The Dark Knights

0

event Iceage-CREDIT GriffinShotDanish punks, Iceage, prove their valor one aggressive anthem at a time

Iceage isn’t Bruce Wayne multiplied by four, per se. The bandmates don’t lead double lives. They don’t wear protective suits with built-in abs. And they certainly don’t have capes blowing in the wind behind them (if they did wear capes, they’d be sweat-matted and sticking to their skinny jeans).

The Copenhagen-bred twenty-somethings do, however, thrive in the darkness of their hard-hitting rock, instilling hope and admiration in fans, which includes the “Godfather of Punk” himself, Iggy Pop, who once spoke of Iceage in an ABC Radio interview: “It’s not easy to be that dark. A lot of people that try to express negative energy sort of just flail; they kind of come off like hamsters or something, where the more they try, the sillier it is.”

Scary Little Friends

0

event LYLB Scary Little FriendsSometimes it takes two or three listens before an album can truly be appreciated. But when it comes to Scary Little Friends’ debut LP, From the Beginning, it only takes 15 seconds. At the tail end of track six, “Devil’s Heart,” Chris Jones has a hair-raising outburst: “And you never get another chance / there’s no tomorrow.” Far from depressing, the line actually explains why Scary Little Friends formed. Bassist and UC Santa Cruz alumnus Jon Payne, now 34, has been friends with Jones since childhood.

Is fish still safe to eat?

0

lt justinI think it depends on the fish. If it was a blue fin tuna that just swam over from the Japanese reactors, I don’t think I would eat it. But other fish is OK.

Justin Cummings
Santa Cruz | PHD Student

Peeling Back the Label

0

aeAt the Imagine Supported Living Services Short Film Festival, individuals with disabilities prove there is more to them than meets the eye

“You can’t judge a book by its cover,” Brianne Holeman proudly asserts across the quiet conference room. “I live by that every day.” 

We’re sitting in the Santa Cruz chapter of Hope Services, one of more than 50 agencies in Santa Cruz County that serve children, adults and seniors with developmental disabilities. Holeman is here as a client. She may have been diagnosed with a learning disability 23 years ago, but she refuses to let it define her.

Closing the Political Gender Gap

0

The growing effort to encourage local women to ‘break the glass ballot’

The United States ranks just 87th in the world for representation of elected women at the national level, and statistics show the number of women in national elected positions is declining. Statewide, an additional 28 women would need to be elected to the California legislature to reach gender parity, and locally, there are a number of women serving on city councils, but no women on the county Board of Supervisors.

Civil Conversations in Uncivil Debates

0

desalinationHow two of desal’s most vocal figures came to understand—and respect—one another despite their differences

In recent years, plans for a controversial seawater desalination plant in Santa Cruz landed retired electrician and environmental activist Rick Longinotti and former mayor and councilman Mike Rotkin on opposite sides of the aisle. Both became leading voices for their respective sides—Longinotti as the founder of opposition group Desal Alternatives, and Rotkin as a once-desal opponent-turned-supporter from years of looking at the issue. The men didn’t know each other well before the desal episode—in Rotkin’s words, their “first real connection was on different sides of this important local issue.” Yet, despite their roles in one of Santa Cruz’s most divisive and heated episodes, they say they not only managed to communicate well, but also grew to enjoy it.

They honed their communication style with one another over the course of several local debates, as well as private meetings they had, and solidified it by appearing with a conflict resolution mediator on KUSP in June. The pair will present “Dialogue Across Differences” at a Sunday, Sept. 29 Conflict Improvisation event hosted by nonprofit Nonviolent Communication Santa Cruz, of which Longinotti is board member. Following Santa Cruz Mayor Hilary Bryant and City Manager Martin Bernal’s recent recommendation that the city put the brakes on the desal plan, and in light of the city’s upcoming look at a new Water Conservation Master Plan in October, the fire has dwindled somewhat in the desal debate, giving these two players time to reflect.

And that is how desal’s biggest critic and one of its staunchest champions wound up sitting on a couch at Good Times’ headquarters, talking about why it’s important to try and understand people on the other side of an issue.

GT: In light of your contrary stances on this issue, how did you two arrive at this sort of collaborative relationship?

MR: Rick works as a therapist, and my politics have always tried to be inclusive. On both sides, we’re two people who see politics not as war but as an opportunity for resolving differences and questions.

RL: After our last dialogue, at KUSP, Mike said to me, ‘I do a lot of debating, [and] it’s not always pleasant. But I always enjoy getting together to talk with you.’ That meant a lot to me. It meant that in spite of our differences, we haven’t landed at that place that I see so pervasive, where you look at someone [on the other side] as “one of them.” Rather, we got to understand each other better through this process.

Mike, based on your experience in city office, why is effective communication important?
MR: Although you can’t resolve every issue with mediation—there are sometimes fixed interests that just can’t be resolved—the question of how you handle differences is something I’ve been interested in a long time. In the progressive community, for example, if you can communicate with each other even though you disagree on a particular issue, you still have a progressive community that has the power to be able to push broadly for change. [What] I see more often than not is that people get so divided over whatever the single issue is that we weaken our entire ability to take on issues in a way that works.

Rick, considering your background in nonviolent communication, did you set out intending to stick to this method when you became prominent in the desal debate?
RL: I knew myself to be someone who really needed nonviolent communication. I get self righteous about things that I believe in, and I get moralistic. And those are exactly the qualities I am trying to overcome. With an issue I feel strongly about, my thought in writing a letter to the editor, for example, was that you really have to rev up people’s passions and to rev up moral indignation, moral outrage. That was my old self. I’ve tried very much to reform that approach because that creates the polarization that I know exists in Santa Cruz, but I didn’t ever feel it so acutely as when I got involved in this. So people like me need to look at our moralistic upbringing and realize we are all in this together. Mike and I share common values; we differ on a strategy. That’s where our differences are, so let’s not think of the other person with daggers in our eyes.

What do you have to overcome in order to communicate effectively with someone you disagree with?
MR: Maybe the single most critical one is that, while I don’t think you can give up judgment—you still have to make judgments on if this action makes sense, or if this one doesn’t—you must [work on] not attaching the judgment to the person but to their ideas or actions.

RL: One of the things that nonviolent communication advocates is that you look at what your needs are. My first reaction is that I get angry. For example, I saw an editorial in the newspaper [recently] written by a board member of Soquel Creek [Water District] in which he represented that the opposition to desal was coming from a desire to constrain growth. I know that’s not true of me, so I got irritated. My need was to be understood. If could really focus on that need—the need to be understood—that changes my reaction.

The nature of the desal conversation was generally harsh and unproductive.  How did your approach fit into that?

MR: I think there were people on both sides who talk about the people they differ with on the issue as stupid, crazy, ill-intended, [or] all three. And it’s a very different kind of approach.

RL: There has been this tribalization, we can call it, but along with that is a reticence to dialogue at all. I’ve tried to have meetings with people and been unsuccessful. That reluctance comes from—this is my imagining—that they think ‘there’s no point talking to Rick because his mind is made up.’ But we can at least try. I think the fact that Mike and I have talked has shown that. [For example], I pulled a leaflet Desal Alternatives was using on the basis that Mike thought the information was misleading about water quality issues.

MR: It seems important that the more heated the issue, the more critically important the parties think the issue is, the more you need to have this sort of [nonviolent communication] approach to it.

Throughout the desal debate, both sides, and even you two, specifically, have disagreed on facts. What happens to finding common ground, or at least understanding one another, when basic premises of the issue aren’t agreed upon?
MR: To me, it’s nice if you can reach common ground—that’s a goal, but it’s not the only reason to do it. And I don’t see us reaching common ground on this issue until sometime in the future, when maybe some new facts would make it possible to reach common ground. But the idea is that at least you begin working on these things. When I find that we can’t agree on some fact, I either figure I need to try to find another way to make that fact clearer, or I realize that if I want to get somewhere on this issue, maybe this isn’t the fact to push, maybe I should look for some other fact that maybe we can agree on. It’s helpful to think strategically.

RL: As a result of the KUSP talk and others, we got pretty clear ideas about where we disagree on matters of fact, such as the potential for getting water back from Soquel Creek for Santa Cruz [in the event of a water transfer], or what the potential is for accomplishing the climate change goals we have as a city. But at some point when you go, ‘Alright this is as far as we’ll get now,’ there are still areas of agreement.

With some of those points of disagreement, did it come down to differing expectations of what people are capable of?
RL: Some of it was more physical, technical issues—like amounts Soquel Creek could give back. Some, like conservation, was a great example of what you expect people to do. On that, maybe it’s differing levels of optimism, but, even there, there is room for agreement. For example, [agreement to] implement this new Water Conservation Master Plan the city is developing, to do that before we make any other decisions about large-scale water projects.

Broadly speaking, did you feel there were any lapses in communication over the course of the desal discussion?
MR: The city was not effective at all about communicating the nature of the problem we are confronting. It’s not that the city did this overnight or rushed to judgment about it, but all of the communications with the public have been that ‘we have a solution to our water problem, and it’s desal, here’s why it won’t destroy things,’ but I don’t think the vast majority of people in this town believe we have a water problem. If I believed that I wouldn’t support desal either. [This is why] I think it’s good that the city is backing up [on desal] and doing the conservation plan. It’s a wise decision considering the wall we went up against of people who don’t like desal but don’t understand the problem. My target for the next period is to persuade people that we have an urgent problem here. Not that desal needs to be done, but that we don’t have forever to figure it out—that we may have a serious drought we will pay for. I want people to understand those facts and that information, and then the conversation will be if it’s not desal, let’s get working on what it’s going to be.

Rick, what are your thoughts looking back on how Desal Alternatives communicated with the public?
RL: For me, the thing I don’t feel I really explained that much in public is that I think our society is heading for a cliff, and that we need to do a lot of things, but one would be to examine very closely any new technology that comes along before we decide to use it. To think about if that’s really where we want to go. Desal is not, to me, just another option that’s benign. As insignificant as desal is in terms of household energy use, the fact is that it sets us forth on a path of energy intensive ways to provide us with water.

Why do the event?
RL: The [NVC’s] Transformative Communication group has been looking for a way to make this sort of communication relevant in terms of not just families and the workplace but also in the larger society, so this is a great way to do that.

MR: I’ve perceived that, in general, within the progressive community there is a tendency to go at one another’s throats rather than fix problems. Anybody who is taking an issue on should think about how to communicate about it in ways that don’t destroy our community. That’s why I was interested in participating.

Are there other problems in Santa Cruz that you think would benefit from nonviolent communication?
MR: The issue of violence and public safety that’s being debated hugely right now is another example where people have a tendency to quickly take [the side of] one extreme. There’s a lot of room for nonviolent communication on that issue as the community goes through this process.


Conflict Improv takes place 6:30-8:30 p.m. on Sunday, Sept. 29 at the Quaker Meeting House Main Hall, 225 Rooney St., Santa Cruz. Free admission. In addition to Rotkin and Longinotti’s presentation, Nonviolent Santa Cruz teachers will engage in conflict role plays based on audience suggestions.


Then and Now

0

news 3 Midtown MonarchsParticipants in the MAH’s third annual Race Through Time explore local history

Two women and three children stood in the middle of El Palomar’s crowded dining room, taking a headcount of the Aztecs who barter leisurely inside a large painting on the restaurant’s wall.

Normally, such behavior might seem strange—especially considering all five were made up to look like butterflies. Last Friday, Sept. 20, however, one diner had seen enough other groups doing the same to guess exactly what was going on. She turned to the group and asked, “Are you on a scavenger hunt?”

Powering Up

0

piet demo areaAn Electric Vehicle Workshop and National Plug-In Day celebrate and educate about electric vehicles

A key point that electric vehicle (EV) advocates are pushing is the idea of return on investment—that the savings people are making by unshackling themselves from the volatile costs of gasoline and oil are more than making up for the upfront expense of a car with rechargeable batteries. 

Considering available tax rebates and other incentives from the state and federal government and increasingly accessible costs, coupled with advancements on vehicle drive range and the appeal of zero reliance on gas stations, EVs are shaping up to be America’s most viable future for personal transportation, says Rick Corcoran, a local advocate, EV owner, and member of the Monterey Bay Electric Vehicle Alliance (MBEVA).

Blasphemy

0

GTW091913I was walking down the festive boulevards of Downtown Santa Cruz recently when I noticed local writer/long-time raconteur Bruce Bratton sitting outside a local coffeeshop. I decided to stop and say hello. Bruce worked at Good Times back in the day, when the day spanned the 1970s, all of the 1980s and some of the 1990s. He now boasts a popular local online portal at brattononline.com.

Bruce and I chatted for a bit.

Bruce: “Say, I hear that intern of yours worked out really well.”

Me: “Yes. Ambitious. Eager.”

Bruce: “A good thing.”

Me: “I suppose so, yes.”

Truthfully, I was actually bit envious. The young lad still had a full head of hair (oh wait, so do I) but he had dashed off to teach English in Argentina. Meanwhile, here I still remained, among the Santa Cruz masses—creative and arty; shoed and shoeless; washed and unwashed; preneurial and entrepreneurial—pondering my mood swings, my fate and the state of the empty Rittenhouse Building. (Which, really, is wonderfully selfless of me.)

Bruce: “How is your family?”

Me: “Good. My mother is coming to visit.”

Bruce: “Your Polish mother?”

Me: “That’s the one.”

Bruce: “You write about being Polish and your Polish family a lot.”

Me: “I do?”

Bruce (smiling): “Yes. Some people joke—take bets if you’ll mention being Polish in your column each week.”

Me (eyes widening): “They do?”

Bruce: “Well, sure.”

Is there any way I can cash in on these bets? Let’s discuss.

My Polish family.

I suppose I have referenced them quite a bit over my 13-year tenure as GT editor (without taking a single prescription med, although by the time we reach the end of this article together … who knows?).

Now, for those of you who have just hit 13 years of age, welcome. We’ve been waiting for you to spring into early adulthood and begin changing the world for the better. So much lies in your hands now. To use Princess Leia vernacular: “You’re our only hope.”

Let’s not get off track.

I walked away from Bruce pondering something: Why is it that I write about my Polish family to the extent that I do? Not that I think it’s a bad thing. I am, after all, in the thick of penning a memoir about their World War II survival story and how the emotional ripple effects of Stalin linger on, but prior to embarking into that emotionally delicious yet thoroughly uncomfortable roller coaster ride, I’ve often referenced my clan—my people, my posse, my tribe.

There is something about writing about one’s own tribe that is a bit therapeutic, after all. (To which I’d now like to publicly say: Thanks for saving me tons of money in therapist fees.)

The following week, an interview with Sherman Alexie literally landed in my lap. (Fine. I did work at achieving it, but it sounds so much better the way I just wrote it.)

Alexie, as many people already know, is the award-winning, prolific writer who draws on his memorable experiences as a Native American coming into his own on the Spokane Indian Reservation. His bestselling books, and books of essays, include “The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven,” which celebrates its 20th anniversary this year, “Smoke Signals,” “Reservation Blues,” “The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian” and “War Dances,” among others—the latter nabbed the 2010 PEN/Faulkner Award for Fiction. Last year, Alexie released “Blasphemy,” a national book award winner that houses a stellar amount of new and selected works. 

The book’s paperback release gets some play this month when Alexie hits town for a Bookshop Santa Cruz event on Sept. 30 at Santa Cruz High School.

Ever curious about an “artist’s” evolution, I, like that damn intern that dashed off to Argentina to help that lovely tribe, was eager to gain more knowledge. In this case, I wanted to know more about Alexie’s “process”—the point from which observation or experience morphs into inspiration, and may later spill onto the page. So, I asked him.

Me: “What makes you write?”

Sherman: “Oh … books. I am sitting here in my office at home [Seatle] and I am looking at, my God, 3,000 books. So, really, I want to be part of this. This is my world.  Honestly, this is the tribe I truly belong to. You are member of my tribe if you have at least 100 books in your house.  In your house—not on your Kindle.”

Me: “Thank you for saying that.” [13-year-olds, please take note: words exist off- screen, too.]

I was curious about when the man knew he needed to express himself through writing.

Me: “So, when did you know? Like—really know?”

Sherman: “I didn’t even know Indians were writers. I was a book nerd all of my life. But I didn’t even see a piece of writing by an Indian until I was junior in college. And so, it was pretty immediate. I read a couple of poems by Indians and it was, ‘Oh, I want this. I want to be this.’”

Me: “Is it the thing that makes you most happy?”

Sherman: “No. And it shouldn’t be. It’s a great job and it’s a great thing to be. I’m happiest when I am getting ready to play basketball or when I am playing basketball.”

Basketball. My brother loved playing basketball. Chubby Polish kid, I … not so much. I felt awkward in the group; uncomfortable in my own skin. I wanted to run off the court and hide. But for Mr. Alexie, it’s nirvana.

Me: “What is it about playing basketball that you love so much?”

Sherman: “Well it’s my meditation. You don’t think of anything else except being on the court, and you don’t think of being there if you are playing well. Fun for me is getting away from my own damn brain.”

Me: (heart leaping, ever hopeful at the thought): “Tell me—how is that for you?”

Sherman: “The only way I have ever done it is through sports. When it comes to meditating, I just fall asleep. Maybe (for you) it’s something outside of all of that … outside of writing and outside of fitness. There’s got to be something that kills your brain for a minute at a time.”

In these times, few things actually do.

Me: “I have to say, I appreciate what you have said previously … that the end game of ‘tribalism’ was on 9/11.”

Sherman: “Another way of thinking about it is that when you start seeing the world by one idea, one lens; bringing yourself down to one idea of the world, and then being hostile to any other ideas … I mean, fundamentalism is the lack of ideas. Fundamentalism is the singular idea. And tribalism is great. But as soon as I get an inkling that somebody thinks I should behave some way because of some particular aspect of my identity, I run screaming. And that’s from the left and the right. I mean, I am supposed to be a certain kind of liberal, a certain kind of Indian, a certain kind of man. And of course, in many ways, I am typical. But I’m suspicious of those parts of me most. And the thing is, generally, when you are behaving in ways that challenge people’s ideas, then that’s when you get called an asshole or arrogant. Not always—some people are just called assholes.”

I have never been called an asshole. Scratch that. My older brother—somebody from my own tribe—called me that once. It was a long, long time ago. I was a teenager expressing myself, sharing my dreams. He didn’t enjoy it much.  That wasn’t the reason why I left my Polish tribe in Chicago for a time. Far from it. (And really, the hole of the ass ought to be revered lest we all acquire colon cancer or cancer of the anus and be forced to send some good energy that way.)

The point is this: So many things take us away from our “tribe” … and so many things pull us back toward it. The threads of the past linger on within us, whether or not we are aware of them. Like unsettled ghosts, they can haunt us and hunt us down; demand our attention; ask us to take a look at something. Perhaps let something go.

In the end, it’s all a game of balance.

A tightrope walk away from there, toward “over there” while remaining “right here.”

It takes a village. A tribe.

Yet. Often we either do it alone—or feel alone doing it.

Me: “What or who has been your brightest influence?”

Sherman: “People? I don’t know. People always disappoint you. I go with ideas.”

Me: “What ideas?”

Sherman: “That the quality of your life is determined by the number of books you read.”

Me: “Tell me—what do you love most about writing?”

Sherman: “Oh man … it’s the only world in which I am in control. When I am writing a book. I am the absolute dictator of my literary world. I hate those writers who do that thing: ‘Oh, my characters took over.’ That’s bullshit.”

Me: “So, you feel most in control when you are in that space?”

Sherman: “Yes. I can do what I want. I can do what my mind ponders.”

Me: “You talk about hoping to reach a blissful place …”

Sherman: “I do?”

Me: “The Bill Moyers interview. The cello. The poem. Wanting to be the cello.”

Sherman: “It’s like a meditation—being played like a cello. But I can’t do it [meditation]. I can’t let the world go.”

Me: “But sports gets you there.”

Sherman: “A lot of spiritual people—and I put that in big 18-inch- wide quotation marks—would call that ludicrous. They would say, ‘no.’ But as an Indian, playing basketball is a lot more sacred and religious than going into a sweat lodge.”

I have never been in a sweat lodge. But I have taken Bikram Yoga for 11 years. Perhaps this is one of the reasons I don’t take prescription meds for my mood swings. (I fear I have outed myself as a mood swinger. Rest assured: I will not parade in panties on a float.)

Does yoga make me more spiritual, I wonder? Well, in the case of Bikram, it certainly makes me more hot. (For the 13-year-olds still reading: I was referring to the heated yoga room and not what remains of my stellar Polish genetic code.)

Is the man I am conversing with “spiritual?”  I inquire.

Me: “Do you consider yourself spiritual?”

Sherman: “No. Somewhere between agnostic and atheist.”

Me: “So, what makes your life work best?”

Sherman: “My bipolar medication.”

Me: “When did you come to know you were bipolar?”

Sherman: “I was officially diagnosed three years ago, but I suspected for years. And looking back, I probably always was.”

Me: “What was that like for you—realizing that?”

Sherman: “I started taking meds and 10 days or so later, suddenly, the world was only 73 percent awful.”

Me: “It is something you continually manage?”

Sherman: “Yes. My swings were from not being able to get out of bed to not being able to go to sleep—ever. It went from hiding under the covers for days till I was hallucinating.”

Me: “And yet you have been extremely prolific.”

cover BlasphemySherman: “Yes. I remember all the stories …

Me: “What brings you the most love and joy in life?”

Sherman: “My family—my wife and kids.”

Me: “What has been the most interesting thing you have been learning about yourself lately?”

Sherman: “My therapist said: ‘Self-loathing is just another form of narcissism.”

I’ll have to ponder that during my next trek through Downtown Santa Cruz.


Experience Sherman Alexie at a Bookshop Santa Cruz event at 7 p.m. Monday, Sept. 30 at Santa Cruz High School, 415 Walnut Ave, Santa Cruz. Cost: $18.50—includes one ticket to the event and one copy of the paperback edition of “Blasphemy.” For more information, visit bookshopsantacruz.com or fallsapart.com.


Six to Watch The fall lit scene is full. Take note of six authors and books to consider.

cover kirbycover cruzcoverjpgsmKirby Scudder“The Cruz”

Artist Jack of All Trades? You bet, although some may call Kirby Scudder the Pied Piper of Artistic Santa Cruz. Over the last decade, Scudder’s passion for the local art scene has not gone unnoticed. His valiant efforts to raise the level of awareness on what’s unfolding may, one day, become the stuff of legend. But for now, the man wins points for having been able to juggle so many artistic balls over the years—from KUSP radio host to Director of the Santa Cruz Institute of Contemporary Art. “The Cruz” is an exploration of artists in Santa Cruz, and draws upon Scudder’s experience of having worked with and/or interviewed a bevy of creative beasts to observe parallels between the dynamics in larger cultural hubs such as New York and Los Angeles, and those cultural dynamics at work in Santa Cruz. And let’s not forget: Last year, Atlantic Magazine ranked Santa Cruz in the top 10 of the country’s most artistic cities. Scudder is part of making that honor a reality.

7 p.m. Wednesday, Sept. 25, Bookshop Santa Cruz; bookshopsantacruz.com.

cover galAuthorcover bonesofparisLaurie R. King “The Bones of Paris”
Paris. The Jazz Age. It’s the festive, colorful and lively world that local author, award-winning author Laurie R. King lures readers into in her latest work, “The Bones of Paris.” And for those who know anything about King and her writing style that typically translates into spending quality time with another pageturner. The ever-prolific King, a third generation Californian, has managed to pen more than 23 books since she entered the literary scene back in 1993. (Oh, let’s hear more talk about turning some of her gems into a major motion picture, shall we? And who couldn’t get enough of “The Beekeeper’s Apprentice?”) Whether it’s her May Russell novels or Det. Kate Martinelli reads, this unique mystery writer manages to not only weave together a stellar tale but also leave an indelible imprint on the hearts and minds of her readers. “The Bones of Paris” is the second in her Bennett Grey/Harris Stuyvesant series. In it, P.I. Stuyvesant is assigned to scour Paris in a quest to find missing person Philippa Crosby, a 21-year-old from Boston who has entered the modeling and acting world abroad. Stuyvesant’s investigation leads him toward an eclectic creative posse of writers and artists, some of which use human bones to create their work. King’s recent Bookshop Santa Cruz appearance was a hit. Catch her at Capitola Book Café later this month.

7:30 p.m. Thursday, Sept. 26, Capitola Book Café; capitolabookcafe.com; laurierking.com.

cover FriendcoverZach Friend “On Message”
Local authors are coming out by the droves lately but look for Zach Friend, Santa Cruz County Supervisor, to generate interest with “On Message.” The book uses our current era—information overload and all that—as a springboard to address how to craft a compelling narrative for business, marketing, and political campaigns—ones that leave lasting results. Friend culls from his experience being a policy, public affairs and communications expert. It doesn’t hurt that he worked for Barack Obama and John Kerry’s presidential campaigns—or the White House Council of Economic Advisers, the U.S. Senate, Congressman Sam Farr and the Democratic National Committee for that matter.

cover jonathan-franzen timecover FranzJonathan Franzen “The Kraus Project”
This one is bound to be memorable. Viennese satirist Karl Kraus was among “the most penetrating and farsighted writers in Europe” a century ago. Here, Franzen does more than offer his own translations of Kraus but manages to annotate them in the most compelling light. He does so, naturally, by serving up his strong opinions, but also by adding supplementary notes from Paul Reitter, the Kraus scholar. Austrian author Daniel Kehlmann is tossed into the mix as well. Franzen is always a big draw around here. Mark your calendars.

7 p.m. Monday, Dec. 9., Bookshop Santa Cruz; bookshopsantacruz.com.

cover Hannahcover Kent Burial RitesHanna Kent “Burial Rites”
Literary debuts are a big thing. But one that is inspired by a true story? Well, that’s more than enough to attract some attention. Hannah Kent’s debut read is already generating buzz for the way it unfolds in such riveting splendor. But take note of the book’s premise: Set in 1929, it chronicles the very last days of Agnes, a young woman accused of murder in Iceland. In a tale set against Iceland’s harsh landscape, Hannah Kent brings to vivid life the story of Agnes, who, charged with the brutal murder of her former master, is sent to an isolated farm to await execution. Better still, it’s a recent Library Journal highlight, which wrote: “”In the company of works by Hilary Mantel, Susan Vreeland, and Rose Tremain, this compulsively readable novel entertains while illuminating a significant but little-known true story. Highly recommended.”

7 p.m. Saturday, Oct. 5, Bookshop Santa Cruz; bookshopsantacruz.com.

cover Schlossercover CommandAndCoEric Schlosser “Command and Control”
How do you bridge the nearly-forgotten disaster of epic proportions at a missile silo in a sleepy Arkansas town with the mammoth history and dangers of nuclear weapons? Carefully. But leave it to Eric Schlosser, the bestselling author/investigative journalist behind “Fast Food Nation, “Reefer Madness” and “Chew on This,” to lead the way. “Command and Contro” takes readers through a mindbending “account of accidents, near-misses, extraordinary heroism, and technological breakthroughs.” Destined to be another bestseller.

7 p.m. Monday, Nov. 4, Bookshop Santa Cruz; bookshopsantacruz.com.

Break a Leg

0

event Matt PondMatt Pond took his lemons and made lemonade

Usually when people say “break a leg!” actual bodily harm isn’t what they have in mind. But unfortunately, that’s exactly what happened to Matt Pond.

“Right before we really got into [producing] the album, I broke my leg on tour,” Pond says. “And it led to this shift in the way I thought about what I was doing. Sometimes, when you’re doing what you love, you feel locked into it. It can become a routine. So when I broke my leg, I realized I really did love [making music] and there isn’t anything else I want to be doing.”

In the end, the accident helped determine the direction and feel of his most recent record, The Lives Inside the Lines in Your Hand. “I just learned to appreciate what I was doing and that was kind of the lens that I looked at while making this last album,” he explains.

The Dark Knights

Danish punks, Iceage, prove their valor one aggressive anthem at a time Iceage isn’t Bruce Wayne multiplied by four, per se. The bandmates don’t lead double lives. They don’t wear protective suits with built-in abs. And they certainly don’t have capes blowing in the wind behind them (if they did wear capes, they’d be sweat-matted and sticking to their...

Scary Little Friends

Sometimes it takes two or three listens before an album can truly be appreciated. But when it comes to Scary Little Friends’ debut LP, From the Beginning, it only takes 15 seconds. At the tail end of track six, “Devil’s Heart,” Chris Jones has a hair-raising outburst: “And you never get another chance / there's no tomorrow." Far from...

Is fish still safe to eat?

I think it depends on the fish. If it was a blue fin tuna that just swam over from the Japanese reactors, I don’t think I would eat it. But other fish is OK. Justin Cummings Santa Cruz | PHD Student Definitely I feel safe eating seafood, and I prefer to eat sustainable seafood. I...

Peeling Back the Label

At the Imagine Supported Living Services Short Film Festival, individuals with disabilities prove there is more to them than meets the eye “You can’t judge a book by its cover,” Brianne Holeman proudly asserts across the quiet conference room. “I live by that every day.”  We’re sitting in the Santa Cruz chapter of Hope Services, one of more than...

Closing the Political Gender Gap

The growing effort to encourage local women to ‘break the glass ballot’ The United States ranks just 87th in the world for representation of elected women at the national level, and statistics show the number of women in national elected positions is declining. Statewide, an additional 28 women would need to be elected to the California legislature to reach...

Civil Conversations in Uncivil Debates

How two of desal’s most vocal figures came to understand—and respect—one another despite their differences

Then and Now

Participants in the MAH’s third annual Race Through Time explore local history Two women and three children stood in the middle of El Palomar’s crowded dining room, taking a headcount of the Aztecs who barter leisurely inside a large painting on the restaurant’s wall. Normally, such behavior might seem strange—especially considering all five were made up to look like...

Powering Up

An Electric Vehicle Workshop and National Plug-In Day celebrate and educate about electric vehicles A key point that electric vehicle (EV) advocates are pushing is the idea of return on investment—that the savings people are making by unshackling themselves from the volatile costs of gasoline and oil are more than making up for the upfront expense of a car...

Blasphemy

…And Other esoteric Musings Await in our Big, Luscious Fall Lit Preview, Featuring Award Winner Sherman Alexie

Break a Leg

Matt Pond took his lemons and made lemonade Usually when people say “break a leg!” actual bodily harm isn’t what they have in mind. But unfortunately, that’s exactly what happened to Matt Pond. “Right before we really got into the album, I broke my leg on tour,” Pond says. “And it led to this shift in the way...
17,623FansLike
8,845FollowersFollow