The Santa Cruz County Sheriff’s Office has at its disposal several pieces of military-grade equipment to use during the myriad emergency incidents that occur throughout the year.
This ranges from armored vehicles to pepper-ball launchers to drones.
And now, all of that equipment is subject to Assembly Bill 481, which became law on Jan. 1. Under the law, law enforcement agencies must get approval from their governing bodies before acquiring military equipment.
In addition, police departments must create a military equipment use policy—subject to approval by the governing body—and publish the policy on its website. To see the policy, click here and scroll to page 512.
The County Board of Supervisors will hear a first reading of the new policy later this month, and consider it for final approval on April 12. If approved, it is expected to go into effect on May 1.
The new policy also allows for a complaint process and requires that all use-of-force incidents be reviewed by a sergeant.
In addition, the SCSO will report annually to the supervisors about the use of equipment, complaints, violations of the policy and the cost of their use.
The law does not preclude counties and cities from adding their own rules.
AB 481, authored by Assemblyman David Chiu, governs law enforcement agencies that take part in the federal Law Enforcement Support Program—formerly known as the 1033 Program—which allows the Department of Defense to transfer excess property such as decommissioned military weapons to local jurisdictions.
Chiu said the law was intended to curb the militarization of police agencies.
“Our streets in California are not war zones, and our citizens are not enemy combatants,” Chiu said in a statement. “Law enforcement in California are our partners in public safety, and the weapons and equipment they carry should reflect that reality.”
During the public meeting on Monday, Sheriff’s Sgt. Dan Robbins stressed that the department has not gotten any equipment from the 1033 program.
“We will not take part in this program,” he said. “Sheriff Hart has made a pledge not to take part in this.”
Instead, the Sheriff’s Department gets its military-grade supplies from law enforcement vendors and other sources, Robbins said.
Robbins says the department agrees with the new rules.
“It provides us another opportunity as a sheriff’s office to look at this and really break down the effectiveness of the tools we’re using, and if something is not working then maybe we need to look at some new ones,” he said.
Robbins stressed that using the equipment provides a vital tool for law enforcement officers.
“It increases the safety of the community, our law enforcement personnel and the persons involved in the calls,” he said. “We’re constantly encountering things that are dynamic, unusual, that we haven’t dealt with before.”
Sheriff’s Office Military-Grade Equipment
Robots
One used by the county’s SWAT team in situations when someone is barricaded and they need to get a layout. The device is also equipped with a microphone and a speaker to communicate with suspects during crisis negotiations.
Two robots are used by the county’s bomb team.
Drones
The Sheriff’s Office has 26 of them. They are used for search and rescue, crime scene documentation, investigating suspicious or explosive devices and during natural disasters.
Armored vehicles
A Bearcat, owned by Santa Cruz Police Department, is a “regional asset,” Robbins said, that other agencies can use during high-risk operations. Using this requires approval of the Sheriff’s executive staff, especially for pre-planned operations, Robbins said.
An armored van for operations involving violent suspects and officer rescue
Command and Control Vehicles
Two drone patrol vehicles
Two patrol SUVs, which have a command center in trunk
A mobile substation van for crisis negotiations and disaster response
Two incident command vehicles used for search and rescue
A bomb squad truck
Weapons
Three AR10 precision rifles, used for covering personnel from a distance. These are only used by SWAT team members and require twice-monthly training. Use must be approved by an executive staff member. These rifles come with three different rounds: training, standard and for use in shooting through glass
A chemical agent launching cup for SWAT missions, must be approved by executive staff
40mm launcher used for chemical agent projectiles or with foam-tipped rounds to “port windows”
Diversionary devices
Sting Balls: Rubber balls, typically used in jail and only used with team commander approval
Chemical agents such as CS gas and projectiles
White smoke
Less-lethal rounds such as bean bags
Bola wrap, fired from a gun, this device sends a cord that encircles suspects’ ankles and immobilizes them.
Pepperball launchers, which work like paintball guns.
Robbins says these devices are used in hostage rescue and when suspects are barricaded. The county does not use these during protests.
PERFECT BY TOMORROW WITH THE RESINATORS The versatility of Perfect By Tomorrow’s influences says it all—The Police, Sublime and The Beatles are just a few. Since the reggae-rock outfit’s recent introduction to the world, they’ve shared stages with everyone from Rebelution to Stick Figure. Already a SoCal favorite, The Resinators, led by brothers Kyle and Kevin Cameron, deliver a similar flavor of infectious reggae-rock. $10/$15. Proof of vaccination or negative Covid test required. Wednesday, March 16, 8pm. Moe’s Alley, 1535 Commercial Way, Santa Cruz. moesalley.com.
UKULELE CLUB OF SANTA CRUZ: 20TH ANNIVERSARY PARTY In 1998, local musician Peter Thomas met Jim Beloff. The latter had just published The Ukulele: A Visual History, intending to change people’s perception of the instrument. It’s not just a toy, and Tiny Tim isn’t an ambassador of the ukulele. Propelled by educating the public on actual ukulele knowledge, the two uke enthusiasts started the Ukulele Club of Santa Cruz, which has met nearly every third Thursday of the month since 2002. An anniversary celebration is well deserved. Free. Proof of vaccination or negative Covid test required. Thursday, March 17, 5:30pm. Rio Theatre, 1205 Soquel Ave., Santa Cruz. riotheatre.com.
THE LIL SMOKIES AND MICHIGAN RATTLERS Montana’s The Lil Smokies’ following continues to grow as they perform venues like Red Rocks and festivals including High Sierra and Telluride. Their third record Tornillo, produced by Bill Reynolds (The Avett Brothers, Band of Horses), marks their best yet. Meanwhile, deep-north natives, Michigan Rattlers, continue to gain traction and acclaim. Following a productive 2018 that included appearances at Bonnaroo and Firefly, Rolling Stone featured them in their “Ten New Country Artists You Need to Know.” $25. Proof of vaccination or negative Covid test required. Thursday, March 17, 8:30pm. Moe’s Alley, 1535 Commercial Way, Santa Cruz. moesalley.com.
THE STINKFOOT ORCHESTRA FEATURING NAPOLEON MURPHY BROCK This 15-piece tribute to Zappa pulls no punches, delivering Frank’s music with power, authenticity and musical prowess. Founded by 35-year veteran of the South Bay music scene Nick Chargin, the Stinkfoot Orchestra has spent the last two and a half years honing their craft and is finally taking their long-awaited show to the stage to rave reviews. $24 plus fees. Proof of vaccination or negative Covid test required. Thursday, March 17, 8pm. Felton Music Hall, 6275 CA-9, Felton. feltonmusichall.com.
MATTSON 2 These uber talented identical twins have been fusing instrumental psych-rock with jazz for nearly two decades. A reinterpretation of John Coltrane’s celebrated A Love Supreme scored big. Jazz Times wrote, “[The record] manages to hold Coltrane’s revered album in the highest esteem while shredding it to pieces.” Mattson 2’s eighth record, Paradise,marks the duo’s first inclusion of vocals. And the new addition has received a warm welcome. $20/$25. Proof of vaccination or negative Covid test required. Saturday, March 19, 9pm. Moe’s Alley, 1535 Commercial Way, Santa Cruz. moesalley.com.
THE OSEES FrontmanJohn Dwyer teems with music, so much so that he’s had to form more than a dozen different bands throughout the last 25 years to contain the hundreds of songs that sweat out of him. Osees is the center of Dwyer’s musical universe, even with the band’s name perpetually in flux. The earliest known iteration of Osees, OCS, is an acronym for either Orinoka Crash Suite or Orange County Sound, depending on Dwyer’s mood. OCS became the Oh Sees, sometimes billed as the Ohsees, and then the Thee Oh Sees moniker was left unchanged for about a decade before the ants in Dwyer’s pants led to the 2020 alteration Osees, which is where it stands—for now.See March 9 story.$35 plus fees. Proof of vaccination or negative Covid test required. Friday, March 18, 8pm. Cocoanut Grove, 400 Beach St., Santa Cruz. folkyeah.com.
SONGWRITERS IN THE ROUND Three different Santa Cruz singer-songwriters will showcase three different approaches to music. David Hunt Cameron is known for personal lyrics and moving from delicate acoustic tunes to funk without warning. Known for his work with popular local Grateful Dead tribute band The China Cats, Scott Cooper is more than a one-trick pony—he has a vast range that takes listeners into a world of dusty old country, rootsy Ozark bluegrass and more. The evening’s host, Steve Nail, is a perpetual troubadour and former member of several local groups (Wred Horse, Sleepless Nights) has a soul full of country folk. $10 plus fees. Proof of vaccination or negative Covid test required. Sunday, March 20, 8pm. Felton Music Hall, 6275 CA-9, Felton. feltonmusichall.com.
ANAT COHEN AND MARCELLO GONÇALVES Grammy-nominated clarinetist-saxophonist Anat Cohen is one of modern jazz’s most respected players. The New York Times writes, “…[Cohen’s] improvisations weren’t just bebop fast; they had a clarity and deep intelligence that is really quite rare. She made it look effortless … she took my breath away.” The Israel native’s second record with Brazilian 7-string guitarist Marcello Gonçalves, Reconvexo, is lightning in a bottle. The duo delves into the Música Popular Brasileira (MPB) songbook. $36.75/$42. Proof of vaccination or negative Covid test required. Monday, March 21, 7pm. Kuumbwa Jazz, 320 Cedar St., Santa Cruz. kuumbwajazz.org.
FLOGGING MOLLY After 20 years, Flogging Molly’s music is still driven by social and political issues. Their forthcoming full-length record, Life is Good, is more of that well-crafted Celtic-flavored punk rock that we’ve come to know. The themes focus on the economy, unemployment, immigration policies and the other crap the world is dealing with daily. $54-149. Proof of vaccination or negative Covid test required. Wednesday, March 22, 8pm. The Catalyst, 1011 Pacific Ave., Santa Cruz. catalystclub.com.
COMMUNITY
42ND ANNUAL ECOFARM CONFERENCE The West’s largest gathering of agriculturalists working to advance fair and ecological farming and food systems will feature online skill-building workshops, visionary keynote speakers, pre-conference events, Spanish sessions and in-person field days. Wednesday, March 16-Friday, March 18. Visit eco-farm.org/conference for various events, times, locations and rates.
BOOKSHOP SANTA CRUZ PRESENTS: MARISSA MEYER – ‘CINDER: THE COLLECTOR’S EDITION’ Considered a master of the fractured fairytale genre, celebrate the 10th anniversary of Marissa Meyer’s Cinder. The live virtual event will feature a book discussion, audience bingo, interactive polls and more. Free. Wednesday, March 16, 5pm. Virtual event. Register at bookshopsantacruz.com/marissa-meyer.
SANTA CRUZ WARRIORS VS. AGUA CALIENTE CLIPPERS Enjoy watching the most talented basketball players in the world outside of the NBA. $27-280. Proof of vaccination or negative Covid test required. Saturday, March 19, 7pm. Kaiser Permanente Arena, 140 Front St., Santa Cruz. santacruz.gleague.nba.com.
GROUPS
GANJA YOGA SANTA CRUZ Cannabis, yoga and community come together to relax and elevate your soul. Javi’s classes blend slow vinyasa flow, chill vibes, grounded spirituality and a touch of Latino spice. All levels welcome, weed welcome (vapes only), masks optional. Free (first class). Thursday, March 17, 6pm. Green Magic Yoga, 738 Chestnut St., Santa Cruz. greenmagicyoga.com/ganja-yoga-santa-cruz.
WOMENCARE ARM-IN-ARM This cancer support group is for women with advanced, recurrent or metastatic cancer. Meets every Monday on Zoom. Free. Registration required. Monday, March 21, 12:30pm. 831-457-2273. womencaresantacruz.org.
OUTDOORS
CONCRETE SHIP HISTORY WALK Learn about Seacliff State Beach’s enthralling history on this one-mile stroll to the Aptos Creek Bridge and back. Get the lowdown on the “Concrete Ship” and the development of Aptos, “The Madman of Seacliff” and more. $10 parking pass. Thursday, March 17, 11am-noon. Seacliff State Beach, 201 State Park Drive, Aptos. Pre-register santacruzstateparks.as.me.
HUMMINGBIRD DAY Celebrate hummingbird migration season as the migrating Allen’s hummers join with the resident Anna’s in stunning displays all over the Arboretum. There will be morning bird walks, photography tips and activities for kids. $10/$5 kids 5-17. Saturday, March 19, 7am-1pm. UCSC Arboretum, 1156 High St., Santa Cruz. arboretum.ucsc.edu.
Jake Nielsen is well aware that there’s no cure and not really any treatment for cerebral palsy. The 32-year-old will likely have to use crutches or a wheelchair for his entire life, since the disorder affects his legs and hips—his hips are so riddled with painful bone chips he needs a hip replacement. But this isn’t a sad story. It’s a story about music, perseverance and a forthcoming career landmark.
When Nielsen picked up a guitar for the first time 20 years ago, transcendental energy radiated from those six strings into his hands. He spent hours studying legends like Buddy Guy and Muddy Waters, teaching himself pentatonic blues scales and chords.
“Early on, I’d play open mics in San Jose and San Francisco, and I was just a sponge soaking up all those brilliant guitar players,” he says. “That’s really how I learned.”
Jake Nielsen’s Triple Threat took flight 15 years ago, and the Aptos blues-rock trio has logged thousands of touring miles since. Nielsen is accustomed to the skeptical looks when he first walks into clubs on crutches. But when the group begins,any lingering uncertainty dissipates—Nielsen shreds with the intensity of Stevie Ray Vaughan. He has to sit for most of the performance; sometimes, he stands for solos, just to prove to the audience that he can. During one of the group’s earliest gigs, his crutch accidentally hit his guitar, and the inadvertent slide effect has become a signature move. Nielsen likens the sound to a car shifting gears. Fans go nuts, though; it has a dissonant appeal similar to Tom Morello’s use of a screwdriver or Allen wrench on his ax.
“Anyone can play guitar, but it’s hard to get people to feel [the music],” Nielsen says. “Your heart and soul have to be in it. It’s hard enough to make it as a musician, but I have to work even harder.”
Even if it’s only for two hours, Nielsen forgets about the CP; his focus is on the connection forged with the audience. It’s cathartic. Many shows went nearly three hours nonstop on a recent tour spanning from South Lake Tahoe down to San Luis Obispo. Sometimes, Nielsen wants to keep performances going all night; for the sake of his bandmates’ sanity, he hasn’t gone that far—yet.
When Nielsen isn’t on stage, he sits at his computer, shooting off emails to organizations, offering his time to talk to others with disabilities. He’d like to be an ambassador, someone who encourages people to use their art as a tool for healing. Recently, Nielsen received a response from Daniel’s Music Foundation, a nonprofit that showcases talented musicians with disabilities. They asked him to enter a video of a Triple Threat performance to be considered for its annual Danny Awards. From there, everything moved faster than Eddie Van Halen’s finger-tapping. Nielsen was voted “Fan Favorite” out of hundreds of submissions. He, his band (bassist David Palmer and drummer Kyle Talty), and his wife Ashley and their two kids, 10-year-old son “Baby” Jake and 8-year-old daughter Lily, are being flown out to New York City—it’ll be their first time in the Big Apple. In addition to receiving the award at a large Manhattan symphony hall, Nielsen’s Triple Threat will perform B.B. King’s “Everyday Blues” with a punk twist and the crutch slide, of course, to close the event.
“I feel like people are recognizing how hard I work and how much I put into my music,” Nielsen says.
The band’s full-length debut Everyday Thing is set to drop sometime before summer, then the group will set out on a countrywide tour with gigs already on the books for Nashville. Another place Nielsen has always wanted to go. So, the hard work will continue without any signs of slowing down. Nielsen wouldn’t have it any other way.
The CZU blazes affected so many people in so many ways, and singer-songwriter Dan Bern is one of them. After moving to Santa Cruz in 2018, he was hit two years later by the ripple effect of the fires’ destruction.
“Our landlord lost their home and needed ours,” he says. “And so just a very, very, very quick turnaround. We knew some friends in New Mexico with the house they weren’t using, so it was ‘let’s go there.’”
Compared to what others lost, he says, it was not tragic. But it was definitely a shock. When he plays the Kuumbwa on Friday, it’ll be his first performance here since he moved. It may have only been two years, but in Dan Bern time that’s long enough to have released several albums.
“Well, I put out, like, five or six things in the last year or two,” says the incredibly prolific songwriter, who once told me keeping track of his own catalog was like having a “50-acre ranch of songs” floating around in his head. “I did a new baseball record, and I did a tennis record, and I did a pandemic record, and there are a couple more. You know, just like clearing the shelves a little bit.”
He also followed up his 2015 kid’s album Three Feet Tall with his daughter Lulu, who’s now 12—and Four Feet Tall and Rising.
“Yeah, we were working on it for a good while. Couple years, probably,” Bern says. “You know, it was probably the last time I’ll be able to tell [Lulu] what to do and have her actually feel like she needs to listen to me. She just took over on that one. I loved it.”
What does he miss most about living in Santa Cruz?
“Playing tennis with all the good players and riding my bike by the beach every day,” says Bern. “And eating salmon at Charlie Hong Kong.”
Dan Bern plays the Kuumbwa on Friday, March 18 at 7:30pm. Alex Lucero opens. $27/$40. danbern.com. Tickets: snazzyproductions.com.
Two side-by-side letters in the GT print edition this week (GT, 3/9) reflect on the vision we have for our county: Michael Funari’s plea that we not further industrialize Santa Cruz, and a second, “Do Your Job,” lambasting our Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) for not doing their job in “administer[ing] public funding to improve our … transportation systems.”
In fact, after spending millions of dollars in studies over the last 10 years, our RTC has wisely come to the conclusion that if there’s no funding for a railroad, and not enough passengers to ride it, then we should move on to implementing the best transportation options we have–like an interim bike and pedestrian trail on the rail corridor (for which we do have money dedicated from Measure D), expanding Bus on Shoulder and improving our existing transit systems, Metro, ParaCruz and Lift Line. This seems to me to be the very definition of the job the RTC is supposed to do. Would the Ad Hoc Committee prefer the RTC commit the county to $1.3 billion dollars over the next 30 years with no source of local or other funding, or any indication that we could make sufficient use of a train even if we could pay for it? The commissioners plainly see that “where there’s a will there’s a way” is not a valid transportation plan! And frankly, an empty train running along some of the most amazing coastline in the world strikes me as the very definition of “industrializing” our county!
Nadene Thorne
Santa Cruz
This letter does not necessarily reflect the views of Good Times.To submit a letter to the editor of Good Times: Letters should be originals—not copies of letters sent to other publications. Please include your name and email address to help us verify your submission (email address will not be published). Please be brief. Letters may be edited for length, clarity and to correct factual inaccuracies known to us. Send letters to le*****@go*******.sc.
On Tuesday, March 8, the Watsonville City Council was given a report by their staff presenting the potential impacts of the upcoming Watsonville Planned Growth and Farmland Protection Initiative, which will be on the Nov. 8 ballot.
Supporters of the initiative prepared a document discussing its benefits, and the city staff presented a document, showing only its negative impacts. We had expected a more professional analysis, but the city attorney confirmed its intention, when she stated, “There is no indication that the information that staff has to provide has to be unbiased or even-handed, or talk about the advantages of the ballot measure.” The people of Watsonville do not want sprawl. They do not want to see the city turn, piece-by-piece, into San Jose.
Sam Earnshaw
Watsonville
This letter does not necessarily reflect the views of Good Times.To submit a letter to the editor of Good Times: Letters should be originals—not copies of letters sent to other publications. Please include your name and email address to help us verify your submission (email address will not be published). Please be brief. Letters may be edited for length, clarity and to correct factual inaccuracies known to us. Send letters to le*****@go*******.sc.
After the CZU fires, a lot of noise was made about how easy local government agencies were going to make it for those who lost their homes to rebuild. That’s why most of us assumed those rebuilding efforts were surely on track—what could go wrong, right?
Well, once you read Aiyana Moya’s cover story this week, you’ll understand that the answer to that question is “everything.” She takes a deep dive into what’s happened in the tiny community of Last Chance to illustrate how the aftermath of the fires has been a nightmare for county residents who lost their homes, and what she finds is unsettling, to say the least.
There is plenty of blame to go around—just try to wrap your head around the mess that fire victims are going through with Anvil Builders Inc., which denied more than half of residents’ claims after doing millions of dollars in damage while removing debris. Or ask why CalFire won’t declare Last Chance Road fire-safe, which has effectively halted the community’s rebuilding efforts.
But other issues are a lot more nuanced than you might expect, and Moya’s story illuminates some surprising truths about just how hard it is to navigate a rebuilding effort. For instance, we all would think the county should waive permitting fees for fire victims, right? Wait until you read why that would be a disaster. In short, this story may very well change how you think of the CZU aftermath altogether; it’s absolutely a must-read.
STEVE PALOPOLI | EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
ONLINE COMMENTS
RE: CASTRO ADOBE
As a descendent of the Rodriguez family, who arrived at the same time and married with the Castros, I love seeing the history of the area preserved and learned from. Our history is an important part of our story and our lives. Thank you for preserving it!
– Carrie Zeidman
As a descendant of Jose Joaquin Castro, our family heritage remains in this beautiful Adobe restoration. I and my siblings look forward to more programs and activities to participate and contribute to. Saludos to all of the collaborators.
– Julia Brooks
RE: SCOTTS VALLEY SCHOOLS
I have heard similar stories about Aptos (middle and high schools). I knew of kids who left Scotts Valley and Aptos due to their oppressive cultures of conformity. Santa Cruz High (where my kids went to school) always seemed to welcome and accept all types of kids. I’m sure there were exceptions, but this was my experience both as a medical provider and a parent.
Before spring starts this weekend, one last “winter nap,” which was the title of this submission. Photograph by Karen Jensen.
Submit to ph****@go*******.sc. Include information (location, etc.) and your name. Photos may be cropped. Preferably, photos should be 4 inches by 4 inches and minimum 250dpi.
GOOD IDEA
THIRST RESPONDERS
If you’re interested in drought response plans, Santa Cruz County has a job for you.
The county’s Water Advisory Commission is developing a Drought Response Working Group to create water conservation plans for small water systems and wells. The commission is looking for two representatives for the group, who are able to commit to 15-20 hours of meetings between late April through October. The deadline to apply is March 25. Find out more at scceh.com.
GOOD WORK
STAFFING UP
Senderos, a non-profit that celebrates Latinx culture and supports Latinx youth, hired its first staffer last week after 20 years of being an all-volunteer based organization. Gabriela Cruz—who immigrated from Mexico when she was 1, and has lived in Santa Cruz for the past 32 years—will serve as Senderos’ executive director. She has been involved in activism since the Trump administration ended Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) in 2017, and is excited to continue to serve Latinx families at Senderos.
QUOTE OF THE WEEK
“There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people.”
Driving up the winding road that leads to Last Chance Road, I miss my left turn.
First, I’m distracted by the view in my rearview mirror as I ascend to the top of the hill. It’s a pristine, cloudless day, and I have a clear view of the hills that tumble into the expansive ocean. Second, I am out of service, so Google Maps fails to alert me that I passed the turn.
Luckily, I notice that I am veering off my blue line and driving into the gray, according to Google Maps, so I make a quick turn in the middle of the road—it’s the middle of the afternoon, and I haven’t seen another car since I turned onto the road up the the hill 20 minutes ago.
My eyes scan for a road sign labeled Last Chance, but I don’t see any indication that such a road exists. I do see a tractor, and construction workers dressed in bright orange vests pouring concrete onto a road that leads off into the direction Google Maps wants me to go, so I take a chance. Behind them, I see Creedence Shaw, who has organized my visit, talking with another man a few yards down the road.
“So secretive they even took down the road sign,” Shaw jokes.
The people who live on Last Chance Road have a reputation for being protective of their community. That’s why I, along with Good Times photographer Tarmo Hannula, hop into the jeep of former Last Chance resident Toni McAuliffe, who is our chauffeur for the day.
People living on Last Chance road can easily spot outsiders. “Tight-knit” is the phrase that every resident I interview uses to describe the community here. Every year before the CZU fires in 2020, the community held annual barn dances that every neighbor attended. The community had its own schoolhouse, and hired teachers to teach the kids living here; all three of McAuliffe’s kids went to school there at some point. Both of these structures burned during the wildfire.
Once, McAuliffe tells us as we drive, a car veered off the road and fell a few feet down into a ravine. Because the fire marshall can take nearly 40 minutes to drive out, McAuliffe, along with a dozen other residents, came to the rescue, lowering a rope for the woman trapped in the car to use to climb out.
Living out here, McAuliffe says, you have to rely on your neighbor to survive.
All that is to say that everyone who lives on this road knows everyone else who lives on it. Every car that we pass on our way into the heart of the community glides to stop, and Toni will roll down her window to say hello. More times than not, the cars will idle next to each other, the engines humming underneath the conversations.
“Our houses out here, they aren’t close together,” McAuliffe says after wrapping up another conversation with a passing driver. “But we’re close.”
McAuliffe moved to Last Chance with her husband 30 years ago. She and her husband loved living in the hills and amongst the towering trees so much, they would commute an hour each way into Davenport for work.
It was only after their home burned down during the CZU Lightening Complex Fires in 2020 that they were forced to move out of the community and into downtown Santa Cruz. Now, a trailer sits in a clearing where their two-story home used to be.
“We’re too old to be living like that,” says McAuliffe.
McAuliffe is, by her own admission, lucky to have the option to live someplace else. All the renters have moved, she says, but for most of the homeowners in Last Chance, moving isn’t financially viable.
The residents of Last Chance are not the only fire victims in the county stuck living in trailers and tents as they wait on building permits. Rural communities like Bonny Doon and Ben Lomand are also struggling to get cleared for permits: in Bonny Doon, the biggest hurdle is residents getting septic clearances, while in Ben Lomand people are struggling to receive geological clearances, according to Shaw and county officials.
Following the fires in Oct. of 2020, the county made multiple promises that CZU fire victims would be able to benefit from streamlined permitting processes and relaxed building codes. But the people I spoke with say a number of roadblocks are preventing residents from rebuilding.
The county even told Last Chance residents that they could be part of a pilot program that would streamline the building process, and allow them to use alternative means of construction, as long as the homes were found to be structurally sound and meet basic health and safety requirements. But because CalFire has not approved the road as fire safe, residents haven’t had a chance to put the pilot program into action. “The codes are killing us,” McAuliffe says.
Permitting Chaos
The CZU Complex fire burned 86,500 acres from the Santa Cruz Mountains into San Mateo County. More than 1,490 structures were lost, and 911 homes in Santa Cruz County burned—including every single structure on Last Chance Road.
After the fires ravished Santa Cruz County, California’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), hired San Francisco-based construction company Anvil Builders Inc. to help clear debris from the CZU fire, as part of a $225 million contract. But come last November, it became clear that in the debris removal process, Anvil had caused millions of dollars in damage to county and private roads, as well as to septic and storm drainage systems. To Last Chance Road alone, Anvil caused an estimated $2.7 million in damages down 7.8 miles of the road.
Creedence Shaw, who works with Community Foundation Santa Cruz County, has been everything from a mediator to an investigator in his work helping fire victims in Last Chance. PHOTO: TARMO HANNULA
That’s where Creedence Shaw comes in. Shaw works with Community Foundation Santa Cruz County, which is helping fire survivors relocate and supplement essential costs. His original job was to help homeowners with the documents and permits they need in order to start rebuilding, and this remains his guiding principle. But, he says, this has required him to do everything from being a mediator to a full-blown investigator.
“Neither Susan [True, executive director of Community Foundation] or I really could have predicted what this job would entail,” says Shaw.
Shaw has assumed a sort of liaison role, working as a mediator between residents seeking permits to rebuild after the fire and the county. But the more he learned about what happened in the Last Chance community, the more he realized that the road itself was the key to moving the building process forward.
Steve Barnes is the road manager for Last Chance Road. He is a licensed timber operator, and owns a construction company. He has maintained the road for decades, ensuring it was drivable, filling potholes and creating and caring for the culverts, which is one of the most critical components of maintaining the road.
Culverts are so crucial, Barnes says, because without them Last Chance Road would flood when it rains.
There were 34 culverts in the Last Chance community. Some, Barnes says, were burned in the fire. The others, he says, Anvil destroyed.
“The money to replace [the culverts] is coming out of our pockets. These culverts should have never been ripped out. We’ve had a tremendous amount of rain this year and before I got the critical culverts in, the roads were like creek beds,” says Barnes.
Anvil offered Last Chance $75,000 for repairs, despite county estimates that the cost of the damage was closer to $2.7 million. So when Shaw sought to help the people of Last Chance rebuild, he quickly realized that repairing their road would be an essential first step. Because Last Chance road is a private road, finding money for repairs would be the community’s responsibility.
So he set to work.
“I looked at the damage claims. I read through the contract (with Anvil). I made public access records requests. Anvil blatantly violated its contract,” says Shaw.
More than 70 damage claims were filed by residents or residential groups. 28 were approved. The county also filed claims and appeals for 17 public roads with the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Shaw has submitted public access records from Anvil and Cal OES, hoping to understand why these damage claims were denied. Instead, Cal OES returned with general information on its practices, long email chains passing off Shaw’s requests and no supporting documentation specifying the reasons behind denying some residents’ damage claims.
Cal OES did not coordinate an interview in time for print.
Luckily for Last Chance, an anonymous donation is funding the cost of repaving the road, says Barnes. But CalFire Fire Marshal Chris Walters says it needs to be wider to be accessible for fire trucks, there needs to be a secondary egress, and it needs to be paved as an all-weather road before CalFire will clear it for a permit.
All of this will cost money.
The donation was a blessing, Barnes says, but that money went to recovering the culverts that Anvil damaged, and there is still work to be done on the road and no permit in sight.
Although Last Chance residents hope that CalFire might ease its road requirements, Walters says there are county-wide road standards that must be met in order for emergency responders to reach people in need of help.
“If someone called 911 during rainy conditions and it was muddy out there, more than likely we would not be able to get an actual fire engine out there,” says Walters. “We want to be able to get to their door and render aid, and an all-weather surface road is the way we do it.”
Driving on the road to interview Last Chance residents, both Tarmo and I remark on the condition of the road: we are both surprised by the fact that it actually looks to be in great condition. There are no potholes, it is wider than most back country roads I have driven, and although it’s not paved, it also is not just a dirt road.
We pull up onto Terra Barsonto’s property, she’s gardening next to a long, make-shift greenhouse structure that sits beside a modest yurt.
Barsonto has lived on the property for decades. She is a retired school teacher, and since the CZU fires decimated her two-story home and mother-in-law unit two years ago, she has been living in some form of a tent: originally, a camping tent, but recently she upgraded to the yurt. A few months ago, her son set up an outdoor kitchen station, a stove and a standalone sink, inside the greenhouse structure.
“It’s hard to live in a tent,” says Barsonto. “I was newly retired, and I thought I had the rest of my life planned, but everything was completely disrupted. Not knowing what to do, being traumatized … I only recently was able to think about getting a yurt.”
Right now, rebuilding, for Barsonto and the rest of the Last Chance community, isn’t legally possible without the green light from CalFire.
“That’s what’s holding us hostage,” says Barsonto. “If CalFire could somehow ease up on these regulations … they’re holding us to this high standard that we can’t reach, and so we don’t have the chance to rebuild.”
Struggles Across County
Last Chance Road isn’t the only community that is still trying to rebuild, two years later.
Ann McKenzie lives in Bonny Doon, where over 100 other homes were burned, according to Cal Fire estimates. McKenzie’s home was one of the houses included in that estimate.
McKenzie and her husband lived in their home for over 34 years. Now, they have two trailers on their property, one that McKenzie and her husband share and one that her son lives in, as they apply for the permits they need to rebuild.
“It gets kind of tight,” says McKenzie, “but there’s no other option for us. And honestly, it’s worth it to live here in Bonny Doon, in the mountains surrounded by trees, where we have so many memories.”
The biggest sticking point for them as they work with the county to acquire their permits is getting their septic cleared. In the past two years, McKenzie and her husband have sunk around $10,000 on the permitting process, but you wouldn’t have guessed that from looking at their land; they haven’t been able to start the building process at all, as they apply and reapply to get their septic clearance.
McKenzie doesn’t understand why this is the roadblock that is stopping them from rebuilding. For more than 34 years, she says, they have lived without issues with their septic tank; now, the county requires they move it further away from the creek that runs near her property. Already, she and her husband will have to adhere to new building codes, like indoor sprinkles, solar panels and a litany of other updates that their home that burned in the fire didn’t have. “It’s frustrating,” McKenzie says.
She’s not alone in her frustration. The Community Foundation’s True says that building to brand new codes has been the most challenging part of the process for fire survivors.
“It’s a mismatch. These people have been here for generations,” says True. “And to now be like, ‘We don’t have the right water pressure for our sprinkler system,’ it’s trying to match the need for public safety, and the overall assurance that your home will be rebuilt.”
Michael Renner is the Director of Development Recovery Services for 4Leaf Inc, the outside agency that the county hired to help residents get their permits. He explains that the California Building Code is revised and adopted every three years. That means that over the last decade or so, the state had three separate opportunities to update building requirements.
In a lot of ways, the county’s hands are tied when it comes to easing up on those codes, especially the ones that are handed down from the state. That’s because the state has certain building codes and requirements that the county has no authority to modify.
“What the state says goes,” says Renner. “I wouldn’t say there’s a lot of differences between county and state regulations, but when the state regulations are more restrictive, then the county doesn’t have an option but to defer to the state requirement. And there is no legal mechanism to allow people to build back to an old code.”
For many of the people I spoke with, the permitting fees themselves were also daunting. According to Renner, the county has tried to pare down costs to the absolute minimum, so the hard costs were covered.
According to data that Renner shares, the average cost for permitting a 1500-square-foot home is nearly $28,000. Even with certain fees waived by the county for CZU survivors, the cost is still nearly $11,000.
Renner says that he has been involved in fire recoveries ranging from Sonoma County to the town of Paradise to Oregon, and he has never seen a county completely waive permitting fees. In fact, the only jurisdiction that he knows of that actually promised to waive its fees had to retract that promise.
“The city of Malibu initially waived fees for wildfire victims,” says Renner. “And then FEMA came in and said, basically, ‘Great, if you have the ability to waive fees, you don’t need our assistance or money, and now you need to pass that money back.’”
What’s also difficult, Renner says, is that in these more rural communities, these homes might not have been up to code or permitted to begin with.
“I would say the biggest challenge I’ve seen in Santa Cruz County is getting the non-permitted structures to a point where we can get them to receive a permit,” says Renner. Especially, he says, because many unpermitted structures were also uninsured.
“We have to ensure that homes are safe, and built in a safe environment,” says Renner. “We also have to understand that people want to get back to their homes. So there’s a balance there.”
Wildfire Costs
How wildfires change a county are multifold, in ways that scientists and researchers are still trying to understand.
One study found that across the U.S., wildfires significantly lower per capita wage earnings across multiple sources of earnings data for up to two years after wildfire. But the California Council on Science and Technology found in a 2020 study that because there is no statewide, standardized methodology for identifying the costs of wildfires, it’s impossible to accurately collect data on wildfire costs. Not to mention, accurately quantifying societal losses will require substantial additional data collection and research in a number of disciplines.
Moreover, the costs associated with unquantified categories of loss (e.g., health impacts, loss of ecosystem services) may likely exceed the reported costs. For example, federal and state firefighting expenditures exceed $3 billion per year; utility wildfire prevention and mitigation costs are approximately $5 billion per year; whereas the insured property losses in three out of the past four years have exceeded $10 billion per year.
Jason Hoppin, communications director for the county, says it’s impossible to determine the cost of the wildfire across all sectors of the community, especially given that the pandemic is intrinsically tied into those costs. But on a county and city level, the wildfire wreaked havoc on budgets, and budget managers are now factoring in climate change and natural disasters when drawing up their budgets.
True has observed first-hand the ripple effect that CZU fires had economically and demographically.
“A lot of fire survivors that we helped right away after the fire were very small business owners,” says True. “Maybe they were painters, contractors, landscape architects, small farmers, massage therapists, photographers who lost their kind of tools of trade in the fire. We are losing these people.”
The residents I spoke with at Last Chance and Bonny Doon also confirmed this reality. Renters are forced to exchange the rural areas they were living in for the city. But True sees some renters leaving Santa Cruz County altogether, especially as rent continues to increase (in the past year, median rent is up 18.6% according to apartment rental agency Dwellsy).
“People who had carved out a way to live in Santa Cruz County, literally for generations, may not be able to make it here anymore,” says True. “I don’t even know what we’re gonna see yet in terms of homelessness.”
Some fire survivors know homeowners who left for other states because of wildfire concerns. Meanwhile, the homeowners who can’t afford to leave, remain. “I worry about future wildfires,” says McKenzie. “But this is my property, this is my home. Where would I go?”
‘Where would I go’ is a phrase that is echoed across many of the interviews I have with fire survivors who are rebuilding. Last Chance resident Terra Barsonto says nearly exactly that when we speak.
“This is my home, I don’t have the money to go someplace else,” Barsonto says. “Where else would I go?”
Looking Forward
Sarah Newkirk, the Executive Director at Land Trust of Santa Cruz County that aims to find sustainable ways to protect land and wildlife, says that creative solutions exist to ensure less damage from wildfires.
In a study Newkirk co-authored, she and her fellow researcher found that by creating a managed buffer of open space around a community, losses from wildfires could be reduced by up to 30%.
“One of the biggest challenges we’re facing again, there’s just tremendous demand for more housing right now,” says Newkirk. “And with that demand, comes pushing the limits of cities further and further out into what’s called the wildland urban interface. And in those areas, the fire risk is just simply greater.”
That’s why, in addition to land management, Newkirk hopes to see cities do everything they can to utilize urban space and meet state-set housing goals.
“I would encourage cities to be really focusing their planning on areas of infill development, and creating new housing,” says Newkirk. “I don’t think that it’s a reasonable long term solution to put people at risk in order to mitigate the housing problem.”
In the meantime, Shaw continues to fight for the Last Chance community and other survivors who sustained damage from Anvil.
At the county level, Michael Renner says that supervisors have been meeting to come up with solutions for the people who are still in the throes of the permitting process—especially, he says, people living on Last Chance Road.
“There’s some ideas being floated through the county council,” Renner says. “We’re not sure of the legalities of some of the ideas that have been spit-balled, but I do know those answers could be coming fairly quickly, even later this month.”
The Last Chance Residents I spoke with are cautiously optimistic that this is the case, but careful to not get their hopes up.
As I am wrapping up my interview with Barsonto, I ask what she hopes the future holds. She is silent for a while, looking at her makeshift kitchen, her yurt and lastly at her garden, where vegetables like chard and lettuce are unfolding and a few wildflowers push through the earth.
“My main dream is to have a legal home out here,” Barsonto says. “That one day, we will have another home, and I can watch everything that burned down regrow.”
Last year, the news that the UC Regents had approved UCSC’s 2021 Long Range Development Plan (LRDP)—a document which outlines the campus’s goal to swell enrollment to 28,000 students, and build housing for 100% of new enrollees and up to 25% of new faculty—sent a wave of anger through Santa Cruz County. Like water in Mad Max or spice in Dune, housing in Santa Cruz gets people justifiably riled up. Critics of the plan pointed out that since the university’s commitments are not legally binding, it could theoretically enroll all the students but build none of the new housing it envisions.
On Feb. 22, these concerns led to a new lawsuit filed by the City of Santa Cruz against UCSC, alongside a separate complaint by the County of Santa Cruz. The suit, which lists the UC Regents, UC President Michael Drake, UCSC Chancellor Cynthia Larive and UCSC as defendants, alleges that the 2021 LRDP and its accompanying Environmental Impact Report (EIR) don’t prepare for scenarios where the university fails to live up to its ambitious plans. In doing so, the university is in violation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the suit alleges.
As a result, the city says, the documents underestimate the impacts that enrolling a host of new students might have on its surrounding community, including displacement of other renters in Santa Cruz, worsening city traffic, increased water consumption and heightened risk for wildfires.
And in the city’s opinion, this scenario is much more likely than one where the university actually meets its commitments. The 2021 LRDP includes provisions to construct up to four new residential colleges over the campus’s current 10, swelling its housing space from 9,283 beds to 17,783. But these plans are relatively vague, mostly amounting to areas on a map where the campus could build these new colleges.
“It’s not just one of multiple scenarios that could play out,” says Santa Cruz’s Assistant City Attorney Catherine Bronson. “We really do view that as the most likely scenario. Because there really hasn’t been any indication that the housing is coming—that there’s a specific plan.”
But the university remains firm that it would provide housing for its new students without a legal mandate to do so. Campus spokesperson Scott Hernandez-Jason says that in recent years, the university has recognized an increasing need for affordable, on-campus housing options. If the university does not build housing to match its enrollment growth, he says, more students would be left to fend for themselves in an increasingly unaffordable off-campus housing market—guaranteeing that some will drop out of college entirely.
“It does nobody any good to have students come and leave the university without earning their degrees,” Hernandez-Jason says.
He added in an email that the school was “disappointed” by the city and county’s lawsuits, and that it had hoped to reach an out-of-court settlement agreement with the plaintiffs last fall, both before and after the 2021 LRDP’s approval.
Chancellor Larive declined to comment on the new litigation, citing its ongoing nature.
The More Things Change
The first discussion of a potential city and county lawsuit over the LRDP issue came back in September of last year, shortly after the UC Regents approved the final versions of the 2021 LRDP and EIR. At that point, the parties entered into a tolling agreement that put a freeze on the 30-day statute of limitations for filing a lawsuit against the university on CEQA grounds, promising to engage in mediated talks.
The outlook among local leaders, at the time, was comparatively rosy. County Supervisor Ryan Coonerty told Good Times last year he was optimistic that the local government could hash out an agreement with the university without fighting the sort of costly, years-long legal battle that followed the approval of the 2021 LRDP’s predecessor, the 2005 LRDP. In that agreement, the university was required to cap enrollment at 19,480 until the 2021-22 school year, and provide housing for 67% of the students it enrolled over 15,000.
By all accounts, says Coonerty, the university met the letter of that portion of the agreement. And it prevented the parties from engaging in any further litigation related to housing and enrollment for the span of time it was in effect.
“From my vantage point, it worked for both sides,” Coonerty says.
But meditated talks in December between the city, county and UCSC failed, putting the parties back on track for a repeat of the 2005 LRDP proceedings. At a Jan. 25 meeting, the Santa Cruz City Council quietly announced that it had greenlit the initiation of a lawsuit against UCSC alongside the county in the days prior.
“It’s incredibly frustrating, because the university made a bunch of promises, and all we’re asking is that they commit to those promises,” Coonerty says. “And because they’ve been unable to do so, now we have to spend time and money on lawyers instead of working collaboratively to create a path that will work for both UCSC and the community.”
The issue of building housing at UCSC is not just a question of will and dollars, though. The campus has a long history of environmental litigation and student protests that have scuppered numerous projects—particularly those proposed for its natural scenic and environmentally sensitive areas, of which there are many.
For example, three lawsuits have stalled groundbreaking on Student Housing West (SHW), a 2,700-bed housing project aimed toward upper-division undergraduates. There, the sticking point has been the project’s placement of a shared childcare and housing development for students with families on the East Meadow, a scenic field of grass that sits near the base of the UCSC campus.
Given the realistic possibility of new housing projects facing litigation, Coonerty says obtaining a binding commitment is all the more important.
“Because of budget challenges and development challenges, we know that unless it has a binding commitment, the university may not live up to its promises,” Coonerty says.
What is an LRDP?
Flipping through the 193-page 2021 LRDP and its 780-page EIR, one might be amazed at the sheer scope of development it envisions on the campus. Under it, the university would nearly double its housing capacity. All told, the plan calls for expanding the total accessible square footage of campus construction from 3.7 million square feet to 9.3 million square feet.
Ambitious as this vision may be, campus leaders are quick to point out that LRDPs, in general, are more vision than plan—a “what could and should be” instead of a “what shall be.”
Essentially, explains Frank Zwart, who was UCSC’s campus architect from 1988 to 2010, an LRDP is a map of what types of buildings can go where on the UCSC campus, providing guidance on how the campus should expand per a given enrollment level.
“For example, if the campus anticipates the need for a new science building—a new laboratory of some sort—typically in the back of the minds of the people who worry about this stuff like the campus architects or the campus planner, they know the LRDP designates a piece of the campus for what’s called the Academic Core,” Zwart says. “So that pretty much limits where one would look for sites for that sort of project.”
This means that in conceiving a new project, university planners look more to the immediate needs of the campus than the general needs laid out by the LRDP.
The reason for this, Hernandez-Jason points out, is that things change. Looking back to the campus’s previous five LRDPs, what the campus actually built on its grounds often diverged from the letter of these documents. For instance, the 1963 LRDP set UCSC’s target enrollment at 27,500 by 1990—which, due to the combination of Reagan-era budget cuts, the Loma Prieta earthquake in 1989 and other factors, never came close to materializing.
Hernandez-Jason says that the way the university has operated during the Covid-19 pandemic suggests ways it may detour from the 2021 LRDP: with Zoom instruction on the table, he says the campus may find itself needing fewer new academic buildings in the future.
“The LRDP, it’s not a to-do list,” Hernandez-Jason says. “It’s sort of a framework for how we would grow if that growth is needed and funded. And if it’s not, we don’t do it.”
But in some sense, the inherent vague qualities of LRDPs lie at the heart of the lawsuits. None of the new housing envisioned in the 2005 LRDP, for instance, was constructed. In fact, no new housing has been constructed on the UCSC campus since 2002, when College 10 (soon to be rechristened John R. Lewis College) was built.
Instead, the university has expanded its undergraduate bed capacity by subdividing its already-existing construction: refitting rooms that previously housed two students to house three, and converting lounge spaces into rooms housing four or five students.
Now, Hernandez-Jason says, the university has effectively hit a ceiling on the number of beds it can squeeze out of its current construction, both in terms of safety code limits and student comfort.
“The way to add more housing space for students is to build new housing,” Hernandez-Jason says. “Is there another lounge somewhere that could be converted? Maybe, but that’s not going to solve the problem.”
A Tale of Town and Gown
Running parallel to the city and county’s new litigation is a separate lawsuit filed last October by the Habitat and Watershed Caretakers (HAWC), a citizen group that has been involved in a number of environmental law cases against the university since its founding in 2008.
Like the city and county, the group alleges that the university failed to analyze the full scope of environmental impacts that could arise from the 2021 LRDP. They also argue that the university did not examine feasible alternatives to its plans, as mandated by CEQA, and that the LRDP’s consideration of drawing groundwater from beneath the campus to supplement water provided by the city could exceed the replenishment rate of its subterranean aquifers.
Don Stevens, one of HAWC’s leading members, says the Santa Cruz community has likely already hit its upper limit when it comes to accommodating campus growth. Unlike the city and county, Stevens says he would be in favor of placing lower caps on university enrollment, in addition to the stipulation that it houses all its new enrollees.
“The thing that the city and county are most adamant about is that the university make a commitment to house 100% of its new students,” Stevens says. “That would not mitigate all of the negative impacts.”
On the other side of the debate are housing activists like Zennon Ulyate-Crow, who point toward declining admissions numbers across the UC system as an indication that current Californians have less access to education than their predecessors—and that this issue stems from slowing growth at the campus level. Ulyate-Crow, a first-year at UCSC, leads the Student Housing Coalition (SHC), a campus organization involved in a wide range of housing policy initiatives in California.
Recently, the group successfully campaigned to bring a new piece of legislation that would streamline the approval process for student housing projects. Called the Student Housing Crisis Act, SB 886 would exempt such projects from completing certain time-intensive environmental review processes, so long as the environmental impacts of these projects are accounted for in a general planning document like an LRDP.
Still, Ulyate-Crow is skeptical about whether the campus can feasibly construct enough housing to meet its enrollment projections, with or without a city mandate. His organization, he says, is pushing for a “shared responsibility” model to handle the effects of campus growth, where both the university and local officials hold each other accountable for addressing these impacts.
“We need to advocate for a model where both the university and the city are stepping up to do as much as possible about the student housing crisis, because a crisis only happens when everything goes wrong,” Ulyate-Crow says.
Former Santa Cruz County Clerk Gail Pellerin is running for the 28th Assembly District in the upcoming June 7 primary after receiving the nod from current representative Mark Stone, who is reportedly not seeking reelection.
That group’s goal aligned with Pellerin’s long-standing objective to get more women into positions of leadership throughout Santa Cruz County, and do something that has never been done before: have a woman from the county elected to the state legislature. Pellerin and other women-led groups had their eyes on preparing a candidate to run for the 28th Assembly District in 2024, when Assemblymember Stone would term out.
“We started talking to people about who was interested in running,” Pellerin says. “And the more we talked to people about ‘Who do you think [should run],’ the more people said, ‘How about you?’”
Pellerin, who retired from her position with the county in 2020, had planned to run for the seat then. But she says that a recent meeting with Stone, a Scotts Valley Democrat who was first voted into the legislature in 2012, accelerated that timeline.
“Stone came and talked to me, and he was very sweet and gracious, and said that he was not going to be running and he wanted me to be his representative,” Pellerin says.
Pellerin declined to say when the conversation with Stone happened.
Just before the March 11 deadline, Pellerin filed her intent to run for the new 28th Assembly District, which, in essence, replaces the current 29th District as a result of the recent decennial redistricting process. The new district still represents North Santa Cruz County, but no longer counts mid-county or the southern coastal region as part of its footprint. It now branches out to the east, covering Los Gatos, Morgan Hill and various communities around San Jose.
Pellerin says that she has already received the endorsement of State Senator John Laird and Assemblymember Robert Rivas—the representative for the Pajaro Valley in South County. She—and any other prospective candidate—has until March 16 to submit 40 signatures to officially get her name on the ballot. She says she is trying to collect signatures from “all throughout the district.”
“I have a lot more calls to make today,” she said on Saturday. “Just tracking people down and asking them that important question.”
As she said in an interview with this paper weeks before her retirement, Pellerin took a year off from public service before throwing her hat in the ring once again for an elected office. Her year away has been anything but a vacation. She joined the National Alliance on Mental Illness and has been active with women-serving organizations such as Girls Inc. and Women’s Educational Success at Cabrillo College. She has also spearheaded the creation of the Cabrillo College Local Government Fellows program, which aims to encourage students to get involved in local government by providing scholarships and paid internships and mentorships.
She has also worked with the California Democratic Party on its voter protection committee.
“Once an elections geek, always an elections geek—you just can’t stay away from elections stuff,” she says.
Stone did not respond to a request for comment.
The longtime representative started his career in politics on the Scotts Valley Unified School District Board of Trustees. He served two terms on the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors before moving to the Assembly.
In a brief emailed statement to his supporters sent Saturday afternoon, Stone said that he endorsed Pellerin.
“In a time when Democracy is literally under attack, I cannot think of another person more qualified or more prepared to fight for our Democracy and protect voting rights,” the statement read. “I can’t wait to see what she will accomplish in the State Assembly … It has been my honor to serve in the State Assembly, and I cannot thank you enough for all the support I have received over the years.”
Pellerin is recognized as a leading voice in California elections. She previously served as president of the California Association of Clerks and Election Officials from 2010 to 2012, and she served on California’s Voting Accessibility Advisory Committee. She has also been a member of the Future of California Elections since 2011.
If elected, Pellerin says that she would focus on issues surrounding affordable housing, health care access, climate change and mental health services.
“I think that democracy works best when elected officials enlist the ideas of the constituency so I’m going to be doing exactly that,” she says. “I’m someone who has always built teams and get people to work together … I’m a helper, and I like impacting people’s lives in positive ways.”
In addition to elections and voter registration duties, the clerk’s office is also responsible for other services such as passports and marriage licenses.
After a brief career as a journalist and as a legislative staffer in Sacramento, Pellerin moved to Santa Cruz. From 1993 to 2004 she was elections manager under then-County Clerk Richard Bedal, and was eventually appointed to the permanent role after some of the duties of that office were split. She went on to win reelection four times, running unopposed each time.