The addition of around 4,000 new housing units over the course of 25 years. Two-way traffic on Lake and Beach streets. A completely reimagined industrial district on Walker Street. A network of pedestrian “paseos” that provides safe walking paths. The reduction of one lane on Main Street.
All of these ideas are part of a wishlist included in the draft of the Downtown Watsonville Specific Plan, a comprehensive planning document in the works for the past two years that will guide development downtown, reviewed by the city’s advisory committee at a virtual June 30 meeting.
A coalition of public officials, developers, business owners, nonprofit leaders and community organizers, the committee asked questions and gave feedback to the land-use consultant—Raimi + Associates—and City of Watsonville representatives at the gathering. Among their biggest areas of concern: The implementation of a “road diet” on Main Street, the proposed plan for Walker Street, the reduction of parking requirements and new land-use restrictions.
Getting around
The reduction of lanes, commonly referred to by planners as a road diet, on Main Street has been a hot topic since it was first introduced in 2019.
City staff says that the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is now not only tentatively on board with the project but is showing interest in using Watsonville as a road diet case study for other similar-sized communities that have a highway thoroughfare running through their downtown area.
“This is something that [Caltrans] would like to explore as part of their own project,” Watsonville Principal Planner Justin Meek said. “This would be something that the state would take on, would design, would fund, would build. It’s a good benefit for the city, itself, that the state would do on our behalf.”
The road diet included in the draft plan would change Main Street from four lanes to three lanes, with one lane in each direction and a middle turning lane and median. This would allow the addition of bike lanes and extended curbs and sidewalks along the street.
In order for that plan to move forward, the city must conduct an environmental impact report (EIR) to measure what effect it will have on the area. That EIR is underway and will be completed by the fall, according to Watsonville Community Development Department Director Suzi Merriam.
The road alterations don’t end there. The draft plan also suggests changing East Lake Avenue and East Beach Street in downtown to allow two-way traffic. Other streets such as Union, Brennan and Rodriguez are listed in the plan as roads that will need to be improved with bike lanes and larger sidewalks if the road diet is approved and traffic begins to spill into other areas.
Another ambitious plan included in the draft: A snaking pedestrian path linking the corridor through businesses, parks and housing developments. These so-called “paseos” would provide pedestrians with a way to navigate downtown without having to walk alongside street traffic.
These walkways would be prime locations for street art, outdoor dining and entertainment, the draft plan stated.
Industrial revolution
The draft also lists a handful of “opportunity sites” that, if redeveloped by the city or current landowners, could help address housing and economic development downtown. These sites include Watsonville police headquarters and the old city hall between Union and Main streets; the site that houses Ramos Furniture and Habitat for Humanity ReStore next to Bank of America on the corner of Main and 5th streets; and the city-owned parking lot off of Union Street between East Lake Avenue and East Beach Street.
The draft also suggests a wholesale makeover of several properties off Walker Street around the historic rail station. The stretch of Walker between Lake Avenue and Beach Street could accommodate opportunities for housing, and commercial development that, planners say, would fit the growing trend of placing more services around transportation.
Multiple committee members said that with the recent defeat of Measure D meaning plans for the rail trail will likely move forward, the redevelopment of sites across the street from the station is key for the city’s growth and environmental sustainability. But before that development occurs, committee members urged that the city address pedestrian safety in the area.
“Walkability between Walker to Main Street is a bit challenging for seniors and folks with mobility issues,” said committee member Felipe Hernandez, the former mayor of Watsonville and current candidate for Santa Cruz County Supervisor. “Here on Ford Street, I see people trying to walk with walkers, with baby carriages or on wheelchairs, and they have to move on the street because of telephone poles and narrow sidewalks.”
Parking & housing
In all, the draft plan projects that the corridor—with the initiatives identified—could add roughly 3,910 housing units over 25 years.
A big reason why this would be a possibility is the reduction of parking requirements for housing developments. Developers would no longer have to meet the current requirement of including at least two parking spaces for each studio, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom units included in their project. In addition, affordable housing projects would be wholly exempt from minimum parking requirements, according to the draft plan.
The plan also suggests the city change parking time limits and pricing throughout downtown to funnel visitors to less-frequented spots and maximize the use of city-owned parking lots.
Another reason why the number of housing units could quickly increase: Projects in the core of downtown can now be built six stories tall—the maximum height falls to three stories as one moves away from Main Street into the adjacent neighborhoods to the east and west.
Businesses
The committee also had concerns about the land-use restrictions suggested in the draft plan, which states that thrift shops and antique shops would no longer be allowed downtown.
Raimi + Associates planner Simran Malhotra said that the draft plan excluded these businesses—which also include pawn shops—because there are already several of these establishments downtown.
“The desire is to encourage more restaurants, cafes and other types of uses within that core area,” Malhotra said, adding that current thrift and antique stores will be grandfathered into the corridor.
But local artist Judy Gittelsohn said that this could deter eclectic businesses from moving downtown. Gittelsohn, who last year established Studio Judy G downtown, highlighted the success of vintage houseware retailer SHEF in asking that these businesses be included in the corridor’s future.
“How do you allow for funky, little artisans to be in the town if you’re going to do this?” she asked. “I think what you’re doing here is cutting off your nose to spite your face.”
Feedback
The draft plan is open for public comment through July 14.
The advisory committee will have another virtual public meeting on July 21 in which it will go over the draft plan and the public feedback it received.
The plan, along with the EIR for the road diet, will likely go to the Watsonville City Council for approval in the late fall.
For information on the plan and to give feedback, visit cityofwatsonville.org/1626/Downtown-Specific-Plan.
You have got to be joking about the parking requirements for the developers of these new housing units. Why shouldn’t developers have to meet the minimum requirements and why are “affordable housing” projects wholly exempt from required parking? As a taxpayer and resident of this city for many years, I have to ask has the city council and the development department looked at the residential streets around town. You have all allowed too many people to move into single family dwellings, as well as allowing anyone to throw up a shack in their backyard to welcome tenants. Did anyone consider that 2- people living in a 3 bedroom house, now have 12 or 13 cars to park on the street. I for one, rarely have parking space in front of my own house for my guests, but these over populated houses and their tenants take up all the parking on the street, and more than likely, the owners of the property aren’t claiming rental income on their taxes. How is it fair to property owners who have resided here for years, and were limited as to what they could do with the parcel restrictions in single-family dwelling neighborhoods? It seems you can now just throw up another house in your backyard, complete with a garage, that looks down into other people’s windows, and it’s perfectly ok TODAY?? i know someone who added a room to their home not too long ago, and they were forced to add another parking spot in the back of their house next to their garage. Guess the rules only apply to some, and not to others.