County issues evacuation orders for communities near CZU burn scar

0

Several communities in the San Lorenzo Valley and along the North Coast have been ordered to evacuate in anticipation of strong rains that could trigger debris flows near the CZU Lightning Complex burn scar.

The Santa Cruz County Sheriff’s Office began door-to-door outreach Saturday, contacting homes in “low-lying, high-risk” areas that had the highest potential for evacuation: most of Boulder Creek and Brookdale and a few areas near Ben Lomond and Felton.

Sunday morning’s evacuation orders included Swanton and the majority of residents off of Last Chance Trail. Evacuation orders were also issued for a few communities in southern San Mateo County.

In all, there were 319 addresses in Santa Cruz County that are considered low-lying, high-risk homes for debris flow, the County said in a press release.

Officials issued evacuation warnings Saturday morning after the National Weather Service (NWS) said that strong rainfall, 8-10 inches, was expected Sunday for several areas in Northern California, including the Santa Cruz Mountains.

The “atmospheric river,” NWS said, could produce “significant and life-threatening flash floods and mudslides, particularly over burn scar areas.”

Debris flows are fast-moving masses of mud, rocks, boulders, trees and sometimes homes or vehicles. They move quickly and are often deadly to those in their path. 

The County opened a shelter on Sunday morning at San Lorenzo Valley High School. If possible, the County asks residents to seek shelter with friends and families.

Residents are encouraged to look up their evacuation zone at community.zonehaven.com, and register landlines, cell phones or VoIP phones with CodeRED by visiting scr911.org and signing up for notifications, or texting SCR911 to 99411.

The only way to avoid debris flows is to move to safety prior to any debris flow event. 

When evacuating, the County says to follow these steps:  

  • Follow instructions from local officials, including for travel routes.  
  • Wear protective clothing and sturdy shoes.  
  • Take your emergency go-bag or disaster supply kit.  
  • Lock your home. 
  • Let others know when you left and where you are going.  
  • Make arrangements for pets and livestock, if necessary.  

In preparation for debris flow evacuations, the County opened a virtual Temporary Evacuation Point (TEP). Residents can call 831-454-2181 with questions regarding evacuations and resources.

The weather forecast anticipates high winds and the potential for downed trees. Residents should exercise caution when leaving their homes during the storm. For road conditions, visit sccroadclosure.com.

Those needing assistance with large animals should call Equine Evac at 831-708-8998.

Sunday’s evacuations mark the second time officials have asked residents to leave their homes because of possible debris flows in the aftermath of the CZU fires.

In January, less than half of residents that were asked to evacuate from the Santa Cruz Mountains did so, according to data reported to the Press Banner by the Boulder Creek Fire Department.

Union Leaders Say County Employees Ready to Strike

SANTA CRUZ—More than 100 County of Santa Cruz workers filled the County Supervisors chambers during the board’s bi-monthly meeting on Tuesday, where many of them demanded pay increases and other requests to highlight ongoing contract negotiations between their union and the County.

The workers, members of Service Employees International Union chapter 521 (SEIU), are also asking the County to make Juneteenth a paid holiday. The federal holiday commemorates June 19, 1865, the day that Black slaves were emancipated in the U.S.

County spokesman Jason Hoppin says that the County already offers its employees 13 paid holidays a year, which amounts to nearly three weeks. In addition, the County added Christmas Eve as a paid holiday, he says.

“Just 9 percent of employers offer Juneteenth as a paid holiday,” Hoppin said.

In addition, SEIU is asking for more employees to be able to telecommute, which union representatives say is a way to support climate action and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. 

During the meeting, SEIU 521 President Veronica Velasquez said that union members are ready to strike if their demands are not met.

Velasquez said that County workers have not seen a pay increase since 2019, a fact that is particularly irksome after they worked through the Covid-19 pandemic and the CZU Lightning Complex fires.

“Negotiations are going nowhere,” Velasquez said. “Employees are fed up, burned out and disrespected.”

Katie Williams, a public health nurse with the County’s communicable disease unit, agreed.

“We’re doing a lot more work with a lot less time and fewer people,” she said.

Alma Ruiz, a child support specialist for the Department of Child Support Services, says that offers from the union have garnered unacceptable responses from the County. County workers last year took a 7.5% pay cut, which she says amounts to 156 hours.

“Every economic proposal we placed on the table, the response has been a very insulting counter-offer,” she said.

Hoppin says that the union and County will meet again today for continued negotiations. Employees are working under a one-year “placeholder” contract during the aftermath of the CZU fires and the pandemic, he says.

SEIU members say that Latinx people are paid less than their white counterparts, an assertion Hoppin says is untrue.

“Pay and benefits are set by civil service rules and salary schedules negotiated among all labor groups,” he stated in an email. “The schedules are gender and color blind and largely set by seniority.”

Velasquez says that making climate change a part of contract negotiations could be an “unprecedented” move by a union.

“But we feel it is everybody’s responsibility to do something about climate change, and we can no longer delegate this to the experts and the federal government,” she said. “We need to take action.”

Ruiz says that allowing more employees to work from home—thus reducing greenhouse emissions and traffic—would align with a county pledge to be “carbon neutral” by 2030. 

Hoppin says that the County has one of the most progressive telework policies of any local government in the region.

“We understand the desire to work from home and support it, but at some point, if you are going to serve the public you will need to interact with the public,” he said.

Williams stressed that many employees have been working with the public for the past two years marked by twin calamities.

“Nobody shirked their duty and said, ‘hey we can’t come in because we’re working from home today,’” she said.

Pfizer Says Vaccine Is Highly Effective in Children Ages 5 to 11

By Aina J. Khan, The New York Times

Pfizer reported data Friday showing that its coronavirus vaccine had a 90.7% efficacy rate in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 in a clinical trial of children ages 5 to 11.

The company and its partner BioNTech submitted the information to the Food and Drug Administration, which was expected to release its own analysis of the data later in the day.

Children in the trial received a dose of 10 micrograms, one-third of the adult dose. Researchers said that the dosage was safe and that trial participants had seen only mild side effects.

Of 2,268 children in the trial, twice as many were given the vaccine as received a placebo. Sixteen children who received the placebo got COVID-19, compared with three who received the vaccine.

There were no cases of severe illness. All of the cases occurred in July or later, a time when the highly transmissible delta variant was spreading in the United States and globally, Pfizer said.

After the second shot, the children had levels of neutralizing antibodies at least equal to those of 16-to-25-year-old volunteers in another Pfizer-BioNTech trial. Although antibody levels are just one measure of the immune system’s response, experts have said such a finding would indicate that one-third strength was the proper dosage for young children.

Pfizer also reported that there were no cases of the heart conditions of myocarditis, which is inflammation of the heart muscle, or pericarditis, which is inflammation of the lining around the heart, in volunteers roughly three months after receiving the second dose. Both conditions have been tied to adult recipients of the vaccine, particularly younger men. Because the conditions are rare, it is unlikely that one of them would have occurred in a study size as small as Pfizer’s.

Studies have also shown that the risk of heart problems after COVID-19 is higher than after vaccination.

The FDA released the data before a Tuesday meeting at which the agency’s expert advisers will decide whether to recommend that the agency authorize the vaccine for children in this age group. Federal regulators have already made the vaccine available for those 12 and older.

The Biden administration has been eagerly promoting the prospect of protection for the 28 million children aged 5 to 11, promising that tens of thousands of pediatric or primary care offices, pharmacies, and school and rural health clinics will be ready to administer shots if regulators grant authorization. With the school year well underway, many parents are anxiously awaiting the development.

If the FDA grants authorization, distribution of the doses would still depend on signoff by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which sets vaccine policy. The CDC has scheduled a two-day meeting of its own advisory committee for Nov. 2 and 3. Federal officials have said they intend to ship 15 million doses to the states immediately if regulatory and health officials authorize the move.

About 17 million adolescents aged 12 to 15 became eligible for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine in May. A month ago, Pfizer and BioNTech said their vaccine was also safe and effective for young children but did not release any detailed clinical trial data.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

Biden Crafts a Climate Plan B: Tax Credits, Regulation and State Action

By Coral Davenport, The New York Times

WASHINGTON — After losing the centerpiece of his climate agenda just a week before heading to a major global warming summit, President Joe Biden intends to make the case that the United States has a new plan that will still meet its ambitions to sharply cut greenhouse gases that are warming the planet.

The administration’s strategy now consists of a three-pronged approach of generous tax incentives for wind, solar and other clean energy; tough regulations to restrict pollution coming from power plants and automobile tailpipes; and a slew of clean energy laws enacted by states.

An analysis released this week by Rhodium Group, a nonpartisan analysis firm, found that strategy could technically fulfill Biden’s ambitious pledge to cut the country’s emissions 50% from 2005 levels by 2030. The United States is historically the largest source of the pollution that is heating the planet.

But chances for success are slim; the approach faces significant legal, logistical and political challenges. The process of crafting regulations could take years, and the conservative-leaning Supreme Court could overrule them, or a future president could simply roll them back. And relying on states to amp up their clean energy laws just shifts the fight to statehouses for environmentalists and fossil fuel interests to battle it out on the local level.

“That mix of tax credits, and new federal regulations, and new state actions puts the target within reach. But there are a lot of ifs,” said John Larsen, an author of the Rhodium analysis. “You need states to up the ante on clean energy at a level they haven’t yet done. You need the Environmental Protection Agency to put regulations on every power plant in America in a way they haven’t yet done. And then you have to hope the Supreme Court doesn’t throw that out. Everything has to break in the right way.”

The White House fell back on the plan after its main hope to significantly cut emissions, a clean electricity program, was blocked by Sen. Joe Manchin III of West Virginia, a pivotal vote in an evenly divided Senate.

The clean electricity program would have rapidly cleaned up the electricity sector by rewarding power plants that switched from burning coal, oil and gas to wind, solar, nuclear and other clean energy, and penalizing those that do not switch. It was intended to push the nation’s electricity sector to generate 80% of its power from clean energy sources by 2030, from 40% now.

Manchin, who has financial ties to the coal industry and whose state also produces natural gas, has said he is opposed to any measure that would hurt coal and gas companies.

A major scientific report released in August concluded that countries must immediately shift away from burning fossil fuels to avoid a future of severe drought, intense heat waves, water shortages, devastating storms, rising seas and ecosystem collapse.

The deletion of a clean electricity program from a massive budget bill now being negotiated on Capitol Hill weakened the hand of Biden, who is set to arrive in Glasgow, Scotland, on Nov. 1 for a pivotal U.N. summit where he had hoped to reestablish U.S. leadership on the fight against climate change.

Speaking at a CNN Town Hall on Thursday night, Biden pledged that when he arrives in Scotland, “I’m presenting a commitment to the world that we will in fact get to net zero emissions on electric power by 2035 and net zero emissions across the board by 2050 or before, but we have to do so much, between now and 2030, to demonstrate what we’re going to do to get there.”

Accompanying the president to Scotland, in addition to a significant portion of his Cabinet, will be Biden’s top climate change advisers, John Kerry and Gina McCarthy, both veterans of the Obama administration. During that administration, Kerry and McCarthy traveled to multiple international climate negotiations, where Kerry promised that the United States would pass a tough climate law, which it never did, and McCarthy detailed tough pollution rules governing smokestacks and power plants, which were enacted but then rolled back by the Trump administration.

Biden is likely to present his Plan B to a skeptical audience in Glasgow.

“Biden has been forceful with what he says on climate change,” said Laurence Tubiana, France’s former climate change ambassador who is now the chief executive of the European Climate Foundation. “But credibility is a problem. There will still be a question mark — how can he deliver?”

Still, Biden does appear poised to deliver one of three major carbon dioxide-cutting policies.

The broad spending bill now before Congress includes about $300 billion in tax incentives for producers and purchasers of wind, solar and nuclear power, and for consumers who buy electric vehicles. The tax incentives would remain in place for a decade — a change from existing clean energy tax credit programs, which typically lapse after one to five years, although they are often renewed. It also includes $13.5 billion to construct charging stations for electric vehicles and promote the electrification of heavy-duty vehicles. It would spend $9 billion to update the electric grid, making it more conducive to transmitting wind and solar power, and $17.5 billion to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from federal buildings and vehicles.

That package would be the single largest federal expenditure to promote clean energy, and the Rhodium analysis found that it could lower pollution enough to meet one-third to one-half of Biden’s emissions reduction goals, cutting carbon dioxide emissions about 25% from 2005 levels by 2030.

Ron Wyden, D-Ore., who chairs the Senate Finance Committee, is the chief author of that clean energy tax credit package. If the legislation passes before the Glasgow summit ends Nov. 14, Wyden said he would fly to Scotland to deliver the message that the United States has enacted a law that will take a big bite out of its carbon dioxide emissions.

“The president will be able to say that this is the most far-reaching climate bill ever enacted by Congress,” Wyden said, although he conceded that the bar was low: The United States has never passed a major climate change law.

“This is the first-ever tax overhaul that ties cash incentives to actually reducing emissions, and it says, the more you reduce emissions, the bigger your savings,” Wyden said. “We think you’ll have an extraordinary increase in renewables and clean transportation.”

Larsen, the Rhodium analyst, agreed. “The U.S. has never had this foundation for long-term clean energy tax credits before,” he said. “This would give electric power utilities, car manufacturers and builders the certainty they’ve never had before.

“But they don’t get you to the president’s target on their own,” he said.

For that, the Rhodium analysis finds, the Environmental Protection Agency would need to release a suite of tough regulations aimed at the nation’s three main greenhouse polluters: cars, electric power plants, and oil and gas wells that leak methane, a potent heat-trapping gas.

While running the EPA under President Barack Obama, McCarthy helped craft the most ambitious climate rules that the United States had ever seen, aimed at reining in pollution from those three sources of pollution.

None of them remain in place today. The Supreme Court halted implementation of McCarthy’s rule to cut pollution from coal-fired power plants, and the Trump administration rolled back the rest.

“There was a lot of support and faith in the Obama administration when it did these regulations,” said Joseph Aldy, who served as one of Obama’s negotiators at a major 2009 climate summit in Copenhagen, Denmark. “But now there will be skeptics saying, ‘We’re worried about the next administration undoing what’s been done.’ The question is, how durable will this be legally and politically?”

Looming over that question is the shadow of former President Donald Trump, who relished dismantling Obama’s climate policies. The fossil fuel industry would almost certainly challenge new environmental regulations, which could end up before a Supreme Court with a conservative majority, including three justices appointed by Trump. The former president also appears to be weighing another run for the White House in 2024.

State action, which does not depend on the occupant of the White House, is an essential part of the national emissions strategy, Larsen said.

Already, 29 states have enacted their own versions of the clean electricity program that Biden had hoped to implement for the entire country. Led by California, several states have updated those laws to make them more ambitious. If many or most of those states enact laws designed to generate all of their electricity from zero-carbon sources by 2035 — the same target set nationally by Biden — it could significantly lower the nation’s carbon footprint.

Larsen pointed to a law just passed in Illinois that would phase out coal and gas-powered electricity by 2050.

But the continued passage of such legislation also depends on the makeup of statehouses — and some of the states with the most abundant renewable resources also have strong political opposition to such policies.

“If my state, the Sunshine State, had a clean energy standard, the whole U.S. would be much further along in meeting our clean energy goals,” said Rep. Kathy Castor, D-Fla., who chairs the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis. “But the electric utility industry in my state is against it.”

Still, Democrats will keep pushing, Castor said. “We’re going to do as much as we can,” she said, “and then we’ll wake up and do more.”

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

Watsonville Pilots Association Sues City Over Housing Project

WATSONVILLE—The Watsonville Pilots Association (WPA) has filed a lawsuit against the city of Watsonville over the City Council’s recent approval of a proposed 21-condo development across the street from Watsonville Municipal Airport.

The lawsuit (case number 21CV02343) claims the City undercut California Environmental Quality Act guidelines, the State Aeronautics Act and a court order stemming from previous litigation to make various zoning changes in order to push the project at 547 Airport Blvd. forward.

According to the suit, the City has failed to follow a court order from a previous lawsuit between the two parties some 10 years ago that said the municipality must incorporate the California Division of Aeronautics (CDOA) handbook into its general plan.

“[The City’s] repeated failure to comply with the State Aeronautics Act and incorporate the CDOA Handbook is a failure to proceed in a manner required by law and a failure to follow a mandatory duty,” the lawsuit states.

This failure, WPA has argued in court and at public meetings, poses a risk for both the pilots that fly to and from the airport and those that would eventually live in the proposed homes.

The City has not filed a response to the lawsuit, but Watsonville officials were scheduled to meet with the WPA and their lawyers in a settlement meeting on Wednesday.

City Attorney Alan Smith declined to comment on the meeting.

The Watsonville City Council approved the project 5-1 in August despite the threat of litigation from the WPA. Mayor Jimmy Dutra was the lone “no” vote. He said he was worried the developers—a family that has owned the property and the steel fabrication business there for at least two decades—were getting into an overwhelming legal battle against the WPA, which has several times successfully challenged the City in court.

That includes the aforementioned litigation from the last decade that nullified the City’s general plan update. In two rulings, a judge found that, among other things, Watsonville failed to adequately project population growth, provide mitigation measures for Highway 1 traffic and incorporate airport land use documents into the general plan, then called Watsonville Vista 2030.

Although the City has not yet updated its general plan with the needed handbooks, City staff said at the August meeting that the project does indeed meet the requirements in those documents.

But, City Attorney Smith explained at that meeting, the pilots contend that the court decision against the City’s 2030 general plan is retroactive, and that if the City continues to operate under the 2005 general plan, that it must be updated with the handbook requirements before the City can approve any construction around the airport.

The Watsonville City Council last month approved the use of $1.1 million in federal funding to update its general plan and other land use documents around the airport. That work is expected to get underway early next year.

Mobile Home Park Prevails: Residents Won’t See Rent Increase, for Now

WATSONVILLE—A Santa Cruz County Superior Court Judge on Oct. 14 sided with the residents of a mobile home park who had been battling a giant rent increase since 2017. 

Attorneys for the residents say the decision supports a County ordinance governing rent increases, and has broader implications countywide for residents of other mobile home parks when faced with similar increases.

The park, which has about 170 units, is owned by Pinto Lake Mobile Home Park LLC, and Roseville-based Waterhouse Management.

The issue began in 2017, when the residents of Pinto Lake Mobile Estates found notice of a special rent increase of $211—which for some was a 47% increase—buried on the third page of their annual increase.

County ordinance allows for a small annual rent increase to meet cost of living increases, and to impose special increases, if park owners can give valid reasons for them.

Resident Chris Girard says that he and other residents tried to negotiate with the owners, offering a smaller increase, from $40 to $100.

Those negotiations failed, and so the residents formed their own faction of the Golden State Manufactured Home Owners League (GSMOL) to battle the increase.

“We had to fight quite a bit,” said Girard, who served as president of the local chapter. “We got everyone in the park involved. We had giant meetings.”

Henry Cleveland, who was appointed by Santa Cruz County Supervisor Zach Friend to serve on the County’s Manufactured Mobile Homes Commission, estimates the residents collectively saved some $1.7 million by not having to pay the increase.

“This is money that got to stay in the community,” he said. “People got to stay in their homes.”

Residents organized and appealed under the County’s rent ordinances, and won at a subsequent hearing. Waterhouse appealed, and lost at trial after a judge agreed that residents had to be part of the suit. Waterhouse appealed, and the 6th District Court of Appeals referred the case back to Santa Cruz County.

In making the tentative ruling, Judge Timothy Volkmann was not deciding on the merits of the rent increase. Instead, he dismissed the case because Waterhouse did not include the park residents as “essential participants” in their lawsuit.

Tanya Ridino, Executive Director of Senior Citizens Legal Services (SCLS), which provided legal services in the case, says that, if the judge decided in the property owners’ favor, it would have made it easier for park owners to ignore rent control ordinances set out by local jurisdictions.

“It would have been a really bad thing for all mobile home residents,” she said. “It would have allowed the parks to massively increase rents for the lowest-income homeowners in Santa Cruz County.”

James Ballantine, the attorney who represented Waterhouse, said the County’s ordinance allows for rent increases based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI). But that does not account for how much the cost of living increases every year. As such, Waterhouse was not making a fair rate of return on the property.

“Over time if the park owner is only able to increase the rent a fraction of that CPI, as time goes on their revenues will increase less that the expenses increase,” he said. 

Ballantine says it seemed “burdensome” to have to name every resident of the park in the lawsuit, and that he believed that the GSMOL could have represented residents’ interest.

Jeneen Hill, the SCLS attorney who handled the case, says the organization devoted an unprecedented amount of resources to fighting the protracted battles. Hill reckons that she spent around 150 hours on the case.

Hill said she found it “disheartening” that Waterhouse seemed to be trying to extract every dollar they could from the residents, many of whom are low-income.

“There is so much money to be gained if they were to invalidate the ordinance, which is what they were trying to do,” she said. There is so much opportunity to take advantage of these communities.”

Ballantine says that Waterhouse has the option of asking for another special rent increase, and is looking at their options.

That comes as no surprise to Girard, who called the victory bittersweet.

“They can start all over again,” he said. “They can go for another special rent increase if they want. It’s going to happen again. Once you get involved, you don’t ever think it’s over.”

Escalante Named Santa Cruz Interim Chief of Police

Santa Cruz Police Deputy Chief Bernie Escalante has been appointed to serve as the Interim Chief, effective Oct. 30.

A Santa Cruz native, Escalante is a 25-year veteran of the Santa Cruz Police Department, having started his career as a community service officer in 1996.

Since then, he served as a patrol officer, sergeant, detective and tactical team leader, among other assignments. He was promoted to lieutenant in 2009, where he managed the Investigations Division and was the Commander of the Emergency Services Unit Tactical Team. He was also the primary lieutenant in the Neighborhood Policing Unit. 

He was appointed to the rank of Deputy Chief in February 2020.

“Interim Chief Escalante will bring to the position a deep knowledge of department operations and officers and a sharp focus on serving the needs of the community,” said Interim City Manager Rosemary Menard in a press release. “He brings a track record of results, particularly in investigations and neighborhood policing, and I am confident in his leadership as he takes on this critical role for the City.” 

In a press release, Escalante stated that he plans to, “hit the ground running” in trying to fill in for outgoing Police Chief Andy Mills.

“My first priorities will be building our staffing and expanding on the trusting community relationships and innovative problem-solving brought to Santa Cruz by Chief Mills,” he stated. “I am constantly impressed by the dedication and professionalism of our law enforcement team here in Santa Cruz, and I am honored to lead this dynamic department as an Interim Chief.”

Escalante grew up on the west side of Santa Cruz. He went to Santa Cruz High, where he played football, basketball and baseball. He earned a bachelor’s degree in social science from San Francisco State, and continued to play baseball. Escalante went on to get a master’s degree in law enforcement and public safety leadership from the University of San Diego. He completed the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) Law Enforcement Command College in 2014.

Escalante will serve in the role of Interim Chief until a permanent appointee is named, which is expected to occur following the appointment of a permanent City Manager, city spokeswoman Elizabeth Smith said.

Pressure Mounts on UC System to Reach Agreement with Lecturer Workforce, Strikes Loom

BY MIKHAIL ZINSHTEYN, CalMatters

With the threat of multiple strikes this fall that could cancel instruction for a third of undergraduate students, the University of California has inched closer to meeting some demands of its more than 6,000 lecturers. It’s a move that coincides with increased pressure from state lawmakers to resolve the labor dispute that has been going on for more than two years.

The lecturers say the UC’s latest offer from last Monday — which promises increased job security — is a step in the right direction. But they’re not pleased yet because it falls way short of the salary bumps they seek and includes other loopholes they find troubling. Chief among them? The new job stability provisions would kick in next summer, creating the possibility for mass dismissal of current lecturers, the union representing lecturers said. 

There’s no “ulterior motive,” said Letitia Silas, head of labor relations for the UC, the state’s third-largest employer, in an interview with CalMatters.

But now there may be signs of resolution for the two sides. For the first time since June, the lecturer union and UC officials will meet Friday to discuss the latest contract proposal.

“We believe that our comprehensive package proposal is fair and competitive, including our proposal on wages,” said Silas, adding that the UC’s latest offer “does respond to the issues that the union has raised.”

It’s a meeting lecturers have sought since last week and threatened to strike over if they had not gotten it. Still, another strike may occur later in the fall if the lecturer union doesn’t get the contract terms it wants. Hundreds of tenured and tenure-track professors of the UC have pledged to cancel classes in solidarity with lecturers.

“I do believe it’s the UC administration’s fault for not coming to a resolution sooner, and for not ending this impasse,” said Assemblymember Ash Kalra, a Democrat from San Jose and chair of the Assembly committee on labor and employment.

He and 11 other assemblymembers have signed a letter addressed to UC President Michael Drake that went out Tuesday, urging him to “prioritize labor peace and job stability for lecturers.” Other lawmakers have issued their own letters with the same sentiment, such as Dr. Richard Pan, a former UC faculty member who’s now a Senate Democrat representing Sacramento.

But there may be limits to mutual understanding. The UC denies that lecturers are being pushed out of their positions to make way for cheaper instructors, a chief union allegation.

Asked whether lecturers leave of their own volition, Silas, the head of UC’s labor relations, said “yes, some do.” Does that imply most leave for other reasons, such as being pushed out? Silas didn’t directly answer that.

“The term ‘pushed out’ is a mischaracterization,” Silas said. “The university has proposed to continue the dialogue with the union … if there does appear to be an issue of a trend, and to address those things with the union.”

For more than two years UC-AFT, the union representing lecturers, has been at a standstill with the UC Office of the President over a new labor contract that provides them with greater job stability.

A CalMatters investigation showed that a quarter of lecturers — instructors typically with doctorates who provide about a third of the instruction undergraduates at the UC receive — don’t come back annually. Though the data CalMatters obtained doesn’t show why lecturers churn at rates higher than other education workers, a key grievance among them is that the UC doesn’t offer continuous work. Instead, most lecturers have to reapply for their jobs every quarter or year and rarely know if they’ll have a job after their short contracts expire.

Core to the union’s demands is a promise to have lecturers evaluated so that their bosses can make informed hiring and dismissal decisions. Such a review system doesn’t exist at the UC for most lecturers, though it does at the larger California State University.

For some students, the lack of an evaluation for lecturers is perplexing.

“I want my teacher to be someone that knows what they’re doing,” said Sofia Stuart, a second-year biology major at UCLA who took part in a protest organized by lecturers last week. Without lecturer reviews, the UC could just hire inexperienced lecturers or renew ineffective ones, she said.

Natalie Lim, another UCLA student at the protest, held a sign calling for multi-year contracts for lecturers. “I want my institution to have morals and it doesn’t really feel like that right now,” she said. 

The letter from lawmakers zeroes in on the lack of an evaluation process.

“By refusing to evaluate lecturers or use a merit-based retention process, the University also fails to foster a skilled teaching faculty, instead punishing experience and letting excellent faculty go arbitrarily,” the letter said. “Sadly, UC students are being cheated of educational continuity and dependable mentorship.”

Job stability and evaluations

The latest UC offer would go a long way to assuring more job stability for lecturers, but with key caveats. 

The system now proposes three types of contracts of increasing length that add up to six years: a one-year contract, then a two-year contract and finally a three-year contract. That’s more stability than the UC’s previous offer of two one-year contracts followed by two two-year contracts. None of those came with any promise of evaluations.

The UC is also proposing a formal review before the three-year contract, the first such offer in these negotiations and a big win for lecturers. But UC is proposing just an “assessment” before the two-year contract. And the union doesn’t really know what that means. Lecturers don’t have clarity on what factors upon which a review would be based. 

The UC’s summary of its latest offer last Monday mentioned a review process after three years but not after one.  

Silas, the UC labor relations chief, disputes that lecturers after their first year wouldn’t get an evaluation based on their teaching ability. “I’ll have to say that that’s probably an oversight on my part,” she said, in response to a question about why the summary letter omitted a reference to a first-year review.

Because the average duration for a lecturer at the UC is two years, having job security earlier in their tenures would likely go a long way to lowering lecturer churn. 

The formal offer’s language on a review after the first year “doesn’t even come close to the robust evaluation after the third year,” said Mia McIver, president of the lecturer union and herself a lecturer.

But even the new review process after three years comes with asterisks that alarm the union. One says that a lecturer who passes their evaluation and is owed a three-year contract can still be hired for just a year if the department thinks the class the lecturer is teaching won’t be around the following year.

McIver said that may look fair, but what happens if the department decides to keep the class anyway? The lecturer still won’t be able to have the class back, she added. 

here’s less movement on matters of pay. The union wants bigger raises than what the UC is offering, which is about 4% in the first year of the five-year contract and 3% annually thereafter. Other lecturers would get additional bumps and extra merit pay. The lecturers say the UC can offer more across the board, citing the 5% increase in state support the recent state budget sent the UC’s way.

The UC argues it offers some of the best pay to lecturers among top research universities. “In October 2019, UC systemwide’s average salary on an annualized basis was $71,068 for pre-six lecturers and $92,693 for continuing lecturers,” wrote Ryan King, a UC spokesperson. 

The UC offer on pay

But that number is misleading: More than half of lecturers are part-time, according to a CalMatters review of UC data the lecturer union shared, meaning most lecturers don’t get that annualized pay. And many lecturers work one term but not the next. A CalMatters analysis of wage data shows that lecturers on average make close to $33,000, while more permanent academic faculty make three to six times as much.

Another major issue is how much a lecturer is paid per class. Basically, lecturers get paid a percentage of an annual salary based on the “workload” of each class. The union is upset that the same classes can be counted as, for example, one-seventh of full-time work or one-ninth depending on the campus. They want consistency throughout the system. 

For lecturers, those fractions matter: For one, the higher the percentage of full-time work, the greater the pay. Also, health benefits can kick in at around 44% or 50% of full-time work, depending on how many hours a lecturer works in the year. So every extra fraction of workload goes a long way to determining if a lecturer has health insurance through the UC.

“The University of California should be a responsible employer and provide accessible, affordable, quality health benefits and a living wage for all of its employees so that no UC employee must rely on public assistance,” wrote Sen. Pan. His letter noted that some UC lecturers rely on Medi-Cal because they’re ineligible for UC health insurance. 

Will lecturers strike?

McIver, the union president, doesn’t know. She said they’d rather have a settled contract. “The things that we need to cross the finish line of this contract are not onerous for our employer,” MicIver said. As far as the union is concerned, the ball is in UC’s court.

Friday’s bargaining meeting with the UC “is a positive step,” McIver said. But the union’s lecturers will decide whether they like the offer the UC is presenting, so it’s impossible to gauge how close to a resolution both sides are. 

“We need our lecturers,” Silas said. “We appreciate and value our lecturers.”

No strike about the contract terms can happen until a state-led labor mediation process runs its course. Both sides are in mediation, but Friday’s meeting is independent of that state-led process. 

County Selects Aranda as Artist of the Year

The County of Santa Cruz has named multi-media artist Guillermo “Yermo” Aranda as the 2021 Artist of the Year.

Every year the Arts Commission presents the award to a local artist for their achievements in performing, visual or literary arts, as well as their contributions to overall cultural enrichment in the county.

Aranda, originally from San Diego, comes from a family of artists, craftsmen and musicians. He studied at San Diego City College and San Diego State, and co-founded a number of organizations and projects, including the murals of Chicano Park in 1973—now a National Historic Landmark.

After moving to Watsonville in 1983, Aranda attended Cabrillo College and Cal State Monterey Bay. Since then, he has made a name for himself through his various community projects in Santa Cruz County, especially in Watsonville. He co-founded the Whitehawk Dancers, a cultural organization offering visual and performing arts to youth that is influential in the area to this day.

Aranda currently teaches art locally and throughout the state, working with students as well as inmates at a state penitentiary. He has displayed over 80 murals throughout Santa Cruz and Monterey counties, all of which were the result of youth art projects.

“We often call him ‘Maestro,’ the teacher,” said Raymon Cancino, CEO of Community Bridges. “He’s really served as a mentor for other muralists throughout the community. That speaks highly to his values—not to be selfish, but instead be inclusive and share his passion with others.”

Cancino has worked on various projects with Aranda, including the restoration of one of his murals at Community Bridges’ headquarters at 519 Main St. He says that Aranda’s work has resonated with him over the years.

“He was one of the few artists putting people like me, people of color, in murals,” Cancino said. “I started seeing myself in art because of artists like him. Being immigrants, you often feel left out. But once you see symbols, images that are part of your heritage and culture … that perception shifts.”

For Aranda, giving back to his community, especially to young artists, is a major accomplishment.

“I’ve had a lot of young artists say, ‘Thank you for the inspiration you’ve given me; everywhere I go I see your work,’” Aranda said. “That’s very rewarding. I like to think I’ve contributed to some artistic visibility around town.”

Watsonville City Councilmember Rebecca Garcia was a teacher at Watsonville High School in 1989 when she worked with Aranda to bring a mural to campus. The project hit a series of roadblocks, the first being the Loma Prieta Earthquake, which struck only months after Aranda agreed to the project.

Then it came down to funding, which was eventually secured with help from the City of Watsonville. In 1990 things started up again, only to be halted by school staff and others claiming that the mural was “too Hispanic” and falsely claiming it contained gang imagery.

“I had to be the one to tell [Aranda] to stop,” Garcia said. “It was awful.”

Eventually, Aranda and his students completed the 40-foot long mural, entitled “Sueños” (Dreams) in October 1991. But last year, the mural was erroneously painted over during a refurbishment of the school’s cafeteria. This led to a repaint, once again under Aranda’s supervision, with help from a handful of his original painters and current Watsonville High students.

A short film by local company Calavera Media entitled “Painter of Dreams” chronicled the repainting of the mural. It screened earlier this year with the Watsonville Film Festival and is scheduled for the Big Sur Film Festival in 2022.

Aranda will be awarded at a live-streamed performance on Oct. 23 at 3pm, where he will speak about his work. The Whitehawk Dancers will also perform. 

Aranda said he is honored to be chosen by the County and the greater arts community for his work, and is excited at the new creative energy that is growing in the Pajaro Valley.

“It’s an exciting time,” Aranda said. “It’s an important time for all of us … I hope to see even more focus on the arts in South County. I really look forward to it.”

Click here for information about the event and the Zoom link.

Local Agencies’ Conservation Efforts Hope to Help Coho Salmon Populations Rebound

They’re an average of eight pounds, with distinct pink scales, and in this area, they’re officially endangered. Local coho salmon have declined more than 95% from their historic population level, according to the Center for Biological Diversity.

The main culprit is the degradation of spawning grounds, such as low river levels due to water being diverted for human use, or dams that block the way upstream. But two recent initiatives—focused on waterways along the North Coast of Santa Cruz County—have sought to help turn the tide.

In one, the Sempervirens Fund, the state’s oldest land trust, spearheaded the removal of an old dam along Mill Creek in the wake of the CZU Lightning Complex fires. In the other, the Santa Cruz Water Department rejigged its water-taking portfolio to allow more liquid to move through Laguna Creek.

The Mill Creek Dam removal story is about breathing life into a beloved watershed, environmentalists say.

“Watershed health is vital to redwood forests,” said Matt Shaffer, Sempervirens Fund’s marketing director. “Watersheds are really land.”

Four conservation organizations own the 8,852-acre San Vicente Redwoods: the Peninsula Open Space Trust, Save the Redwoods League, Land Trust of Santa Cruz County and the Sempervirens Fund, which notes the entire area was consumed by flames, last year.

Davenport’s water lines were also destroyed, including the portion that ran across the top of an old dam on Mill Creek.

The San Vicente watershed is renowned for its karst formations, where dissolving bedrock has left sinkholes and caves, which causes water to rise up from underground. Where Mill Creek empties into the Pacific Ocean at Davenport Beach (via San Vicente Creek), there’s no sandbar or estuary, which means easy access for salmon and steelhead trout, Shaffer explained.

“The conditions are exceptionally good for this watershed to be a good place for spawning,” he said. “It’s very cold water, which is great for salmon. It’s heavy flowing even in the summer.”

However, there’s been a dam in the way.

It’s unclear when Mill Creek Dam was built or what it was supposed to be used for, but it was likely built to serve a rock-mining town called Bella Vista at the turn of the century.

The earliest reference to it was as the “old dam,” in documents about another, further upstream, Shaffer said.

“The dam never worked as intended,” he said. “It was immediately defunct.”

But for more than a century, it blocked fish from passing.

“It could have failed at any time and fallen apart, which would have been a different kind of problem,” he said.

Over the last decade, the Sempervirens Fund installed 13 different wood structures in the creek downstream, to provide salmon with a place to deposit their eggs.

“They capture downflowing debris and create these sandbars,” he said. “It also helps to create a safe haven.”

The Santa Cruz Portland Cement Company started in Davenport in 1906 and later became part of CEMEX, Inc. When CEMEX sold the land on which the dam sits, it kept the water rights—which includes the pipes. So, after the CZU Complex destroyed Davenport’s water infrastructure, Sempervirens saw an opportunity to take ecological action. It asked the company to change the water pipeline’s path.

“The pipe has already been rerouted,” Shaffer said. “That happened very quickly in December, last year.”

In March, Sempervirens Fund got a $550,000 Open Rivers Fund grant from the Resources Legacy Fund, supported by The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, which was established by Hewlett-Packard co-founder William Redington Hewlett and his wife Flora Lamson Hewlett.

“That set us on a course to get all the work together and get the dam removed,” Shaffer said, noting they had to race against the clock before winter storm season started.

Prior to the dam removal, the Amah Mutsun Land Trust, an initiative of the Amah Mutsun Tribal Band, an Indigenous organization representing the descendants of native people brought to Santa Cruz and San Juan Bautista missions, invited UCLA researchers to study salmon DNA in the creek.

“The salmon were an important food source for Indigenous people in this area prior to colonization,” said Sara French, the organization’s director of development. “Indigenous people had ceremonies to honor the salmon and had annual ceremonies to call the salmon back each year.”

Shaffer says he’s learned plenty from the way the Amah Mutsun Land Trust approaches conservation. French explained they’re blending contemporary resource management practices with Indigenous ecological knowledge. That means returning to traditional practices like selective harvesting and targeting medium-sized fish instead of just harvesting the big ones.

“The UCLA study is using a cutting-edge tool to track the presence or absence of salmon, and their response to the restoration work that’s happening there,” she said.

Work began with professional ecologists moving about 400 plants, like ferns and berry bushes, elsewhere, according to Shaffer. Next, teams went “e-fishing”—meaning they used an electric wand to stun fish so they could be relocated downstream, he said. And on Sept. 21, small and large excavators moved in to do the heavy lifting.

Crews tried to pump water out of the creek so they could get at the dam but were challenged by the karst system continually replenishing the waterway. Eventually, they made enough progress to attack the old pipe and other material forming the barrier.

“They were actually able to begin to break apart the dam wall,” Shaffer said. “We had to move quickly and get going.”

It took about 90 minutes from the first shovel hitting the top of the dam to eliminate it from the ecosystem.

“It looks like nothing, which is exactly what it’s supposed to look like,” he said. “There’s no way to tell that there was ever a dam there.”

Removing the dam and unlocking the upstream sediment was the missing puzzle piece to create perfect conditions for coho spawning, according to Shaffer.

“It’s exceptionally rewarding to be part of this moment in history,” he said. “It’s a historic moment for a very important watershed in the region.”

French says it’s exciting to see progress like this made.

“We are all about restoring pre-colonization conditions,” she said. “These sorts of steps are really important to restoring the natural way of things in the ecosystem.”

Now it’s up to the salmon.

But just a few waterways south, at Laguna Creek, utility officials announced some early success in the wake of another habitat-restoration initiative.

While coho babies hadn’t been spotted in the Laguna Creek lagoon since 2005, that changed in 2020. Now, biologists have recorded 2-year-old coho there, this year.

Chris Berry, watershed compliance manager with the Santa Cruz Water Department, said it was nice to see the City’s voluntary mitigation efforts working.

“Laguna Creek used to be one of the city’s primary drinking water sources,” he said. “The Water Department’s operations have changed a lot.”

It decided to rely less on water from Laguna Creek and draw more from places like the Loch Lomond reservoir, in order to pump the millions of gallons of water it delivers to 98,000 customers, every day.

It used to divert about 6.5 cubic feet per second from Laguna Creek during winter.

“Now we generally take none unless it is a wet year where there is enough water to meet fish needs,” Berry said, adding the lagoon at the outflow lets salmon bulk up before heading out to sea. “It’s a rough world out there in the ocean.”

Juvenile coho documented in recent surveys were 16 to 19 centimeters long, with coloring indicating they were in the early stage of smolting; this suggested they were about to leave the lagoon and become part of the marine environment, utility officials said in a release.

French explained that, because she lives in Santa Cruz, drawing a bath for her daughter has provided teachable moments on the topic of salmon ecology.

Sometimes her daughter, who is now 4, would ask mom to add extra water.

“I say, ‘Nope. We can’t fill it up more. We have to leave it for the salmon,’” she said, adding the message about conserving North Coast streams seems to be sinking in. “She talks about the salmon all the time.”

County issues evacuation orders for communities near CZU burn scar

debris flows
Several communities in the San Lorenzo Valley and along the North Coast have been ordered to evacuate in anticipation of strong rains that could trigger debris flows near the CZU Lightning Complex burn scar. The Santa Cruz County Sheriff’s Office began door-to-door outreach Saturday, contacting homes in "low-lying, high-risk" areas that had the highest potential for evacuation: most of Boulder...

Union Leaders Say County Employees Ready to Strike

More than 100 Santa Cruz workers filled the County Supervisors chambers, where many demanded pay increases and other requests

Pfizer Says Vaccine Is Highly Effective in Children Ages 5 to 11

The Biden administration has been eagerly promoting the prospect of protection for the 28 million children aged 5 to 11

Biden Crafts a Climate Plan B: Tax Credits, Regulation and State Action

The United States has a new plan that will still meet its ambitions to sharply cut greenhouse gases that are warming the planet

Watsonville Pilots Association Sues City Over Housing Project

Lawsuit claims the City undercut California Environmental Quality Act guidelines, the State Aeronautics Act and a court order involving zoning changes

Mobile Home Park Prevails: Residents Won’t See Rent Increase, for Now

A Santa Cruz County Superior Court Judge sided with residents who had been battling a large rent increase since 2017

Escalante Named Santa Cruz Interim Chief of Police

Bernie Escalante
Santa Cruz Police Deputy Chief Bernie Escalante has been appointed to serve as the Interim Chief, effective Oct. 30. A Santa Cruz native, Escalante is a 25-year veteran of the Santa Cruz Police Department, having started his career as a community service officer in 1996. Since then, he served as a patrol officer, sergeant, detective and tactical team leader, among other...

Pressure Mounts on UC System to Reach Agreement with Lecturer Workforce, Strikes Loom

The threat of multiple strikes this fall could cancel instruction for a third of undergraduate students attending University of California institutions

County Selects Aranda as Artist of the Year

Guillermo “Yermo” Aranda co-founded a number of organizations and projects, including the murals of Chicano Park in 1973, now a National Historic Landmark

Local Agencies’ Conservation Efforts Hope to Help Coho Salmon Populations Rebound

Coho babies hadn’t been spotted in the Laguna Creek lagoon since 2005, but biologists have recorded 2-year-old coho there, this year
17,623FansLike
8,845FollowersFollow