwriting club.

“I just needed to express myself somehow,” she says.

During a semester at the University of Sussex in Brighton, England, in early 2019, she tried her hand at stand-up comedy and loved it.

“I was nervous because it seems like much higher stakes. At least with music you can hide behind your guitar. But stand-up comedy, if you don’t make them laugh, you’re a total failure,” Ferrell says. “I figured, ‘If this goes badly, I can just leave the country.’”

Her new songs are her funniest yet. When she started to work with Greer on “Loser,” he suggested she write more jokes into it. She agreed.

As of now, Feral is a one-woman project, though that could change at some point if she could find her perfect riot grrl band to back her. But for now, she’s going to continue to dig her soul for honest, vulnerable, funny and perhaps inappropriate songs.

“I do want to give credit to Liz Phair and Alanis Morissette for setting the pathway for women to be able to sing about these topics,” Ferrel says. “I just want to give them credit for paving the way so that I can, you know, even feel comfortable writing these kinds of songs.”  

For more information, check out Ferrell on Spotify or at 2feral.bandcamp.com.

A Visit to the Farmers’ Market Lifts the Spirits on Winter Days

On a crisp February day, our farmers’ markets still bustle and crackle with good vibes and an abundance of seasonal harvests.

Granted it’s not May, but it will be soon. Meanwhile, I can see my neighbors over the long tables of citrus and pomegranates. Lots of green things, kale, brussels sprouts, spinach, and root crops flourish right now. Think beets and carrots and potatoes. 

Chicories from Blue Heron and fennel from Live Earth. Mandarins from Dirty Girl. Blackberries, gorgeous crimson radishes. Colorful bags of shell beans from Pescadero’s Blue House Farm. Huge jars of organic olives from Good Faith Farm. And all manner of tangy prepared foods from preserves to chutneys. Come hungry, and you’ll find amazing items like chile rellenos and fresh-grilled naan, ready for you to grab and eat whilst strolling through the market.

The live music here goes a long way to lifting spirits tired of hunkering down. Great coffee and fresh pastries exert their siren song. We respond. I spotted a table of fresh-made charcuterie and soups from Home, and was tempted by a huge jar of bolognese sauce from the hand of Brad Briske’s Home team. Companion Bakeshop loaves perfume the air, along with the endless quiches of Adorable French Bakery

The farmers’ market feels safe and secure these days, with clearly marked lines, entrances and exits, and masks and social distancing requirements. There are so many fresh surprises, especially at the largest Downtown Farmers’ Market on Wednesdays. By now you have your own favorite reasons to go and find ingredients for your home cooking. Flowers will be there soon! 

For a complete schedule of all our local markets, go to santacruzfarmersmarket.org

More Pandemic Dining Pro-Tips

What we do to keep things both fresh and manageable at home is to hit the aforementioned farmers’ market for seasonal veggies, with an eye to creating a big pot of stew or soup. Stew is the perfect cold weather food—my go-to trio of recipes are sausage and bean stew, chile verde, and chicken and cannellini bean with kale. Fresh carrots and canned whole tomatoes go in everything! 

We dine on stew along with salad of fresh greens from the market one night, then freeze enough for two more nights (in four containers). I mix it up by getting takeout entrees from our favorite restaurants a few nights a week, often adding one of our own salads. Once a week we’ll get a piece of fresh fish (wild when available) and build around that, usually with brown rice and broccolini. And we can always make a second meal out of our restaurant entrees, usually a composed salad that refreshes the entree in a way that goes beyond the concept of leftovers.

Looking Doon

Bonny Doon Vineyard founder and perpetual Rhône Ranger Randall Grahm emails to say that he’s getting doon and dirty over at his expansive San Juan Bautista vineyard with the semi-pronounceable name, Popelouchum. With 10 acres under cultivation, including Pinot Noir and three Grenache varietals, Grahm anticipates selling his estate wines next year! This is exciting news for all of us who have trekked through Grahm’s dreams and output for lo these past three decades.

Grahm, who says that he remains involved in the Bonny Doon Vineyard wines after last year’s sale to WarRoom Ventures LLC, is also ready to invite visitors to tour and visit Popelouchum, maybe this summer if the situation allows. I’ve walked this estate with Grahm and can tell you it is gorgeous as well as viticulturally exciting. Grahm has always been an experimental sorcerer of unusual grape varietals, and there is much to check out on this estate. Stay tuned!

This Year’s Dungeness Crab Fishery a Shell of its Former Self

New regulations and price strikes delayed the start of the season. Now, Dungeness crab fishermen face the worst catch numbers in decades. As challenges mount, many of them worry about the future of their fishery.

After 71 whales became entangled in fishing gear in 2016, the Center for Biological Diversity sued the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). The settlement resulted in the Risk Assessment Management Program, known as RAMP. Under these new regulations, CDFW monitors for humpback whales, blue whales and leatherback sea turtles and can delay or halt Dungeness crab commercial fishing if they determine that the risk of entanglement is high. 

That happened twice at the beginning of this season. The presence of humpback whales kept the fishermen out of the water from the originally scheduled start date of Nov. 15 until Dec. 23. 

Some fishermen, like Ben Platt, president of the California Coast Crab Association, worry that the new regulations will squeeze the season into a few months every year.

“It’s going to change this fishery, especially in Central California,” he says. This is concerning, he explains, because many fishermen rely heavily on Thanksgiving markets.

Half Moon Bay-based fisherman Tim Obert agrees. “The Thanksgiving market’s huge for us,” he says. “The RAMP has taken that out.”

Fishermen are also concerned that the later start dates make the job more dangerous for smaller boats. As winter storms bring larger swells, “guys start going a little extreme to get out there when it opens,” Obert says.

Watching recreational fishing continue as normal adds to the frustration. “It’s great that they have the opportunity, but their rope is no different than my rope. Their buoy is no different than my buoy,” Obert says.

Clawing Back

The number of whale sightings that trigger a closure depends on population numbers. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) estimates that around 2,900 humpback whales live off the west coast for part of the year — around one-fifth of what the population used to be. 

But some fishermen say the numbers are outdated. They want new estimates. “We’re hopeful that triggers for closures will change based on new stock assessments for humpback whales,” Platt says. 

If that doesn’t work, the California Coast Crab Association might try filing a petition to delist the species from the Endangered Species Act. “Litigation should always be the last resort,” Platt says. “But we are definitely willing to litigate if that’s what it takes to protect this fishery.”

Platt and Obert say the new regulations are unnecessary and over the top. They cite better gear management and a whale entanglement working group that began making recommendations for best practices in 2015.

“It was kind of a slap in the face for us as fishermen,” Obert says. “We had just had a great season of not interacting with these whales.” In 2019, NOAA traced three humpback whale entanglements back to commercial Dungeness crab fishing in California. The agency could not identify the source of several other entanglements.

Despite the frustrations, the fishermen don’t blame CDFW. “I don’t really hold it against the department so much,” Obert says. “They had their arms tied from the lawsuit with CBD [the Center for Biological Diversity].”

The fishermen remained collaborative and cooperative throughout the closures, says Ryan Bartling, a CDFW senior environmental scientist.

“There are always differing views, but during the delays and the initial surveys that ultimately resulted in the delay, we were working with the [fishing] fleet,” he says. “I think we’re on the right path, and it’s just going to take everybody working together to solve this problem.”

Even though some fishermen want the RAMP regulations to change, they say that they still want to help protect endangered species.

“We started these jobs because we love the ocean. We love the wildlife,” Obert says. He feels that fishermen often get portrayed as “people out there just taking everything we can and making money.” 

But many fishermen see the occupation as a way of life rather than a job. “I always thought that I’m never going to get rich, but I’ll have a good life,” Obert says. “It’s a tough pill to swallow, to see things start crumbling to the point where you don’t know if it’s going to be able to come back.” 

In a Pinch

After the two delays, the fishermen entered price negotiations with major buyers. When most of them finally made it out on the water in early January, a new challenge arose: The crabs seemed to have disappeared. 

“This crab season in terms of catch is the worst one I’ve seen personally since 1999 in California,” Platt says. 

Obert experienced the same. “I’ve never seen it worse than this my whole life,” he says.

Platt, who began fishing at nine years old and has owned boats for 25 years, doesn’t feel alarmed. “Most of us that have been around for a while just think were in a down-cycle year,” he says. But while populations vary naturally depending on ocean conditions, climate change and ocean acidification could make it harder for eggs and larvae to survive and weaken the stock’s ability to rebound.

Platt remains hopeful. “I’ve been hearing that it’s the end of days for commercial fishing since I was nine years old,” he says.

But he acknowledges that things are changing.

“More and more every year, we have to fight just to be able to do it,” he says. Amid new regulations and an ever-changing ocean, “we’ll have to stay engaged in this process until we hang up our boots.”

California Economy Czar Dee Dee Myers on Vaccines, Reopening

Mass confusion about vaccines. Enough small business owners scrambling for state cash to crash a website. Contentious battles over COVID-19 reopening rules and getting kids back into classrooms.

All in a day’s work for Dee Dee Myers. 

As 2020 came to a chaotic close, the former Warner Bros. communications executive and the country’s first female White House press secretary took over California’s faltering economic response to the pandemic. Myers joined as a senior adviser to Gov. Gavin Newsom and director of the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development after predecessor Lenny Mendonca resigned, a high-profile recovery task force dissolved and Newsom tried to regain credibility after attending a lobbyist’s birthday party at the French Laundry.

In an interview edited for length and clarity, Myers spoke with CalMatters this week about navigating reopening conflicts, the state’s evolving COVID-19 recovery plan and why she doesn’t fear Elon Musk’s move to Texas.

Q: You started this role leading the state’s business and economic development efforts in December, right as new stay-at-home orders went into effect and the virus surged again. How did you come in and start to prioritize relief efforts in that environment?

A: I started on Dec. 15, so I did walk into a difficult situation that was yet more difficult. There was already work ongoing. The governor and the Legislature had announced at the end of November that they were going to stand up this $500 million small business grant program. It opened on Dec. 30. 

At the same time, the governor and team were working on his budget, which also prioritized economic recovery more broadly. That included another round of spending on small business grants, which we’re continuing to discuss with the Legislature. It included other incentives — tax incentives, regulatory relief, other things to continue to support small businesses. 

And then there are other programs, too. You know, vaccine distribution is a business-important program, right? Investments in higher education. A lot of people in economically difficult times go back to school. Job training programs. And the Golden State Stimulus, which will put $600 into the hands of millions of Californians. So all of those programs working together. And by the way, adding another dimension: education. Reopening schools has also been a priority. 

Q: The second round of applications for the state’s COVID-19 small business relief grant program closed this week, and we know there were more than 330,000 applicants in the first round. How intense was the demand this time, and how much concern is there about having enough money to go around?

A: Anyone who completed an application but didn’t get a grant in the first round was automatically rolled forward into the second round. We don’t know yet what the final number will be. Grants will start going out later this week, and that will continue to roll out.

There’s obviously substantially more need than there is money at this point. The two rounds together, round one and round two, will be roughly $500 million. The governor had proposed another $575 million. I think the Legislature and the governor working together will provide substantially more than that, and we’ll see where it all lands. 

Q: When it comes to the state’s reopening rules, we’ve also seen several lawsuits from businesses like salons, gyms and breweries that say the rules are too arbitrary. Do you see a scenario where those industry-specific rules change as vaccines roll out, or what’s your response to those concerns?

A: Yes. There’s so many things that have made this challenging. It’s unprecedented, it continues to change. We haven’t been operating on a static playing field. It’s a three-dimensional kind of thing where the rules change on everybody every day. That said, we will definitely try to evolve our guidance as we go forward and as circumstances on the ground change, as more people get vaccinated, as we see what happens with infection rates and other metrics.

I think on the one hand, people feel relieved to see a substantial drop in infection rates. On the other hand, there are these variants out there that are big wild cards, so nobody wants to take their foot off the brakes of social distance, wear your mask, don’t mix, be smart. So that will continue, but I mean look, ideally we want to open the economy as quickly as it’s safe to do so. The state’s and the governor’s strategy has always been health first. Until you get the pandemic under control, you can’t fully open the economy.  

At the same time, the idea has always been to open what you can as soon as it’s safe. As the metrics change and things become safer, we will continue to open more businesses, and you’ve seen the dialogue around schools. The final details of that need to be negotiated with the Legislature and teachers, but hopefully we’ll be able to move toward more reopening of schools, which will ease pressure on working parents.

Q: I did have a question about schools. I mean, you wrote the book on “Why Women Should Rule the World,” but with so many schools still closed, we’re hearing anecdotally about more women being forced out of the workforce. Are there any concrete ways the state can address or reverse that impact?

A: Yeah, it’s something we’re very concerned about. You saw last week as the federal government announced the new unemployment numbers, there was like a five-fold impact on women leaving the workforce or losing jobs. I think that’s why there are a lot of supports in the programs that we’ve already rolled out. The small business grants targeting women, reopening the schools to help parents.

One of the priority areas for the grant program is daycare. It’s very hard for parents that do want to go back to work to find daycare if they have younger kids who aren’t in school. I do think we’ll continue to discuss, as we come through this, how do we get people back to work, including women who have been disproportionately impacted and industries that have many women in them, like care work? How can we support their return to work in a safe and equitable way? There’s a lot to do going forward on that. 

Q: On the issue of going back to work, you said when you started that “job one is distributing that vaccine.” The state has moved toward age-based vaccination after essential workers. So how are you communicating with businesses about when employees might be able to go back in person, versus this bigger issue of how much remote work might continue?

A: That’s going to be a sector-by-sector, business-by-business kind of decision. We’ve already seen just in the kind of anecdotal response that there’s a range. Some businesses are saying we can’t wait to get back to everybody being together. Others are saying it’s up to employees. Many are somewhere in between. That is definitely going to affect just the way work works going forward. I don’t think any of us know at this point how it’s going to look.

In the meantime, job one is to get everybody who wants a vaccine vaccinated. And to encourage everyone to want one — working with employers so that they will encourage their workers to get vaccinated, making sure they have time off if that’s what they need. There will be some on-site vaccinating. We’re still trying to figure that out. The bottleneck continues to be the supply of vaccine

Employers will have to decide whether they want to require a vaccine for people going back to work. I don’t think that’s a state question. At least it’s not so far. It’s going to be interesting. It’s accelerated things that were happening in the economy by, like, five years.

Q: For people out of work, long unemployment delays continue to be a problem, and the state is just starting to confront $11 billion and counting in unemployment fraud. On the business side, we obviously have to think about the state unemployment fund paid for by employer taxes. Who is ultimately responsible for ensuring that workers are made whole and the state’s unemployment fund is sustainable?

A: You know, that’s not a conversation that I’m involved in right now, but I do think it’s one that’s important. 

Q: Two other big labor shifts during the pandemic were the explosion of delivery services, then voters approving Prop 22 to revert on-demand workers to independent contractors. At this point, are you involved in conversations about potential federal changes on this issue, or what does the administration see as the path forward on gig work?

A: That’s an ongoing conversation, and it’s not one I’ve been super involved in in the midst of the pandemic. But what is a quality job? What kind of benefits should they attach to the job? Those are some of the longer-term questions that the state is grappling with. The governor stood up the Future of Work commission 18 months ago to grapple with some of that. There will be a report coming out relatively soon about that, and really trying to create a process.

You know, there are no short-term answers to this. There’s no silver bullet, and there are a lot of stakeholders: business, labor, consumers, employees. And there are many, many sectors it affects. Coming from Warner Bros., musicians were an interesting subset. I think that’s a longer-term conversation.

Q: The other thing we’re hearing a lot of are these really familiar frustrations with the state’s high costs and strict regulations, pushing some businesses and residents to look at moving out of state. Do you think talk of a California exodus is overblown, or are there ways that you’re currently working to head off that migration?

A: Yes and yes (laughs). I think it’s overblown. My husband is a journalist. I’ve said this a million times, but he always says in journalism three’s a trend. You get HPEElon (Musk) and Larry Ellison, and all of a sudden, everyone’s leaving California, but there still somehow manages to be almost 40 million people who are still here. But look, that said, they’re not the only ones.

The tax question is an interesting one. First of all, the governor has said he’s not gonna raise personal income taxes. There will be no wealth tax. No increase in corporate taxes this year. Off the table. That’s not something that has seemed to penetrate. The other thing is this idea that California taxes are so high. Well, the top marginal rate is high. But the actual tax burden for the average person is like 10th-lowest in the country. 

I think we need to both address the things that make it difficult for businesses and remind people why certain things are the way they are. Business, I mean, they get it. They don’t need us to tell them about the advantage of being here. They wouldn’t be here. That’s not to say there aren’t other challenges. The cost of housing is high. We need to continue to address that. Transportation is something we all think about. Continuing to dig into those problems and try to figure out new solutions, creative solutions, is really important.

On bigger issues like housing construction and electric vehicle infrastructure, those are both included in the governor’s budget proposal for economic recovery. But some business owners I talk to say those aren’t things that will help businesses directly right now. How do you think about balancing the short-term needs during a crisis, versus these longer-term trends that are playing out?

You do absolutely have to do both. For the short-term, that’s why you see $4.5 billion in the governor’s budget for immediate relief. It’s really helpful that the federal government is also prioritizing that they also want to go to 100% clean energy. It’s like great, we’re in, let us show you some of the things that we’ve learned, and why don’t you invest some more of that money here? 

In the short term, we have learned that there’s an additional $10 billion in surplus. Some of it’s earmarked for other things, but the rest of that money will go to helping in the immediate term to restart the economy and to get us through the pandemic. Longer term, there’s also things in the budget and in the governor’s plans, (including) $1.5 billion for zero-emissions vehicles, which creates jobs and creates opportunities but also meets our climate goals. 

Communicating public health guidance that’s constantly changing isn’t easy, but the governor has developed a unique vernacular for doing it. Do you think California is meeting the moment in this respect, or are there ways the state could do this more effectively?

You can always improve, right? But I think on balance, California is doing better than maybe the public realizes. Not that there haven’t been some stumbles and missteps, but we’ve now distributed 5 million vaccines. That’s substantially more than any other state. That’s one good example of how I think the governor’s meeting the moment. 

We’re in, I don’t know, the fifth inning of this? The sixth inning? At the end of the game, there will be a score. Judge us by that. 

CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.


County Health Director Urges Prioritization of Older Adults for Vaccines

Less than four days before Santa Cruz County was set to inoculate 1,000 people in a mass Covid-19 vaccination clinic at the Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds, county health officials canceled every appointment on the docket.

They did so because about two-thirds of those who had signed up to receive the shot had found out how to “game the system,” County Health Services Agency Director Mimi Hall said at Thursday’s press conference. More than half were under 65 years old. Others were from outside the county—Hall says line jumpers from as far as Los Angeles and Yolo County took vaccination slots away from the area’s older adults, the target demographic of the weekly fairgrounds clinic.

The county health department and the dozens of Watsonville community-based organizations that it has worked hand-in-hand with since the start of the pandemic scrambled to call back the 300 county residents that did qualify for Wednesday’s vaccination. They also managed to fill several slots in the hours leading up to the clinic.

In all, the county distributed about 500 doses of vaccine. The other 500 earmarked for the clinic, says Hall, were preserved for future distributions and not wasted.

“That’s not 500 doses wasted. It’s 500 doses saved for someone who truly needs it,” Hall said.

That incident was a microcosm of California’s hectic and ever-changing first two months of vaccine distribution. Since the state began administering the vaccine in December, Gov. Gavin Newsom and the California Department of Public Health have altered their vaccination plan multiple times, struggled to quickly distribute doses—the state was dead last in vaccination rates last month—and favored large health care providers such as Dignity Health and Sutter over county health departments in its dispersal of the vaccine.

As a result, Santa Cruz County has been overwhelmed at times while trying to follow Phase 1B of its vaccination plan. Chief of Public Health Jennifer Herrera said the county has been “building the [plane] as we fly.”

“That has been the story of this pandemic,” Herrera said.

Phase 1B prioritizes people over the age of 65, the demographic that is most at risk of falling seriously ill and overwhelming the health care system, Hall says.

All told, the county of roughly 270,000 residents is near the top of the state in doses administered per population and has inoculated about 23,000 residents as of Thursday. Still, there are hundreds of thousands of county residents awaiting their vaccine, including about 35,000 people over the age of 65.

It is not known when the county will be done vaccinating older adults—Deputy County Health Officer Dr. David Ghilarducci has said June, but County Health Officer Dr. Gail Newel has said it will happen sooner—and Hall says they are in a “race against time” to vaccinate as many people in that population as possible before a predicted surge in cases next month.

Not helping the cause, Hall says, are incidents such as Wednesday’s mix-up and deals between employers and health care providers that are not prioritizing those 65 and older.

“Our call to action to everyone who is listening is if you’re an employer, if you’re an employee, if you’re part of a certain sector, please be patient,” she said. “If you somehow have the opportunity to get a vaccine and you don’t happen to be high-risk, and you’re not a health care worker and you’re not over 65, even though you have the opportunity to do it … think about it. Everyone who waits for their turn and saves the vaccine that we have right now for as many people over 65 as possible is going to be part of that collective effort to save more lives in our county.”

According to county data, 166 of the more than 14,000 county residents that have tested positive for Covid-19 have died. All but nine deaths were in people aged 60 and above, underscoring the risk older adults have faced over the past eight months.

OLD FASHIONED

The novel coronavirus has heavily impacted Watsonville, which has accounted for more than half of the county’s Covid-19 cases. As such, the county has prioritized its limited vaccine supply to older adults in its southernmost city. Along with its weekly vaccine clinic at the fairgrounds, a vaccination center funded by the state and run by OptumServe at the old Watsonville City Hall, 250 Main St., is administering 210 doses a day Thursday through Monday.

Those eligible include people in Phase 1A, all county residents aged 75 and older and residents 65 and older from the 95019, 95076 and 95077 zip codes.

To make sure doses are indeed going to Watsonville residents, the county sets aside a few dozen slots every day for the city of Watsonville. Senior Center staff, headed up by Older Adult Services Supervisor Katie Nunez, have helped coordinate vaccination appointments for about 270 older adults since Feb. 6.

They’ve done so the old fashioned way, says Watsonville Assistant City Manager Tamara Vides, calling the older adults who before the pandemic used to spend their day at the Senior Center. They’ve also started dropping off informational flyers in neighborhoods around the city with high populations of older adults, reaching out to Spanish speaking churches and working with nonprofits that serve older adults. The hope is to connect with people who have been traditionally hard to reach because of the digital divide and language barrier, an even tougher task today because of social distancing and stay-at-home orders, Vides said.

Vides encouraged Watsonville’s older adults to call the Senior Center at 831-768-3279 to set up an appointment. Those appointments, Vides said, are important because they are “low barrier.”

“It doesn’t require that a senior has internet access, a computer or computer skills for that matter,” she said. “Our Senior Center staff are able to sign them up… The system really, really works to lower the barriers of accessing the vaccine.”

In all, the OptumServe site has administered about 950 vaccines since opening on Feb. 6. Non-Watsonville residents can make appointments at myoptumserve.com/covid19 or by calling 877-218-0381.

FINDING EQUITY

According to data presented by Ghilarducci at Thursday’s press conference, about 7,000 people of Latinx descent have received at least one vaccine dose in the county. That’s compared to roughly 37,000 residents of different ethnicities. The number, Ghilarducci said, is skewed because of the large number of non-Latinx residents working on the front lines of the health care system that were prioritized in Phase 1A. That trend, however, has recently “improved,” says Ghilarducci.

“Our communities that have traditional difficulties accessing health care and also happened to have a disproportionate impact from this disease, it’s super important that we continue to reach out to them,” he said.

Organizations such as Community Bridges are trying to reach those communities in several ways, CEO Raymon Cancino says. That includes hosting a multilingual community forum on Covid-19 vaccine safety, effectiveness and distribution on Feb. 23. The free forum will be presented in Spanish with real-time translation in English, Mixteco and Trique—languages spoken by the Trique people of the Mexican states of Oaxaca and the state of Baja California. It will be available online or via phone. To register visit communitybridges.org/events. The forum begins at 6pm.

The interactive event will address vaccine hesitancy, identify myths and provide information on how to get the vaccine. Attendees will be able to ask questions of the expert panelists, including Dr. Newel and Dr. Oscar Gantes of Saluda Para La Gente, and five $100 raffle prizes will be awarded.

“We’re trying to really extend and focus on seniors 65 and older and really having a hyperfocus on identifying Latinx folks,” he said.

Cancino says grassroots phone banking systems similar to the Watsonville Senior Center will likely be the best way to connect with hard-to-reach older adults for vaccine appointments.

Community Bridges, a countywide nonprofit, recently established a helpline of its own—831-219-8607—in hopes of helping older adults navigate what Cancino called a “fragmented” vaccine distribution system. 

The so-called four-legged stool is more like an eight-legged table, Cancino argues, as large health care providers, small federally-recognized clinics and multiple agencies working with the county all have different numbers, websites and standards to qualify for the vaccine.

“It’s really hard for seniors to navigate that, especially people that have low digital literacy rate, don’t have access to the internet, don’t have access to hardware to access some of these things,” he said.

The phone line, Cancino said, is not only helping older adults set up appointments, but it is also sending them down the correct path to hopefully avoid another predicament similar to Wednesday’s vaccination clinic. Community Bridges and the county are working with large health care providers to make sure the county’s vaccine doses are used solely for the hard-to-reach communities that have been disproportionately impacted by the pandemic. Callers that receive their health care from Dignity or Sutter are forwarded there. The same goes for callers that have gone to clinics such Salud Para La Gente in Watsonville.

Cancino said that in its first eight hours in service, the helpline had already received 65 messages from older adults asking for assistance.

“We’re all just coordinating as best as possible,” Cancino said. “It’s been a lot of work, a lot of volunteer work, a lot of donated time and a lot of great partners….It’s been really great to see the traditional partners of nonprofits and new patterns coming in and stepping up.”

The Journey to Unionization at Bookshop Santa Cruz

5

Roughly thirty people gathered in the sunshine in front of the Tom Scribner statue in downtown Santa Cruz on Saturday, Feb. 6. Masked and many dressed in red, they congregated and cheered in celebration of the recent vote to unionize Bookshop Santa Cruz workers. 

“Bookshop Santa Cruz has long touted itself as a progressive business,” committee organizer and five-year Bookshop employee Molly Schrank told the crowd. 

Organizers like Schrank believe this is part of a growing trend toward more workers-rights policies and socialist-based groups such as the Democratic Socialists of America, whose Santa Cruz chapter has some 300 members (including this writer). 

“Now is a time to stand up to those claims by demonstrating what progress truly looks like,” Schrank said at the rally. “Now is the time for Bookshop to lead the way, forging a path for all Santa Cruz workers to rise up and stand together fighting for a Santa Cruz that is vibrant, equitable and sustainable.” 

The vote passed 18-10 on Feb. 3 after the effort to unionize was first publicly announced Dec. 11. The booksellers—of which there are about 40 total—will be represented by the Communications Workers of America Local 9423. They are part of a growing number of unionized bookstore employees including at Green Apple Books in San Francisco, Powell’s Books in Portland, and Strand Book Store in New York. 

Celeste Orlosky, another member of the organizing committee, says the vote represents the culmination of a nine-month effort by employees to organize a collective bargaining group. It all began when the store furloughed employees at the beginning of the pandemic, last March. Orlosky tells Good Times that a companywide email was sent informing staff when they could come back. If they choose not to, it would be viewed as voluntary termination, leaving the person ineligible for unemployment benefits. She says that while it was not the best option, it was “understandable.”

“However, what was missing from that correspondence were any measurable protections when we were back in the store,” she says. 

That’s when Orlosky and others decided to write an email to Protti, outlining 10 key issues the employees wanted to see addressed moving forward, like putting up Plexiglas barriers and having someone be a greeter with the store’s Covid-19 regulations at the front entrance. The pandemic also pushed workers to unionize for health care benefits. 

“It organically formed out of realizing if we wanted safety protection we would have to push for it every step of the way,” Schrank tells GT.

Orlosky hopes the move will help streamline and update certain features of working at the store, like switching from a work schedule written on Google Docs to a more concrete medium. Since California has at-will employment—meaning employees can generally be fired without cause or notice—Orlosky also believes unionizing will set in place the proper procedures if someone needs to be terminated. 

“Bookshop is not necessarily a business that tries to fire people,” she says. “But if there are workers who aren’t working cooperatively, there are procedures for that situation. So it benefits both us and the employer.” 

Contract negotiations often can be a long, drawn-out process. Workers hope to include more transparency in pay rates between the different departments, de-escalation tactics for dealing with hostile—often anti-mask—customers, and guaranteed annual or semi-annual raises.

When asked if working conditions at the local shop were hostile, Orlosky denied this, saying the choice to unionize sprung more out of giving the employees a collective voice. Schrank described working conditions as “usually pretty good.”

Another organizer and rally speaker, M.J. Jennings, agrees more transparency is needed and sees the unionization effort based on communication issues. 

“Bookshop has seen exponential growth, which is great,” says Jennings. “But when you get that growth and that many added people in the mix there’s just not the level of communication infrastructure between coworkers and management that you need.” 

Bookshop owner Casey Coonerty Protti says the company plans to enter “good faith bargaining” to meet the needs of employees and the store alike. However, the vote to unionize—and the demands surrounding the effort—caught her by surprise. 

“Up until they served the union papers, I didn’t have a single employee ever come to me and ask for employer-based health care or ask why we didn’t provide it,” she explains. 

In fact, the store provided health care through 2010 until premiums grew so high they decided to instead take the money and redistribute it to employees. Protti says at the time they also added an additional $50,000, which allowed the store to give a $2 an hour raise to its staff.

As for the email sent to employees about returning during the early stages of the pandemic last year, Protti says many of the safety demands made by the organizers were already in motion. She says things like the Plexiglas barriers were already ordered and the store had been working “almost 24 hours a day nonstop” to prepare for opening, including organizing future safety meetings. Still, she wanted to know the exact number of employees committed to returning prior to divulging the changes that would take place. It’s a decision she now regrets. 

“It was my mistake doing it the opposite way,” she says. “But [concerning] the demands they sent me, half of them were already done.” 

Protti prides herself in having an “open door” policy with employees, welcoming them to bring any concerns or grievances to her and management. The store has a standing policy of staff liaisons as an avenue for anonymous feedback, which she prioritizes. They have also held staff-led diversity committees and conducted an anonymous survey surrounding concerns about race, equity and inclusion any Bookshop employees may have had. 

She says the business not only addresses all matters raised but actively tries to implement change concerning any issues communicated through these avenues. Moving forward, what most concerns Protti will be the lack of individual needs being met. 

“Now all of that will happen through a process where they are relying on union representatives and we’re relying on lawyers,” she says. “It seems like a very formalized, expensive approach to something we’ve always done side-by-side with each other.” 

Negotiating committees do consist of union reps and individual employees.

Still, it’s a major concern shared by one long-term employee who wished to remain anonymous for fear of retribution from co-workers. They say in their five-year tenure they’ve seen the open-door policy in place and feel the company actively works to respond to employees needs.They fear a union will only fracture these bonds instead of strengthening them. 

“It’s created a divide that wasn’t there before,” they say, expressing much of the push seems to be coming from younger staff members, with participation phasing out among older employees. They believe unionizing was less about the context of the situation and more about the ideology of collective bargaining in general. 

“The idea of unions really applies to people whose jobs are putting them at risk, and for them the need for unions is a real thing,” they say. “But is that applicable to a small, family business? And could those concerns have been solved with better communication or even mediation?”

Protti says, “There’s not a lot of hidden money sitting around. But we’re open to hearing what the union is interested in and how they might prioritize how we spend money in terms of wages and benefits.” 

Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, the business of bookselling was already under strain. 

According to the American Booksellers Association, most independent bookstores operate within a 2% margin of profitability. Protti says much of that is due to publishers and vendors setting the price of books, not the individual stores like other business models. So as overhead costs increase, while profits don’t. 

Despite that slim margin, whenever it was known Bookshop would make a profit, Protti says that money went back into the store—primarily for salaries. For her part, she decided not to take a salary all of last year in an effort to cut costs for the business which saw anywhere from 15-50% revenue loss each month of 2020. 

“Ownership didn’t take any money out of the store,” Protti says. “It all went back straight into the store to allow it to survive and ensure the employees could make a living wage as best as we could provide.” 

Organizer Orlosky acknowledges the stress of the pandemic has been taxing on Protti and staff alike and hopes this next chapter will be seen as an effort to grow the business.

“The intention, of course, is not to close Bookshop. We can include provisions for, as an example, during a pandemic,” she says. “Everything in the contract is up for negotiation, and we certainly do not want to harm Bookshop in any way, shape or form.”

Rob Brezsny’s Astrology: Feb. 17-23

Astrology, Horoscope, Stars, Zodiac Signs
Free will astrology for the week of Feb. 17

States Are Expanding Access to Vaccines. The Supply Isn’t Keeping Up.

State officials ready to administer more shots every day—if they could get them

California Shifts Vaccine Priorities Again: People with Health Conditions Are Eligible Next Month

Californians with high-risk medical conditions will qualify for Covid-19 vaccines starting March 15

Disasters, Evacuations Don’t Slow Santa Cruz Mountains Housing Market

While fires and mudslides send some residents packing, housing market still reaches new heights

Aptos’ Kelsey Ferrell—aka Feral—Gets Brutally Honest on New Songs

Single is a feel-good, snarky rock ’n’ roll song in the vein of early Liz Phair

A Visit to the Farmers’ Market Lifts the Spirits on Winter Days

Great coffee and fresh pastries exert their siren song at local farmers’ markets

This Year’s Dungeness Crab Fishery a Shell of its Former Self

Struggles roll in like waves for one of the oldest and largest fisheries in California

California Economy Czar Dee Dee Myers on Vaccines, Reopening

Myers talks about the state’s evolving Covid-19 recovery plan

County Health Director Urges Prioritization of Older Adults for Vaccines

Health officials warn of predicted surge in Covid-19 cases next month

The Journey to Unionization at Bookshop Santa Cruz

Bookshop owner says worker demands surrounding the effort caught her by surprise
17,623FansLike
8,845FollowersFollow