Santa Cruz Museum Month Kicks Off with Free or Reduced Admission

0

After more than a year of closures due to Covid-19, museums, galleries and other cultural institutions across Santa Cruz County are once again opening their doors to visitors. To further encourage people to return, they have come together to create Santa Cruz Museum Month. 

Throughout the month of May, visitors can enjoy free or reduced admission while exploring spaces large and small, from South County to the Santa Cruz Mountains. 

Institutions have been hard at work behind the scenes making improvements and implementing safety measures. According to the California Association of Museums (CAM), a recent study at the Berlin Institute of Technology found that the risk of Covid-19 transmission is much lower in museums than in supermarkets, restaurants and on public transportation. 

Along with vaccination rates and recent decreases in active infections in Santa Cruz County, it is great news for the local arts and culture community.

Museum Month first began years ago as a statewide campaign led by CAM. But during the pandemic it has not happened. This prompted Felicia Van Stolk, executive director of the Santa Cruz Museum of Natural History, and other museum leaders to plan their own event.

Van Stolk says she began reaching out to other institutions at the beginning of the crisis. They discussed the virus, the recent natural disasters, and how they could support each other through everything.

“We were all looking for camaraderie, for ways to connect,” she says. “We realized that working together, we could amplify all of our efforts to get the word out.”

A special website for Museum Month, santacruzmuseummonth.org, has been created. The site lists each participating museum and gallery, with information about their selection of offerings, locations, hours and more.

Lisa Robinson, president of the board of directors and curator at the San Lorenzo Valley Museum, says the idea for the site also formed from a project of the Santa Cruz Museums Partnership, which produced a similar website a few years ago. 

“Museum Month is revisiting that partnership,” Robinson says. “As we’re coming out of being closed … we are working on how to promote each other and get people back into museums safely.”

Some of the participating museums and galleries are always admission-free, but many residents might not know this, Robinson says. Museum Month aims to encourage people to return, but also remind them of what is available year-round.

In addition, it helps encourage support of the institutions, most of which are nonprofits.

“Many of these museums are already free, but most have membership options, ways to support the institutions, some that have been around for decades,” Van Stolk says. “Museum Month is both a thank you for helping us survive, and welcoming people back in.”

In South County, the Pajaro Valley Historical Association (PVHA) will be participating, along with Pajaro Valley Arts and the Agricultural History Project. 

PVHA archiver Lou Arbanas says it feels “exhilarating” to once again welcome people back to their historic grounds and buildings in Watsonville. 

“We are shaking off our dust,” he says. “We are going to be bright and shiny and ready to receive guests. It’s a breath of fresh air … being able to look people in the eye and share the history of the Pajaro Valley once again.”

Arbanas urges residents to support their local nonprofit arts and culture organizations.

“Museums rely one hundred percent on their communities’ participation,” he says. “We belong to this community. We look forward to having them back in, to continue to help preserve their own history.”

Participating organizations include: The Agricultural History Project, Capitola Historical Museum, Curated by the Sea, Museo Eduardo Carillo, Pajaro Valley Arts, Pajaro Valley Historical Association, Radius Gallery, R. Blitzer Gallery, San Benito Historical Society and Museum, San Lorenzo Valley Museum, Santa Cruz Art League, Santa Cruz Children’s Museum of Discovery, Santa Cruz Museum of Art and History, Santa Cruz Museum of Natural History, Santa Cruz Mountains Art Center, and the Seymour Marine Discovery Center. 


Rachel Kippen Resigns as Executive Director of O’Neill Sea Odyssey

4

In a major shake up to local charity O’Neill Sea Odyssey (OSO), Executive Director Rachel Kippen publicly resigned Wednesday, stating that she could no longer “in good conscience” continue as its leader because the board was unwilling to address “institutional racism, misogyny and privilege.”

Kippen took to Facebook to announce her resignation and post her letter to the nonprofit’s board of directors. In it, she says she is proud of the work they do, but she cites a lack of racial and gender representation and equity among the board and staff.

She had been in the position since 2019, when she took over from the initial Executive Director Dan Haifley. 

While email requests by Good Times to Kippen remain unanswered as of publication time, OSO, in a statement, says it is “deeply saddened” that Kippen “chose to attack and malign” the program. 

“Although we are grateful for the service of our former Executive Director, we disagree with her comments about our commitment to diversity and inclusion,” it says. “Fortunately, OSO’s mission and its track record speak for itself.”

Founded in 1996 by the legendary Jack O’Neill, OSO was created to teach school children about marine biology, ocean ecology and navigation. To do this, OSO takes students in grades throughout Santa Cruz Harbor on the Team O’Neill catamaran for a three-hour tour. Since 2002 it has also included in-class curriculums to its program.

The organization has won several awards for its work, most recently the 2013 Silicon Valley Business Journal’s Community Impact Award. Over 100,000 kids have passed through the program, most coming from mixed and underprivileged backgrounds.

However, the differences between the board and students they claim to help did not go unnoticed by Kippen during her tenure. She notes that 80% of the students come from non-white backgrounds and 68% from low-income households. While she admits the organization “leverages” these students as a way to fundraise, she commends the choice of students.

“However, I believe our organization is tasked with an obligation much greater than giving students a free boat ride on a beautiful yacht,” she writes.

She says she believes it is the duty of OSO to make the students feel welcome and accepted in the material and languages taught, and to have their leadership represent the people they serve. She says the OSO board is predominantly male, all white and lacks term limits. She says that while the most recent members joined in 2006, most directors hail from the initial 1997 group.

When she attempted to address these issues within the organization she says she was rebuked by the board.

“My leadership evaluations were hastily and retroactively revised in attempts to silence me,” the resignation letter reads. She also says when she garnered an equity-oriented grant for the organization, it was returned to the funder on the basis of OSO not being able to address racial issues during the Covid-19 pandemic. According to Kippen, this was the first time in the group’s quarter of a century history that a grant was returned and she doesn’t believe the grant’s focus on racial equity was coincidental.

Kippen, who in the post says she is a “mixed race woman under 40,” says she understands how essential equity is to education.

“In order to mitigate undue burden or harm,” she writes. “That the organization has internal work it must do prior to welcoming any person representing a minority as future Executive Director or board member.”

OSO says it has previously had bilingual crew members to better serve non-English speaking students and “women have served in key leadership positions from the chair of the board to senior deckhands/instructors on our classroom at sea.” It also claims the board’s decision to hire Kippen “is itself indicative of its commitment to diversity.” 

Former Santa Cruz mayor and current City Council member Justin Cummings reposted Kippen’s Facebook post on Thursday morning. The former director and founder of The UCSC Doris Duke Conservation Scholars Program, he says he appreciates Kippen’s leadership and is proud to be a part of a new generation of young professionals and leaders.

In an interview with Good Times, Cummings says studies like 2014’s Green 2.0 report show many nonprofits and charities claim diversity and equity inclusion are important factors to their organizations. However, their actions to address these issues often fall short of their values. He says he respects Kippen’s decision to follow her morals and step down.

“The O’Neill Sea Odyssey has done a lot of great work,” he adds. “But like many others they need room to grow and changes need to be made particularly around diversity and equity inclusion in the field of conservation studies.”

Seven Potential Candidates Mull Santa Cruz County Supervisor Race

After Santa Cruz County Supervisor Ryan Coonerty announced he would not seek reelection in 2022, local politicians and activists are assessing the void that his departure will leave, as they try to figure out what’s next.

Among the significant possible candidates for his seat, no one has so far stepped up and declared they will definitely run. But few have ruled out the possibility altogether. 

Coonerty says he hopes the opening creates an opportunity for more diversity on the Board of Supervisors, which has been made up of all white men for the past eight years. But at this stage, it’s hard to tell whether everyone wants the job—or no one does.

Santa Cruz Mayor Donna Meyers says she was surprised by Coonerty’s decision not to seek a third term, but she realizes that the supervisor has had a rough year marked by both major crises—including the Covid-19 pandemic—and personal loss, when his aide Allison Endert was killed by an allegedly intoxicated driver.  

“He’s put in a lot of hours for this community, and he deserves to take a walk on West Cliff and drink some coffee and not have someone come up to him and tell him what they need from him,” Meyers says.

Meyers says she’s enjoyed working closely with Coonerty this year, including on issues around homelessness. As for her own ambitions, Meyers says she is currently too zeroed in on her term as mayor to think about running for anything right now. Among her priorities, she says she’s focused on seeing housing projects—including affordable housing developments on Pacific Avenue and on Jessie Street—through the pipeline.

Santa Cruz Vice Mayor Sonja Brunner, who was the top vote getter in the 2020 City Council race, says she’s excited about the possibility for the county board to see some diversity. Since hearing Coonerty’s news she has started thinking about the various differences between city and county operations, she says. Brunner adds that she’ll consider running for the 3rd District seat, as she ponders what would be the most effective way for her to serve the community.

Santa Cruz City Councilmember Justin Cummings, who last year served as the city’s first-ever Black male mayor, says he plans on discussing his options with supporters and friends before making a decision about whether to run. “I’m considering it, and I appreciated working with Ryan, and I’m really happy we were able to work toward the common good,” he says.

Fellow City Councilmember Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson says she’ll also consider running for the seat. Kalantari-Johnson, an Iranian-American immigrant, won her first election to the City Council this past year. She believes her public health background would make her a strong candidate and potentially a strong supervisor—helping offer guidance to the county’s local criminal justice systems and its various health initiatives.

“They all sort of overlap around public health, and I have extensive knowledge around public health,” she says

Another City Councilmember, Renée Golder, was elected in a special recall election last spring, and she says she’s been getting supportive texts from friends in and outside the city of Santa Cruz telling her to run. She says she is too busy at the moment—in between the City Council, her day job as a teacher and family—to pay the opportunity too much mind.

“I’m super curious about what will happen,” Golder says. “I definitely want to see continued collaboration between the city and the county to try and help residents thrive—with recovery from fires and Covid. There are so many overlapping issues, from water to homelessness.”

Meanwhile, Santa Cruz Councilmember Martine Watkins, who just won reelection this past year, says she might consider running, but she doesn’t currently live in the 3rd District, which includes Bonny Doon, Davenport and most—but not all—of the city of Santa Cruz. Watkins and her family live in the sliver of the city occupied by the 5th District, which is represented by Supervisor Bruce McPherson. Watkins does think that better decision making happens when women have a seat at the table.

As she keeps an open mind about a possible campaign, Watkins notes that the boundaries of the district will be redrawn this year, and it’s too early to say where they ultimately will fall. She also says she isn’t sure whether she would want to pack up and move into the 3rd District in order to run for supervisor. Watkins and her family love their house, she explains. Also, her husband has a lot of very large and very heavy fish tanks. “It wouldn’t be an easy move,” says Watkins, who became Santa Cruz’s first-ever mayor of African American descent in late 2018. 

Councilmember Sandy Brown, who also won reelection this past year, lives in the 5th District as well. She says she has no plans of moving and is actually relieved that she probably won’t be able to run for the position.

“I imagine there will be plenty of jockeying for the seat,” says Brown, an ally of Cummings on the City Council. “And I’m looking forward to seeing a strong progressive candidate step up.”

Another potential candidate who has been getting some buzz is Food, What?! Development Director Kayla Kumar, who fell narrowly short her bid for a Santa Cruz City Council seat when she ran on a slate with Brown last year.

Kumar tells GT via email that she believes the open seat for the 3rd District represents an “opportunity to better represent the 3rd District, by acknowledging the growing number of powerful, young progressives within it.”

“I’d personally love to see a woman of color in the role who doesn’t only look like us, but loves the people like us. I will say, a number of folks reached out to me to discuss this news,” she adds. “Right now, I’m focused on returning those calls and having these conversations with my community. All I can say for certain is that I’m really looking forward to helping ensure that the progressive people of Santa Cruz have a representative in the 3rd District, no matter what shape my role takes in that endeavor.”

Why Are Santa Cruz County’s Younger Residents Avoiding the Vaccine?

Santa Cruz County health officials’ prediction that residents would be frustrated over not being able to find a Covid-19 vaccine after the state expanded its eligibility to most Californians earlier this month has not come true.

Instead, the demand for the inoculation has been lukewarm in the first two weeks that all people between the ages of 16 and 49 were made eligible to receive the shot.

Only about 29% of the county’s youngest vaccine-eligible residents (ages 16-24) have received at least one shot, and about 13% are fully vaccinated, according to county spokesperson Jason Hoppin.

The good news, Hoppin said Tuesday, is that 90% of county residents 75 and above have received at least one dose, and about 74% of that population is fully vaccinated.

In all, the county has administered more than 233,000 vaccines, and about 62% of residents have received at least one dose.

Though most young people have only been eligible to receive the vaccine since April 15, Hoppin said the county still considers the initial turnout “pretty low,” and that it might interfere with the county’s progress toward herd immunity.

The faint interest in the vaccine was made evident when Wednesday’s drive-thru clinic at the Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds was opened up for walk-in appointments because about 100 doses were unclaimed. That was despite the fact that the clinic was recently added to the state-run scheduling website My Turn.

Hoppin also said that a recent vaccine clinic through the County Office of Education for students 16 years and older saw a muted response, and that there were still several appointments available for vaccine clinics through local health care providers Sutter Health and Dignity Health.

“You can choose your vaccine right now,” Hoppin said. “We were telling people early on to take whichever one is offered to you; now you have a choice.”

Why exactly the turnout for young county residents has been low is unknown, Hoppin said. He did, however, say that there have not been many incentives for young people to receive the shot. That might change this summer after California’s economy reopens in June, as Gov. Gavin Newsom announced earlier this month. Young people might be more willing to get the vaccine if sports and performance venues require it as a form of entry, Hoppin said.

Though the state is not currently requiring venues to deny entrance to those who are unvaccinated, it has given those businesses incentives for doing so. If a performance venue, for example, requires a negative Covid-19 test or vaccination for entry, then it can up its capacity to 50%, according to California Department of Public Health guidelines.

The San Francisco Giants took it a step further recently, bringing in “vaccine only” sections in which vaccinated groups of people can sit together without being split into socially distanced “pods” of two to four people.

Another incentive to receive the vaccine came Tuesday morning, as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated its mask-wearing guidance. Those who have been vaccinated no longer have to wear a mask outdoors if they’re walking, running, hiking or biking, either alone or with members of their household, and in small outdoor gatherings.

“Today’s developments around masking and future developments around the tiered blueprint potentially going away on June 15, that should provide people an incentive to go get vaccinated,” Hoppin said.

Watsonville City Councilman Francisco Estrada, who is a member of the South County arm of the SAVE Lives Santa Cruz County group, said that hesitancy from the county’s younger residents does not surprise him. He said he feels that the current era of “misinformation and mistrust” fueled by conspiracy theories floating around the internet has led many in his generation (Millennials) to second guess information coming from the government.

Though they are merely anecdotal experiences, Estrada, 38, says that conversations about the vaccine with friends who live in South County have been mixed. One friend, he said, called him a “sheep” simply following the government’s orders, and another was still unconvinced that he needed the vaccine because he was young and in good physical condition.

To a small extent, Estrada said, he understands their reasoning but believes that most people will come around. One of his closest friends, for example, recently got the vaccine because he wanted to protect his young daughter.

“I think he found a greater reason than himself to get the vaccine,” Estrada said, “and for some people, that’s what it’s going to take.”

Estrada said that the South County leadership group—which consists of various local lawmakers, nonprofit organizers and health officials—was recently made aware of the low turnout among its youngest residents, and it has since started working with FoodWhat?! to further push the nonprofit’s outreach campaign targeted at the demographic.

Lupita Rojas, a Watsonville High School senior and youth activist with FoodWhat?!, has for the past few weeks sat in on the South County group’s weekly meetings, and had the opportunity to ask various questions about the vaccine. She has used that knowledge to produce videos about the vaccine that are geared toward her peers.

Rojas said that the project sprouted from a conversation with FoodWhat?! Founder and Director Doron Comerchero in which the latter was stunned that Rojas did not know simple facts about the vaccines such as when she would be eligible for it and where and how to get it.

“I remember him saying, ‘oh, that’s an issue,’” Rojas said.

Rojas has since received the vaccine, and though it was ultimately a tough decision, she said she is happy that she did. But, she said she understands that there might be hesitancy among other young people because of the false claims being posted to social media apps popular among teenagers such as Instagram and TikTok.

“You can fall down the rabbit hole (on those sites),” she said, “and I think that’s where most of us get our news.”

Rojas remembers seeing one post on Instagram that said there is a high probability that a person might contract herpes while receiving the vaccine. Another, on TikTok, claimed that there was no chance the vaccine, which took less than a year to develop, is safe, considering that there is no cure for cancer and other diseases despite decades of research.

“I don’t feel like the youth doesn’t care about getting the vaccine,” she said. “They just want to make sure they’re making the right decision for them and their family. I think some of us are still scared and trying to get the right information.”

Santa Cruz County health officials at a press conference Thursday said they are indeed trying to reach young people in various ways to assure them of the vaccine’s safety, but Chief of Public Health Jen Herrera said it is clear “that we may not be the messenger to provide that information.”

“This is a place where we are relying on collaboration,” said Herrera.

County Health Officer Dr. Gail Newel added the state is working with some “youth-focused celebrities” on TikTok and other social media platforms to create vaccine outreach campaigns.

Though he is one of the youngest elected officials in the county, Estrada also said that there is a limit to the impact that his words carry. He said that most people unsure about receiving the vaccine will be convinced by the people closest to them, highlighting the South County group’s Trusted Voices campaign along with FoodWhat?!’s efforts. Through the Trusted Voices initiative, the group has produced videos featuring people who live and work in Watsonville that have received the vaccine and are encouraging their peers to do the same.

The most recent video featured Dr. Elisabeth Bedolla Rocha, a Watsonville High School alumna who now works at Salud Para La Gente. In the video Bedolla—speaking in Spanish—says she, her mother and her grandmother have all received the vaccine and answers several questions about its efficacy, its safety and how and where to get it.

“People watched that video and said, ‘Oh, I know her,’” Estrada said. “I think that stuff makes a difference …. We’re trying to be creative as possible to let people know that the vaccine is safe.”


Capitol Mum on Eviction Moratorium Extension as Renters Seek More Time

By Nigel Duara, CalMatters

With two months to go before a statewide eviction moratorium expired in January, lawmakers, lobbyists and the governor’s staff were already deep into negotiations on an extension. They reached it just days before the deadline, providing six more months of a ban on eviction. 

Now, with two months left before that extension itself expires on June 30, there is no proposed legislation on giving renters more time before the moratorium ends, and lawmakers expressed uncertainty that there would be. 

“It remains to be seen if there’s appetite in Sacramento to extend the protections past June 30,” said David Chiu, a San Francisco Democrat who wrote the original eviction moratorium legislation. “But I don’t think any of my colleagues have an interest in seeing a wave of mass evictions.”

On Wednesday, a group of local-level elected officials, renters and tenant advocates called for an extension of the moratorium, either through legislative action or executive fiat, and a change to the elements of the law that still allow landlords to evict tenants for reasons other than failing to pay their rent.

“If we don’t get this right, we will struggle for generations to come,” said Carroll Fife, a member of the Oakland City Council. 

One of the tenants’ primary objections was a major victory for their opponents, landlord advocacy groups, in the last round of negotiations: the state’s preemption of local eviction moratoria that went further than the state’s deadline, like those in the city of Los Angeles or Alameda County early in the pandemic

Dean Preston of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors urged Gov. Gavin Newsom and legislators to allow cities and counties to set their own eviction moratoriums, as long as they went beyond what the state already made law. 

“Don’t get in our way,” Preston said. “If you lack the spine to stand up to the real estate industry, you will have to live with that reality, but the minimum you can do is get out of the damn way.” 

A spokesperson for Assembly Speaker Rendon declined to comment. 

The California Apartment Association, the state’s most powerful landlord lobbying group, is reviewing the need for another extension, but its chief lobbyist Debra Carlton said current legislation doesn’t account for tenants who refuse to apply for rental relief or those who don’t qualify for relief but still don’t pay rent. 

“Housing providers who need help are slipping through the cracks because of issues with the current law,” Carlton said. “CAA will continue to evaluate whether an extension is necessary.”

Anya Svanoe, communications director for the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment Action, said the changes tenant advocates are calling for would likely come from amendments to the budget, which needs to be passed by June 15.

Activists and tenants also argued that some of the eviction protections instituted during the pandemic should be made permanent, especially a measure in SB 91 giving tenants 15 days to respond to an eviction notice. The previous range was three to five days.  

CalMatters found the state’s plan to funnel $2.6 billion in federal funding into rent relief, as laid out in SB 91, has had mixed results. The state has received a total of 150,000 applications, and processed just more than 50,000 of them. More federal money is on the way. 

“We are not seeing the level of participation in the rent relief program to warrant ending all protections on June 30,” Chiu said. 

Activists and tenants also called for measures that failed to gain traction in the last round of negotiations, such as a total cancellation of rental debt and protections from credit agencies that will use rental debt to lower tenants’ credit scores. 

“Renters are seen as transient, unreliable,” said Daniel Lee, a Culver City council member. “But while it’s the people who flip houses who only live there for four or five years, it’s the renters who stay.”

This article is part of the California Divide, a collaboration among newsrooms examining income inequality and economic survival in California.

CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.


Battered, Burned But Alive: Time Will Heal Park’s Wounds, But It Needs Big Money, Too

By Julie Cart, CalMatters

In the annals of California history, no one has ever had to put a broken state park back together. There’s no guidebook, no rules. So now state officials and conservationists are attempting a complex and extraordinary Humpty Dumpty project: The reawakening of Big Basin Redwoods State Park.

The state’s oldest park, Big Basin was nearly erased in last summer’s lightning-caused wildfires. In one day, 97% of it burned, destroying buildings that had been standing for 120 years.

The fire destroyed roads, bridges, campsites, trails, the visitor center, restrooms, electrical and water systems — everything that makes a park accessible to the public. Forests of giant redwoods were charred by flames that soared more than 100 feet high. Trees that didn’t fall in the fire were knocked down by howling winds in January, delivering the fatal coup de grace.

In all, it was the most comprehensive destruction ever of a major park in California history. Portions of other parks have burned, cracked by earthquakes or submerged by flooding, but not like this.

Today, the park remains closed, its trails gone. Thousands of dead, blackened trees, tens of thousands of acres of charred shrubs and scores of unearthed boulders still litter the ground.

But a rare tour on Thursday proved that regrowth is already apparent. Towering redwoods, stripped of limbs, still manage to crowd out the sky. Some have the look of chimneys, hollowed out by fire. Most are, eight months after the lightning fires, both green and black. Scorched, alligatored bark rises hundreds of feet, but vivid green shoots sprout at their base like fuzzy house slippers.

“These are resilient, long-lived trees,” said Chris Spohrer, the district superintendent overseeing the state parks in the Santa Cruz Mountains. “It takes a lot to kill them.”

State park officials now have a message to get across: The park, 20 miles northwest of Santa Cruz, needs help, mostly money, but also public support and patience.

The state’s early estimate of $200 million for basic wildfire repair across the Parks and Recreation Department will be gobbled up to satisfy Big Basin’s needs alone, estimated at $186 million. But that’s just the beginning.

The tedious work of hauling equipment and materials down a steep ravine to rebuild a trail and a viewing platform at Berry Creek Falls will cost at least half a million dollars, Spohrer said. And the state’s bill for debris and hazard tree removal in the region is now about $270 million, according to the California Office of Emergency Services.

The repair list is unimaginably long. Here’s a partial catalogue: six vehicle bridges and 46 pedestrian bridges, 85 miles of trail, 53 miles of road, 100 structures, including the park headquarters, a museum, a lodge, 20 ranger homes, hundreds of signs and miles of fences.

It’s going to take a long, long time for the park to be rebuilt, and for the forests to heal. Patience is required. But nature will prevail. Forests are resilient. The thousand-year-old redwoods have seen this before. They are already coming back.

But don’t expect an identical Big Basin.

“We don’t know what it will look like,” Spohrer said. “But we do know the park is not going to look the same for a long time. It will not look the same in our lifetimes.”

A wholesale reimagining of California’s oldest state park

Spohrer stood in a parking lot off highway 236 on Thursday in the only 15 acres of the park’s front country that did not burn. Spohrer, blond and lanky, is the district superintendent overseeing state parks in the Santa Cruz Mountains.

He’s delivering, not for the first time, a carefully considered message. As awful as the fire was, its aftermath presents a unique opportunity for a wholesale reimagining of Big Basin Redwoods. Decisions will be made about where and if to rebuild structures. Rather than constructing charming wooden buildings, perhaps they’ll use fire-resistant materials and put them in places that aren’t as likely to burn. Maybe they won’t build facilities on the root structures of ancient trees.

The planning process will begin this summer and is expected to include public meetings, consultation with partner agencies and friends groups as well as local tribes, whose history is not deeply explored in the park. 

There is no reopening date yet, it’s far off and subject to the progress of restoration efforts. But the Rancho del Oso area should be open for day activities by Memorial Day, Spohrer said. 

He leads a convoy of four-wheel drive vehicles that bump along a narrow ridgetop road, affording a view of the darkly monochromatic landscape. The stands of knobcone pines here are reduced to smudges of ash on the chalky slopes, revealing pale Santa Cruz mudstone.

Most of the redwoods survived. The fire’s intensity triggered a survival response in the knobcone pines still standing: The cones are fused tight by a seal of resin. Temperatures of 350 degrees or higher melt the resin and release seeds, which can continue to rain down for years after a fire.

“Nature will find a way,” said Joanne Kerbavaz, Big Basin’s senior environmental scientist.

Other plants have spent their lifetimes adding to the soil’s seed banks, which are stored underground and called upon during times like this.

The landscape will continue to change, its balance upended: Delicate ferns that had spread in shady ravines under a now-gone dense tree canopy are likely to wither in the summer’s sun and heat. 

The status of the park’s animals, such as deer, owls and racoons, is unknown. Those that could fly or run did so, and will return if they have homes to come back to. A system of trail cameras will help researchers track who’s around, Kerbavaz said.

“With the amount of biomass that’s been removed in the areas that are severely burned, there isn’t the same type of cover or food sources,” she said. “Species that could take advantage have moved in, like pileated woodpeckers. One of our important species, marbled murrelet, is a seabird that nests in old growth. We are concerned how the fire affected nesting habitat.”

None of the restoration work in the park is straightforward or in an easily accessible place. The park’s most popular site, Berry Creek Falls,  is one example of the complications.

The long descending trail that traces the creek is barely visible and crisscrossed with the husks of tree trunks. The trail’s artfully crafted wooden steps and hand railings are burned, the concrete bridges are lost and the once-burbling creek is clogged with trees and ever-falling rock.  The viewing platform, the site of visitors’ must-have selfies shot facing the cascading waterfall, is gone. 

In January the state sent the Federal Emergency Management Agency its preliminary assessment of the repairs. If accepted, the state parks will be reimbursed for as much as 75% of the costs.

Some trees are still smoldering

Spohrer said he is “in triage” mode and has prioritized repairing the roads — which includes rebuilding culverts — placing the water infrastructure and ensuring public safety. Much of that work involves removing the “standing dead,” trees that may suddenly crash down three or five years from now, with the impact of a falling building.

“That’s what I worry about,” Spohrer said. 

There’s plenty more to worry about. The fire is not out. It is still quietly smoldering in the root systems of some trees. Two weeks ago fire flared again.

One change Spohrer hopes to institute is more prescribed burns to lessen the forest’s fuel load. Big Basin has been clearing brush and trees with fire since the 1970s, but the complexities and legalities that often snarl burn plans means that there have been only four prescribed fires in the last 10 years, he said.

Despite its challenges, the park — which draws more than a million visitors a year — has a dedicated constituency. Both the Sempervirens Fund and the Save the Redwoods League raised nearly $750,000 in emergency funding and stand ready to continue that assistance. 

One possible funding source, said Sara Barth, executive director of the Sempervirens Fund, is the Biden administration’s $2 trillion infrastructure plan. With the Vice President and Speaker of the House Californians, the time is right.

“I don’t see how this can’t happen,” Barth said. Her organization and others are lobbying in both capitals to free up funding to rebuild Big Basin. 

“It’s going to be excruciating to have to wait while the forest recovers and parts of the park are open,” she said. “It’s really about whether humans can get their act together.

“My hope is whatever emerges better be worth it. I am hopeful for the future but it does take a long view. The trees will deliver, let’s be clear.”

CalMatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.

The Vulnerable Homebound Are Left Behind on Vaccination

By Jenny Gold

It was April, more than three months into the vaccination campaign against Covid-19, and Jim Freeman, 83, still had not gotten his first dose.

Freeman had been eligible for months as part of the 75-and-older target group deemed most vulnerable to death and serious illness in the pandemic. But he could not leave his home to make the journey to one of the mass-vaccination sites in San Mateo County. Freeman, who has Parkinson’s disease, has extremely limited mobility and no longer can walk.

“He watches TV at night and sees all these people in line getting vaccines, but he couldn’t do it,” said his daughter Beth Freeman, 58. “It was really frustrating.” She contacted the county and state public health departments and even her local congresswoman for help, but none had a solution.

Finally, after weeks of failed attempts to get someone to vaccinate her father at their home, Beth spent $700 to rent a special wheelchair-accessible van and, with the help of a home health aide, nervously drove her father to the county’s mass-vaccination site.

Even as the nation has moved on to vaccinating everyone 16 and older, the vast majority of homebound people have not yet been vaccinated, said Kelly Buckland, executive director of the National Council on Independent Living. “As far as I can tell, no one’s really doing it. Maybe a few places in the country, but not on the mass scale it needs to be.”

Across the nation, an estimated 4 million Americans are homebound by age, disability or frailty, unable to easily leave their homes to receive a Covid vaccine.

Buckland noted that while homebound people are not out in public where the virus is circulating, they don’t live in a bubble. Most rely for care on family members or a rotating staff of home health aides who come and go and often have their own homes and families. “For people with disabilities, you can’t close yourself off. You don’t have the option. People have to come into your home every day to give you services.”

The Biden administration in late March dedicated $100 million to help vulnerable older adults and people with disabilities get vaccinations. But many caregivers and homebound people say they aren’t yet feeling the impact of that effort.

California, where tens of thousands of residents like Jim Freeman are still waiting their turn for vaccination, offers a sharp lens on the challenges.

Marta Green, a California official helping oversee vaccine distribution, said during an April meeting of the state’s Community Vaccine Advisory Committee that California is “working on a partnership” to send ambulances to vaccinate homebound people where they live. In response to questions about how many homebound people had been vaccinated so far, a spokesperson for the California Department of Public Health said the effort was “just beginning” and estimates were not available.

As part of a $15 million no-bid contract with California to administer the state’s vaccination program, Blue Shield of California is obligated to provide vaccine access to homebound people. The company, nonetheless, declined to provide responses to specific questions about such efforts. Spokesperson Erika Conner said the company has “diligently explored opportunities for this work” and recommended that homebound people contact their local public health departments or health care providers.

The logistics of inoculating homebound people with a vaccine that requires cold storage is not simple. Once thawed, a vial of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine contains six doses that must be delivered within six hours, while a Moderna vaccine vial contains 10 to 15 doses to be used within 12 hours. With each vaccination visit lasting about an hour plus the travel time, there isn’t much room for error, especially in rural areas where residents may live far apart. The one-dose Johnson & Johnson vaccine offers more flexibility, but the pause due to safety concerns resulted in delays.

“Yeah, it’s not easy. If it were easy, we’d already have done it,” said Dr. Mike Wasserman, a geriatrician and member of the California vaccine advisory committee. “But that’s not an excuse. These are the folks who if they get the virus they’re going to die. I don’t accept it.”

Wasserman said he’d give the state a “D” for its efforts to reach the homebound for vaccination. For some, he added, it might already be too late. “If you’re 80 years old and you live in a 1,000-square-foot home with 10 other people, you’re probably dead already.”

In the absence of a coordinated state-driven effort, California counties are attempting a patchwork of approaches.

In Los Angeles County, the public health department has partnered with the sheriff’s department and 15 fire departments to vaccinate homebound residents, with some success. Health officials projected that 50% of the county’s 10,000 homebound residents will have received one dose by the end of April.

In Fresno County, with more than a million residents, health officials said they are compiling a list of homebound people who want help getting a vaccine. So far, fewer than 20 people in that category have been contacted and received the vaccine.

In San Mateo County, where Freeman lives, the health department has identified at least 1,000 individuals who are homebound and in need of the vaccine; so far, 100 have been vaccinated.

Before she resorted to renting the $700 mobility van for her father, Beth Freeman contacted county workers. They offered to send a bus to pick up her father and take him to a vaccination site, but she couldn’t imagine how that would work for him, both in terms of the physical logistics and the risk of exposure. She asked the nurses who visited her father twice a week through Sutter Health’s care-at-home program for help — after all, they had given him the flu shot. But no luck. The nurses said they were not allowed to offer the Covid vaccine.

Finally, on April 6, Beth made the difficult decision to transport her father despite his limited mobility. “I did not want to take him out of the house for this. It was risky for his health. But at some point I realized it wasn’t going to happen any other way,” she said. “He wanted to see members of his family and time was ticking.”

She said her father was up all night worrying, and his body was stiff. But with help from a home health aide, she used a special lift to hoist him into a wheelchair and wheeled him down two ramps and into the rented van, where she strapped him to the chair. They drove 20 minutes to the San Mateo County Event Center, her eyes darting from the road to the rearview mirror to check on her father, and then waited 40 minutes in the drive-thru line.

“When I rolled down the window, the nurses were like, What the hell? Why is he only coming to us now?” she said. The experience was so stressful for her father, she added, that he slept on and off for the next two days.

This week, they repeated the ordeal for his second dose — including laying out another $700 for the rental van. “All this, while he sees nurses at home twice a week?” Beth Freeman said. “What a missed opportunity.”

This story was produced by KHN (Kaiser Health News), a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues. Together with Policy Analysis and Polling, KHN is one of the three major operating programs at KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation). KFF is an endowed nonprofit organization providing information on health issues to the nation. 

Report: Covid-19 had Bigger Impact on Black, Latinx Communities

The Covid-19 pandemic has had a disparate impact on communities nationwide, with Latinx and Black communities experiencing greater impacts than white ones.

That is according to a report heard Tuesday by the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors.

The report, presented by Health Services Agency Director Mimi Hall and labor economist Teresa Ghilarducci, shows that the pandemic affected numerous aspects of life, from health to education.

“That is the overarching story of this economic recovery,” Ghilarducci said. “It’s been very unequal.”

A sister of Santa Cruz County Deputy Health Officer Dr. David Ghilarducci, Professor Teresa Ghilarducci is a nationally recognized expert in labor, aging and retirement security. She serves as the Bernard and Irene Schwartz Chair of Economic Policy Analysis at The New School for Social Research. She has been a professor at The New School in New York since 2008.

While the pandemic kept all students at home to engage in distance learning, she said, higher-income, “well-resourced” parents could more easily make up for the learning loss while low-income families languished.

“This is the kind of inequality that lasts a long time,” she said. “Were going to have to really rebuild our infrastructure for our human capital losses.”

While the health impacts of the pandemic affected every race, the report also notes an “appalling” reduction in life expectancy among Black and Latinx people due to the health impacts of the pandemic, Ghilarducci said.

The report also shows that businesses owned by non-whites suffered under the pandemic. Statewide, 41% of Black-owned businesses failed since March 2020, along with 32% of those owned by Latinx people, 26% by Asians and 25% by women.

There were bright spots in the presentation. The various economic stimulus packages by state and federal governments helped close the wealth gap and kept some people from going into debt, Ghilarducci said. In addition, legislation limiting evictions helped reduce the spread of Covid-19 by 3.8% and deaths by 11%.

Also, Hall said that all 7,000 of the county’s permanent farmworkers have been vaccinated.

Hall said that the county helped address the inequities caused by the pandemic by investing its stimulus payments into Health Services Agency (HSA) programs. This includes $10.3 million that went to pay for testing, data management, infrastructure and equipment.

It also included $1.8 million for economic support for uninsured and underinsured people impacted by Covid-19.

After receiving more than $50 million from President Joe Biden’s American Rescue Plan, the county has already earmarked $6.4 million for public health programs, and plans on investing another $11 million to further bolster those efforts including data, health infrastructure and community engagement, Hall said.

“I really wish that the federal government and the state were able to invest even more, because when you spread it out over the up to four years that these dollars were intended for, there are still scarce dollars for what we need,” she said.

The report also looks at discrepancies in vaccine distribution.

When looking at vaccines administered by all providers countywide, South County came out behind, with just 29% of the total vaccines. That’s compared to 32% in North County and 39% in Mid-County.

But the HSA worked to ameliorate this discrepancy by administering 61% if its vaccine supplies in South County, Hall said. 

“The way you address a disease properly and impactfully is to go where it is impacting communities the most,” she said. “When we do our work in this manner, we are protecting the entire community by protecting those who are most likely to be impacted.”

UCSC Luminary, Institute of Marine Sciences Founder William Doyle Dies

William T. Doyle, a Watsonville High School graduate who founded the Institute of Marine Sciences at UCSC—in addition to the Long Marine Laboratory—and was professor emeritus of biology at the university, died April 21 at his home in Santa Cruz. He was 91.

Doyle was one of the founding faculty members of UCSC when the campus opened in 1965.

He held many important administrative positions at UCSC but was best known for his leadership in the planning and development of the campus’s marine science program. He was largely responsible for the establishment of Long Marine Laboratory, and one of the lab’s original research buildings was named in his honor in 2003, when the lab celebrated its 25th anniversary.

“Bill was a wonderful human being who supported people and made UCSC and the world a better place,” said UCSC Institute of Marine Sciences Director Daniel Costa in a press release. “He played an essential role in building the marine science program at UCSC, and he made sure people had the resources and support they needed to succeed. He was absolutely critical in the development of my own career, and I know he touched the lives of many other people throughout the campus.”

William T. Doyle died at his home in Santa Cruz on April 21. He was 91. PHOTO: Carolyn Lagattuta

Doyle served as chair of the campus planning committee on marine studies from 1970 to 1972, and he served as director of the Center for Coastal Marine Studies (renamed the Institute of Marine Sciences in 1983) from its establishment in 1976 until his retirement in 1991.

“While not a marine scientist himself, he had the vision to see that this was a field that UCSC could and should excel in, and he dedicated years to make that happen,” said Gary Griggs, professor of Earth and planetary sciences, who succeeded Doyle as the Institute of Marine Sciences director, in the press release. “Bill was generous with his time, and he encouraged and supported many young scientists in the early stages of their careers, whether undergraduates, graduate students, post-docs or young faculty. He was always ready to step in and take charge to move something forward in order to make UCSC a stronger institution.”

As a botanist, Doyle specialized in a relatively obscure and little-studied group of terrestrial nonflowering plants known as liverworts and hornworts. He was the leading authority on the liverworts and hornworts of California and published a comprehensive reference on them in 2007.

With the development of the campus’s marine science program, however, Doyle and his students delved into various areas of marine botany, including research projects on the ecology of marine algae and marine algal aquaculture. Among the graduate students Doyle advised were Julie Packard, now executive director of the Monterey Bay Aquarium, and Andrew DeVogelaere, research coordinator for the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary.

“Bill Doyle had a huge influence on so many students’ lives, and the world will be a lesser place without him,” said Packard, who met Doyle when she took his introductory botany course as an undergraduate, which led to her working in his lab and signing up for the intertidal biology field course he taught with marine biologist John Pearse.

 “Those before-dawn forays up the coast to Davenport Landing proved to be a turning point in my life, sparking my interest in ocean life and especially seaweeds,” she said in the press release. “When I later got involved in founding the Monterey Bay Aquarium, seaweeds featured prominently, from the kelp forest to our kelp swirl logo. The world owes all that to Bill Doyle. More than anyone during my college career, he was my mentor.”

In addition to his leadership of the marine science program, Doyle served as dean of the Division of Natural Sciences from 1980 to 1983. He also served for two terms as chair of the Department of Biology, and served as deputy and acting provost during the early development of Oakes College. He worked closely with J. Herman Blake, founding provost of Oakes College, to develop the college’s science program.

“As a colleague Bill Doyle profoundly influenced my work during my 18 years at UCSC. As friends we shared life perspectives that made each of us better persons,” Blake said in the press release. “Bill’s counsel and leadership gave life to the vision Ralph Guzman and I had for an outstanding science program at Oakes College. We created a singularly unique program that opened a new world to many students.”

A fellow of the California Academy of Sciences, Doyle also played the French horn in the Santa Cruz County and Monterey County symphonies from 1966 to 1980.

Doyle was born in 1929 in Coalinga, California. His parents divorced when he was five, and his mother moved with her four children to Soledad, a small farming community in Monterey County. While still in grammar school, Doyle began working to help support the family, doing yard work and delivering newspapers during the school year, and working during the summers on farms and ranches, in a fruit packing shed, and in a grain warehouse.

In 1944, the family moved to Watsonville, where Doyle graduated from Watsonville High School in 1947. He served in the California National Guard from 1948 to 1949, and in the U.S. Air Force from 1949 to 1952. In 1953, he married Glendawyn (Glennie) Cox, whom he had met in high school, where they both played in the school orchestra. She died in 2020.

Doyle received his bachelor’s and doctorate degrees in botany from UC Berkeley. He spent five years on the faculty of Northwestern University in Illinois before coming to UCSC as a founding faculty member in 1965.

In recent years, Doyle published two books on the history of the UCSC campus. “The Origin of UC Santa Cruz” focused on the events leading to the establishment of the campus in Santa Cruz, and “UC Santa Cruz: 1960–1991” covered the campus beginnings and early development of science programs and facilities, with an emphasis on the marine sciences.

Doyle is survived by his daughters Shelley, Carol, Jean, and Mary, and three grandchildren. Donations in his memory may be made to the Institute of Marine Sciences General Fund and the J. Herman Blake Fund for Service Learning at Oakes College.

Watsonville City Council Sets Special Meeting for Rail Trail Business Plan

3

The Watsonville City Council at the tail end of its Tuesday night meeting approved plans to reconvene Friday to discuss a resolution in support of the Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission’s (RTC) business plan for construction and operation of a passenger rail line along the 32-mile stretch from Davenport to Pajaro.

The meeting is expected to be set for 4:30pm, though that is subject to change.

It is unclear what exactly the resolution will state, but both Councilmen Aurelio Gonzalez and Lowell Hurst—the former the chair of the RTC and the latter an alternate member—said the proposed document will express support for the RTC’s business plan that failed to pass in the agency’s early-April meeting.

The RTC’s plans for passenger rail, estimated between $465 million and $478 million, have deeply divided Santa Cruz County. Advocates envision a convenient, environmentally friendly transportation alternative. Opponents see an unsightly, expensive untenable behemoth incompatible with the county that is unlikely to reduce Highway 1 traffic congestion.

The move came at the end of the City Council’s regular bi-monthly virtual meeting after a verbal kerfuffle between Mayor Jimmy Dutra and Gonzalez and Hurst.

Hurst tried to add the resolution as an emergency item, but that attempt failed.

Then, Gonzalez said Dutra declined to use his power as mayor to add the resolution to the agenda, but Dutra said that he could not add the item because it came in after the agenda was set on Tuesday.

“There is a process,” Dutra said. “I’m trying to be transparent to the community. If there is something that needs to go onto the agenda, it needs to be done by the rules.”

Councilman Eduardo Montesino, also a member of the RTC, ultimately suggested scheduling a special meeting for the item.

It passed unanimously, though both Dutra and Councilwoman Ari Parker said they might not make the meeting because of prior engagements.

The 66-page business plan gave a 25-year outlook for the rail plan, including costs, which group had oversight and how much ridership was predicted once completed. It called for construction to commence around 2030, with rail service to begin five years later. According to the plan, the project is short $189 million for construction costs and $125 million to run the rail system over the next two decades. The report listed numerous potential state and federal funding sources, but none of those are certain.

If the Watsonville City Council does indeed show support for the RTC’s business plan, it would follow in the footsteps of the Santa Cruz City Council, which earlier Tuesday passed a resolution in favor of passenger rail.

Santa Cruz Museum Month Kicks Off with Free or Reduced Admission

Reopened institutions countywide welcome back visitors

Rachel Kippen Resigns as Executive Director of O’Neill Sea Odyssey

Kippen cites concerns about 'racism, misogyny and privilege'

Seven Potential Candidates Mull Santa Cruz County Supervisor Race

vice mayor
Few have ruled out bid for Ryan Coonerty's 3rd District seat

Why Are Santa Cruz County’s Younger Residents Avoiding the Vaccine?

County, local activists seek to combat false claims about the vaccine on social media

Capitol Mum on Eviction Moratorium Extension as Renters Seek More Time

Lawmakers expressed uncertainty that there would be another extension

Battered, Burned But Alive: Time Will Heal Park’s Wounds, But It Needs Big Money, Too

The state’s oldest park, Big Basin was nearly erased

The Vulnerable Homebound Are Left Behind on Vaccination

Estimated 4 million Americans are homebound by age, disability or frailty

Report: Covid-19 had Bigger Impact on Black, Latinx Communities

Report notes health, education challenges and more

UCSC Luminary, Institute of Marine Sciences Founder William Doyle Dies

Doyle was a founding faculty member when UCSC opened in 1965

Watsonville City Council Sets Special Meeting for Rail Trail Business Plan

Santa Cruz City Council already passed a resolution in favor of passenger rail
17,623FansLike
8,845FollowersFollow