Homeless Advocates Ask Officials to Address Mounting Issues

[This story has been updated from a previous version. — Editor]

WATSONVILLE—About a dozen nonprofit leaders and community advocates asked the Watsonville City Council at its Tuesday meeting to address the city’s mounting homelessness issues that have been further compounded by a recent rainstorm.

Among the concerns brought forth to the elected leaders: an increase in brazen harassment of downtown business owners and a dispute over a camp that homeless advocates set up on Dec. 12 in a city-owned parking lot adjacent to the Buddhist Temple on Bridge Street.

In the latter issue, people who spoke at Tuesday’s meeting say that the camp is serving as a warming center for people experiencing homelessness. They also say that the city and Santa Cruz and Monterey counties have largely failed to provide them access to services, something both jurisdictions say is not true.

“We need tents, we need food, we need an emergency resolution to fund a warming center and expand shelter options because people have nowhere to go,” one woman said. “And, really, that’s the problem.”

On Thursday morning the city gave notice to the people staying there that they would need to remove their belongings from the area to allow Public Works employees to clean the lot on Sunday morning. Watsonville spokesperson Michelle Pulido said Thursday that the cleanup is part of the city’s regularly scheduled cleanings that it does at various homeless encampments throughout the city.

But Anthony Prince, general counsel for the California Homeless Union/Statewide Organizing Council, said that it would be a “harmful act” for the city to move the people staying at the lot and their property. Prince says that the people are members of the Pajaro/Watsonville Homeless Union, which he represents. They were displaced by a recent cleanup on the Monterey County side of the Pajaro River levee conducted by the Monterey County Water Resources Agency.

federal judge a few weeks ago placed a temporary restraining order against Monterey County, giving the county and the residents until Monday to get hotel vouchers and work out a plan to move the people into those hotels. Prince said that the judge in a case status hearing on Thursday ordered the Homeless Union and Monterey County to continue working toward housing the homeless people with hotel vouchers. He also said that Monterey County has talked with hotels in Watsonville that will accept the vouchers.

“This is a very serious situation … we’re about a week away from Christmas and more rain is coming,” he said. “We’re strongly advising that the city refrains from any action.”

Watsonville Interim City Manager Tamara Vides, who took the reins from outgoing City Manager Matt Huffaker on Tuesday, said in an interview that medical providers such as Salud Para La Gente and the Homeless Persons’ Health Project have visited the camp and tried to connect the people there with services available to them.

“I think what is a priority is first finding out where they came from, and what resources that they’re eligible for,” Vides said. “There are many, many ways that a person can be eligible to receive resources … There are resources today that are available in Santa Cruz County and in Monterey County for those people and we want to link them to them.”

People at the camp told the Pajaronian Wednesday afternoon that roughly 20 people slept there Tuesday night—some stayed in their vehicles but the majority slept on the floor. They also said that they have called both Grace Harbor Women’s Center and the Salvation Army for help in transitioning people into shelters. But they say there are not enough beds available at local shelters, and that Watsonville Police Department officers have said they will cite or arrest them if they do not leave the lot.

But Pulido says that WPD’s Crisis Assessment Response and Engagement team, which pairs officers with mental health liaisons, has multiple times offered people at the camp access to services, including beds at local shelters.

“They have all refused,” Pulido said.

The Watsonville City Council could not take any action on the concerns, but some of the councilmembers said they had visited the camp or met with community leaders to discuss what the city could do to help.

Councilwoman Rebecca Garcia, for instance, said she had met with 17 other leaders from around Santa Cruz County after several downtown businesses and service providers said they were struggling to deal with an uptick in violence, drug use, “indecent exposure” and harassment from people experiencing homelessness.

“Several of the agencies shared what they are doing to provide resources for the homeless, but many more shared that they are not providing services but are being impacted by the prevalent number of homeless in downtown,” she said. “The county will be having conversations with others to see what role they can play in addressing homelessness in Watsonville.”

Garcia said that a county-wide committee will meet on Dec. 28 to decide how to move forward on the issue.

Community Action Board of Santa Cruz County Executive Director Maria Elena De La Garza said that the recent meeting was “just a start.”

“It’s a crisis downtown,” she said. “We know that it’s raining and it’s cold and we don’t have anywhere for folks to go. We’re concerned about how we can come together as a community to continue our response, to continue to understand that we need different strategies and to help support.”

Watsonville Names Jorge Zamora New Police Chief

WATSONVILLE—A Watsonville police officer who began his career with the agency as a cadet three decades ago has become the department’s newest police chief.

Jorge Zamora was chosen after an extensive national search.

“Through the process, Jorge demonstrated his in-depth knowledge and understanding of our community and his clear vision to support, develop and lead the police department in future years,” said Interim City Manager Tamara Vides. 

Zamora was born and raised in Watsonville. He became a full-time Watsonville Police Department Officer in 1996.

“My approach to policing is simple: lead with integrity, self-compassion, competency and courage,” Zamora said. “Do the right things for the right reasons, treat all people with respect and fairness, set high standards for myself and the organization, and be accountable through transparency.” 

Once sworn in, Zamora will become the city’s 16th Chief of Police, and the first, first-generation Mexican-American to hold this role.

“It is great to see a native of our community have the opportunity to lead the police department,” said newly seated Mayor Ari Parker. “Jorge, along with his many years of experience, training and education that will position him well to lead our men and women of the Watsonville PD, understands the needs of our city and the challenging expectations residents have of the police.”

During his time with the department, Zamora has served in various assignments including patrol, gang and narcotics enforcement and SWAT. He has served as a detective, a field training officer and a hostage negotiator. He has also been a Regional Occupational Program instructor, and served in youth mentorship. 

He most recently served as a police representative on the City’s Ad-HOC Committee on Policing and Social Equity, where he worked alongside community members to gain a deeper understanding of how the police department and the city can better serve its residents. 

Zamora attended local schools and graduated from Radcliff Adult School. He holds a bachelor’s in criminal justice management from Union Institute & University and a master’s in leadership studies from Saint Mary’s College of California. 

His appointment follows the retirement of Chief of Police David Honda, who served Watsonville from 2016 through 2021.

The community is invited to attend Zamora’s badge pinning ceremony on Jan. 10 at the City Council chambers at 4pm.

Ari Parker Takes Over as Watsonville Mayor

WATSONVILLE—On an emotion-packed night that featured warm sendoffs for several city staffers, Ari Parker stepped in as Watsonville’s mayor during Tuesday’s City Council meeting.

A lifelong Watsonville resident and an educator for more than three decades, Parker was sworn in by Assistant City Clerk Irwin Ortiz as the city’s head elected official. City Councilman Eduardo Montesino was sworn in by his son, Cuauhtémoc, as the Mayor Pro Tem, or the representative who would act as mayor should Parker be unable to perform her duties.

In a brief speech, Parker thanked her mother, Aurora Ardaiz Parker, 98, who was at the meeting briefly. She also thanked other family members present at the City Council Chambers, and her Native ancestors—she has roots with the Amah Mutsun people. Parker’s great-grandfather, Giles Refugio Joaquin Cano, Sr., was the constable for Pajaro for more than 30 years.

“He’s inspired a lot in our family to do service to the community,” Parker said. “Many people use this post of mayor, it may be about them. But this is not about me. This is not about our City Council—our City Council has been very clear about that. This is about you. And this is about our city. We’re diverse, we’re caring and we are an amazing community.”

Parker is the 10th woman to become mayor in the city’s 153-year history. She was voted into office in 2018 and serves as the representative for the 7th District, which encompasses much of the eastern region of the city off East Lake Avenue and around the senior villages.

In an interview after the meeting, Parker said that, among other things, she would like to continue the work on the city’s downtown plan, build out current youth programs, support the Native American community and renew the city’s emphasis on its long-term planning around the growing older adult community.

“I’m a huge supporter of our senior plans and, of course, I have 5 billion ideas about that,” she said. “[They’re] probably more than we have money for but what the heck, we’ll go looking for [funding].”

Parker’s oath of office came after Jimmy Dutra wrapped up his one-year stint as mayor—because of voter-approved Measure I the mayoral seat rotates annually. Dutra, after highlighting his efforts in helping bring the Covid-19 vaccines to South County, among other things, said that his year as mayor was tumultuous because of the pandemic.

“It’s been a long year, but it feels like it flew by,” he said.

That was just one of four major changes that happened at the Tuesday meeting. Dutra honored City Manager Matt Huffaker, City Attorney Alan Smith and City Clerk Beatriz Vasquez Flores with proclamations. All three are set to leave the city. Huffaker will take over as Santa Cruz’s city managerSmith will retire after 25 years as the city’s legal counsel and Vasquez Flores will soon leave the city after severing as clerk for several years.

Watsonville will also welcome a new City Councilmember next month when Vanessa Quiroz-Carter is sworn into the 2nd District seat. She beat Frank Barba in a special election earlier this month.

Parker said that she is excited about the changes. She also said that she has confidence that Interim City Manager Tamara Vides can lead the city as it seeks a new chief executive over the first quarter of 2022. She also highlighted the fact that the city’s mayor and executive team—city manager, city attorney and city clerk—are all women.

“I think that’s great,” she said.

Parker, who earned a bachelor’s degree in political science from Santa Clara University and completed her graduate work at UC Santa Cruz, got her start as a teacher at Salsipuedes Elementary School before moving to MacQuiddy Elementary School. She now teaches at Bradley Elementary School—at least two of her students were in attendance at Tuesday’s meeting. 

Her first foray into politics, she says, was helping her father stuff envelopes for local campaigns in her youth.

“I learned that but I vowed I’d never be a candidate because I saw how difficult it was,” she said. “But, local government is probably the best because [constituents] do show up at my door at 8am on a Saturday morning—and I’m in my pajamas—because they live down the street from me. I’m OK with that … that’s part of accessibility.”

Parker’s four-year term on the City Council will end at the end of next year, but city records show that she has already formed a reelection committee for the Nov. 8, 2022 election.

For now, Parker says that her focus is squarely on helping Watsonville be “the best Watsonville that we can.” She also wants to bring back “positive social discourse.”

“I want to bring Watsonville back together,” she said. “I feel like we’ve been very divided.”

Water Street Housing Project Moves Forward

The saga over a controversial housing project that would build low-income apartments will continue, after the Santa Cruz City Council voted 4-3 to move the project forward at Tuesday’s meeting. 

The development would build between 55 to 82 apartments for people who earn 80% or less of area median income ($82,234) at 831 Water St. In all, 145 apartments, the rest made up of market rate units, would be constructed. 

The project was originally denied by the Santa Cruz City Council, but the elected leaders later rescinded that decision after the state found their action was illegal and organizations threatened to sue the city.

The project developer, Novin Development, submitted the application under Senate Bill 35, a bill passed in 2017 that aims to streamline affordable housing projects. SB35 applies to cities that have not met their affordable housing mandates imposed by the state, and limits local elected leaders’ ability to deny housing proposals. SB35 also forces cities to consider proposals according to their objective standards, allowing developers to bypass requirements that apply to most projects.

Many people who called into Tuesday’s meeting spoke of their struggles to find affordable housing, and a few said they, or someone they knew, were forced to move because of high rent. 

“I am urging the council to approve 831 Water Street and more housing projects like it,” said Michael Bull, a third-year UCSC student. “I know personally people who dropped out of UCSC because they couldn’t get housing for fall quarter. It’s a housing crisis.” 

Councilmembers agreed that there is a need for affordable housing projects, but nearly all spoke to procedural issues with Novin Development’s application. Councilmembers Sandy Brown and Justin Cummings cited contradictory and incomplete materials as part of their reasoning in voting against the project. Councilmember Martine Watkins also said the application was confusing and seemed incomplete, and that ultimately it didn’t feel like a fit for the community. 

Councilmember Donna Meyers, who also had objections about the development, reminded her peers that the vote was to decide if the project met the city’s objective standards. 

“I think the procedural aspect of what we’re facing is, unfortunately, probably the piece that is the hardest to swallow today,” said Meyers, who voted to move the project along. “But I am very concerned that a denial through this motion basically will land us in a lawsuit.”As the project moves toward a building permit, city staff made five recommendations to the developer. Most were related to adding traffic signals and warning signs for the bike lane and to increase bike safety, two of which the applicant included in its new proposal.

bell hooks, Pathbreaking Black Feminist, Dies at 69

By Clay Risen, The New York Times

bell hooks, whose incisive, wide-ranging writing on gender and race helped push feminism beyond its white, middle-class worldview to include the voices of Black and working-class women, died Wednesday at her home in Berea, Kentucky. She was 69.

Her sister Gwenda Motley said the cause was end-stage renal failure.

Starting in 1981 with her book “Ain’t I a Woman? Black Women and Feminism,” hooks, who insisted on using all lowercase letters in her name, argued that feminism’s claim to speak for all women had pushed the unique experiences of working-class and Black women to the margins.

“A devaluation of Black womanhood occurred as a result of the sexual exploitation of Black women during slavery that has not altered in the course of hundreds of years,” she wrote.

If that seems like conventional wisdom today, that is in large part because of the enormous impact that hooks had on both feminism and Black women, many of whom had resisted aligning with a movement they felt was designed to diminish their experiences.

“I think of bell hooks as being pivotal to an entire generation of Black feminists who saw that for the first time, they had license to call themselves Black feminists,” said Kimberlé Crenshaw, a law professor at Columbia University. “She was utterly courageous in terms of putting on paper thoughts that many of us might have had in private.”

Womanhood, hooks said, could not be reduced to a singular experience but had to be considered within a framework encompassing race and class. She called for a new form of feminism, one that recognized differences and inequalities among women as a way of creating a new, more inclusive movement — one that, she later said, had largely been achieved.

She applied a similar, and equally trenchant, criticism to Black anti-racism, which she said was often grounded in a patriarchal worldview that excluded the experiences of Black women. But she also recognized, in books like “We Real Cool: Black Men and Masculinity” (2004), that such a worldview resulted from centuries of oppression and exclusion of Black men.

hooks resisted the title “public intellectual,” but by the 2000s she had achieved celebrity status. Her books, written in a flowing, jargon-free style, were required reading across a wide range of college courses. She appeared onstage with actors like Laverne Cox and activists like Janet Mock, and on the bookstand of model and actress Emily Ratajkowski, who cited hooks as inspiration while writing her recent essay collection, “My Body” (2021).

Part of hooks’ appeal was the sheer diversity of her interests. Her work, across some 30 books, encompassed literary criticism, children’s fiction, self-help, memoir and poetry, and it tackled not just subjects like education, capitalism and American history but also love and friendship.

In “Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom” (1994), she argued that the American education system had been constructed to quell dissent and shape young people into productive workers — and that it was therefore up to teachers to push against the grain by showing students how to use knowledge to resist.

She did just that in her own classes, instructing her students to see critical thinking and reading as liberating acts.

“She was a foundational influence on how I understood the possibility of my becoming a writer,” said Min Jin Lee, author of the novel “Pachinko,” who took two classes with hooks at Yale University. “She taught me how to read. But more than that, she taught me how to read as a global person.”

bell hooks was the pen name of Gloria Jean Watkins, who was born Sept. 25, 1952, in Hopkinsville, Kentucky, a small city in the southwestern part of the state not far from the Tennessee border.

Although her childhood in the semirural South exposed her to vicious examples of white supremacy, her tightknit Black community in Hopkinsville showed her the possibility of resistance from the margins, of finding community among the oppressed and drawing power from those connections — a theme to which she would return frequently in her work.

Her father, Veodis Watkins, was a postal worker, and her mother, Rosa Bell (Oldham) Watkins, was a homemaker. Along with her sister Motley, hooks is survived by three other sisters, Sarah Chambers, Valeria Watkins and Angela Malone, and her brother, Kenneth.

Her early education took place in segregated schools, although she moved to white-majority schools once the state integrated its education system — an experience in navigating complex racial and gender hierarchies that she later drew on in her memoir, “Bone Black: Memories of Girlhood” (1996).

She was an avid reader, vacuuming up books and reading long past her bedtime. She dreamed of becoming an architect and of leaving small-town Kentucky behind.

“Gloria learned to read and write at an early age and even proclaimed she would be famous one day,” her sisters said in a statement released after her death. “Every night we would try to sleep, but the sounds of her writing or page turning caused us to yell down to Mom to make her turn the light off.”

(END OPTIONAL TRIM.)

hooks began her climb at Stanford University, from which she graduated in 1974 with a degree in English literature. While still an undergraduate, she began writing “Ain’t I a Woman,” its title borrowed from a speech by Black abolitionist Sojourner Truth.

She received a master’s degree in English from the University of Wisconsin in 1976 and a doctorate in literature from the University of California, Santa Cruz, in 1983, with a dissertation on Toni Morrison.

Her first book was a collection of poems, “And There We Wept,” which was published in 1978 while she was teaching at the University of Southern California. It was the first time she used the pen name bell hooks — in homage to her maternal great-grandmother, Bell Blair Hooks, to whom she was often compared as a child. She insisted on rendering it in lowercase letters to emphasize, she often said, the “substance of books, not who I am.”

After teaching at a number of institutions, including Yale, Oberlin College and the City College of New York, she returned to Kentucky in 2004 to take up a teaching position at Berea College. A decade later, the college created the bell hooks Institute as a center for her writing and teaching.

By the 2010s, she had entered semiretirement and was spending her days writing, meditating and visiting with her neighbors in Berea, an intellectually vibrant town in the foothills of the Appalachians.

“I loved how open her table always was with such hard conversations, mediated by her incredible balance of encouraging patience and absolute honesty,” novelist Silas House, a friend and former Berea instructor, said in an email.

Especially in her later work, hooks emphasized the importance of community and of healing as the end goal of movements like feminism and anti-racism. Some criticized this position as papering over deep social divisions.

But hooks, who described herself as a “Buddhist Christian” and spoke often of her friendship with Buddhist monk Thich Nhat Hanh, insisted that love was the only way to overcome what she called the “imperialist white supremacy capitalist patriarchy.”

“I believe wholeheartedly that the only way out of domination is love,” she told philosopher George Yancy in an interview for The New York Times in 2015, “and the only way into really being able to connect with others, and to know how to be, is to be participating in every aspect of your life as a sacrament of love.”

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

Lawsuit Against Harm Reduction Coalition Dismissed

A Sacramento Superior Court Judge has dismissed a lawsuit against the Harm Reduction Coalition of Santa Cruz County (HRC), a group that provides services for people that use drugs, many of whom are homeless. 

The lawsuit was filed nearly one year ago in Sacramento Superior Court. In it, plaintiff Grant Park Neighborhood Association was trying to stop the organization’s syringe exchange program, saying that it poses a public health threat and constitutes a public nuisance.

The lawsuit alleged that HRC’s program violates the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because they did not perform the environmental review needed for the distribution, collection and disposal of used needles.

The lawsuit also stated that HRC’s program operates “in direct conflict” with the county’s Syringe Services Program because it allows untrained volunteers to perform its services.

In a 30-page ruling, Sacramento Superior Court Judge Laurie Earl pointed out that Assembly Bill 1344—signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in October—exempts syringe exchange programs from environmental review and therefore rendered the CEQA part of the lawsuit moot.

“This is a massive victory for us,” HRC Fiscal Director Kate Garrett stated in a press release. “We have wasted so much time having our resources drained by this lawsuit and being forced to turn our attention away from the fight against HIV, Covid-19, hepatitis, overdoses, and all of the other harms our participants experience. 

The lawsuit was filed at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic against two organizations already working around the clock fighting its spread, Garrett added.

“I could not be more relieved to see the core causes of action be rejected completely as we have actual work to do for our community,” she continued.

David Terrazas, who was among numerous plaintiffs, says that the decision is “bad for the people of Santa Cruz County.”

He pointed out that the judge in a preliminary decision ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, a decision that changed after Assembly Bill 1344 was passed.

Terrazas says that HRC last year distributed more than 796,000 syringes in Santa Cruz County, and only collected back about 432,000. 

“The state’s actions have effectively immunized their program from any local accountability for their bio-waste in the environment and destroyed the County Health and Human Services distribution program that also focused their efforts on providing professional health care and addiction recovery support services in connection with needle distribution,” Terrazas says.

He adds that “all available options are currently under consideration” when considering future legal action.

HRC organizers say that the public nuisance piece could still move forward, but that those claims will be difficult to prove.

Denise Elerick, who started the program in 2018, says the dismissal signals a broader shift in the negative public perception of syringe exchange programs.

“This was far larger than Santa Cruz County,” she says. “This has statewide ramifications. Other programs have been shut down, and this will put an end to that. They won’t stop, but we won’t either.”

The lawsuit also alleged that California Department of Public Health only allowed a 45-day public comment period, rather than a 90-days, but Judge Earl ultimately said that this was not a factor in the lawsuit. She also rejected plaintiff’s claims that state officials only consulted with Santa Cruz County Sheriff Jim Hart and then Santa Cruz Police Chief Andy Mills, pointing out that the other law enforcement officials were allowed to write in with their comments.

HRC has long been criticized by residents who claim that they frequently find syringe litter scattered throughout the county.

But Elerick has long rejected assertions that supplemental syringe services programs result in increased litter. 

“Syringe litter is simply a symptom of the public health crisis, and we have not talked about overdoses and saving lives,” she says.

Elerick says the program was never intended to replace the county’s programs, but to supplement them. She says that HRC helps numerous drug users and has removed tens of thousands of needles from public spaces. The group also refers drug users to county programs.

In addition, the organization claims to have helped during the Covid-19 pandemic by distributing more than 65,000 masks, 2,780 bottles of hand sanitizer and more than 45,000 disposable gloves, all for free through their syringe services program.

“An environmental lawsuit without merit, without any facts, without any science behind it isn’t anything more than a personal attack, and an attempt to bully and shut us down,” she says. 

HRC Program Coordinator Dani Drysdale says that the lawsuit impacted the organization’s operations, as organizers missed essential training to battle it. 

“It’s hard to calculate exactly how much damage this did, but despite all of the time and money we have been forced to waste on this lawsuit, the fact is that we are coming into the new year with more people, more funding, more services, and a huge weight off of our shoulders,” Drysdale says.

Report Shows Law Agencies Aligned

All of the county’s four city police agencies—and the Sheriff’s Office—have similar policies when it comes to use of force and releasing of information to the public, according to a report released in November by the Criminal Justice Council of Santa Cruz County.

The report—thought to be the first of its kind nationwide—examined policies and procedures of Capitola, Santa Cruz, Watsonville and Scotts Valley police departments, in addition to the Santa Cruz County Sheriff’s Department. 

The main takeaway, according to Sheriff Jim Hart, is that most departments’ policies are aligned with each other, which he says is a rarity among counties and a sign that the county’s law enforcement model is on the right track.

“You don’t see many or any other counties where all of the police agencies are able to come to the table and have this level of agreement on policies,” Hart says. “It’s a very unique situation that we have here, and I think it serves our people well.”

According to the report, all the law enforcement agencies prohibit controversial tactics such as chokeholds, as well as neck and carotid restraints. All are required to use de-escalation techniques before using force, and require “less-lethal” force before using deadly force. In addition, all require a warning before lethal force when it is safe to do so.

While only some departments have dedicated units with mental health workers paired with officers, all would support efforts to create such a unit.

The report also shows that only Santa Cruz Police Department reports complaints against its officers to the public or elected officials and that Capitola and Scotts Valley police departments do not publish public requests for information under the public records act.

All, however, release footage from officer-worn body cameras in officer-involved shootings.

The report also looked at which agencies have independent auditors, or any other type of independent oversight, and found that only SCPD has either.

None use facial recognition technology, and all say they require implicit bias training for their officers.

Only Scotts Valley does not have policies in place regarding the acquisition of surveillance technology. Chief Steve Walpole explained that the small department has not yet had the funds to purchase such technology, and that it would develop policies before that occurred.

“I was proud of the work everyone did,” Walpole says of the report. “It was open and honest. All of us in the law enforcement community have to work together to do their job. There is not one agency that can do everything they need to do without the help of other agencies.”

Supervisor Zach Friend—who chairs the CJC—called the report “in-depth analysis of local police agency policies and procedures—in particular around use-of-force.”

The purpose, Friend says, is to see where there is alignment, where there are gaps and where there are opportunities to improve.

He adds that the goal is not to necessarily have a standardized set of policies across jurisdictions. 

“Local agencies and the communities they serve may have reasons why they have specific policies, don’t have specific policies or have policies that differ from other agencies within the county,” he says. “The CJC focuses discussions on prevention and intervention as well as reentry programs—rather than simply a suppression model.”

The council, for example, has held a conference on the role of women and girls in gangs and worked with school districts, nonprofits and others on intervention and prevention programs to reduce youth involvement in gangs in general.

The CJC is made up of local police chiefs, the county sheriff, the chief probation officer, the district attorney, leadership of two local nonprofits, two local judges, the public defender and the county superintendent of schools, among others. 

Next year, the focus will be exclusively on behavioral health and the criminal justice system, Friend says.

To see the report, visit bit.ly/3GJC2BN.

More Updates to the Santa Cruz Mixed-Use Library Project

Santa Cruz’s mixed-use library project received yet another round of updates this week, and while the changes were well received by most at Tuesday’s City Council meeting, opposition to the project remains. 

The city of Santa Cruz has been working on updating its decaying library since voters approved Measure S in 2016, an initiative that provided funding for library renovations across the county. The original plan for the update was to build five stories of parking above a new library.

But now, the city plans on building a two-story library with 310 parking spaces, adjacent to an 85-foot affordable apartment building. The construction would happen at the parking lot on the corner of Cedar and Lincoln streets, the site of the popular weekly downtown farmers market.

“When I was first campaigning for City Council, I’d heard that the site would have a six-story parking garage,” said Councilman Justin Cummings, who told voters he opposed the initial project while running for office in 2018. “But what’s before us today, I feel like it’s a really big improvement.” 

The updates modify a few elements of the master plan that the City Council approved in June 2020. Jayson Architecture, the firm hired by the city to design the project, collected suggestions from the public to create the library’s new design during a series of workshops held in October.  

The new plan, approved unanimously by the City Council at Tuesday’s meeting, increases the affordable housing units from 50 to a minimum of 100 and decreases the parking by 90 stalls. The vote also approves new design elements, like a green roof and an adjacent roof deck, and expands the library to accommodate a daycare facility. 

“The city’s thoughtful and proactive approach, and incorporation of community input, in designing the library mixed-use project has entirely paid off,” said Emily Ham, the executive director of the Santa Cruz County Business Council. 

Her sentiment was echoed by multiple callers, who praised the library’s new design elements and additional affordable housing units.

But some voiced concerns that have long followed the proposal: what would the construction mean for the future of the weekly farmers market, and why won’t the city simply renovate the existing library at 224 Church St.?

One group called Our Downtown, Our Future is collecting signatures to bring these issues to the voters as a ballot measure. Our Downtown hopes to make Lot 4, the lot that the mixed-use library would build affordable apartments on, the permanent location for the downtown farmers market. The group also wants the city to remodel the current library, a plan that both the Downtown Library Advisory Committee (DLAC) and Downtown Library Subcommittee found would be costly and limit the project. 

But some have also questioned Our Downtown’s true intentions, wondering if the ballot initiative is simply a way to block affordable housing and dictate where it belongs. John Hall, one of the organizers of the initiative, has maintained that Lot 4 simply makes for a better location for the farmers market. 

Should the ballot initiative collect enough signatures and be approved by Santa Cruz voters in the November 2022 election, the library project would have to stop, City Attorney Tony Condotti confirmed. 

For now, the project will have one final round of feedback before it will begin construction. It could be completed sometime in 2025, the city says. People will have two more opportunities to give input and contribute to the library’s final design elements at meetings that will be posted at the library’s project website

Prescribed burns

0

The atmosphere at most broadcast prescribed burn sites feels calm and professional. Crews begin arriving early in the morning to check conditions and set up. At a briefing—usually around eight o’clock—the group reviews the prescription and their individual roles. 

They conduct a small test fire in the middle of the area. If the fuel burns well, the group sends a request to the regional office for permission to put fire on the ground. The burn itself begins around 10 and runs until mid-afternoon, when the crews begin shutting it down.

A couple of the engines stay behind to patrol the area overnight. The next morning, a smaller group comes back out with foresters to evaluate the area. Once everything has been cold and out for a while, the burn is officially done.

Most controlled burns end without incident. But occasionally, conditions change and things get out of hand. Such was the case at the Estrada Fire in Corralitos in late October.

Wind picked up and sent fire over the lines just as CAL FIRE was starting to shut it down. 148 acres burned before firefighters got the blaze under control.

The unit came under fire on social media for conducting a burn at all on a warm fall day. But Rich Sampson, the Vegetation Management Division Chief for the Santa Cruz County Fire Department, says the day’s conditions fit the bill when they started working. 

“Conditions changed,” he says. CAL FIRE critiqued and debriefed after the Estrada fire, but they will not conduct a formal internal review. 

“It happens from time to time on fires,” says Sampson. “That’s why we go heavy on the resources.”

There’s a lot of pressure to conduct burns, he says. Millions of acres of land need management to prevent catastrophic wildfires. But conditions must align in just the right way to make it possible. 

A narrow window

Air quality, winds, temperature and moisture all determine whether a burn is possible. If conditions are too dry and hot, a fire becomes dangerous. But when the land is too wet, fuel won’t ignite or burn efficiently.

“There is a lot of work that goes into it ahead of time—a lot of environmental review and planning in terms of what will be required in order to implement a burn,” says Angela Bernheisel, CAL FIRE San Mateo-Santa Cruz Unit division chief.

“If anybody thinks it’s just like, we wake up in the morning and say, ‘Oh, I think I’ll just go burn today,’ that’s not how it works,” she says. “There’s a lot of planning and thought that goes into it before any fire ever hits the ground.”

CAL FIRE makes prescriptions for specific plots of land years in advance. When conditions look promising, they choose a plan and start making preparations. But the implementation has to stay flexible.

“We only have about a 25% chance of it actually happening when we plan on it,” says Sampson. Sometimes, the winds change. Other times, resources get pulled to a different fire. At the start of November, a planned week of prescribed fires in Wilder Ranch ended early after rains soaked the brush.

“We’ll make four or five attempts to try to do a burn—say in the fall or in the winter when the conditions are what we want—before it actually happens. Or we have to wait until the next year,” he says.

In recent years, climate change and large wildfires have made it harder to find good windows.

“You need to be in prescription,” says Bernheisel. “So, if climate change is creating conditions that are hotter and drier for longer periods of the year, then it might be more difficult to find that time period when you would be in prescription.” 

When conditions do line up, the unit also needs enough people and equipment to manage the fire. 

“Because of how bad the fires were this summer around the state, the resources that we had to conduct the fires were gone most of the year on wildland fires,” says Sampson.

“Some years, we just can’t put fire out on the ground because it’s too dry and the field conditions are outside of their prescription or our resources are all gone,” he says. “And so that just pushes more of the pressure to other years, when the conditions are better or resources are available.”

A changing landscape

New developments further complicate matters. Sampson says using fire used to be a “completely different situation.” There were hills where crews could burn a few thousand acres without worrying. 

“But now, you go look at some of these areas that used to be vacant, and there’s homes out there,” he says.  

“There’s power lines going through areas where it used to be just bare hillsides.” 

Fire has existed both as a natural part of the landscape and for management in Santa Cruz County for millennia. 

“The ancestors of the Amah Mutsun tribal band were using intentional fire as a tool for many thousands of years,” says Sara French, the director of development at the Amah Mutsun Land Trust.

The Amah Mutsun Land Trust currently works with CAL FIRE on prescribed burns at the Soquel Demonstration State Forest.

CAL FIRE mostly uses prescribed burns in Santa Cruz County to complement or enhance other management strategies, like fuel breaks. 

“So we’re not just relying on prescribed burns to do the whole job,” says Bernheisel. “We’re using it as one of the tools to do the job.”

“But conditions are going to continue to get worse and worse,” says Sampson. “The question is, can we put enough on the ground to make a difference and help out? To go ahead and reduce some of the danger?”

Measure U Extension Committee Submits Signatures

0

WATSONVILLE—About two dozen organizers packed into the Watsonville civic offices on Monday afternoon to turn in the signatures needed to put an extension of a landmark ballot measure before Watsonville voters next year.

Measure U, approved by voters in 2002, put restrictions on where, when and how Watsonville could expand in an effort to protect the sloughs and rich farmland that surround Santa Cruz County’s southernmost city. But some of the protections are set to expire in 2022 and the rest will expire five years later.

The Committee for Planned Growth and Farmland Protection over the past six months gathered some 3,100 signatures from registered Watsonville voters to put the item on next year’s ballot. 

The coalition of environmentalist and agriculture industry leaders created for the sole purpose of extending Measure U through 2040 only needed to submit roughly 2,200 signatures—or 10% of Watsonville’s voting body—to the Watsonville City Clerk’s office before Dec. 15.

The signatures must now be verified by Watsonville City Clerk Beatriz Vazquez Flores.

Former Watsonville Mayor Betty Bobeda, who brought the initial petition forward more than a year ago, said that the fact that they surpassed that mark by nearly 1,000 signatures showed there is overwhelming support for the extension.

“The people of Watsonville don’t want urban sprawl,” she said. “They want preservation of farmland.”

The renewal will be on what should be a contentious and lengthy election day ballot that will feature several Watsonville City Council races and a battle over the county supervisorial seat that oversees most of Watsonville, the 4th district.

Committee leader Sam Earnshaw says that the group will now try to build support for the extension, an effort that he expects will ramp up after the June 7, 2022 primary. While he doesn’t expect it will be difficult to win over Watsonville voters—he said they already had their say in 2013 when they overwhelmingly voted against Measure T—a bigger fight will be trying to convince the Watsonville City Council to support it.

The local elected leaders have been largely critical of the measure’s impact on the city when discussing the item during public meetings. Some City Councilmembers have gone as far as calling the committee’s claims about Measure U “propaganda” and others have said that there are racist overtones in their stance against allowing Watsonville—a community with a large Latinx population with several people who cannot vote—to expand in order to build more housing and attract more employers.

Earnshaw, however, says that Measure U has been good for Watsonville and that the city’s urban line limits should stay where they are to limit urban sprawl and encourage developers to renovate blighted areas and underused parcels within city limits. The farmer turned environmentalist also cites a citywide survey in which 95% of respondents said the city should create additional jobs and housing near already existing infrastructure to help preserve natural and agricultural land.

“It’s not like there aren’t any [vacant and underutilized parcels] in Watsonville,” Earnshaw said. “Focus on that, and then you got 2040 when you can try to go for some farmland again.”

Homeless Advocates Ask Officials to Address Mounting Issues

Nonprofit leaders and community advocates ask the Watsonville City Council to provide assistance for ongoing homeless crisis further compounded by rain

Watsonville Names Jorge Zamora New Police Chief

The Watsonville native became a full-time Watsonville Police Department Officer in 1996

Ari Parker Takes Over as Watsonville Mayor

The Watsonville resident and longtime educator was sworn in by Assistant City Clerk Irwin Ortiz as the city’s head elected official

Water Street Housing Project Moves Forward

Santa Cruz City Council rescinds original decision to deny the project after state finds their actions illegal and organizations threaten to sue the city

bell hooks, Pathbreaking Black Feminist, Dies at 69

hooks argued argued that feminism’s claim to speak for all women had pushed the unique experiences of working-class and Black women to the margins

Lawsuit Against Harm Reduction Coalition Dismissed

The Santa Cruz County organization provides services for people that use drugs, many of whom are homeless, including a needle exchange program

Report Shows Law Agencies Aligned

homicide-watsonville
The Criminal Justice Council of Santa Cruz County examined policies and procedures of Capitola, Santa Cruz, Watsonville and Scotts Valley police departments

More Updates to the Santa Cruz Mixed-Use Library Project

The city council's revised plan for the 'mixed-use library' project includes more affordable housing units and less parking stalls

Prescribed burns

The atmosphere at most broadcast prescribed burn sites feels calm and professional. Crews begin arriving early in the morning to check conditions and set up. At a briefing—usually around eight o’clock—the group reviews the prescription and their individual roles.  They conduct a small test fire in the middle of the area. If the fuel burns well, the group sends a...

Measure U Extension Committee Submits Signatures

The landmark measure put restrictions on where, when and how Watsonville could expand in an effort to protect the surrounding sloughs and farmland
17,623FansLike
8,845FollowersFollow