Two Years After CZU: Still Tangled in Red Tape

When we last spoke in March, Bonny Doon resident Ann McKenzie, whose home burned down in the CZU Lightening Complex fires, was waiting on the county permits so she could start rebuilding her home—and life—after the fires.   

Not much has changed. 

McKenzie is going on her third year of living without a permanent home. She shares an RV with her husband on the property where their home once stood, and she expects it will be nearly another year before they are able to move into their rebuilt home.  

One of the most frustrating parts, says McKenzie, is that they haven’t even been able to break ground. That’s due to the permitting process, which she says has been slow and tedious. McKenzie and her husband originally applied to get pre-clearance permits on April 14, 2021. They finally received them in May of 2022, over a year after they started the process.

McKenzie is now waiting on different permits—and so are the majority of CZU fire survivors.

Two years after the fires, 187 permits are still being processed, and the county has issued 152 pre-clearances

Out of the 911 homes that were destroyed in the fires, only 11 have been rebuilt.  

That leaves a gap of almost 600 homes that are not currently in the process of rebuilding legally. The remaining homeowners could still apply for permits, but in March, Good Times spoke with multiple people who were fed up with the lengthy permitting process—after living for two years in tents or mobile homes, in many cases—and admitted they planned to rebuild illegally, without permits. 

County officials say the county has tried to pare down the process as much as possible, by cutting permitting costs, setting up the Office of Response Recovery as a resource to help homeowners rebuild, and hosting informational town halls to help with the permitting process. 

As for why only 11 homes have been reconstructed, a county official speculates that contractor scarcity and supply chain issues could be to blame for the large discrepancy between people with permits in hand and finalized homes. CZU fire survivors are looking at higher residential construction costs, a labor shortage problem in construction and building material shortages. 

McKenzie’s story illustrates another reason: that even after all pre-clearance permits are issued, there’s still lag time to receive the other necessary permits.

After pre-clearances, owners like McKenzie submit applications for their dwelling units building permit, which includes construction documents, geotechnical engineering report, along with any other required technical material. 

McKenzie’s designers submitted those additional permits to 4Leaf, the county’s permitting agency, on July 29. 

But to her dismay and frustration, 4Leaf notified her that the Single Family Dwelling permit must be submitted separately from the Additional Dwelling Unit permit, a detail she says no one mentioned beforehand. Her designers are still separating the documents. 

The whole permitting process was riddled with small (and not-so-small) setbacks like this one, according to McKenzie. 4Leaf has a processing timeline of 10 days, but McKenzie says the reality tends to be closer to a few weeks, and even sometimes a month.  

McKenzie’s story is not unique, especially because the areas hit the hardest by the fires were in the more rural parts of Santa Cruz County. Bonny Doon, Ben Lomand and other areas of the Santa Cruz Mountains were home to the majority of the 911 houses that were burned during the fires. 

Those communities have struggled the most to get up to code, according to Michael Renner, Executive Director of 4Leaf. Pre-clearances take into consideration fire access, environmental health-sewage disposal and potential geologic hazards. But the requirements to receive those permits have changed in the time that these more rural communities developed, and many people have lived in the area’s homes for generations.  

McKenzie just hopes that she can get all the permits soon—as the rainier months loom, she knows getting the foundation done as soon as possible will be crucial, so that construction can continue throughout winter.  

The day she does break ground, McKenzie plans on celebrating—even though it marks the start of another months-long journey,  

“I’m gonna have a ceremony and a ribbon cutting, and I’m gonna stand there with a shovel,” she says. 


Read More: Two Years After CZU

Rethinking Wildfire Prevention

Grand Jury Report Says the County Needs to Step Up Its Plan for Removing Vegetation that Increases Wildfire Risk

Lasers, Mushrooms and Other Innovations Help Heal the Local Landscape

Coastal Commission Stifles RV Ordinance—Again

The City of Santa Cruz’s Oversized Vehicle Ordinance (OVO) is once again in limbo. 

At its July 14 meeting, the California Coastal Commission agreed to review the OVO following a Coastal Commission Staff Addendum that states the ordinance would have a “substantial” impact on public access to the area’s beaches.

“By taking that action, the Commission took jurisdiction over the coastal permit application for the project,” California Coastal Commission Coastal Program Analyst, Kiana Ford, wrote to GT in an email. 

The OVO was passed in November 2021 by the Santa Cruz City Council in a 5-2 vote, with councilmembers Sandy Brown and Justin Cummings dissenting. It prohibits any vehicle 20 feet or longer, 8 feet or taller and 7 feet or wider from parking on city streets between the hours of midnight and 5am. Parking permits for up to 72 hours are also available to purchase, but only for neighborhood residents.

While the Coastal Commission initially did not find any substantial issue with the OVO, the recent staff addendum followed an appeal filed by local individuals and organized groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union and Santa Cruz Cares.

“This ordinance is very clumsy,” says Reggie Meisler, cofounder of Santa Cruz Cares. “It’s developed by people who want to push the unhoused out of the city.” 

Santa Cruz Cares was founded last November in response to the OVO. Their appeal—which was filed in May—contested one particular part of the ordinance which calls for a 24-hour, no-parking oversized vehicle buffer zone within 100 feet of “crosswalks, intersections, boulevard stop signs, official electric flashing devices and approaches to any traffic signals.”

The addendum argued the city already implements a 20-foot no parking buffer zone in these areas. It states if the 24-hour, 100-foot ban was to take effect, it would eliminate “parking options for oversized vehicles on 28 miles (at least) of City coastal zone streets (a 54% loss of such parking areas).” This is a significant reduction in coastal access—as mandated by the Coastal Act and Local Coastal Program, two sets of rules that dictate what local governments can do around the state’s beaches—for all oversized vehicles, including tourist RVs, the addendum states.

“If the City intends to continue to pursue that buffer parking restriction, then they are going to need to develop data to support it,” writes Ford. 

However, city officials say the 100-foot zone is already part of California policy. 

“It’s a public works issue,” explains Lee Butler, the city’s planning and community development director.

He cites the California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) Highway Design Manual, which calls for a sight distance of 100 feet while stopping at speeds of 15 miles per hour.

“The issue is regarding sight distance and safety around those issues,” he says. 

Ford writes that the next step is for Coastal Commission staff to “evaluate the City Coastal permit application in light of the Coastal Act and the LCP” and then develop a recommendation on it. 

“We will continue to work with the city on these issues as we develop a recommendation,” Ford says. 

The recent ruling is the latest obstacle the city has faced in trying to rework its rules around where, when and for how long RVs can park.

In 2015, the city council approved an ordinance—commonly referred to as the “RV ban”—that halted oversized vehicle parking in selected areas between the hours of 8pm and 8am. But that rule was overturned by the Coastal Commission a year later, following an appeal from local advocates for people experiencing homelessness.

As it did in last month’s ruling, the commission determined that the 2015 ordinance restricted coastal access.

“I continue to tell city staff that the resources we are investing [in the OVO] are not going to make a darn bit of difference,” Brown tells GT. “It’s really focused on appeasing a narrow constituency, I believe.” 

She says that the OVO’s enforcement-based approach does nothing to address issues of safe parking or even why people are living out of their vehicles in the first place. Instead, she believes it only further continues the poverty cycle many residents living out of their vehicles already face.

“Without alternatives, people will be ticketed, towed and possibly lose their survival vehicle, which results in more people on the street,” she says. 

Difficult Road

“We create a system where we don’t give people a chance to better their situation because they’re facing constant criminalization,” says Stacey Falls. 

Falls, a teacher at Santa Cruz High School for the last 17 years, is one of the citizen appellants to the OVO. After being served an eviction notice from their rental home of 11 years, she and her husband lived out of their RV from April 2019 until March of this year.

Falls considers herself and her husband two of the lucky ones. When they were panicking over where to park their vehicle both during the day and at night, a friend who owns a home came to their aid and offered to let them park it in the backyard. 

“We ended up buying a house in March,” says Falls, who believes the only reason they were able to save money is by living in an RV without the worry of harassment.

Even so, Falls says they received a cease and desist letter from the City of Santa Cruz and had to prove to officials they were within the law on their friend’s private property.

“My problem with the OVO is that people pushing it don’t understand the desperation most renters are feeling,” she says. “They can’t understand why somebody might resort to living in an RV and aren’t accommodating to this alternative form of housing in this crazy expensive city that’s now the second-hardest rental market in the country.”

The Coastal Commission Staff Addendum also notes that individuals who use oversized vehicles “constitute an environmental justice community.” It’s a growing concern as climate change progresses and communities are displaced like in 2020 during the CZU Lightning Complex, which forced more than 25,000 people to evacuate their homes.

The staff report says the OVO contains language for the city to open more safe parking areas, but lacks specific language as to when and where they will be opened, and how many spaces could be available.

In her emailed response to GT, Ford says this will have a crucial impact on the Coastal Commission’s decision. 

“We believe that this aspect of the city’s proposal needs to be further fleshed out for the Commission to properly consider the program as a whole,” she writes.

The City of Santa Cruz currently operates two safe-parking sites exclusively for overnight parking. The first is Lot 4, between Lincoln and Cathcart streets and the second is an emergency lot at the Santa Cruz Police Station. 

“We have the ability to open up various other locations as well, but haven’t had the demand,” states Butler.

Still, he says the city is working on opening a third tier to their safe-parking program. Located in front of the Armory, this will operate as an all-day lot that will provide inhabitants with 24-hour parking.

“We have a contract approved with the Association of Faith Communities and the Free Guide to operate a 24-7 facility,” he says. “It will also provide services to connect individuals to housing, county services and benefits they might be eligible for.” 

He says authorities are hoping to have it operating “within a month or so.”

But OVO opponents believe real progress can only be made by looking at the issue in an entirely different way.

“I do get it, there are some negative impacts of having RVs parking on the street,” Falls admits. “But we can mitigate those negative impacts by actually having support and infrastructure without criminalizing people.” 

Council Adds Hotel Tax Increase to November Ballot

Roughly one month after a sales tax increase failed to pass by a mere 50 votes, the Santa Cruz City Council approved plans to once again ask voters to increase taxes—this time on stays at hotels and short-term rentals—in order to provide the city with additional revenue officials say it needs to offset a looming budget deficit.

In a unanimous vote at its Aug. 9 meeting, the council placed a transient occupancy tax (TOT) hike on the Nov. 8 ballot. If approved, patrons staying at hotels, motels, inns and other commercial lodging facilities will see the TOT percentage increase from 11% to 12%. Taxes for those staying in short-term rentals would rise three percentage points to 14%.

The city has not increased its TOT rates since 2013.

The city says the increase could bring in around $1.38 million annually to the general fund. It would go into effect at the start of the new year if approved by voters.

It will cost the city between $91,402 and $146,244 to place the item on the ballot.

The measure, named Measure P, was brought forth by the council’s ad-hoc budget and revenue committee spearheaded by Mayor Sonja Brunner, Vice-Mayor Martine Watkins and councilmember Sandy Brown. Brunner said that the committee saw the tax as a way to use the city’s large tourism industry as a revenue source to fund city services.

The new TOT rates would bring the city in alignment with the County of Santa Cruz, which in the June election received approval from voters to increase the rates for hotels and short-term rentals in the unincorporated parts of the county.

The fact that the county’s increase was overwhelmingly approved—roughly 70% of voters elected to increase the TOT rates—was a factor in the committee’s decision to bring the measure before the council, Brunner said.

“It creates a fair and leveled playing field across the region,” Brunner said. “It also helps to ensure that visitors and tourists pay their fair share for city services.”

Brown said that the city had previously weighed bringing a TOT increase before voters in 2019, but backed off the next year because of the pandemic.

“It’s been 10 years since the TOT has been raised,” Brown said. “Given the challenges that the hotel industry has faced, and that history, this is a very measured proposal moving forward.”

Santa Cruz County Chamber of Commerce CEO Casey Beyer was one of four people who spoke about the measure at the meeting. He said that while the chamber does not oppose the increase, they do question the timing.

“There’s a need to get additional revenue streams, we get that. We understand that the city has to find revenue to provide city services that the community wants,” he said. “My [question is] did you do any outreach to the hotel industry before making this decision, and, if not, I would encourage you to before you put this on the ballot that you have that engagement … It’s critically important that they be a part of the conversation.”

Brunner said that she, along with city staff, spoke to “a couple” of hoteliers, but admitted that outreach to the industry leading up to the Aug. 9 decision was limited.

City Manager Matt Huffaker and Economic Development Director Bonnie Lipscomb both said the timeline of bringing this tax increase forward has been atypical.

“This has been a condensed time frame,” Huffaker said. “We were waiting for final certification of the Measure F results, weighing the implications of that outcome and what would make the most sense for the city moving forward based on a number of variables. That didn’t lend itself to having the more robust dialogue that we would typically have. But, of course, we’re open to continuing those conversations.”

The measure will be one of three that will go before Santa Cruz voters in November. Measure N proposes levying a tax on residential properties that are in use for less than 120 days within a calendar year. Measure O, meanwhile, will ask voters to decide whether the city should proceed with plans to redevelop the parking lot on the corner of Cathcart and Cedar streets into a new library complex that would include at least 50 affordable housing units and a parking garage.

Rob Brezsny’s Astrology: Aug. 17-23

ARIES (March 21-April 19): Aries filmmaker Andrei Tarkovsky wrote, “All my life, I’ve been going around waiting for something—as if I were waiting in a railway station. And I’ve always felt as if the living I’ve done so far hasn’t actually been real life but a long wait for it—a long wait for something real.” If I could speak with Tarkovsky right now, I would cheerfully tell him that his wait will soon be over. I’d say that in the coming months, Aries people who have been postponing and postponing, who have been standing by and holding on and biding time, will have an excellent chance to begin inhabiting their full, rich destiny. I invite you to imagine what that will feel like.

TAURUS (April 20-May 20): Taurus poet Sherko Bekas wrote, “Each joy I wear, its sleeves are either too short or too long, too loose or too tight on me. And each sorrow I wear fits as if it were made for me wherever I am.” With this as our starting point, Taurus, I’m pleased to report some good news. In the next three weeks, you will have zero sorrows to try on and wear like a garment. And there will be at least three joys that fit just right. The sleeves will be the correct length, and the form will be neither too loose nor too tight.

GEMINI (May 21-June 20): Tips on how to get the most out of the coming weeks: 1. Create a big spacious realization by weaving together several small hunches. 2. Keep a little angel on your right shoulder and a little devil on your left shoulder. Enjoy listening to them argue, and don’t get attached to anything they say. 3. Do the unexpected until it becomes expected. Then abandon it and try a new, unexpected experiment. 4. Meditate expansively on the question, “How many careers can I have in one lifetime?” 5. Enhance your home so it feels even more comfortable.

CANCER (June 21-July 22): Be fluid and flexible while still being rooted and sturdy. Be soft and sensitive even as you are also firm and resolute. Be mostly modest and adaptable, but become assertive and outspoken as necessary. Be cautious about inviting and seeking out challenges, but be bold and brash when a golden challenge arrives. Be your naturally generous self most of the time, but avoid giving too much. Got all that, Cancerian? Carrying out the multifaceted assignments I just described might be nearly impossible for most of the other signs of the zodiac, but they are in your wheelhouse. You are a specialist in fertile complexity.

LEO (July 23-Aug. 22): “I’ve swung from ancient vines in the caves of Jamaica,” exults Hoodoo priestess Luisah Teish. “I’ve danced with delight around totem poles and pressed foreheads with Maori warriors. I’ve joked with the pale fox in the crossroads, then wrestled with the jaguar and won. I have embraced great trees between my thighs and spoken words of love to thunder while riding lightning bolts.” I offer Teish’s celebratory brag to inspire you as you formulate plans for the coming weeks and months. What exhilarating adventures will you give yourself? What expansive encounters will you learn from? What travels outside of your comfort zone will you dare? The time is right for upsurges and upturns and upgrades.

VIRGO (Aug. 23-Sept. 22): In his poem “The Pupil,” Virgo-born Donald Justice speaks of how he spent “a whole week practicing for that moment on the threshold.” I advise you to do the same, Virgo. The goal is to be as prepared as you can be for the upcoming rite of transition—without, of course, being neurotically over-prepared. It’s fine and natural to honor the tension of anticipation, using it as motivation to do your best. One other thing: As you get ready, please have as much fun as possible. Visualize the sense of accomplishment you’ll feel when you’ve reached the other side of the test.

LIBRA (Sept. 23-Oct. 22): “One is always at home in one’s past,” wrote author Vladimir Nabokov. But I encourage you to rebel against that theory, Libra. For now, find a way to NOT feel at home in your past. Question it, be curious about it, re-evaluate it. My hope is that you will then be motivated to change how your history lives in you. Now is an excellent time to reconfigure your life story, to develop a revised relationship with its plot twists and evolution. Revisit and update some of your memories. Re-evaluate the meanings of key events. Enchanting healings will materialize if you do.

SCORPIO (Oct. 23-Nov. 21): Of all the signs in the zodiac, you Scorpios are most likely to regard that old pop tune by the Animals as your theme song. “I’m just a soul whose intentions are good,” croons lead singer Eric Burdon, “Oh, Lord, please don’t let me be misunderstood.” But you may have less motivation to express that sentiment in the coming weeks, dear Scorpio. I suspect you will experience record-breaking levels of being seen and appreciated for who you are. For best results, do this: 1. Inform your deep psyche that you have no attachment to being misunderstood. 2. Tell your deep psyche that you would very much like to be well understood.

SAGITTARIUS (Nov. 22-Dec. 21): “Unless we are creators, we are not fully alive,” wrote Sagittarian author Madeleine L’Engle. She was referring to everyone, not just people in the arts. She believed that to be soulful humans, we must always make new things, generate fresh possibilities and explore novel approaches. The restless urge to transform what already exists can be expressed in how we do our jobs, our parenting, our intimate relationships and every other activity. You are now entering a phase, Sagittarius, when this initiatory energy will be especially available, needed and valuable.

CAPRICORN (Dec. 22-Jan. 19): In her poem “Valentine,” Capricorn poet Carol Ann Duffy tells a lover she won’t give her a “red rose or a satin heart.” Instead, her token of affection is an onion, a symbol of multi-layered complexity. “Its fierce kiss will stay on your lips,” Duffy writes, “possessive and faithful as we are, for as long as we are.” She adds that the onion will “blind you with tears like a lover.” OK. I understand the tough attitude expressed by Duffy. Romance isn’t a relentlessly sweet, sentimental romp through paradise. But I don’t recommend that you imitate her approach to your love life in the coming weeks and months. Appreciate the sometimes shadowy and labyrinthine convolutions, yes, but don’t make them more important than beauty and joy and love. How about invoking the symbol of a pomegranate? It represents fertility and rebirth out of the darkness.

AQUARIUS (Jan. 20-Feb. 18): Be extra expressive with the people and animals you care about. Be even more amusing and generous than usual. Dare to be abundantly entertaining and engaging and empathetic. Make it your goal to draw out your allies’ dormant potentials and inspire them to love themselves even more than they already do. I’ll tell you about the endearing terms that author Vladimir Nabokov called his wife. Consider using them with your dear ones: “My sun, my soul, my song, my bird, my pink sky, my sunny rainbow, my little music, my inexpressible delight, my tenderness, my lightness, my dear life, my dear eyes, kittykin, poochums, goosikins, sparrowling, bird of paradise.”

PISCES (Feb. 19-March 20): Sometimes, you may feel you’re under the influence of a debilitating spell or hindered by a murky curse. Pisceans are prone to such worries. But here’s a secret. More than any other zodiac sign, you have the power to escape from spells. Even if you have never studied the occult or read a witch’s grimoire, you possess a natural facility for the natural magic that disperses curses. From the depths of your psyche, you can summon the spiritual force necessary to cleanse the gunk and free yourself. Now is a perfect time to prove to yourself that what I’ve said here is true.

Homework: What injustice are you most motivated to correct? Newsletter.FreeWillAstrology.com.

Supes to Stick with Current Term System

The Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors on Aug. 9 rejected a proposal to set term limits on their positions, saying that the current system of letting voters decide who fills the seats is sufficient.

The proposal by 4th District Supervisor Greg Caput would have set a three-term cap on the elected positions, although anyone who reached that limit could run again after waiting four years.

If the supervisors had approved the cap, it would have been placed on the November ballot.

Caput said that incumbents often have an unfair advantage during elections, with increased name recognition and ability to raise funds.

“[Term limits] have been proven successful at the state and federal level—and also the county and city level—to encourage participation by newcomers, and to diversify the representation of the voting public,” said Caput, who has elected to not run for his fourth term, and will leave the board following the November election.

Supervisor Bruce McPherson, who oversees the 5th District, said that several California counties have similar policies, and that he would be open to discussing the issue.

But 2nd District Supervisor Zach Friend said he didn’t see a need for the policy in a county where almost nobody serves more than three terms.

“In the last 170 years, there have been a total of four supervisors that have actually served, by my estimation, longer than these 12 years,” he said. “I don’t know that this is even an issue.”

The term limits proposal failed 4-1. Caput was the lone vote in favor. 

Board Chair Manu Koenig, who beat out three-term incumbent John Leopold in 2020 for the 1st District seat, said voters already have the option to remove supervisors when their terms expire. He also said he is wary of creating a law when there is no existing problem.

“Ultimately, voters are happy to tell us when they’ve had enough of any of us,” he said. “And they have an opportunity to express those opinions in elections.” 

Tuesday’s vote was not the first time Caput has found himself at odds with his fellow supervisors as he sought to curtail the position. He previously introduced a two-term limit, which also failed. He has tried unsuccessfully several times to cap supervisor pay and benefits, and has donated portions of his own $134,710 paycheck to charity.

Burrell School Vineyards’ Honor Roll Worthy 2020 Chardonnay

Burrell School Vineyards is named after an old schoolhouse on the property that dates to 1854, when Lyman J. Burrell settled on the land that is now home to Burrell School Vineyards & Winery. David and Anne Moulton started living there when they began the development of their vineyards in 1973. Dave Moulton is still the winemaker and runs the property. Burrell School is well worth visiting, not only for its fine wines but also for the beautiful vistas, which look out over acres of vines. 

Moulton has given many of his wines a school-theme name, such as Valedictorian, Honor Roll, Extra Credit—and Teacher’s Pet for the 2020 Chardonnay ($39), a prime example of excellent wine made from Moulton’s estate vineyards.

“This dry, medium-bodied wine has moderate acidity,” says Moulton. “The flavors range from apple and lemon to pineapple with notes of vanilla.” It’s simply an exquisite Chardonnay.

Burrell School Vineyards & Winery, 24060 Summit Road, Los Gatos. 408-353-6290; burrellschool.com.

Balanced Bubbly

A good Prosecco for under $15 is made by Bread & Butter Wines. This balanced bubbly is produced in a small town in Italy and comes with lively notes of ripe apple, pear and white peach. 

Bread & Butter tasting room, 3105 Silverado Trail, Napa. 833-332-7323; breadandbutterwines.com.

Cantine Winepub

My husband and I met up with friends recently at Cantine for a little celebration, so we indulged in a bottle of incredible Lester Estate Syrah. Cantine is a cozy wine bar that carries many local wines, including a delicious Viognier by Bottle Jack. As well as wine on tap, Cantine also has beer on tap, including Corralitos Brewing and Seabright Brewery. Try their mouthwatering tapas—all delicious. 

Cantine Winepub, Aptos Village, 8050 Soquel Drive, Aptos. 831-612-6191; cantinewinepub.com.

The Bagelry Scores Big with a Classic Breakfast Staple

Santa Cruz native Sybil Morgan has worked in the restaurant industry her entire life. Her resumé is as well-rounded as the namesake of the Bagelry in Soquel Village, which she’s managed for over two years. Morgan originally started working part-time at the Seabright Bagelry before becoming manager at the Soquel locale (they have a downtown Santa Cruz location, too, of course), a position she happily took. She defines the Bagelry as a local favorite with friendly counter service. Also, local art, which changes monthly, adorns the walls. Bestsellers include the scram, a build-your-own breakfast sandwich, and the lox deluxe. Bagel varieties include jalapeño, salt, whole wheat and gluten-free. They are also known for vegan spreads like red pepper cashew, hummus and guacamole. A rotating scratch made-daily soup and homemade cookies round out the menu. Hours are every day, 7:30am-2pm. Morgan chatted with GT recently about all things bagels.
 

What makes the Bagelry a Santa Cruz institution?

SYBIL MORGAN: Our bagels come in fresh every morning from our downtown bakery. We utilize all fresh ingredients and have a good variety of options and flavors. We are also very well known for our huge variety of spreads that are all made in-house and have very diverse flavors and ingredients. We regularly have visitors, and even people who have moved out of town come back just for our spreads because they are so unique to us and really have a nostalgic flavor. 

What’s the best bagel you ever had?

A darkly toasted everything bagel with cream cheese, freshly sliced tomato, salt and pepper. I love to toast both sides, the inner and outer, which makes it very crunchy and firm. And toasting both sides coax the flavors out of the seasonings. The first time I tried one this way was at a pop-up in Los Angeles; they called it a “burnt bagel.” It just adds an extra level of earthiness, flavor and deliciousness that take it over the top. 

The Bagelry, 4763 Soquel Drive, Soquel, 831-462-9888; bagelrysantacruz.com.

Namaste India Bistro Brings Bold Flavors to the Westside

A golden statue of Shiva greeted us at the front door as we picked up our first dinner from Namaste India Bistro, the Santa Cruz sibling to the restaurant’s Los Gatos and Monterey outposts. Lovingly decorated, with a small wine bar at the back, the new restaurant is a very welcome addition to the Westside. We loved our take-out order of Jhol Momo ($12.50), a classic Nepali dish consisting of eight plump dumplings, pale green globes twisted into knots at the center. With the dumplings came a separate container of creamy, tomato-tinged sauce, thickened with spicy sesame with a lovely kick at the end. Dumplings in a curry sauce—what a treat.

The Namaste menu lists many different momos (such a fun word to say), some with more firepower, some with chicken filling, but we loved our vegetarian version. This was easily enough for 3-4 people to share as a start to a meal.

I have to admit, I was taking a chance ordering a tandoori dish for takeaway. But the entree showed off the expertise of Namaste’s cooking team. An order of Tandoori Salmon ($29.50) proved generous, moist and delicious. Four rectangles of salmon lay on a thick cushion of thinly sliced onions and cilantro, with wedges of lime. Classic presentation. And again, plenty for another meal—or to share at the table with friends. Marinated in a spice-infused yogurt—usually including cumin, paprika, coriander and garlic—the fish arrived moist and tender. A mild smokiness from the clay oven is the haunting signature of tandoori cooking. The rich spices ignite complex sensory sparks. These dishes awaken the palate.

One of the must-have classics of Northern India cuisine, palak paneer is a go-to dish for us ($16.50). It’s easy to like the bright green dish of fresh creamy spinach puree cooked with tomatoes and studded with spices and fat cubes of the fresh cheese called paneer. Easily one of the best vegetable dishes I know of, and the Namaste version did not disappoint.

To go with our dumplings, salmon and palak paneer courses, we took home an order of Jeera rice ($5.50), a fragrant basmati rice studded with cumin and often cloves. I certainly detected the cumin and coriander in ours. The rice helped soak up a side of sweetly mysterious, cola-flavored tamarind chutney ($4).

A small order of mixed pickle ($3) is absolutely required with these dishes, splendidly hot and addictive, a mix of peppers and cucumbers pickled in garlic and chiles. I let the spicy juices drench the rice, while my dining partner bravely bit into the pickles themselves. His brow grew moist and his eyebrows raised, but he kept eating. Spicy food is irresistible. We could feel ourselves getting high on these flavors.

One bite led to another, and by the end of my dinner I wanted to eat a whole second plateful.

Namaste India Bistro is a great new addition to the Westside neighborhood, filling the shoes of the former long-standing Vasili’s with a menu that roams the vastness of India’s many regions, from Goan vindaloos to Manchurian and Nepalese dumplings and kebabs to countless curry and biryani dishes. During lunch hours, Namaste also offers a full listing of thali platters, with chutneys, dal and naan. Even after a single week of being open, the India dining spot has already found many fans. And I’ll be personally working my way through this menu, week by week. Curries are next!

Namaste India Bistro, 1501 Mission St., Santa Cruz. Open 11:30am-2:30pm, 5-9pm (9:30pm Friday and Saturday). Closed Monday. namasteindiabistro.com.

SCPD Says Shooting is Likely Gang-motivated

0

The Santa Cruz Police Department is investigating a drive-by shooting that injured two victims on the 100 block of Raymond Street.

The incident, which occurred late Sunday, is believed to be gang-related, SCPD spokeswoman Joyce Blaschke said.

Police responded to a call of a shooting just after 11pm. Officers found two males in a nearby park, both suffering from single gunshot wounds in a nearby park.

The victims, 26 and 28, were taken to a Bay Area trauma center and are listed in serious but stable condition.

Investigators recovered several casings and confirmed that both victims belong to a criminal street gang.

The investigation is ongoing. Anyone with information is asked to contact the SCPD Investigation Unit at 831-420-5820. Anonymous tipsters can call 831-420-5995.

California’s Climate Countdown

0

It’s climate crunch time in California. 

Starting today and lasting through Thursday, generators and transmission-line operators should delay any scheduled maintenance to avoid possible power outages as Californians crank up their air conditioners to deal with an expected onslaught of 100-plus degree heat, the state’s electric grid operator said Friday

The California Independent System Operator’s warning came on the heels of draft legislation Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office unveiled late Thursday to extend the life of Diablo Canyon, the state’s last nuclear power plant in San Luis Obispo, by as much as 10 years — and give its operator, PG&E, a forgivable loan of as much as $1.4 billion to do so

Taken together, the two actions underscore the extent to which California is at risk of repeating the events of 2020, when the state was unable to supply enough energy to meet demand, triggering the first rolling blackouts in nearly two decades

Newsom—no doubt eager to avoid power outages as he elevates his national profile in what some suspect is preparation for a future presidential run—has for months pushed the idea of temporarily extending Diablo Canyon’s lifespan past its planned 2025 closure to help shore up the state’s electricity supplies. 

But the draft legislation makes explicit the urgency behind his proposal: It would exempt the Diablo Canyon extension from review under the California Environmental Quality Act and several other environmental laws, limiting the legal challenges that anti-nuclear advocates and other environmental justice groups could bring against it, according to the Los Angeles Times

And, unless Newsom calls for a special legislative session, lawmakers will have to approve his plan before the regular session ends on Aug. 31 — giving them less than three weeks to reach an agreement on the complex issue. (That isn’t the only contentious environmental legislation they’re grappling with: Newsom on Friday sent them a list of last-minute climate proposals he wants enacted, including accelerated greenhouse gas cuts, new interim targets for reaching 100% clean energy and safety zones around new oil and gas wells.)

Assemblymember Jordan Cunningham, a San Luis Obispo Republican, told the Sacramento Bee“I think (the Newsom administration is) pretty serious” about Diablo Canyon. “Serious enough to be briefing me about it, serious enough to be proposing some bill language in a trailer bill, serious enough to be expending some political capital to try to make the case and get the information to the voters and the public as to why we need it.” 

But the draft bill has angered some environmental advocates: “Legislators should reject it out of hand,” Environment California, Friends of the Earth and the Natural Resources Defense Council said in a joint statement. “With Governor Newsom and the legislature working to appropriate climate budget funds and advance ambitious climate legislation in the waning days of the legislative session, this proposal is a dangerous and costly distraction.”

The swirl of proposals comes as California prepares to lose its top climate regulator. Newsom announced Friday that Jared Blumenfeld, secretary of California’s Environmental Protection Agency, will step down at the end of the month to lead the Waverley Street Foundation, a new $3.5 billion climate change nonprofit founded by Laurene Powell Jobs. Newsom appointed Amelia Yana Garcia Gonzalez, a California Department of Justice special assistant attorney general focused on environmental issues, to replace Blumenfeld, the latest high-ranking official to depart the governor’s administration.

Other Important Climate News:

Two Years After CZU: Still Tangled in Red Tape

Despite promises of a fast-track process, most fire victims who want to rebuild legally are waiting for permits

Coastal Commission Stifles RV Ordinance—Again

When and where oversized vehicles can park on Santa Cruz streets remains unclear

Council Adds Hotel Tax Increase to November Ballot

Roughly one month after a sales tax increase failed to pass by a mere 50 votes, the Santa Cruz City Council approved plans to once again ask voters to increase taxes—this time on stays at hotels and short-term rentals—in order to provide the city with additional revenue officials say it needs to offset a looming budget deficit. In a unanimous...

Rob Brezsny’s Astrology: Aug. 17-23

Astrology, Horoscope, Stars, Zodiac Signs
Free will astrology for the week of Aug. 17

Supes to Stick with Current Term System

Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors reject proposal to set term limits on their positions

Burrell School Vineyards’ Honor Roll Worthy 2020 Chardonnay

The centerpiece of David and Anne Moulton’s picturesque Los Gatos winery is an 1854 schoolhouse

The Bagelry Scores Big with a Classic Breakfast Staple

The popular breakfast joint serves up a variety of bagels at locations throughout Santa Cruz County

Namaste India Bistro Brings Bold Flavors to the Westside

The new Mission Street locale joins sister outposts already thriving in Los Gatos and Monterey

SCPD Says Shooting is Likely Gang-motivated

Two victims in stable condition after Sunday night drive-by shooting on Raymond Street

California’s Climate Countdown

Can the state power through it?
17,623FansLike
8,845FollowersFollow