Venus Spirits Cocktails & Kitchen Flies High with Taste and Service

Sean Venus makes some mighty fine spirits, and I’m finding that the best place to enjoy his handiwork is the better-than-ever Venus Spirits Cocktails & Kitchen, an industrial-chic adult playground that offers lots of outdoor seating options. Bev and I liked our indoor-outdoor countertop that was wide open to all the action—families, students, fashionistas, happy canines—out under the setting sun.

Service at Venus Spirits is prompt, friendly and smart, and our server helped us work our way through the tempting menu, starting with two of the house cocktails. I make no secret of my affection for Venus No.1 gin with its citrus and juniper inflection. But this evening I went for a gin & tonic ($10) made from Venus Gin No.2, an aromatic spirit with a nose of orange, bay and assorted botanicals. To amplify the gin’s inherent sensory properties, my cocktail arrived topped with star anise and a bay leaf. A slice of fresh orange was suspended within. Utterly refreshing and delicious.

Bev chose the house Negroni ($14), in which the unusual artichoke liqueur Cynar stands in for Fernet Branca. Simultaneously bitter and sweet, it had a full-bodied feral quality that calls out for … cornbread topped with bourbon bacon! If you can actually sit down at Venus and not order this signature appetizer, you’re a stronger woman than I. An enormous square of the tender cornbread ($8) arrived festooned with bourbon cured bacon, along with a side of honey-infused soft butter. After dusting off some of the brilliant green rings of jalapeño, we consumed shamelessly and without remorse.

We shared another appetizer of crispy brussel sprouts ($14), light and crunchy, autumnal in nuttiness, and interspersed with bright pink caramelized onions. A layer of cashew cream and black garlic sauce underscored the sprouts. A complex dish that transforms the lowly sprout into a baroque dining experience. Another favorite appetizer here at Venus is the gorgeous burrata plate, interspersing the succulent mild buffalo mozzarella with seasonal fruit, tomatoes and a side of toasted bread.

By now, Bev needed to try one of the house Ginger Mule cocktails and chose Venus Gin No.2 to infuse the lime and ginger. We both approved of this fresh, pale green drink.

Our last dish was the evening’s “From the Sea” creation, a beautiful platter of garlic tiger prawns on a bed of pale hominy polenta strewn with roasted peppers, cherry tomatoes, bacon, and cilantro ($28). The prawns were served whole in their shells, leaving the plump flesh especially moist and tender. Compliments to the kitchen for this sparkling seafood variation. As did the cocktails at Venus, these dishes refreshed, rather than tiring our palates. I have yet to make my way on to the dessert course here at Venus. The night Bev and I were there we might have tried a chocolate torte or seasonal cobbler topped with Gin No.1 whipped cream. Sexy idea, gin-spiked whipped cream. Maybe next time. Venus is fun, no doubt about it—invigorating and decidedly post-Covid in its stress-free attitude. All servers were masked, but the rest is up to you.

Venus Spirits Cocktails & Kitchen – 200 High Road (off Delaware), SC Wed-Sun 4-9pm. Best to make a reservation. venusspirits.com.

Growing ImportanceA thumbs-up to Homeless Garden Project for partnering with Growing the Table this year during the harvest season. Since May, 6,000 boxes of organic produce have been distributed to people in need in our community and 138,000 pounds of fresh produce to food-insecure families throughout the Central Coast. Help the HGP keep food on needy tables. Donations at Growingthetable.org

Santa Cruz City Councilmember Justin Cummings Announces Run for 3rd District County Supervisor

Although the election date is still over a year out, the race for the 3rd District seat on the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors is already underway. 

Santa Cruz City Councilmember and former mayor Justin Cummings has announced he will be the second candidate running for Ryan Coonerty’s seat. Councilmember Shebreh Kalantari-Johnson announced her candidacy in June, six weeks after Coonerty said he will not be running for reelection.

Elected onto the City Council in 2018, Cummings received the largest number of votes that year and was immediately elected as vice mayor for the 2019 session. The following year, he became not only Santa Cruz’s first millennial mayor, but also the city’s first Black mayor in its 155-year history.

He believes both of those factors provide him with a unique perspective he will bring to the Board of Supervisors, which is currently all white. If he wins, Cummings will be the third millennial on the five-person board.

“As an African American I can bring the perspective of what it’s like to be in the back demographic living in Santa Cruz County,” he says. “The experience of not only African Americans, but of all people of color.”

Cummings is also a lower-middle-class renter. 

Constituents can often find him around town at local music venues and punk shows before retiring to a home he shares with multiple roommates. Another factor he says gives him a perspective that is sorely underrepresented in local government. 

“I don’t think there’s any middle-class representation on the Board of Supervisors,” he says. “And as a renter, we struggle very hard to live and exist in Santa Cruz County. We’re seeing so many working-class people being pushed out of this county or being forced to work multiple jobs just to survive. It’s not sustainable.”

Cummings is already gathering endorsements from local business owners and several of his fellow council members such as Vice Mayor Sonja Brunner and Sandy Brown. 

Brown, who has served on the council since 2016, says she immediately volunteered her help to Cummings when he told her of his plan to run for supervisor. During their time on the City Council, Cummings and Brown have worked closely on the issues of affordable housing and land use. They led the charge to increase the rate of affordable housing units included in new developments from 15 to 20%.

Brown tells GT during her time working with Cummings that he has demonstrated a willingness to fight for important issues based on all the evidence provided. 

“He is willing to step up and push in a thoughtful way with a thorough analysis of the issues,” she says. “He really does his homework.” 

Cummings believes the next four years will be crucial for the county as it faces the monumental challenges of homelessness, individuals facing mental health crises, climate change, land use and criminal justice reform. 

Despite only serving one term on the Santa Cruz City Council, Cummings says he is ready for a seat on the Board of Supervisors. After all, he served as mayor during one of the most tumultuous years in recent memory. 

“One of the things I learned last year is you’re going to be confronted with situations where there is no plan,” he admits. “And I feel like that’s when leadership instincts kick in. There are times when you’re really just going to have to do what’s right and stand up to be the face that’s out in front. It forces you to think about what’s right for the greater good of the community.”

Cummings credits his Ph.D. in ecology and evolutionary biology along with his 20 years experience as an environmental scientist by trade, to giving him a quick start and understanding of the Covid-19 pandemic during its early stages.

Along with grappling with the pandemic in 2020, Cummings also led the city during the Black Lives Matter and racial injustice protests and the CZU Lightning Complex fires. He tells GT these experiences have provided him the tools needed to take on countywide issues.

While a majority of the 3rd District is the city of Santa Cruz itself, district lines stretch from Live Oak up the North Coast, including Bonny Doon and Davenport. 

Cummings believes the CZU Lightning Complex, which totaled 1,490 structures and, for several days, displaced 65,000 people in Santa Cruz and San Mateo counties, raised awareness for the need for better infrastructure in the county’s more remote areas.

He acknowledges many constituents were kept updated via Facebook—where unvetted and often false information is shared. As supervisor, he would work to ensure more traditional forms of communication, such as emergency radio frequencies were installed.

He also says many constituents have reached out to him concerning the unincorporated areas’ many power outages because of PG&E blackouts, often due to unsafe fire conditions. He believes these residents are at an unfair disadvantage and that it’s time to look into the possibility of establishing microgrids in these areas. He hopes to bring local government together with professors at UCSC who are currently working on the technology.

“If you don’t have a generator and the power goes down, there’s no way to communicate,” he says. “So figuring out a way to get either microgrids or some form of alternative emergency energy in the mountains is critical for people when the power goes out, which we’re seeing a lot of.”

Brown says Cummings was the “linchpin” on the City Council for several racial justice issues last year.

He was central to the renaming of the London Nelson Center, the official declaration of July as Black Lives Matter month, the painting of the Black Lives Matter street mural in front of city hall and the flying of LGBTQ+ and transgender flags for LGBTQ+/Pride month.

“He isn’t afraid to get into the messiness of community engagement,” Brown says. “Justin is committed to representing the public interest, engaging in conflicted points of view and bridging the divide between the government and the people.” 

“We need to make sure we are always including the community in the conversation,” Cummings says of his idea about local government. “I know this community cares a lot about helping people. We need to make sure it’s involved in the process when the policies have a big impact on people’s lives.” 

‘Biketober’ Returns for Another ‘Spokey’ Season

Roughly 1,120 people in Santa Cruz participated in Ecology Action’s Bike Month in May. Residents logged trips for prizes, attended virtual workshops and joined group rides. This month, the local environmental nonprofit is hosting similar festivities for Biketober, with a few changes.

The organization offered “Safe Route Group Rides” for the first time in May. The group rides, where Ecology Action staff guide participants across town, proved immensely popular.

“The biggest barrier for most people is feeling safe around traffic,” says Matt Miller, the program specialist leading the event. “A lot of people were like, ‘Oh, there are ways today—right now—to get around town that isn’t terrifying and doesn’t have cars going 40 miles an hour.’ I think it’s eye-opening for a lot of folks,” he says.

More than 100 people signed up for the group ride waiting lists in May, so Ecology Action made this month’s rides bigger. The organization also plans to make destinations more fun. After one ride, for example, the group will arrive to music, prizes and Verve drinks.

Back to School

With the return of school, the organization will also resume Bike and Walk to School Day on Oct. 21 after two years off. The team, partnered with school administrators, parents and student leaders, will offer breakfasts and prizes at schools across the county. 

“We’ve been doing that for 25 years, and it’s a big celebration in a lot of schools,” says Miller. “It’s been part of the cultural fabric of Santa Cruz County forever, and a lot of people are excited to bring that back as school goes back in the session.”

Ecology Action set out hoping to get 20 or 25 schools involved. “And I think as of last week, we’re up to 35 schools who have said they want to do bike and walk to school day,” says Miller.

Biketober also includes virtual workshops about safety and commuting. And the bi-annual Bike Challenge encourages participants to log rides online for the chance to win weekly prizes and $1,000. 

Miller sees the challenges as a way to help build the habit of riding. He encourages everyone to participate, “whether it’s one ride in October for 10 minutes or 30 rides and you’re covering hundreds of miles or anything in between.”

Learn more at https://ecoact.org/biketober/

Progressives Stand Firm on Priorities as Infrastructure Debate Continues

By Luke Broadwater and Chris Cameron, The New York Times

After a tumultuous week in Congress, during which deep divisions in the Democratic Party delayed progress on part of President Joe Biden’s economic agenda, debate spilled over into the weekend as the party braced for intense negotiations in the weeks ahead.

Progressives on Sunday flatly rejected the latest demands from Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., a key swing vote for Democrats, to shrink Biden’s domestic policy agenda by more than half and to insert a provision to ensure that the federal government does not fund abortions.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., and chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said progressives would not agree to reduce Biden’s 10-year, $3.5 trillion social safety net and climate bill to $1.5 trillion, as Manchin requested.

“That’s not going to happen,” Jayapal said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “That’s too small to get our priorities in. It’s going to be somewhere between $1.5 and $3.5, and I think the White House is working on that right now. Remember: What we want to deliver is child care, paid leave, climate change.”

Manchin said in an interview with National Review last week that he was insisting that the legislation include the Hyde Amendment, which states that Medicaid will not pay for an abortion unless the woman’s life is in danger or the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest.

The Hyde Amendment has been reauthorized every year since 1976, but Biden did not include it in his latest budget proposal. During the presidential race, his campaign initially said he supported the amendment, but he later reversed course and condemned it.

Jayapal, who was one of three members of Congress who testified last week about their personal experiences of having an abortion, said she opposed Manchin’s demand.

“The Hyde Amendment is something the majority of the country does not support,” she said.

However, Jayapal and other progressives said they were willing to compromise on the package’s price tag. Several said they were discussing whether to cut certain programs from their agenda entirely or to reduce the duration of the bill’s funding — to five years from 10 years, for example.

“We can front-load the benefits and have less years,” Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., said on “Fox News Sunday.”

Jayapal said that progressives were willing to explore shortening the length of some components of the funding bill to decrease its cost, but that new clean-energy standards needed to stay in the legislation for a decade.

“It takes time to cut carbon emissions,” she said.

Debate has raged on Capitol Hill over the past week over Biden’s domestic agenda. The nearly 100-member Congressional Progressive Caucus blocked a House vote on his $1 trillion infrastructure bill, which is favored by the Democrats’ centrist wing. The more liberal lawmakers sought leverage to secure passage of the president’s larger $3.5 trillion domestic policy bill, which some centrist Democrats have not endorsed.

With slim majorities in both chambers of Congress, nearly every Democratic vote is needed to pass both bills.

Biden, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and majority leader, have assured the Congressional Progressive Caucus that both bills will advance as part of a “two-track” process.

“We’re trying to pass some of the most significant legislation to help working families — throughout New York and around the country — that’s been done since Franklin D. Roosevelt,” Schumer said at a news conference in New York City on Sunday. “It takes a little time. I believe we’re on track to pass both the bipartisan infrastructure bill as well as the reconciliation Build Back Better bill, and our goal is to get both bills done in the next month.”

In a letter to lawmakers Saturday, Pelosi urged passage of the infrastructure bill by the end of the month and signaled that Democratic leaders were continuing to negotiate the broader social policy and climate bill with Manchin and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., two party holdouts who are needed to pass legislation in the Senate.

“Again, we will and must pass both bills soon,” Pelosi wrote. “We have the responsibility and the opportunity to do so.”

Sinema on Saturday released a statement condemning the delay of the infrastructure vote, calling it a “failure” and “deeply disappointing for communities across our country.”

“Denying Americans millions of good-paying jobs, safer roads, cleaner water, more reliable electricity and better broadband only hurts everyday families,” she said.

But Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., chair of the Budget Committee, expressed confidence in the progressives’ negotiating position, pointing to signals from the White House that their faction was right to push for a more ambitious legislative agenda.

“We’ve got the president of the United States on our side,” Sanders said on ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday. “Got 96% of the members of the Democratic caucus in the House on our side. We got all but two senators at this point in the Democratic caucus on our side. We’re going to win this thing.”

Cedric Richmond, a senior adviser to Biden, predicted that both liberals and centrists would have to give some to reach a deal.

“People will be disappointed. People will not get everything we want,” he said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “We’re going to fight until we get both bills.”

Speaking on “State of the Union,” Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., the No. 2 Senate Democrat, agreed that some big choices lie ahead.

“We have to ask that very fundamental question,” he said. “Should we do everything to a limited degree, or should we really invest ourselves in the most important things?”

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

Seymour Center Reopens, Staff and Volunteers Rejoice

By Guananí Gómez-Van Cortright

After nearly two years of being closed due to the pandemic, the Seymour Marine Discovery Center is fully reopening its exhibits to members and the general public this month.

“It’s been 19 months since this place closed down, and this is the first time we’re welcoming folks back into the building,” said Seymour Center Executive Director Jonathan Hicken. “I’m excited to see this place full of people discovering and seeing the ocean the way scientists see it.”

All the iconic Seymour attractions are back on display, including the gray and blue whale skeletons outside and the indoor touch tanks and aquarium exhibits. “The seawater table is back open, the sharks are back, you can touch a shark,” said Dale Bieser, volunteer and member of the Seymour Center board. 

The Seymour Center is also showing a new exhibit, “Photos from the Field,” which gives visitors a glimpse of cutting-edge marine research being done in Santa Cruz County. 

“Look forward to feeling some hometown pride,” said Hicken. “[This research] is contributing to global conversations about the ocean and climate change, right here. Santa Cruz is making a global impact.”

While volunteers and staff are thrilled to welcome back visitors, the journey to reopening was no easy feat. Bieser says the Seymour Center lost 75% of its staff when it closed because of the pandemic.

“All the students had to go, all the part-time staff, and a lot of the full-time staff. I would walk down that empty hall and it’d be so sad,” Bieser said.

A skeleton crew of volunteers and staff kept busy, determined to find ways to keep sharing the wonder and importance of marine science with the community. They got creative, experimenting with virtual exhibits and hosting an outdoor ‘seaside shopping’ event to sell off gift shop inventory during the holidays. 

“I pretty much didn’t shut down during the shutdown,” said Bieser. “Truly, I don’t know how I would have gotten through the pandemic without the Seymour Center—it’s like family. But I missed the camaraderie, talking to people, those ah-ha moments, the little kids.”

In the midst of caring for the aquarium animals with minimal staff and experimenting with virtual outreach, the CZU Lightning Complex fires struck. All of the Seymour Center and Long Marine Laboratory animals had to be evacuated.

“People came from Monterey, from all over to help take our animals,” said Bieser. “There were photos of all the orange, the smoke. But all these people came out to help us.” Many of those helping with the evacuation were former volunteers and summer camp students. “It’s amazing how a lot of young people get inspired here,” said Bieser.

As the threat of fires eased and vaccinations rolled out, volunteers organized weekly outdoor events on the Seymour Center grounds. Starting on Earth Day in April, they hauled out tables with props and plastic tubs that served as mini touch tanks. The brief outdoor events attracted as many as 100-200 visitors per weekend.

“It was only for three hours on Saturdays, but we couldn’t believe how many people came,” said Bieser. “And they kept coming back.” 

The Seymour Center summer camp, Ocean Explorers, was also able to run outdoors in 2021.

Now, the Seymour Center is ready to fully reintroduce itself to the community. “It was a labor of love,” said Hicken. “Reopening is a major milestone and testament to everyone’s hard work.”

UCSC student workers have returned to staffing the front desk, and staff is currently working on resuming school programs and field trips come this winter. Visitors peruse among the exhibits, peering through the glass at seven-legged sea stars and dipping into the touch tanks to stroke the bumpy backs of swell sharks.

“It feels like the real world again,” said Susie Hotelling, an exhibit guide volunteer staffing the gray whale table. “To see young people get excited about the ocean and the animals, it’s awesome. We live in an amazing place.”

The Seymour Center is opening its doors to members the weekend of Oct. 8, and will reopen to all visitors Oct. 15, Friday-Sunday. 10am-4pm.

Pelosi Hunts for Infrastructure Votes as Democrats Feud Over Agenda

By Jonathan Weisman and Emily Cochrane, The New York Times

WASHINGTON — A bipartisan, $1 trillion infrastructure bill that is a pillar of President Joe Biden’s agenda hung in the balance Thursday night, as Democrats fought to corral the votes to pass legislation that had become mired in a broader internal battle over the party’s ambitions.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi and top members of Biden’s team worked into the evening at the Capitol in a frenzied effort to strike a deal between feuding factions and move forward on the expansive public works measure, which passed the Senate in August on a wave of bipartisan bonhomie.

Centrist Democrats and a handful of House Republican allies remained hopeful that the measure could squeak past a blockade of liberal Democrats, who have pledged to thwart its passage until the Senate approves a $3.5 trillion climate change and social safety net bill.

But the divide on that larger bill, between progressives and more conservative Democrats, appeared only to be growing wider and angrier.

The House and Senate did pass — and Biden signed — legislation to fund the government until Dec. 3, with more than $28 billion in disaster relief and $6.3 billion to help relocate refugees from Afghanistan. That at least averted the immediate fiscal threat of a government shutdown, clearing away one item on the Democrats’ must-do list, at least for two months.

But a planned Thursday vote on the infrastructure bill — a compromise plan that would invest heavily in the nation’s roads, bridges, highways and climate resiliency projects, delivering billions of dollars in projects to lawmakers’ states and districts — slipped into the night without the majority needed.

The measure, which would provide $550 billion in new infrastructure funding, was supposed to burnish Biden’s bipartisan bona fides. It would devote $65 billion to expand high-speed internet access; $110 billion for roads, bridges and other projects; $25 billion for airports; and the most funding for Amtrak since the passenger rail service was founded in 1971. It would also begin the shift toward electric vehicles with new charging stations and fortifications of the electricity grid that will be necessary to power those cars.

But progressive leaders were threatening to vote it down until they saw action on the legislation they really wanted — a far-reaching bill with paid family leave, universal prekindergarten, Medicare expansion and strong measures to combat climate change.

That ambitious plan was in peril Thursday as conservative-leaning Democrats made it clear they could never support a package anywhere near as large as Biden had proposed. Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia told reporters that he wanted a bill that spent no more than $1.5 trillion, less than half the size of the package that Democrats envisioned in their budget blueprint.

And he had a blunt message for House progressives. “I’ve never been a liberal in any way, shape or form,” he said. If they wanted their way, he advised, “elect more liberals.”

Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, a leader of the House Progressive Caucus, fired back: “If the senator thinks electing more Democrats is how you get it done, then that is something he should say to the president, because this is the president’s agenda.”

Manchin spoke out about his position after a memo detailing it was published in Politico on Thursday.

The document was instructive in ways well beyond the spending total. His bottom-line demands included means-testing any new social programs to keep them targeted at the poor; a major initiative on the treatment of opioid addictions that have ravaged his state; control of shaping a clean energy provision that, by definition, was aimed at coal, a mainstay of West Virginia; and assurances that nothing in the bill would eliminate the production and burning of fossil fuels — a demand sure to enrage advocates of combating climate change.

On provisions to pay for the package, he was more in line with other Democrats, backing several rollbacks of the Trump-era tax cut of 2017, including raising the corporate tax rate to 25%, up from 21%; setting a top individual income tax rate of 39.6%, up from 37%; and increasing the capital gains tax rate to 28%, another substantial boost.

But that tax agreement ran counter to the position of the other Democratic holdout, Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, who has told colleagues she opposes such significant tax rate increases.

As of Thursday evening, Pelosi was still pressing forward with a vote on the infrastructure bill, projecting relentless optimism as competing groups of liberal and moderate lawmakers shuttled in and out of her office.

“We’re on a path to win the vote — I don’t want to even consider any options other than that,” she declared at her weekly news conference.

Pelosi, 81, who wrangled the Affordable Care Act through the House 11 years ago, put her reputation as a legislative powerhouse on the line in the talks, saying she had told top Democrats that the social policy and climate measure was “the culmination of my career in Congress.”

As the sun set in Washington, Susan Rice, director of the White House Domestic Policy Council, and Brian Deese, director of the National Economic Council, were huddled in Pelosi’s office with her aides and with staff of the Senate majority leader, Chuck Schumer of New York, trying to hammer out a social policy framework that could satisfy the warring factions, according to an official.

The negotiations stretched into the night as Democratic leaders delayed any votes until at least 10 p.m. and different factions of the caucus met privately.

“It is an absurd way to do business to be negotiating a multitrillion-dollar bill a few minutes before a major vote with virtually nobody knowing what’s going on,” Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, told reporters late Thursday after a meeting in Schumer’s office.

Some Democrats saw Manchin’s memo as at least a starting point for negotiations that have foundered in the absence of a clear signal from him or Sinema about what they could accept.

Manchin said he had informed Biden of his top-line number in the past few days, about two months after he and Schumer both signed the memo acknowledging Manchin’s stance.

His comments Thursday were his most forthcoming about what he wanted to see in the social policy plan, which Democrats hope to push through using a fast-track process known as budget reconciliation that shields fiscal legislation from a filibuster. Democrats are trying to pass the package over united Republican opposition, meaning they cannot spare even one vote in the evenly divided Senate.

Schumer, who signed the agreement as he was working to persuade Manchin to support the party’s budget blueprint, appeared to have scrawled, “I will try to dissuade Joe on many of these” underneath his signature.

On Thursday, a spokesperson emphasized that Schumer did not consider it binding.

“As the document notes, Leader Schumer never agreed to any of the conditions Sen. Manchin laid out; he merely acknowledged where Sen. Manchin was on the subject at the time,” said Justin Goodman, the spokesperson.

Also Thursday, Sinema’s office said she would not “negotiate through the press” but had made her priorities and concerns known to Biden and Schumer.

But caught in the middle was the infrastructure bill, negotiated by Republican and Democratic senators, pushed hard by the nation’s largest business groups and backed widely in polls by voters of both parties.

Rep. Tom Reed of New York, a moderate Republican who has long publicly supported the bill, said the handful of House Republicans backing the measure was growing, against the wishes of House GOP leadership. If Pelosi could keep the vote close, he said, more Republicans would want to be on the winning side — with bragging rights on such a popular bill.

“We’re going to have the vote,” he said. “It’s going to be close, but I’ll tell you, there is a good chunk of Republican members that want to be a yes.”

Even on a day of uncertainty and intraparty squabbles, Democrats said the disarray surrounding the bill’s consideration would not take away from its chances of enactment.

“Somebody may see a story the next day that makes it seem as if we’re disorganized,” said Rep. Tom Malinowski, D-N.J., one of the centrists pressing for a quick vote. “It doesn’t matter two weeks later if I’m at the ribbon cutting for a Gateway Tunnel,” a huge new project connecting New Jersey to New York that is funded in the infrastructure bill.

That was echoed by Sanders, who was standing by liberals holding out for as big a social policy bill as possible.

“If there’s no vote today, or it’s defeated, the world will not collapse,” he said. “This is a hugely consequential bill. We have time. Let’s do it right.”

But as the standoff persisted, the outlook for the measure remained unclear.

“Nobody should be surprised that we are where we are, because we’ve been telling you that for 3 1/2 months,” said Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., head of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

She then put out a fundraising email boasting that “progressives are flexing our muscle on Capitol Hill.”

Rep. Stephanie Murphy, D-Fla., a moderate who has pushed for a swift infrastructure vote, said if the House failed to approve a bill that passed the Senate with 69 votes — 19 of them Republican, including the minority leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky — it would send a damaging signal about Washington.

“It absolutely must pass because as Democrats and Republicans, we have to demonstrate to the American people that we can still govern in this very partisan time,” she said.

Lawmakers reached a deal on the spending legislation after Democrats agreed to strip out a provision that would have raised the federal debt limit through the end of 2022, averting a default otherwise projected for sometime next month.

Senate Republicans blocked an initial funding package on Monday because the debt ceiling increase was included, refusing to give the majority party any of the votes needed to move ahead on a bill to avoid a first-ever federal default in the coming weeks.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

PG&E Responds to Outages

The San Lorenzo Valley has been plagued with power outages for as long as the area has had electricity. 

Strong winds, downed trees and mudslides have taken out power time and again, and residents of the area recognize that living beneath the redwoods has its price. 

In October of 2019, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) began the practice of implementing PSPS outages—Public Safety Power Shutoffs—in an effort to arrest the potential of massive and deadly wildfires caused by arcing power lines in heavy winds. 

The implementation of the PSPS was in response to the utility’s role in two fire events, the October 2017 Northern California wildfires and the 2018 Camp Fire, both of which were started by PG&E’s equipment. Adding fuel to the fire, the utility was recently charged with manslaughter in the case of four deaths from the 2020 Zogg Fire near Redding. The ignominy of being responsible for hundreds of millions of dollars worth of community devastation and the loss of lives required PG&E to do something different.

Enter Enhanced Powerline Safety Settings (EPSS) and the use of “fast trip” switches, a technology meant to shut off power when the lines are met with a potential hazard. By employing these switches, the utility can ostensibly reduce the chance of a power line-induced fire, and preserve the safety of the surrounding area. 

At least, that’s what attendees of the Sept. 23 wildfire safety webinars were told. PG&E hosted the two live webinars—one for the Corralitos/Watsonville area and another for the San Lorenzo Valley—in an attempt to answer questions and provide some transparency to the process.

According to PG&E spokesperson Mayra Tostado, 469 local residents attended the SLV presentation, and more than 300 questions and comments were submitted during the 90-minute virtual meeting. With representatives of the utility attempting to explain the reasons for the dramatic increase of power outages in the area, attendees listened to nearly an hour of corporate-speak interspersed with the recognition that the utility has fallen down on the job when it comes to communicating with residents about impending power outages, the cause and restoration times.

PG&E representatives said that squirrels were a factor in the repeated outages, as their movement across the lines can cause the fast trip feature to engage. In addition, a slight breeze or a falling tree branch could provoke an outage, leaving hundreds on the circuit without power for hours. 

“We recognize the hardship Enhanced Powerline Safety Settings power outages cause our customers and are making a number of improvements that will lessen the impact of EPSS on customers,” said Tostado.

That includes, Tostado said, adjusting the software of the EPSS to lessen the size and time of the outages. She also said that customers should proactively contact the utility if they see any unsafe conditions around power lines.

Teresa Alvarado, Vice President of the South Bay and Central Coast Regions for PG&E, covered the basics on outages in the San Lorenzo Valley.

Estimates were that 34 outages had occurred in the area since July, with 10-12 hours of lost power over those instances. It was unclear whether Alvarado was suggesting that those numbers reflected the average amount of hours without power, or the total hours.

Residents who attended the webinar were hoping to not only get answers about future efforts to mitigate power outages, but they also wanted the opportunity to voice their concerns about the impacts of prolonged outages. Worries about rotting food, loss of income for those working from home, and the inability to operate medical devices were front and center for many on the call. 

The response was that the utility would not compensate ratepayers for financial hardships caused by power outages. Instead, PG&E reps directed customers to contact local food banks, and suggested that seniors could receive two meals per day from Meals on Wheels (a service that is already provided by nonprofit Community Bridges). 

“Customers in our Medical Baseline Program who live in high fire-threat areas may be eligible for our Portable Battery Program. We also have a Generator Rebate Program for customers who rely on well water, customers in our Medical Baseline Program and certain small businesses,” said Tostado, and directed ratepayers to the PG&E website.

Rob Morris, an Alarm Station Operator with the utility, said that there are 800 circuits in high fire threat districts, but PG&E chose to address issues with the 169 circuits that feed into and around the South Bay region. They were chosen, he said, based on a risk model and the public safety specialist team that is made up, in part, of first responders. The circuits’ proximity to flammable material increased the need for critical attention, and Morris said he committed to a “strategic approach” to improve reliability within the next 15 days when it comes to addressing outages that affect our communities.

Fifth District Supervisor Bruce McPherson said that both he and 2nd District Supervisor Zach Friend had lobbied for the utility to hold the webinar in response to public outrage over the repeated outages, and McPherson had requested the opportunity to speak and pose questions during the webinar. According to McPherson’s Analyst JM Brown, the requests were denied. Despite his initial support for the event, McPherson was less than pleased by the outcome. 

“I was disappointed that PG&E chose not to have a direct dialogue with customers in the San Lorenzo Valley, as I had requested, and instead simply read questions,” he said in a statement. “PG&E representatives acknowledged during the meeting that they greatly needed to improve their communications with customers, but missed a good opportunity to do that very thing. While the presentation helped the community better understand the problem with the fast trip setting, I didn’t come away with the impression that people understand how it will be fixed in the long-term.”

Supervisors McPherson and Friend placed an item on the agenda of the Board of Supervisors’ Tuesday meeting calling for the Public Utilities Commission to investigate the outages. It passed unanimously.


To view the webinar, visit wklys.co/PGE2140.

Scotts Valley Mayor Declares City’s Commitment to Diversity

After officially designating September as Childhood Cancer Awareness Month, Scotts Valley Mayor Derek Timm moved on to another proclamation that was close to his heart.

Referencing incidents of hatred and discrimination across Santa Cruz County, he announced the City’s commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion, at the Sept. 1 City Council meeting.

“It’s our obligation to reject hate and bias in all forms,” he said. “And that will make our community a stronger community.”

The proclamation points to the “tragic death of George Floyd in Minneapolis,” and the regional uptick in violence against minority residents since the Covid-19 outbreak as examples of where the United States has more work to do on improving itself.

“As a community, we reject such acts,” Timm said. “And so, I want to declare, on behalf of our community, and on behalf of our City Council, that we will continue our commitment to be an inclusive community that rejects stigma and bias against individuals.”

That includes discrimination based on race, ethnicity, place of origin, physical ability, socioeconomic status, gender identity, sexual orientation, age and religion, he added.

“In this last year I watched some of the commentary online, and how easily people snap,” he continued. “And I’ve seen things that are said that cannot be taken back.”

According to Timm, sometimes people don’t realize how much pain their words can inflict.

“People carry that with them,” he said. “So, I hope that we can treat each other with respect, and work together to overcome all our expressions of hate and bigotry.”

Councilman Jack Dilles thanked the mayor for the “proactive statement supporting diversity,” adding he sees it not just as an anti-hate gesture, but as a way to celebrate diversity.

“We’re more in totality than we are individually,” he said. “And I love that mix of just lots of different folks.”

In an interview, Timm said his wife, Tricia, has told him what it was like for her to grow up as a Latina in California.

“Both her parents immigrated from South America,” he said. “Owning who she is, from a diversity standpoint—versus trying to hide that—has empowered her to be a stronger leader in the business community.”

It wasn’t necessarily overt signals that caused her to continually downplay her identity, Tricia explains.

“It was just very subtle messages that you get throughout your life,” she said. 

“That feeling of not belonging in a space is difficult, because you’re trying to belong but you know that there are just unconscious biases that may exist.”

As she ascended the corporate ladder, as an attorney working in Silicon Valley during the dot-com boom of the late 1990s, she says she perfected “reading the room” for an atmosphere that wasn’t welcoming of her South American heritage and deemphasizing that part of her.

“That’s just a coping mechanism that I developed over all those years,” she said. “So, I have this empathy for those in our community that aren’t part of the majority, whether it’s race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, sexual identity—whatever the difference is from what the majority might be.”

No one is immune from unconscious bias, she adds. Not even her.

Just the other day, she was telling her husband about a situation that happened after Looker, the Santa Cruz software company where she worked as general counsel, was acquired by Google for $2.6 billion in 2020.

“Our CEO was giving an update around Covid and he was saying, ‘We got an update from the Chief Medical Officer I want to share,’” she recalls. “I was the first person that said, ‘Oh, what did he say?’ Our CEO, who was male, was like, ‘She said.’ I’m a woman’s advocate, and I have unconscious bias. I’m trained, through culture, to think that the chief medical officer is a guy. So, we all have them, and we need to not be afraid to recognize that in ourselves.”

Recently, the Timms have had discussions with a family friend whose daughter was bullied in middle school because of the color of her skin, Derek said.

“You want to undo that for that person, but you also want it not to occur in the first place,” he said. “We want to let our community know that actions like that are wrong.”

But the problem is, they keep happening, he said.

In a survey completed last year by the Scott Valley Unified School District, 20% of middle and high school students said they felt discriminated against on campus, for various reasons.

“These aren’t isolated incidents,” he said. “You recognize that there’s work that has to be done.”

According to the mayor, both City and school officials are committed to taking these issues seriously.

After all, that survey was the result of activism by concerned parents, including those in the Scotts Valley Families for Social Justice Facebook group. And Timm’s proclamation came to fruition through the persistent work of Ashley Alvarez-Perlitch, its founder, who Timm thanked during the Council meeting.

“She’s been awesome to work with,” he said in the interview, adding they started working on the proclamation together a few months back. “I wanted to bring it back as the school year was starting.”

Former City Manager Tina Friend also assisted in looking for ways Scotts Valley could improve its operations to “push inclusivity forward” and keep the conversation alive, he added.

Alvarez-Perlitch said she was excited to hear Timm read the final version aloud.

“I was glad that Derek was really supportive of it,” she said. “There’s hope for the future.”

Most recently she’s been working on a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion committee at her daughter’s school, she said.

“We’re working towards seeing if there’s any materials that any of our classrooms lack, or what we can try to teach teachers, to highlight different cultural observances and share that with our kids,” she said.

U.S. Coronavirus Death Toll Nears 700,000 Despite Wide Availability of Vaccines

By Julie Bosman and Lauren Leatherby, The New York Times

Nearly 700,000 people across the United States have now died of the coronavirus, a milestone that few experts had anticipated months ago when vaccines became widely available to the American public.

An overwhelming majority of Americans who have died in recent months, a period in which the country has offered broad access to shots, were unvaccinated. The United States has had one of the highest recent death rates of any country with an ample supply of vaccines.

The new and alarming surge of deaths this summer means that the coronavirus pandemic has become the deadliest in American history, overtaking the toll from the influenza pandemic of 1918 and 1919, which killed about 675,000 people.

“This delta wave just rips through the unvaccinated,” said Howard Markel, a medical historian at the University of Michigan. The deaths that have followed the wide availability of vaccines, he added, are “absolutely needless.”

The recent virus deaths are distinct from those in previous chapters of the pandemic, an analysis by The New York Times shows. People who died in the last 3 1/2 months were concentrated in the South, a region that has lagged in vaccinations; many of the deaths were reported in Florida, Mississippi, Louisiana and Arkansas. And those who died were younger: In August, every age group under 55 had its highest death toll of the pandemic.

That month, Brandee Stripling, a bartender in Cottondale, Alabama, told her boss that she felt as if she had been run over by a freight train.

Stripling, a 38-year-old single mother, had not been vaccinated against the coronavirus, and now she had tested positive. Get some rest, her boss, Justin Grimball, reassured her.

“I thought she would pull through and get back to work and keep on living,” Grimball said.

Last week, he stood in a cemetery as Stripling was buried in her family plot. A pastor spoke comforting words, her children clutched one another in grief and a country song, “If I Die Young,” played in the background.

Her death came in the virus surge that gripped the country all summer, as the delta variant hurtled through the South, Pacific Northwest and parts of the Midwest.

Close to 100,000 people across the United States have died of COVID-19 since mid-June, months after vaccines were available to American adults.

The U.S. government has not closely tracked the vaccination status of everyone who has been infected with the virus, but the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has so far identified 2,900 people who were vaccinated among the 100,000 who died of COVID since mid-June.

Vaccines have been proven highly effective in preventing severe illness and death, and a study from the CDC that was published in September found that after delta became the dominant variant, unvaccinated people were more than 10 times more likely to die of the virus than the vaccinated were. The study, which spanned from April to mid-July, used data from 10 states, New York City, Los Angeles County and King County, Washington, which includes Seattle.

The pace of death has quickened, then slowed, then quickened again over the past 18 months as the virus has rippled across America in waves.

The most recent 100,000 deaths occurred over more than three months, a considerably slower pace than when the pandemic reached its peak last winter. During that earlier surge, just 34 days elapsed between the nation’s 400,000th and 500,000th death.

By late September, more than 2,000 people on average were dying from the virus each day, a level the country has not reached since February.

But the recent deaths have left families and friends, some of whom said they had thought the pandemic was largely over, stunned and devastated. Weary doctors and nurses voiced frustration that many of the patients whose lives they were now struggling to save had shunned vaccines. Coroners, funeral home directors and clergy members were again busy consoling the grief-stricken and preparing the dead for burial.

Wayne Bright, a funeral home director in Tampa, Florida, has been handling COVID-19 deaths since the beginning of the pandemic, working long hours under difficult circumstances.

Still, this summer has been different.

About 40% of the most recent 100,000 people to die of the virus were under 65, a share higher than at any other point in the pandemic, and Bright has spent months bearing witness to what he calls “premature grief.” In one family, a father of teenagers died. A 16-year-old girl in another family lost her mother, aunt and cousin to the virus, all in quick succession.

“Now you’re dealing with people in their 30s and 40s and 50s,” he said. “These are people who, without the pandemic, they would almost certainly be alive and live full lives. It’s so much worse now than it was when the pandemic first happened. The delta variant is tremendously worse. It would be hard for me to define just how much worse it is.”

His own exhaustion runs deep. He works seven days a week and has lately been confronted with previously unimaginable problems: shortages of caskets, hospitals with full morgues and a need to schedule burials weeks into the future so cemeteries will have vaults available.

“It certainly has taken a toll,” he said. “And you just think, this just doesn’t have to be.”

The delta surge has hit working-age Americans particularly hard. Older Americans are still more susceptible to the virus but have benefited from their willingness to be vaccinated: People 65 and older, who have been among the most vulnerable to serious illness from the virus, have the highest rate of vaccination of all age groups, at 83% fully vaccinated, according to the CDC.

Vaccine mandates have begun to take effect in some states and within some companies, but only 65% of the eligible U.S. population is fully vaccinated. The nation’s vaccination campaign has been slowed by people who say they are hesitant or unwilling to get shots, amid a polarized landscape that has included misinformation from conservative and anti-vaccine commentators casting doubt on the safety of vaccines.

Vaccination rates are lower for people in their 30s, and the number of people in that age group who died of the virus in August was almost double the number who died during January, the previous record month, according to provisional counts from the CDC. More than 3,800 people in their 40s died of COVID-19 in August, compared with 2,800 in January.

Stephen Kimmel, a professor of epidemiology at the University of Florida, said younger people were particularly vulnerable to infection now because they have a relatively low rate of vaccination and are increasingly interacting with one another, leading to more opportunities to be infected. The delta variant is much more contagious than previous variants.

“If you look back when the virus first started, the mantra was, this seems to be a disease that affects older people more severely, and fortunately younger people don’t seem to get as sick,” he said. “Younger people now feel this is a virus that won’t affect them.”

In many parts of the South that weathered the worst of the summer surge, deaths from COVID-19 have only recently begun to slow down.

James Pollard, the coroner in Henry County, Kentucky, outside Louisville, said he was seeing more deaths occur at home than at any other time during the pandemic. On a recent day, he said, an ambulance was summoned to return a coronavirus patient to a hospital, but the person died before the ambulance arrived.

“The families are going through a lot of initial pain and shock and when we’re getting 20-, 30-, 40-year-old people who are passing away from it, that makes it so much more difficult,” he said. “It has more of a lasting effect than any other natural death.”

He hears a frequent refrain: family members who vow to be vaccinated after losing a relative to the disease.

The wave of delta deaths has been particularly high in rural areas of the South, where vaccination rates trail those of nearby metropolitan areas. Even though the raw number of COVID-19 deaths is higher in metropolitan areas because their populations are larger, the share of people dying of the virus in rural areas has been much greater.

The outsize impact on the South propelled Mississippi ahead of New York and New Jersey for the most coronavirus deaths relative to population throughout the pandemic. Before the delta surge, the worst-hit states had been mostly Northeastern states that suffered dire early outbreaks, as well as Arizona. But Louisiana and Alabama have become two of the five states with the highest proportion of COVID deaths.

Harold Proctor, the coroner in Floyd County, Georgia, said his office was handling twice the number of deaths compared with this time last year. At this point in the pandemic, he said, some families are so accustomed to hearing and reading about COVID-19 that they have a sense that deaths from the virus are commonplace.

“It does seem like they have more accepted that people will die of COVID now,” Proctor said.

Other families have expressed sorrow mixed with profound remorse that their dead relative was not vaccinated.

The Rev. Joy Baumgartner, a minister in Beloit, Wisconsin, presided over a recent funeral that she described as “the saddest, most grief-stricken I have ever experienced.”

The woman who died of COVID-19 was a 64-year-old church member, talented baker and frequent volunteer during group dinners on Thanksgiving. Her adult children had advised her not to receive a shot.

When they arrived at the church, Baumgartner said, the woman’s children were full of regret, despairing over their actions and searching for a rationale. “They condemned themselves,” she recalled.

“I had to hold these people in my arms in front of this urn of ashes, asking God to help them through this. It was a never-ending week of excruciating pain.”

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

Santa Cruz City Council Advances Homeless Garden Project Relocation

Along the trail that leads through the upper meadow of Pogonip, signs are posted calling on community members to protest the relocation of the Homeless Garden Project, said Carrie Major on Tuesday evening.  

Major was one of the 30-plus people who called in to discuss the Homeless Garden Project’s speculated relocation to the Upper Meadows of Pogonip at Tuesday’s city council meeting. 

The relocation is proving to be contentious, with advocates on either side sharing strong opinions in favor and in opposition. Many of the callers opposing the relocation shared their support for the Homeless Garden Project, a nonprofit organic garden that provides job training to people in Santa Cruz who are experiencing homelessness. But those same callers cited environmental and fiscal concerns regarding the garden’s relocation.

“I support the Project’s work, but I implore them to stop pursuing this controversial move,” said Rebecca Sinclair, who said she was a longtime Santa Cruz resident. “Another location will have less environmental impacts, and this allocation of funds will be the first of thousands of dollars that will be required to pursue this divisive project. This is not the way I want my tax money to be spent.”

The Homeless Garden Project has been looking for a permanent home for more than 20 years. In 1998, the City adopted the Pogonip Master Plan, which placed the garden in the lower meadows. But because it was previously used as a skeet shooting range, it was later found that the soil there was contaminated with lead, rendering the land unfarmable.

After this discovery, the project issued a request for the council to consider the garden’s relocation to the upper meadows. The council first heard the proposal in August and has since received dozens of letters from residents opposing the move.

The nonprofit hopes to move to the upper meadows of Pogonip in part due to its central location, accessibility for its clients, and also because of its wide-open space. 

“Space for a large farm is really limited,” said Tony Elliot, Santa Cruz’s parks and recreation director. “Pogonip is our largest single property, at 640 acres.”

Elliot also said the proposed plan will include an environmental review that will identify the implications of the relocation on the plants and animals inhabiting the land.

“That’s part of a phase that we will undertake here over the next three or four months or so,” Elliot said. “Our bionics analysis will help us know what are the conditions in the upper meadow and if this is feasible.” 

The estimated cost for the environmental review and related consultant fees will be around $102,500, which will come from the city’s General Fund.

The council unanimously approved these expenses and confirmed the schedule and process to potentially change the Pogonip Master Plan to allow for the relocation. Council members stressed that the decision does not confirm the garden’s relocation to the upper meadows. 

“I hear some urgency and concern about making this move, and again I know it’s been stated, but I’ll just reiterate what we’re talking about here is opening up a process,” said council member Sandy Brown. 

Council also reiterated the patience the organization has shown for the past two decades, as a home for a permanent garden is determined.

“We have made a commitment to this organization that has been waiting for a permanent home for 23 years,” said Santa Cruz Mayor Donna Meyers. “Nonprofits are incredible. They do the work that government and business doesn’t do.” 

Venus Spirits Cocktails & Kitchen Flies High with Taste and Service

venus-spirits
This year, the Homeless Garden Project is partnering with Growing the Table

Santa Cruz City Councilmember Justin Cummings Announces Run for 3rd District County Supervisor

Cummings is often seen around town attending punk rock shows

‘Biketober’ Returns for Another ‘Spokey’ Season

This month, the local environmental nonprofit is hosting many events—with a few changes

Progressives Stand Firm on Priorities as Infrastructure Debate Continues

Divisions in the Democratic Party delay progress on part of President Joe Biden’s economic agenda

Seymour Center Reopens, Staff and Volunteers Rejoice

The Seymour Marine Discovery Center readies to reopen to the public

Pelosi Hunts for Infrastructure Votes as Democrats Feud Over Agenda

House and Senate pass legislation to fund the government until Dec. 3

PG&E Responds to Outages

PG&E hosts live webinars in attempt to answer questions and provide transparency to its process

Scotts Valley Mayor Declares City’s Commitment to Diversity

Scotts Valley Mayor Derek Timm referenced incidents of hatred and discrimination across Santa Cruz County during Sept. 1 City Council meeting

U.S. Coronavirus Death Toll Nears 700,000 Despite Wide Availability of Vaccines

The U.S. has had one of the highest recent death rates of any country with an ample supply of coronavirus vaccines

Santa Cruz City Council Advances Homeless Garden Project Relocation

The Homeless Garden Project is a nonprofit organic garden that provides job training to people experiencing homelessness in Santa Cruz
17,623FansLike
8,845FollowersFollow