Exhibit Displays Pandemic-Era Artwork, Stories and More

0

Last week, members of the Santa Cruz Museum of Art and History (MAH) had an exclusive sneak peak of the new exhibit In These Uncertain Times: Creativity, Community, and Compassion During a Global Pandemic.

The virtual event was the only time people can view the show until the MAH’s physical building is once again open to the public.

Initially, the show was scheduled to open in late 2020, but after Covid-19 numbers rose and the county was pushed back into more restrictions on what can be open, the museum had to remain shuttered.

Still, the exhibit has moved forward. Artists and staff were hard at work last week with installation, and the plan is to keep the exhibit up as long as it takes to safely reopen the museum.

“The idea is that we’ll have all this artwork up and ready for when we do open,” said Exhibitions and Program Manager Everett Ó Cillín. “We wanted to design something that will be a cathartic experience … for people to come and see what incredible things others were working on during this time.”

In These Uncertain Times has been in the works since the initial closures in March 2020. MAH staff had the idea to highlight the creativity and compassion they saw blooming amidst the crisis. They reached out to the community, seeing if they’d be interested in collaborating. 

The response was immediate. Close to 150 people from across Santa Cruz County expressed interest, and that grew after another more formal open call to local creatives was sent out.

“There has been such a wonderful show of support,” Ó Cillín said. “People are eager to show their artistic process, what they’ve been creating.”

The exhibit will include a selected group of “anchor” artists as well as a long list of “community-sourced” contributors. Some of the pieces will relate directly to the pandemic. For instance, The Surviving Covid Project, organized by local nurse Tawnya Gilbert, includes collected work aiming to provide emotional support to people working in ICUs. 

“In early March 2020 I was struck with the realization that nurses had an obligation to get our country through this [pandemic],” Gilbert wrote in her artist’s statement. “I was aware of the fear and tragedy touching the lives of all healthcare workers and wanted to find a way to bring inspiration, hope, humor and humanity back into our hospital break rooms.”

Other pieces will be from creators who used shelter-in-place to develop new skills: Textiles, paintings, videos, etc. A video piece, “Essential Workers: Campesinos” from Gabriel Medina of Watsonville’s Digital NEST about farmworkers and their families will be featured.

In addition, MAH has been teaming up with the Santa Cruz Downtown Association for related pop-ups. The displays are located at 119 and 121 Walnut Ave. in Santa Cruz. One covers the 1918 influenza pandemic—in particular, how Santa Cruz County responded to it.

Ó Cillín said that learning about that history is a good way to help move forward.

“We’re experiencing many of the same moments,” they said. “This shows us, we’ve been here before, and we’ll make it through.”

The museum has also been finding new ways to use their space during the pandemic. They transformed one of their galleries into a studio, inviting local artist Abi Mustapha to have a residency there for three months. One of her pieces will be featured in In These Uncertain Times.

This year, the MAH will be celebrating its 25th anniversary. Staff hopes to hold a celebration this summer. For now though, they aim to keep supporting the community in any way they can.

“This isn’t the first pandemic and it won’t be the last,” Ó Cillín said. “While in this time of uncertainty … creativity and compassion will help us to process and move on.”

For more information about “In These Uncertain Times,” visit: santacruzmah.org/exhibitions/uncertain-times.

Drive-Thru Crab Feed Slated for March at Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds

0

Following an enormously successful fundraiser for the Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds Foundation with the first Holiday Lights Drive-Thru, more events are now being lined up with a similar footprint.

Next in line: The first Drive-Thru Crab Feed, slated for March 6.

“Holiday Lights was a resounding success,” said John Eiskamp, committee chair of the event and a sixth-generation local berry grower. “We were very pleased with the results; the turnout was approximately twice of what we expected. We were amazed with the success and with the outpouring of support.”

Thus, here comes the crab, just after the commercial crab season kicked off.

“We are planning a great dinner as always, but this year you get to drive-thru and pick up dinners to enjoy at home,” organizers said. “We also will have an online auction complete with our outstanding cakes and champagne items we have each year.”

A ticket for the Crab Feed will provide guests with a whole cleaned crab, a half barbecue chicken, tossed green salad with Italian dressing, fire-roasted garlic bread, a cup of clam chowder, a container of cioppino sauce and a dessert cookie all packaged in a reusable cooler container. Dinners include a crab bib, cracker and heating and serving instructions. A bottle of red or white wine will be included for every two dinners ordered (must be 21 for wine).

“We couldn’t have done it [Holiday Lights] without the volunteers,” Eiskamp said. “There were about 30 to 40 of them working on the displays set up alone. And the sponsors were incredible—around 20—who really helped make this happen. It will be even better next year; after the response we got we don’t really have a choice not to run it again. It was so rewarding to be a part of it.”

All proceeds from the events allow the Fairgrounds Foundation to help fund the county fair and other Santa Cruz County Fairground events.

Visit fairgrounds-foundation.org for more information and to buy tickets.

Santa Cruz’s Covid-19 Vaccine Distribution Slowed by Limited Doses

At least 5,600 doses of Covid-19 vaccines have been distributed throughout Santa Cruz County, a number that county health officials at a Friday press conference said has been significantly impacted by plodding distribution from the state.

Overall, the county has received about 16,000 doses of Covid-19 vaccines—both from Pfizer and Moderna. But that is far short of the 29,000 doses needed for the county to finish up the first phase of its vaccination plan, which includes frontline health care workers, several first responders and residents and employees of skilled nursing facilities, among others. Of the roughly 11,000 doses still in the county’s inventory, about 8,000 are squared away as second doses for those who have already received the first shot.

Most frontline employees at local hospitals have received both doses, health officials said Friday, but others in the so-called Phase 1A portion of the vaccination plan have not. That includes many residential care facilities, who have not yet heard when they will receive the vaccine, according to Deputy County Health Officer David Ghilarducci.

Ghilarducci said that is because the vaccine is still in low supply locally, and the number of doses being sent to public health agencies has been limited. Next week the county is expected to receive only 200 doses, Ghilarducci said, making it “an impossible task” to quickly finish off Phase 1A and move on to the much larger Phase 1B, which now includes all people over the age of 65—about 48,000 people in Santa Cruz County—thanks to a mandate from the California Department of Public Health.

Still, Ghilarducci said his earlier prediction that the county would advance into Phase 1B in late January or early February remains an attainable goal. He said many county residents would receive their vaccines from agencies such as the Pharmacy Partnership for Long-Term Care, their health care providers or other smaller health care providers such as Safeway Pharmacies and Doctors on Duty. The county’s allotment of vaccines, he said, would go to residents living in communities disproportionately impacted by the pandemic and will be distributed in clinics such as Salud Para La Gente in Watsonville.

“The bottom line is that we are asking for patience and understanding,” Ghilarducci said. “We certainly understand your anxiety, and we’re actually very happy that many of you are interested in being vaccinated because that is really our path out of this.”

The vaccination woes come as the county is seeing its highest case rates since the start of the pandemic. According to state data, the county had 59 cases per day per 100,000 residents as of Friday, meaning the county, which has a population of roughly 273,000, is seeing more than 160 new Covid-19 cases every day.

There are currently more than 3,000 active cases, according to county data last updated Thursday evening.

“The data that came in this week surprised even me with its severity,” said County Health Officer Dr. Gail Newel. 

The county’s death toll also rose to 113. More than 8,500 people have recovered from the disease, which has sickened more than 11,700, including 346 who have required hospitalization. The pandemic continues to have an outsized impact on low-income and disadvantaged communities locally, too.

But there was some good news reported Friday. Newel said the state reassured her the overall Bay Area ICU capacity is not expected to reach zero in the next four weeks, meaning Santa Cruz County could potentially offload some of its ICU patients to its neighbors if capacity continues to be in limited supply.

There were 80 people in county hospitals with Covid-19 on Thursday, including 12 in the ICU. No ICU beds were available.

Jimmy Panetta on Impeaching Trump Twice and Threats to Democracy

In the days after the pro-Trump mob stormed the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6 in an attempt to overthrow results of the November election, U.S. Rep. Jimmy Panetta (D-Carmel Valley) received a letter from lawmakers in El Salvador.

Assemblymember Damian Alegria, who wrote the letter, expressed concern about the violence. “As I watched your Congress being overrun and the seat of your democracy being vandalized, I was saddened for you and for the world,” the letter stated. 

The backstory to the letter goes back nearly a full year. El Salvador witnessed a troubling use of force of its own in February 2020, when its president and a group of soldiers occupied the capitol in a show of force. In the days that followed, Panetta wrote his own letter to U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, calling attention to the action and condemning it. Eighteen members of Congress, including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) and Ted Lieu (D-Torrence), signed on to the letter. 

When rioters broke into the U.S. Capitol after being incited by President Donald Trump and his allies, the parallels were all too striking for Alegria and his colleagues. “You’re just like us,” he wrote. 

January has been an eventful month in American politics. Panetta made some time Thursday afternoon to talk with us about the riot at the Capitol, the impeachment of Trump, the letter from El Salvador, and what comes next.

Where were you when the looters broke into the Capitol building? Were you in your office?

JIMMY PANETTA: That’s correct. they had advised members who weren’t part of the states that were being challenged—so at that point it was mainly Arizona—to remain in their offices. They said you could go watch in the gallery. But based on that advisory, I had already scheduled a Zoom call with some constituents about vaccine distribution, so I had work to do. And in the middle of that call, U.S. Capitol Police came knocking on the door loudly and advising us that we had to leave. I went ahead and sent my staff out with them. But I stayed in my office because I had to finish that call! Then I had some other stuff to do as well, so I stayed holed up in my office the whole time.

Was that scary?

It was not scary. I was not scared. If anything, Jake, I was really pissed off. I was more angry than anything—watching the scene on TV unfold, getting text messages from my colleagues, who had then been ushered into a secure location in the Ways and Means Committee Room. I was not scared. They were not scared, or at least the ones I spoke to. If anything, we were really angry, upset. Then, as we saw the president was involved in the incitement, obviously it became distressing—that he played such an integral part of this, with the constant lies prior to it and then the incitement immediately before it. That’s what led to our vote yesterday and his second impeachment from the House of Representatives within four years.

When you supported Trump’s impeachment in 2019, did you think there was any possibility that you might end up impeaching him again before his term ended?

Look, you don’t ever go into this job thinking that you might have to impeach a president, you know what I mean? So it’s obviously something you don’t want to have to do, but it’s part of our responsibility to hold a president—especially like Donald Trump, who acts in the manner that he does, when it comes to causing disruption and violence—[accountable].

This second impeachment—I actually felt better about it than the first one. Similar to the first one, but more so in this one—you had strong evidence. It wasn’t just a phone call. It wasn’t just a transcript. This is something we saw play out on TV from right at the end of the November election all the way up to the day of Jan. 6. From his action and his incitement before the riot to his inaction and his failing to lead before the riot and then his thinking that it was appropriate, subsequent to the riot. I hope that the Senate not only feels the same way, but does the same thing, based on the evidence that’s out there. As a former prosecutor, you look at the facts, you look at the law, you apply the facts to the law, and that’s your verdict.

We’re not in a court of law. The Senate’s not a court of law. It’s a political courtroom. Therefore, they take in other political considerations, as we saw with the first impeachment. Let’s hope with new evidence and the drip-drip-drip of new videos, new information that’s coming out, that they feel not only is the evidence there but, politically, it’s the right thing to do to convict this president.

Would you have preferred that the Trump administration officials instead use the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office?

No, I would have preferred that he just did the right thing and stepped down. Now, he obviously did not do that. We called on Vice President [Mike] Pence to step up and invoke the 25th Amendment by gathering the cabinet members and having them conclude that the president was unable to perform his duties. Now, Pence wasn’t able to do that. So we in the House of Representatives stepped up and impeached him.

Some Salvadoran legislators sent you a very powerful letter after the attempted coup at the Capitol. How long have you known those lawmakers?

Just during my time in office. There were a few members who came to Capitol Hill. Then, obviously, when I found out about the Feb. 9, 2020, incident, where [President Nayib Bukele and armed soldiers] stormed their legislature, I wanted to show our support to the members that we have members of Congress here in the U.S. who support them and their efforts to fully exercise their democracy and ensure that they don’t cower to threats of democracy, as I believe they tried to do when he and that group stormed the congress. So I wanted to send a letter to them, letting them know they had our support. They sent a letter back to us [this month], letting us know that we have their support. 

They did the right thing, in that they didn’t back down. And we did the right thing on the morning of Jan. 7, showing that we weren’t gonna back down. Despite the violence that was perpetrated on the Capitol, we got right back on the same House floor that they tried to storm, and we did our job. We certified the electoral college count, so that there will be a transition of power on Jan. 20. I appreciated that they sent me that letter, inspiring us that we would continue to do our jobs, just like we did to them.

The letter, written by Assemblymember Damian Alegria, ends with the passage, “I never imagined that anything like that could happen there. You’re just like us. We will be praying for you and your country.” Do you remember how you felt when you read that?

I took that to mean, ‘Look, we are not going to back down to any sort of violence or threats of violence when it comes to exercising our duties to uphold our constitution and to ensure that our democracy moves forward.’ They didn’t do it. We didn’t do it, and I believe that’s how we continue to move forward as a country. Our history has been riddled with more bad times than the good times. But the way we’ve been able to get through it is to do our jobs and uphold the U.S. Constitution and move forward. And this is one of those times. It’s obviously difficult  right now. There’s a lot of corrections that we have to make, but that’s one of the things that makes this democracy one of the greatest in the world. We can self-correct. We can make ourselves the more-perfect union that we’re supposed to be.

We could all use some of that optimism right now. However, the letter shows a lot of concern for the U.S., and obviously we have seen some Central American countries, like El Salvador, encounter real threats to their democracies. The letter expresses fears that the U.S. is trending in that direction, that our democracy is in danger—that maybe we’re no better off than they are. Do you share those concerns at all?

What you have to realize is that democracies are very fragile. It gives us a framework. But it’s up to individuals; it’s up to the people to make sure that we continue to make that framework strong enough to hold our house, our government, our country. What people need to understand is that politics flows down from morality. So when you are electing people to office, no matter what the position is, you need to make sure that they are the right character to reinforce and work for our democratic values.

As I said on the House floor, American exceptionalism is not guaranteed. We constantly have to work for it. We have to make it better. But like I said, that’s the good part, that we can make it better. Yes, we may have incidents like this, horrific incidents like we saw the sixth of January. But we damn well better be able to correct it and move forward, if we’re going to uphold our democracy, and I believe we will.

By very narrow margins, we’ll see a Democrat-controlled government when former Vice President Joe Biden assumes the presidency Jan. 20. What are you expecting?

It’s going to help that you have Joe Biden and Kamala Harris in the White House. You’re going to have a Democrat-led Senate and, of course, a House of Representatives led by Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Obviously, that’s a good foundation. But as you mentioned, based on the narrow majorities, it demonstrates [the need for] what I believe Joe Biden ran on. And that’s his ability to get things done and his ability to work together to get things done. I think that’s what people are yearning for after four years of a president who didn’t get much done. I believe it’s going to be refreshing. It’s going to be a sense of normalcy. That is exactly why President Biden won. So I’m very optimistic—in the sense that he will put together a national strategy on fixing Covid-19, basically making sure that the vaccines are distributed properly. We just had a briefing about the economic stimulus package he put forward. We will put forward an immigration package. We will put forward an immigration reform package. These are all big things that President Trump could have done, but clearly based on a lack of leadership didn’t do.

County’s Equity Measures Show Watsonville’s Struggles to Quell Covid-19

0

Current positivity rates in Santa Cruz County’s low-income and disadvantaged communities are among the worst in the state and Bay Area region, according to data reported by the California Department of Public Health.

The county’s “Health Equity Quartile Positivity Rate,” or test positivity rates in its most disadvantaged neighborhoods, was 22.7% on Wednesday, much higher than the overall county positivity rate of 12.3%. Only hard-hit counties in the Southern California and San Joaquin Valley regions have higher Health Equity positivity rates.

The Health Equity number, according to the state, focuses on the positivity rate data of test results coming from census tracts that have “low health conditions” as determined by the state’s Healthy Places Index.

The county’s troubling health equity numbers underscore the impact the pandemic has had on Watsonville, a primarily Latinx community with three census tracts that are in the bottom fourth of the Healthy Places Index range.

More than half of the county’s 11,447 cases have been identified in Watsonville, despite the city accounting for less than a fourth of the county’s population. The county’s Latinx residents, about a third of its population, have also been disproportionately affected by Covid-19, making up more than half of the area’s cases.

There have been roughly 6,100 cases in Watsonville since the start of the pandemic, meaning about one out of every nine residents in the city of some 55,000 has had Covid-19.

That trend is not unique to Santa Cruz County. According to state data released Jan. 6, Latinx Californians have accounted for 55.1% of Covid-19 cases and 47% of deaths related to the disease. White Californians, the second largest demographic in the state, have accounted for 20% of cases and 31.6% of deaths.

To try to make up for this and other inequities, counties are required to implement a Targeted Equity Investment Plan detailing their efforts of how they planned to promote “an equitable recovery.” Santa Cruz County’s most recent plan detailed a five-pronged attack that sought to improve testing, contact tracing, isolation support, data collection and community engagement, especially in South County.

In all, that plan distributed about $8 million worth of grants and other investments to various organizations such as UCSC, Santa Cruz Community Ventures, Pajaro Valley Community Health Trust, the South County Communications Task Force and Salud Para La Gente.

Despite that, cases in Watsonville—and the rest of the county—have continued to rise. And county officials say the next two weeks will be the most trying time of the pandemic.

The current surge, which began in early November, is starting to plateau as cases county officials believe were spread during Halloween and Thanksgiving gatherings have slowed. But cases resulting from Christmas and New Year’s gatherings, says Santa Cruz County Health Officer Dr. Gail Newel, are beginning to arise.

“Our case counts and test positivity rates are extraordinarily high right now and we would expect those to rise in the coming weeks as we absorb a surge in cases from the holidays,” she said in a prepared statement. “It is extraordinarily important—more important now than ever—that people stay home if possible, wear masks if they do go out in public, and especially avoid gathering with others outside your household. Don’t put yourself and your loved ones at risk.”

There were about 2,800 active cases in the county Wednesday, and the death toll continued its climb to 111 county residents. More than 8,500 residents have recovered from the disease, and about 330 have required hospitalization. That includes the 79 patients in county hospitals as of Wednesday, 14 of which were in the ICU, according to state data.

There were no ICU beds available in the county Wednesday, a statistic that closely mirrored the rest of the Bay Area region, which will be under the stay-at-home order until conditions improve, the CDPH announced this week.

Second Stimulus Bill to Support Arts and Culture Venues

On March 10, 2020, the Kuumbwa Jazz Center in Santa Cruz held a live performance, complete with a large audience, full band, and an open kitchen and bar.

What staff, musicians and patrons didn’t know at the time was that the concert would be the center’s last live event for more than a year. The pandemic brought everything to a halt, shutting Kuumbwa and all other venues like it to slow the spread of the virus.

“Suddenly, we didn’t have any more ticket or cafe sales, no promoters renting our space … all local events just came to an end,” said Kuumbwa’s Executive Director Bobbi Todaro. “It was shocking.”

Help for venues like Kuumbwa might finally be coming thanks to the new $900 billion Covid-19 Relief Act, which was signed into law on Dec. 27. The act includes a $15 billion funding package meant for independent arts and cultural venues through the Save Our Stages (SOS) Act.

SOS was passed thanks to a lobbying effort led by the National Independent Venue Association (NIVA), a coalition of more than 1,200 live venues across the U.S. The program, to be handled by the Small Business Administration, will assist live venue operators, promoters, theatrical producers, performing arts organizations, museums, movie theaters and talent representatives.

“It’s a remarkable story, what NIVA has accomplished,” Todaro said. “This funding is going to help so many.” 

Kuumbwa, a nonprofit which also works with county schools on music education, was able to apply and receive a loan from the Payroll Protection Program (PPP), which was part of last year’s Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. But unlike PPP loans, SOS funding is grants-based, meaning venues will not need to pay back the amounts.

This will greatly help live venues, which even after the pandemic will not be able to open immediately—instead, they have to wait for the touring industry to return to somewhat normal operations. Artists, crews and more will all need to be rehired.

The SOS act allocates funds for payroll, employee benefits, rent and mortgage, insurance and other business expenses, incurred during the period from March 1, 2020 through Dec. 31, 2021. The funds cap out at $10 million to each establishment selected.

Todaro said she and other local venue owners have been connecting regularly, discussing which funding opportunities were available. They’ve received help from Santa Cruz County Bank, the Small Business Development Center, and Arts Council Santa Cruz County, as well as national organizations such as Americans for the Arts.

“Having these relationships goes a long way,” she said. “It really helps make sure we know who to talk to about what.”

In addition to the SOS grants, other assistance such as PPP loans and tax write-offs are expanding this time around, giving opportunities to small, independent businesses and organizations. For example, PPP loans will be limited to companies with fewer than 300 employees. 

This includes 501(c)(6) organizations such as chambers of commerce, which were not eligible for CARES funding. Shaz Roth, CEO of the Pajaro Valley Chamber of Commerce and Agriculture, called the aid a “game-changer.”

“It will really just help us stay afloat,” Roth said. “We haven’t been able to have events or fundraisers. Businesses are not renewing their memberships, which is what we mainly rely on. This is going to help out a lot.”

Kuumbwa, which celebrated its 40th anniversary in 2020, has done its best to remain engaged with the community during the pandemic, kicking off a weekly virtual concert series filmed at their venue.

“I hear from people all the time that live music is what they miss the most,” Todaro said. “Being together with a lot of people in one room who share the same values, having a meal and a glass of wine …. Concerts are a great expression of joy. This [funding] will help guarantee we can do it again.”

California Counties ‘Flying the Plane as We Build It’ in a Plodding Vaccine Rollout

In these first lumbering weeks of the largest vaccination campaign in U.S. history, Dr. Julie Vaishampayan has had a battlefront view of a daunting logistical operation.

Vaishampayan is the health officer in Stanislaus County, an almond-growing mecca in California’s Central Valley that has recorded about 40,000 cases of covid-19 and lost 700 people to the illness. Her charge is to see that potentially lifesaving covid shots make it into the arms of 550,000 residents.

And like her dozens of counterparts across the state, she is improvising as she goes.

From week to week, Vaishampayan has no idea how many new doses of covid vaccines will be delivered until just days before they arrive, complicating advance planning for mass inoculation clinics. The inoculation clinics themselves can be a bureaucratic slog, as county staffers verify the identities and occupations of people coming in for shots to ensure strict compliance with the state’s multitiered hierarchy of eligibility. In these early days, the county also has provided vaccines to some area hospitals so they can inoculate health care workers, but the state system for tracking whether and how those doses are administered has proven clumsy.

With relatively little help from the federal government, each state has built its own vaccination rollout plan. In California, where public health is largely a county-level operation, the same departments managing testing and contact tracing for an out-of-control epidemic are leading the effort. That puts an already beleaguered workforce at the helm of yet another time-consuming undertaking. A lack of resources and limited planning by the federal and state governments have made it that much harder to get operations up and running.

“We are flying the plane as we are building it,” said Jason Hoppin, a spokesperson for Santa Cruz County. ”All of these logistical pieces are just a huge puzzle to work out.”

It’s a massive enterprise. Counties must figure out who falls where in the state’s multitiered system for eligibility, locate vaccination sites, hire vaccinators, notify workforce groups when they are eligible, schedule appointments, verify identities, then track distribution and immunizations administered.

Some of that burden has been eased by a federal program that is contracting with major pharmacies Walgreens and CVS to vaccinate people living in nursing homes and long-term care facilities, as well as a California mechanism that allows some large multicounty health care providers to order vaccines directly. As of this week, some smaller clinics and doctors’ offices also can get vaccine directly from the state.

But much of the job falls on health departments, the only entities required by law to protect the health of every Californian. And they are doing it amid pressures from the state to prevent people from skipping the line and a public eager to know why the rollout isn’t happening faster.

As of Monday, only a third of the nearly 2.5 million doses allocated to California counties and health systems had been administered, according to the most recent state data available. Gov. Gavin Newsom has acknowledged the rollout has “gone too slowly.” Health directors counter it’s the best that could be expected given the short planning timeline, limited vaccine available and other strictures.

“I would not call this rollout slow,” said Kat DeBurgh, executive director of the Health Officers Association of California. “This isn’t the same as a flu vaccine clinic where all you have to do is roll up your sleeve and someone gives you a shot.”

It has been one month since the first vaccines arrived in California, and just over five weeks since the state first outlined priority groups for vaccinations, then passed the ball to counties to devise ways to execute the plan.

Like most states, California opened its rollout with strict rules about the order of distribution. The first phase prioritized nursing home residents and hospital staffs before expanding to other broad categories of health care workers. In the weeks after the vaccines first arrived, state officials made clear that providers could be penalized if they gave vaccinations to people not in those initial priority groups.

Multiple counties said there had been little in the way of line-skipping, but stray reports in the media or complaints sent directly to community officials need to be chased down, wasting precious public health resources. The same goes for reports of vaccine doses being thrown away. One of the vaccines in circulation, once removed from ultra-cold storage, must be used within five days or discarded.

State officials have since loosened their rules, telling counties and providers to do their best to adhere to the tiers, but not to waste doses. On Jan. 7, California officials told counties they could vaccinate anyone in “phase 1a,” expanding beyond the first priority group of nursing homes and hospitals to nearly everyone in a health-related job. Once that wide-ranging category is finished, counties were supposed to move to “phase 1b,” which unfolds with its own set of tiers, starting with people 75 and older, educators, child care workers, providers of emergency services, and food and agricultural workers before expanding to all people 65 and older.

Mariposa and San Francisco both said they would be vaccinating people in the first 1b categories this week. That means residents will start seeing inequities among counties, said DeBurgh, noting that some counties had not yet received enough vaccine doses to cover health care workers while others are nearly finished. Stanislaus County, for example, had received approximately 16,000 first doses as of Jan. 9, but estimates it has between 35,000 and 40,000 health care workers for phase 1a.

And the orders are changing yet again, forcing counties to pivot. On Tuesday, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar said the Trump administration would begin releasing more of its vaccine supply, holding onto fewer vials for second doses; and he encouraged states to open up vaccinations to everyone age 65 and older. In response, California officials said Wednesday that once counties are done with phase 1a, people 65 and older are in the next group eligible for vaccines.

Some local health directors expressed dismay at the prospect, saying they welcome the influx of vaccines but need to prioritize people 75 and older who represent the bulk of hospitalizations. They also noted that states already offering broader access have had their own challenges, including flooded health department phone lines, crashed websites and fragile seniors camping out overnight in hopes of securing their place in line.

While sensible in theory, California’s phased approach to the rollout has proved cumbersome when it comes to verifying that people showing up for shots fall under the umbrella groups deemed eligible. In Stanislaus, for example, 6,600 people qualify as in-home support workers. Someone from another county department has to sit with health department staffers to verify their eligibility, since the health department doesn’t have access to official data on who is a qualified member of the group.

Complicating matters, about half the county’s in-home workers are caring for a family member, and many are bringing that person with them to get vaccinated. The county is required to turn those family members away if they don’t meet the eligibility criteria, Vaishampayan said.

A range of other hiccups hampered the rollout. Across the state, uptake of vaccination slowed to a crawl from Christmas to New Year’s. Health workers, particularly those who do not work in hospitals, were on vacation and enjoying a few days off with family after a tough year, several county officials said. Many chose not to get vaccinated during that time.

Others are choosing not to get vaccinated at all. Across the state, health care workers are declining vaccinations in large numbers. The health officer for Riverside County has said 50% of hospital workers there have declined the vaccine.

And in Los Angeles and Sonoma, officials described software challenges that prevented them from quickly enrolling doctors’ offices to receive vaccines and perform injections.

Still, statewide, officials said they were confident that the pace would pick up in the coming days, as more doses arrive, data snags get sorted out and more vaccination sites come on board. Los Angeles County announced this week it would convert Dodger Stadium and a Veterans Affairs site from mass testing sites into mass vaccination clinics. Similar plans are underway at Petco Park in San Diego and the Disneyland Resort in Orange County. Officials hope Dodger Stadium alone can handle up to 12,000 people a day.

The move solves one problem, but potentially exacerbates another: The two Los Angeles sites have been testing 87,000 people a week, according to Dr. Christina Ghaly, Los Angeles County Department of Health Services director. That will put new constraints on testing, even as covid cases in the nation’s most populous county continue to rise and hospitals are beyond capacity.

KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a nonprofit news service covering health issues. It is an editorially independent program of KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation), which is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Watsonville Brillante Extends Open Call for Local Artists

0

Watsonville Brillante, the ongoing community mosaic project spearheaded by Community Arts Empowerment (CAE), has extended its deadline for art submissions to Feb. 10.

Organizers are looking for local artists’ work to be featured on the six-story parking garage on Rodriguez Street, which is attached to the Watsonville Civic Plaza.

The project, which includes four large vertical pieces by Watsonville-born artist Juan Fuentes, has been moving forward during the pandemic. But Executive Director of CAE Kathleen Crocetti says they have not had enough entries for the 184 smaller, horizontal sections. 

“We’ve only received about 10 entries, and we’ve had the call out for a year,” Crocetti said. “This is the third time we’ve extended the deadline. We want people to know they can still submit work.”

CAE aims to represent in the mosaics the various cultural backgrounds of Watsonville’s population: Mexican, Filipino, Slavic, etc. They offer a list of cultures on their website, but anyone can add to it.

There is no age limit to submit—student work will also be considered. Crocetti says they have developed curriculum materials for local art teachers, and are hoping this will encourage their students to get involved.

“We really like to promote student work,” she said. “We’re trying to push to get classes involved.”

The open call is for anyone living in or within a 10-mile radius of Watsonville, including places such as Pajaro, Corralitos and Freedom. Artists can submit a maximum of five pieces. Organizers are looking for designs such as patterns, textiles, tattoo designs or symbols such as crests and seals.

“Whatever drawing is submitted, it will be translated into tiles,” Crocetti said. “So stay simple, limit your color range. We can’t do things like ombré.”

After submissions are in, the organization will invite the community to vote on a group of semifinalists. The public voting will be anonymous. The selections will need to go to the Arts commission for approval before August, when CAE will begin fabricating the tiles and hand out prize money. 

Crocetti hopes Watsonville Brillante will help keep artists inspired when creative spaces, including CAE’s headquarters, remain shuttered during the pandemic. 

“We will hopefully open up once we are down into the red tier,” she said. “We are eager to do art together again. But this is a way you can do it now, too.”

For more information, visit communityartsempowerment.org/local-artists-invitation.

Downtown Watsonville Mixed-Use Apartment Complex Moves Forward

0

The Watsonville Planning Commission at its first meeting of the year Monday recommended the city council move forward with a mixed-use apartment complex in downtown.

A project from local developers Bill and Neva Hansen, The Residence at 558 Main is a proposed four-story, 50-unit apartment building that, if approved, will be nestled into the historic corridor near the corner of E. 5th and Main streets. Along with apartments, which will include 10 affordable units, the project will also feature about 2,000 square feet of retail space on the first floor, and a small dog park and a courtyard for residents.

There will be six two-bedroom units, 29 one-bedroom units and 15 studios. Market rate apartments will range from $1,750-2,650 per month, according to the project’s website. That includes internet access, cable television and utilities. The affordable units will include median, low, very low and Section 8 rates, as written into the city’s housing ordinance.

The commission recommended approval by a 5-1 vote—one seat sat vacant. Commissioner Ed Acosta was the lone “no” vote. He voiced concern about the proposed entrance and exit from the 56-space, ground-level parking lot of the complex, a 20-foot alleyway running behind the East Fifth Plaza and that spills out onto Brennan Street. He said that adding more traffic to that already busy area would be an “accident waiting to happen.”

“We’re really running gung-ho on this,” he said. “This is not good.”

City of Watsonville staff said it is requiring the Hansens to make several improvements to the alleyway before it can receive approval. That includes installing lane striping and several signs, as well as a sound and light alert system for pedestrians and a convex mirror for drivers to better see oncoming traffic.

Some commissioners asked about the possibility of removing some street parking spaces that obstruct visibility for drivers exiting the alleyway and the nearby business complex.

Bill Hansen also said that, according to a traffic study conducted pre-pandemic, the apartment complex would produce fewer trips through that alleyway than the previous owners of the 558 Main St. property, which included a bank and a pharmacy.

There was also confusion about the secondary access route to the property’s parking lot. According to Hansen and City staff, an existing easement would allow residents to enter and exit through the parking lot off East Lake Avenue that runs behind several Main Street properties. But Edward Newman, a lawyer representing the owner of that lot at 13 East Lake Ave., disputed that there was an easement through that parking lot that would allow access.

“The concern from our client’s standpoint is of course safety and liability,” he said.

Hansen rebuked those claims and said he was willing to work with Newman to resolve the issue. Watsonville Community Development Department Director Suzi Merriam also said presenting proof of the easement is one of the conditions of the approval needed for the project to move forward.

“We’ll get through it, otherwise, it’s real simple, Mr. Newman will sue us,” Hansen said. “I’m not making an assertion that he’s going to sue us. I am saying he has that lever. So we want to make sure that we’re providing whatever information that he needs.”

The proposed three-quarters of an acre location has been surrounded by a cyclone fence ever since the previous structure was razed in 2019.

Pacific Coast Development, a company of the Hansen Family Trust, purchased the property in February 2019. Before it was demolished it had sat empty since ANSR Pharmacy closed in 2017. The since-destroyed 8,000-square-foot Spanish-style building was originally constructed for Bank of California in 1967 at a cost of $200,000, according to a Pajaronian article from December of that year.

The exterior and interior look of The Residence closely resembles that of another nearby Pacific Coast Development project completed in 2018: The Terrace at 445 Main St., a four-story development that features 54 apartments, a Togo’s sandwich shop and other business space on the first floor.

The Residence, Hansen said, is looking for a local sushi restaurant to fill the first floor retail space.

Biden’s Debt Forgiveness Plan Would Help Millions of California Students

 Lea este artículo en español.

Millions of Californians could get one of the biggest transfers of money in this country’s history as lawmakers and the incoming president duel over competing plans to rid the nation of ten of billions of dollars in student debt.

If President-elect Joe Biden follows through with his campaign promise to forgive $10,000 in federal student debt, as many as 1.3 million Californians could see the balance on their federal college loans totally wiped out.

The plan, which would make good on a once fringe progressive goal of student forgiveness that’s gone mainstream in the past five years, would benefit a total of roughly 3.9 million Californians who combined owe $140 billion in federal loans used to pay for college.

But a chorus of Congressional Democrats, including Sens. Chuck Schumer, Elizabeth Warren and California U.S. Representative Maxine Waters, wants Biden to expunge up to $50,000 in federal student debt. Debt cancellation of $50,000 would clear the federal student debts of far more Californians ­— between 2.9 and 3.3 million people, according to a CalMatters analysis of U.S. Department of Education data. 

What that could mean for California

Recent California college graduates with typical federal loan debt would see more than half of their undergraduate loans waived under the Biden plan, and lower-income students who qualified for the federal Pell grant would see a larger share of their debt forgiven. 

Students with Pell grants graduating with bachelor’s from California’s public and private nonprofit universities typically have $18,000 in federal loans — slightly less than the $19,370 in federal loans borrowed by students who didn’t receive Pell grants, according to data crunched by The Institute for College Access & Success for CalMatters. This doesn’t include debt students can accrue as they continue their educations.

Nationally, college graduates generally owe more. The typical debt among graduates nationwide is about $27,000 for Pell recipients and 23,000 for those without Pell. That California funds the largest state aid program in the U.S., the Cal Grant, plus aid its colleges award, likely limits how much students need to borrow. 

Experts are split on the potential economic impact of wiping out more than half of the typical California college graduate’s debt.

On the one hand, economists like Christopher Thornberg don’t think it would make much of a dent in the overall economy. “If you can’t pay back $10,000 in debt, you ain’t making a lot of money,” said Thornberg, a founding partner at Beacon Economics, a Los Angeles-based consulting firm. “And if you’re not making a lot of money, you’re not, what I would call, a macroeconomic driver.” 

On the other hand, some experts think debt forgiveness could boost the economy by helping young people afford more goods, take business risks, and get closer to buying homes

Then there’s the impact debt forgiveness can have on career choices. “Students with a lighter or no debt burden may feel free to pursue careers, especially in the public interest, that pay less –– but benefit everyone more,” said Jonathan Glater, a law professor at UCLA who studies debt relief.

Is debt forgiveness good policy? 

Critics say any debt cancellation, especially as high as $50,000, is a middle- and upper-class giveaway. The argument goes that because college-debt holders tend to be more affluent, and already have federal repayment programs that reduce monthly payments to a portion of one’s income if they don’t earn a lot, wiping out some or all of their debts is a regressive move. 

“We’re proposing to help only people who went to college, forget about those people who didn’t. I find that incredibly inequitable and not a progressive policy,” said Sandy Baum, a scholar on student debt, in an interview. Baum presented her research at a December meeting on student debt held by the California Student Aid Commission, which oversees the Cal Grant and helps to establish financial aid policy in the state. 

She supports targeted debt relief, such as partial forgiveness for every year a borrower is unable to make any payments and for parents living below the poverty line who borrowed on behalf of their children

Backers of comprehensive debt relief say debt forgiveness can close the racial wealth gap. While white borrowers largely pay off their student loans after 20 years, Black borrowers have barely made a dent in theirs, a recent study shows. Next, comprehensive debt forgiveness is much more meaningful to people with lower incomes because they get the largest relief relative to their economic situation, others have shown.

Current debt relief programs lag

Even with programs like income-driven repayment, which exist to reduce how much borrowers have to pay monthly if their incomes are low relative to their debt, Californians still struggle. Less than a quarter of California borrowers in repayment on a federal loan have incomes below $40,000, but those people account for more than half of borrowers who have fallen behind on a federal student loan in the state, according to the Student Borrower Protection Center, a group that supports debt forgiveness and crunched data from the Federal Reserve for CalMatters. 

Debt forgiveness may also spare tens of thousands of Californians from going into default on their student loans, a problem that can plague communities of color in particular.

Part of the problem is that too few low-income borrowers struggling to repay their federal student loans either can’t access or don’t know about income-driven repayment, even though the loan relief programs have been in full force since 2009. Another criticism of debt forgiveness is that it may help past students, but incoming students will endure the same higher-education costs that plagued past borrowers. Biden has two solutions for that

One is doubling the maximum award of the Pell Grant, which currently sits at around $6,300. Nearly a million California students receive a Pell Grant, according to the latest U.S. Department of Education data. Such a move could move the purchasing power of the grant closer to its glory days of 1975 when the maximum Pell Grant covered three-quarters of a student’s in-state tuition and housing costs at a public university. Today, it’s down to 28%.

The President-elect also campaigned to make public colleges tuition-free for students from families earning less than $125,000.

CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.

Exhibit Displays Pandemic-Era Artwork, Stories and More

Exhibit aims to provide 'cathartic experience'

Drive-Thru Crab Feed Slated for March at Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds

Proceeds support Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds Foundation

Santa Cruz’s Covid-19 Vaccine Distribution Slowed by Limited Doses

Vaccine woes come as county sees highest case rates since start of pandemic

Jimmy Panetta on Impeaching Trump Twice and Threats to Democracy

Carmel Valley Congressmember
Letter from El Salvador highlights the stakes for U.S. democracy

County’s Equity Measures Show Watsonville’s Struggles to Quell Covid-19

More than half of county’s cases have been in Watsonville

Second Stimulus Bill to Support Arts and Culture Venues

New funding is grants-based, so venues will not need to pay back the amounts

California Counties ‘Flying the Plane as We Build It’ in a Plodding Vaccine Rollout

Counties must figure out who falls where in multitiered system for vaccine eligibility

Watsonville Brillante Extends Open Call for Local Artists

Organizers look for local artists’ work to feature on six-story parking garage

Downtown Watsonville Mixed-Use Apartment Complex Moves Forward

Four-story, 50-unit apartment building would include about 2,000 square feet of retail space

Biden’s Debt Forgiveness Plan Would Help Millions of California Students

Roughly 3.9 million Californians owe combined $140 billion in federal student debt
19,108FansLike
8,845FollowersFollow