Rob Brezsny’s Astrology: Aug. 25-31

Free will astrology for the week of August 25

ARIES (March 21-April 19): Aries mythologist Joseph Campbell advised us to love our fate. He said we should tell ourselves, “Whatever my fate is, this is what I need.” Even if an event seems inconvenient or disruptive, we treat it as an opportunity, as an interesting challenge. “If you bring love to that moment, not discouragement,” Campbell said, “you will find the strength.” Campbell concludes that any detour or disarray you can learn from “is an improvement in your character, your stature, and your life. What a privilege!” Few signs of the zodiac are inclined to enthusiastically adopt such an approach, but you Aries folks are most likely to do so. Now is an especially favorable time to use it.

TAURUS (April 20-May 20): The brilliant Taurus dancer and choreographer Martha Graham spoke of “a vitality, a life force, a quickening that is translated through you into action,” adding that “there is only one of you in all time.” She added, “It is not your business to determine how good it is, nor how it compares with other expressions. It is your business to keep it yours clearly and directly, to keep the channel open.” But even if you do this very well, Graham said, you will nevertheless always feel “a divine dissatisfaction, a blessed unrest” that will fuel you. This is the perfect message for you Tauruses to embrace in the coming weeks.

GEMINI (May 21-June 20): There’s growing scientific evidence that we make ourselves stupid by complaining too much—or even by listening to other people complain a lot. Excessive negative thoughts drain energy from our hippocampus, a part of our brain that’s essential to problem-solving. This doesn’t mean, of course, that we should avoid dealing with difficult issues. But it does suggest we should be discerning about how many disturbing and depressing ideas we entertain. According to my reading of the omens, all this will be especially useful advice for you in the coming weeks. 

CANCER (June 21-July 22): Your brain contains 100 billion nerve cells. Each cell has the potential to be linked with tens of thousands of others. And they are always busy. Typically, your grey matter makes a million new connections every second. But I suspect your number of connections will increase even beyond that in the coming weeks. Your most complex organ will be working with greater intensity than usual. Will that be a bad thing or a good thing? It depends on whether you formulate an intention to channel your intelligence into wise analysis about important matters—and not waste it in careless fussing about trivial details.

LEO (July 23-Aug. 22): “You should have a sticky soul,” counsels author Elizabeth Berg. “The act of continually taking things in should be as much a part of you as your hair color.” I especially endorse that attitude for you during the next four weeks, Leo. Your task is to make yourself extra magnetic for all the perceptions, experiences, ideas, connections and resources you need most. By Sept. 23, I suspect you will have gained an infusion of extra ballast and gravitas.

VIRGO (Aug. 23-Sept. 22): “I sing like the nightingale whose melody is crowded in the too narrow passage of her throat,” wrote author Virginia Woolf. That was an insulting curse for her to fling at herself. I disapprove of such behavior—especially for you in the coming weeks. If you hope to be in alignment with cosmic rhythms, don’t you dare say nasty things about yourself, even in the privacy of your own thoughts. In fact, please focus on the exact opposite: flinging praise and appreciation and compliments at yourself.

LIBRA (Sept. 23-Oct. 22): The blogger at www-wlw.tumblr.com says the following are the top tender actions. 1. Fastening clothes or jewelry for your companion. 2. Letting them rest their head on your shoulder. 3. Idly playing with their hands. 4. Brushing a leaf out of their hair. 5. Locking pinkies. 6. Rubbing their back when you embrace. 7. Both of you wearing an item that belongs to the other. Dear Libra, I hope you will employ these tender actions with greater frequency than usual in the coming weeks. Why? In my astrological opinion, it’s a ripe time to boost your Affection Quotient with the allies you care for the most.

SCORPIO (Oct. 23-Nov. 21): Naturalist Henry David Thoreau wrote in his journal, “I feel slightly complimented when nature condescends to make use of me without my knowledge—as when I help scatter her seeds in my walk—or carry burs and cockles on my clothes from field to field. I feel as though I had done something for the commonweal.” I mention this, Scorpio, because the coming weeks will be an excellent time for you to carry out good deeds and helpful transformations in nature’s behalf. Your ability to collaborate benevolently with plants and animals and elemental forces will be at a peak. So will your knack for creating interesting connections between yourself and all wild things.

SAGITTARIUS (Nov. 22-Dec. 21): You may have never heard of Sagittarian artist Baya Mahieddine (1931–1998). At age 16, she experienced a splash of acclaim with a show in Paris. Famous artists Pablo Picasso, Henry Matisse and George Braques came. They drew inspiration from Mahieddine’s innovative use of color, elements from her Algerian heritage and her dream-like images. Picasso even invited her to work with him, exulting in the fresh perspectives she ignited. But her art never received the full credit it warranted. In accordance with astrological omens, this horoscope is a small way of providing her with the recognition and appreciation she deserves. It also authorizes you to go out and get the recognition and appreciation you deserve but have not yet fully received.

CAPRICORN (Dec. 22-Jan. 19): “Who knows what is unfolding on the other side of each hour?” asked Capricorn poet Juan Ramón Jiménez (translated by Capricorn poet Robert Bly). “How many times the sunrise was there, behind a mountain. How many times the brilliant cloud piling up far off was already a golden body full of thunder!” Your assignment, Capricorn, is to imagine what is unfolding just beyond your perception and understanding. But here’s the twist: You must steer your mind away from inclinations to indulge in fear. You must imagine that the events in the works are beautiful, interesting or redemptive. If you’re not willing to do that, skip the exercise altogether.

AQUARIUS (Jan. 20-Feb. 18): “Better than any argument is to rise at dawn and pick dew-wet red berries in a cup,” wrote author Wendell Berry. I mostly agree with that sentiment, although I will also put in a good word for certain kinds of arguments. There are moments when it’s crucial for your psychological and spiritual health that you initiate a conversation about delicate issues that might lead to a dispute. However, I don’t think this is one of those times, Aquarius. In my astrological opinion, picking dew-wet red berries is far more sensible than any argument. For further inspiration, read this testimony from actor Natasha Lyonne: “I definitely would rather take a nap than get angry.”

PISCES (Feb. 19-March 20): For painter Vincent van Gogh, love wasn’t primarily a sentimental feeling. Nor was it an unfocused generalized wish for health and happiness in those he cared for. Rather, he wrote, “You must love with a high, serious, intimate sympathy, with a will, with intelligence.” His love was alert, acute, active and energized. It was animated with a determination to be resourceful and ingenious in nurturing the beloved. For van Gogh, love was always in action, forever moving toward ever-fresh engagement. In service to intimacy, he said, “you must always seek to know more thoroughly, better, and more.” I hope you’ll make these meditations a top priority during the next seven weeks.

Homework: This is what I do to earn a living. Let me know what you do. Ne********@***************gy.com

2019 Arroyo Seco Sauvignon Blanc Keeps Summer Alive

My tennis group had a potluck gathering recently, which included some excellent food and, of course, wine! My contribution of a bottle of Morgan Winery’s 2019 Sauvignon Blanc was an ace. The contents disappeared in no time. 

Morgan Winery is known for excellent wine at reasonable prices. That’s why you can find them in restaurants, wine bars and markets all over.

Its new 2019 Arroyo Seco Sauvignon Blanc ($20) is a lovely white that comes with an easy-off screw cap. Bright fruit flavors of lemons, limes and quince, along with enticing aromas of passion fruit, key lime and white peach, make it a delightful go-to summer wine that pairs well with lighter fare.

Wine Enthusiast Magazine awarded 90 points to Morgan’s very drinkable Sauvignon Blanc. 

Morgan Winery, 204 Crossroads Blvd., Carmel, 831-626-3700. morganwinery.com.

Endless Summer Menu at Pacific Catch

Pacific Catch is casual and has several restaurants throughout the Bay Area. A wide selection of wave-to-table seafood, along with some tasty meat dishes, make it a popular dining experience. Pacific Catch’s new “Endless Summer” menu offers terrific deals, such as Ceviche Tacos – $13 for three, which simply burst with Baja shrimp, sea bass and spicy yellowtail. The Rainbow Sushi Bowl for $25 is enough for two to share. Start with a watermelon margarita and end with the passion fruit pot de créme—both delicious! Pacific Catch in Campbell’s Pruneyard Shopping Center has lots of free parking. Visit pacificcatch.com for more info.

Wine with a View at Chaminade

I met with a friend recently for a glass of wine at Chaminade’s The View. It’s a splendid experience to sit on their outdoor terrace at sunset, or any time, for that matter, taking in the panoramic view of Monterey Bay. We both had local Alfaro Family Vineyard wine and shared a cheese plate—a perfect pairing with Alfaro’s Chardonnay. Weekly events are held, such as Monday Locals Night, Tapas Tuesday and Thursday Date Night.

Chaminade, One Chaminade Lane, Santa Cruz, 831-465-3449. chaminade.com.

Bruno’s Bar and Grill Keeps Scotts Valley Bellies Happy

Bruno’s Bar and Grill, a Scotts Valley favorite, serves American comfort cuisine Wednesday-Sunday from 2pm-8pm. It offers takeout, indoor dining, an outdoor rooftop deck and catering. Joanne Guzman and her husband Rogelio, the head chef, have owned the place for four years. She says the restaurant has something for everyone. Their concept also includes fun events, such as drag shows, holiday-themed parties and cornhole tournaments. Joanne recently spoke to GT about “Naughty Sauce,” “Feisty Tots” and some of the other scrumptious specialties that keep Bruno’s unique.

What is Bruno’s philosophy?

JOANNE GUZMAN: Our philosophy is to make both guests and employees feel like family, and we aim for a community feel. Before we purchased Bruno’s, it was a barbeque joint. We changed it to a bar and grill in order to serve a more diverse menu. We still do barbeque, but now also have dishes like pastas, salads, seafood and weekly specials. 

Talk about your barbeque offerings.

We smoke everything ourselves, and one signature item is our beef ribs (served Fri-Sun only), which not many places do anymore. We also have a 12-hour smoked brisket, and people really love our baby back ribs too. Especially the variety of barbeque sauces we serve with the ribs, that’s what sets us apart. They are all made in-house and are very popular. A few examples are raspberry chipotle, pineapple jalapeño and bourbon bacon apricot.

What are some of the other menu highlights?

We keep winning awards for our burgers because Rogelio creates flavor combinations that people rave about. My personal favorite is the Bad Boy, which has smoked gouda cheese, bourbon bacon jam, grilled onions, lettuce, tomato and Naughty Sauce. The key is the sauce; it’s mayo-based with a kick, and people really love it. My favorite salad is the Pear Gorgonzola that has spring-mix lettuce, candied walnuts, dried cranberries, and it’s tossed with our housemade pear vinaigrette. Our rockstar appetizer is our salt and vinegar chicken wings; guests are literally addicted to them. We’re also known for our mac and cheese skin appetizer and our Feisty Tots loaded with honey mustard pulled pork, bourbon bacon jam, Pico de Gallo, grilled jalapeños, jack and cheddar cheese and sour cream. 

230 Mount Hermon Road, Suite G, Scotts Valley, 831-438-2227; brunosbarandgrill.com.

Bantam Reopens; Michelin Recognizes a Pair of Santa Cruz County Restaurants

Bantam’s chef/owner Benjamin Sims was kept busy last Thursday with a full house, inside and out, at his Westside dining spot. Jenny and I scored one of the al fresco booths, surprisingly cozy on a balmy evening, and dove into what was to be a delicious experience.

Along with a slab of the house bread and butter sprinkled with flake sea salt ($5), we sampled a Navarro Vineyards Chardonnay—light and refreshing—and a Viño Ijalba Tempranillo (both $9). I need to stress this: don’t ever stop at Bantam without ordering the insanely delicious bread.

I went back and forth on entrees, loving the idea of prawns with cornbread and Jimmy Nardellos, but eventually ordering my Bantam fave, the pork belly with veggies and something incredible called chili butter ($25).

My dinner partner already had her order in mind: pizza! And yes, Bantam and its wood-fired oven do a killer job with pies. She opted for a simple Marinara pizza, which arrived lightly topped with tomato, garlic and oregano, maybe a hint of chili too ($13). Gorgeous, fragrant, and lightly charred on the bottom, which we both agreed added lots to the rustic flavor. All around us, happy Bantam diners—plus a few kids and well-behaved canines—were all digging into their dinners. A very pizza-intensive crowd, from the looks of it. And the reason is that Bantam’s pizzas completely seduce and satisfy your pizza craving.

I, on the other hand, enjoyed my beautiful plate of roasted potatoes, zucchini wedges, oven-blistered green beans, and dice of eggplant, on top of which sat a slab of pork belly. The Tempranillo was the perfect partner here. The plate had been sauced with pleasantly spicy chili-infused butter, into which I dipped every bite. Pork belly is playful food. Pulling apart the shreds of meat from the flavor-inducing strata of fat is the whole point. And yes we did save room to share a generous bowl of warm from the oven nectarine crumble topped with hazelnuts and brown-sugared oats, plus a large scoop of subtle sweet corn ice cream ($10). Plenty for the two of us to share. Bantam, 1010 Fair Ave., Santa Cruz. 5-9pm. Closed Sunday and Monday.

Michelin Kudos

Two Santa Cruz area restaurants, Mentone and Alderwood, have been tagged by the Michelin folks for new designations. The famed guide to dining excellence is expanding its reach prior to the launch of the 2021 Michelin Guide California. Michelin spokesperson Lauren McClure explained that the upcoming designations “are new to the Michelin Guide, and a preview of the full selection to be announced next month. They are currently listed as ‘new’ on guide.michelin.com website, and could be Bib Gourmands or Stars of tomorrow,” she told me by email.

“By revealing some of the new additions made by our inspectors throughout the year, we enhance our ties to food lovers,” said Gwendal Poullennec, Michelin’s international director.

Mentone’s David Kinch (whose Manresa has three Michelin stars) agreed that this new category was “hard to figure out, but being mentioned the California Central Coast guide is a great honor.” Kinch speculated that it could mean, “a Bib Gourmande label, which is a recommendation for more casual restaurants.” It might mean the restaurant would be recommended, but with no designations like a star or a bib. “This is an honor as well,” he said.

Or it might mean the restaurant is up for a coveted Michelin star. “I don’t know what to expect for Mentone,” Kinch admitted. “My guess is it could be one of the three, but a star being least likely. We are completely honored. If we got a star, I would be surprised—but man, I would be thrilled.”

Outdoor World Closing Final Store

Outdoor World Sporting Goods, which has sold camping supplies in Santa Cruz County for more than a half-century, will soon close its last location in the Capitola Mall.

Company president Chris Thomas says the closure comes after Covid-19 restrictions took a major bite out of business. 

A large part of this comes from supply chain issues, he said.

“There is a lot of merchandise I can’t get from the factories because they don’t have it to ship because their factories don’t have it,” he said.

He adds that the difficulty of doing business in California played a role.

But Thomas also says that he is nearing retirement age, which also factored into the decision.

“It’s been great for the family, and great to offer Santa Cruz the recreational activities we offer. but with all things considered it’s just become time,” he said.

Thomas says the company opened its first store on Pacific Avenue in 1969, at a time when the U.S. was beginning its push to build a nationwide series of interstate highways, and Americans were discovering the country’s national parks.

This meant that more people were seeking camping gear, which at that time was only available in military surplus stores. 

“My father was a hunter-fisherman and so as a family, we went to a lot of national parks,” Thomas said.

The company opened in 1969 as Peninsula Surplus. It was rebranded as Outdoor World in 1978.

At its height, the company had stores in Santa Cruz, Capitola and Seaside, the latter of which never reopened after the closures in March.

The company tried for a fourth location in Pleasanton and Modesto, and had one in Felton and Gilroy for a time, Thomas says.

The Santa Cruz Location on River street closed recently. The final one in Capitola will stay open to sell its last merchandise, Thomas said. It’s not yet clear when that store will close.

The store is open during mall hours, Monday through Saturday 11am–7pm and Sunday 11am–6pm.

Can Gov. Newsom Keep His Job? A Recall Effort in California Shows a Dead Heat.

By Shawn Hubler and Jill Cowan, The New York Times

President Joe Biden sent an urgent message last week to the most populous state in the nation: Keep Gov. Gavin Newsom “on the job.” On the airwaves, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the prominent progressive from Massachusetts, has been repeatedly warning that “Trump Republicans” are “coming to grab power in California.”

Text messages — a half-million a day — are spreading the word on cellphones. Canvassers are making their case at suburban front doors. As some 22 million ballots land in the mailboxes of active registered voters this week in anticipation of the Sept. 14 recall election, Newsom — a Democrat elected in a 2018 landslide — has been pulling out all the stops just to hold on to his post.

The vote is expected to come down to whether Democrats can mobilize enough of the state’s enormous base to counteract Republican enthusiasm for Newsom’s ouster. Recent polls of likely voters show a dead heat, despite math that suggests the governor should ultimately prevail.

Less than a quarter of the electorate is Republican. Newsom has raised more campaign cash than all four dozen or so of his challengers put together. And the governor’s most serious rival is talk radio host Larry Elder, who has called global warming “a crock,” says the minimum wage should be “zero-point-zero-zero,” and gave Stephen Miller, the hard-line Trump administration immigration adviser, his first big public platform.

But the coronavirus pandemic has not been particularly governor-friendly. Polls this month show that approval for Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida is sagging as the state writhes under spiking deaths and hospitalizations.

And Newsom’s supporters are encountering a striking degree of ambivalence and distraction.

“I think he has done as well in the job as any governor could have, given the last year of the pandemic, but I’m not a fan,” Anamaria Young, 53, said recently in El Dorado Hills, east of Sacramento. Removing the governor more than a year before the end of his first term feels undemocratic, Young, a Democrat, said, but she also dislikes his lack of progress on homelessness and his deference to teachers unions.

“When my ballot comes,” she said, “I really don’t know how — or if — I am going to vote.”

Initiated by Republicans who took issue with Newsom on the death penalty and immigration, the once long-shot effort to recall the governor gained improbable traction as the coronavirus persisted. First, pandemic-related shutdowns prompted a judge to extend the measure’s signature-gathering deadline, and then word leaked that the governor had dined unmasked with lobbyists at an exclusive restaurant after imploring Californians to cover their faces and stay home.

If a majority of voters decide to recall Newsom, the new governor will be whoever among his 46 challengers gets the most votes, even if no rival gets a majority.

Critics of the state’s recall rules have long worried that 49% of the electorate could vote to keep an incumbent, only for a tiny plurality of voters to choose a replacement. On Friday, a lawsuit was filed in federal court challenging the recall’s constitutionality, based on that argument. Newsom has been urging Democrats to vote no on the recall and not even bother to answer the second question, which asks who should replace him. Among likely voters, recent polls show support for Elder, the current front-runner, at around 20%.

“No intellectually honest analysis” would predict the governor’s defeat, said Paul Mitchell, vice president of the bipartisan data firm Political Data Inc. in Sacramento. But state lawmakers in February extended pandemic-related accommodations to voters through the year, dealing a wild card.

The rules allow voting by mail at a scale comparable only to the 2020 presidential election — which is seemingly a Democratic advantage, although off-year participation is harder to forecast. Only one other attempt to recall a California governor has come to a vote, and 18 years have passed since the state replaced Gray Davis with Arnold Schwarzenegger, Mitchell noted.

“The swing voters in this campaign are not the usual ones choosing which party to vote for,” said Nathan Click, a former spokesperson for the governor who is now campaigning to defend him. “They’re Democrats who are choosing whether to vote.”

Elder, 69, a Black “small-l libertarian” lawyer who rose to national stature from Los Angeles, where he has been a talk radio fixture for decades, said he was not “some wild-eyed radical,” and that he entered the race at the behest of “normal people” such as his barber and dry cleaner as well as like-minded friends such as Dennis Prager, his right-wing broadcast mentor. His priorities — public school choice, high housing costs and rising crime — transcend party labels, he said.

He said his opposition to abortion was irrelevant in a state that supports abortion rights as much as California, and his view that a minimum wage deters job creation is mainstream economics. Remarks such as the one he made in 2008 on “Larry King Live” discounting global warming were merely to criticize “alarmism,” he said, acknowledging that climate change is happening but adding, falsely, that “nobody really knows to what degree” it is caused by humans.

He said he has voted for every Republican presidential candidate since the 1970s, not just Donald Trump.

“Why bring up Stephen Miller? Why bring up abortion? Why bring up minimum wage?” Elder said. “Because Gavin Newsom cannot defend his record.”

Polls indicate that majorities of Californians approve of Newsom’s policies, but when surveys are narrowed to the most likely voters, his margin thins.

A statewide poll in mid-July by the Institute of Governmental Studies at the University of California, Berkeley, found that likely voters were almost evenly split over whether to oust the governor, with 47% saying they would vote to recall him and 50% saying they would retain him, an edge that just barely exceeded the poll’s margin of error. Subsequent polls have affirmed those results.

So Newsom has spent big to turn out his party’s 46% share of the voters. His recall defense campaign received some $46 million in contributions through July, far more than Elder ($4.5 million); Kevin Faulconer, the former mayor of San Diego ($2.1 million); John Cox, the businessman campaigning with a bear ($9.4 million, mostly self-funded); the reality television figure and former Olympian Caitlyn Jenner ($750,000); or any other candidate.

The mere reminder that ballots are heading for mailboxes should turn many tuned-out Democrats into likely voters, Click said, and teams of supporters have been texting some 500,000 Democrats daily. Rep. Barbara Lee, co-founder and the co-chair of the group Women Against the Recall, said the national Democratic Party is looking to such grassroots efforts as a potential model for future campaigns.

But Sonja Diaz, director of the Latino Policy and Politics Initiative at the University of California, Los Angeles, said Democrats seemed to be playing catch-up as the delta variant preoccupied voters.

“People have been procrastinating,” she said, comparing the governor’s team to overconfident students failing to study for a final. “Delta has made it clear you’re not prepared for the exam.”

Northeast of Los Angeles, in Palmdale, canvassers for an immigrant advocacy group pitched the governor to voters last week.

Ashley Reyes, 27, a registered Democrat who was watching her toddler and his cousins play in her gated driveway, said she did not realize the recall had qualified for the ballot. Her parents and in-laws were immigrants, she said, adding that she would vote to keep the governor.

Peering into 101-degree heat through his metal screen door, Edgar Robleto, 62, a Republican, replied “I want him gone” when the canvassers mentioned Newsom. The state GOP, which represents 24 candidates, voted last weekend against endorsing one contender, lest any Republican opt not to vote.

Experts predict a slugfest. “Negative partisanship is the biggest driver of political decision-making right now,” said Mike Madrid, a longtime Republican adviser.

David Townsend, a Democratic consultant, agreed: “This is going to be totally tribal.”

“This is not going to be about Newsom,” he said. “It’s going to be about whether Democrats want Trump to have a governor in California.”

Copyright 2021 The New York Times Company

It’s ‘Back to That Isolation Bubble’ for Workers Pining for the Office

By Kellen Browning, The New York Times

Before the pandemic, Roya Joseph’s days at the office were defined by interaction. She looked forward to casual conversations with co-workers, mentorship sessions with managers and periodic, freewheeling chats — known as “teatime” — in the office kitchen.

All that was swept away when Joseph, a water engineer for Black & Veatch, an engineering firm, was sent home from her Walnut Creek, California, office along with the rest of her colleagues as the coronavirus began spreading through the United States last year. She jumped at the opportunity to return when her office reopened to some employees in June.

But two weeks ago, the rug was pulled out from under her again. Black & Veatch shut its offices as virus cases rose nationwide, driven by the contagious delta variant.

“It’s depressing,” Joseph, 32, said. “I feel like we’re being pushed back to that isolation bubble. I feel like, mentally, I’m not ready to face that again.”

While workers who want to stay at home forever have been especially vocal about their demands, a silent majority of Americans do want to get back to the office, at least for a few days a week. But as the latest coronavirus surge has led employers to delay return-to-office plans, that larger group is growing increasingly glum.

In a national survey of more than 950 workers, conducted in mid-August by Morning Consult on behalf of The New York Times, 31% said they would prefer to work from home full time. By comparison, 45% said they wanted to be in a workplace or an office full time. The remaining 24% said they wanted to split time between work and home.

Morning Consult surveyed workers from a variety of industries, so white-collar office workers were represented alongside those working in other fields, like retail. The data intelligence company’s findings echoed recent internal surveys by employers like Google and Twitter, as well as outside surveys by firms like Eden Workplace.

Among those craving the routines of office life and cubicle chatter: social butterflies, managers, new hires eager to meet colleagues, and people with noisy or crowded homes.

Veronica Polivanaya, an account manager at the public relations firm Inkhouse, quickly realized just how loud San Francisco’s North Beach neighborhood could be when she started working from home. There was the distraction of her boyfriend’s daily routine — sometimes he got up from his own work to make lunch or get water and ended up in the background of her video calls. Then there were the neighbor’s barking dogs. Package deliveries. Construction noise.

“That’s been a hard struggle for us,” Polivanaya, 30, said. “I feel like I don’t have a good space to focus in.” She was able to return to the relative quiet of her office for a few days a week starting in July, but she worried that the surging virus could send her back to her hectic work-from-home life.

Certainly, some people have thrived in their new remote work lives. They saved time and money, and sometimes increased productivity. The degree to which employees have embraced permanent remote or hybrid work models has been “stunning” to company executives, said Tsedal Neeley, a Harvard Business School professor who has studied remote work for decades.

But for others, Neeley said, it has removed needed barriers between work and home life, increased a sense of isolation and led to burnout. “Some people just dislike the screen — their physicality and their proximity to others is a big part of what work looks like,” she said.

Many workers are back in offices already. Just 13% of Americans worked from home at some point in July, the Bureau of Labor Statistics estimated, down from a pandemic peak of 35% in May 2020. And some workers have said the delta variant has not changed their employers’ return-to-office plans.

But an increasing number of high-profile companies, like Hollywood studios, Wall Street banks and Silicon Valley tech giants, have delayed their returns. For the pro-return-to-office crowd, the fits and starts have been excruciating, Neeley said.

“We are in this perpetual state of waiting, and that now has been extended with more uncertainty,” she said.

David Pantera, an incoming assistant product marketing manager at Google, said the company had decided to turn the September orientation for him and other new hires into a virtual event because of rising COVID-19 cases. Google’s process, known as “Noogler orientation,” is usually a social, community-building event meant to acclimate employees with one another and the company’s culture.

Pantera, a 23-year-old recent college graduate, said he was eager to start his new job but worried about whether missing out on that in-person experience would hinder his career prospects.

“If we don’t get a really solid foundation at this company in our first six months, our first year, what foot does that leave us on for the rest of our time at the company?” said Pantera, who lives in San Francisco. “What if that disillusions a lot of really bright, passionate, smart people from the industry?”

For Michael Anthony Orona, 38, starting a new job during the pandemic was isolating. He was thrilled to finally meet his colleagues at Blue Squad, a company that provides tech tools to progressive political candidates, when its office in Austin, Texas, reopened several months ago.

Then his 10-year-old daughter caught COVID, forcing Orona, his wife and his two children to hole up at home. He found juggling the job and caring for his children to be nearly impossible to manage. Sometimes he had to cancel meetings to make sure his 2-year-old son got down for a nap.

“I’m with our 2 1/2-year-old all the time, and I try to cram in a couple hours of work around that,” he said. “And then when we get him down for bed, I work into the middle of the night. It’s awful.”

He caught COVID, too, but recently tested negative and returned to work, and his children are back at school and day care. But he expects additional quarantines.

“It feels like we’re never going to get out of this,” Orona said. “For people who are working, both parents, it’s totally unsustainable.”

In Toronto, Alethea Bakogeorge is counting the days until she can return to her job at a musical theater company. Working from home, she said, has “eroded the boundaries between workspace and home space,” even causing her to occasionally skip meals to avoid spending more time in the kitchen, which doubles as her office.

Bakogeorge, 25, has cerebral palsy, a condition that causes chronic pain. Her daily walking commutes to the office, she said, provided a form of mild exercise that helped her cope.

“I didn’t realize how much of an impact that had on my physical health as a disabled person, and how much I missed it when it was no longer there,” she said.

But the spike in coronavirus cases has dashed her hopes of a summer return.

“In May, I thought we might be trending in a direction where I could go back to the office,” she said. “Now, with the delta variant being what it is, I think it is far less realistic for me to hope for a return to the office anytime in the near future.”

Copyright 2021 The New York Times Company

FDA Grants Full Approval to Pfizer-BioNTech Vaccine

By Sharon LaFraniere and Noah Weiland, The New York Times

The Food and Drug Administration on Monday granted full approval to Pfizer-BioNTech’s coronavirus vaccine for people 16 and older, making it the first to move beyond emergency use status in the United States.

The decision will set off a cascade of vaccine requirements by hospitals, colleges, corporations and other organizations. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin will be sending guidelines to the country’s 1.4 million active duty service members mandating that they be vaccinated, the Pentagon announced Monday.

United Airlines recently announced that its employees will be required to show proof of vaccination within five weeks of regulatory approval.

Oregon has adopted a similar requirement for all state workers, as have a host of universities in states from Louisiana to Minnesota. In New York, the FDA’s approval also brought into force a requirement announced in May that all students attending in-person classes at State University of New York and City University of New York schools be vaccinated.

The approval comes as the nation’s fight against the pandemic has intensified again, with the highly infectious delta variant dramatically slowing the progress that the country had made over the first half of the year. President Joe Biden addressed the nation Monday afternoon, saying he hopes the development will motivate many of the roughly 85 million unvaccinated Americans who are eligible for shots to get them. He told corporate, state and local leaders: “Do what I did last month. Require your employees to get vaccinated or face strict requirements” such as frequent testing.

“While millions of people have already safely received COVID-19 vaccines, we recognize that for some, the FDA approval of a vaccine may now instill additional confidence to get vaccinated,” Dr. Janet Woodcock, the acting FDA commissioner, said in a statement. “Today’s milestone puts us one step closer to altering the course of this pandemic in the U.S.”

Pfizer said it presented the FDA with data from 44,000 clinical trial participants in United States, the European Union, Turkey, South Africa and South America. The company said the data showed the vaccine was 91% effective in preventing infection — a slight drop from the 95% efficacy rate that the data showed when the FDA decided to authorize the vaccine for emergency use in December. Pfizer said the decrease reflected the fact that researchers had more time to catch people who became infected.

A recent poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation, which has been tracking public attitudes during the pandemic, found that 3 of every 10 unvaccinated people said that they would be more likely to get vaccinated with a shot that had been fully approved.

But the pollsters and other experts warned that percentage could be exaggerated.

“I think that is a vanishingly small number of people in real life, ” said Alison Buttenheim, an associate professor of nursing at the University of Pennsylvania and an expert on vaccine hesitancy.

More important, Buttenheim said, would be the effect of requirements.

“Mandates simplify things for people,” she said.

The regulatory action gives doctors more leeway to prescribe a third shot of the Pfizer vaccine to patients, but federal officials strongly discouraged people from seeking extra shots until regulators decide they are safe and effective. Pending regulatory clearance, the federal government plans to start offering booster shots for adults next month.

The vaccine will continue to be authorized for emergency use for children ages 12-15 while Pfizer collects the necessary data required for full approval. A decision on whether to authorize the vaccine for children younger than 12 could be at least several months away, and Woodcock said no child that age should be given any COVID-19 vaccine because regulators lack safety data.

So far, more than 92 million Americans — 54% of those fully inoculated — have gotten Pfizer shots. Most of the rest received Moderna’s vaccine.

Dr. Peter Marks, the FDA’s top vaccine regulator, said the Pfizer vaccine’s licensure followed a rigorous review of hundreds of thousands of pages of data and included inspections of the factories where the vaccine is produced.

“The public and medical community can be confident that although we approved this vaccine expeditiously, it was fully in keeping with our existing high standards for vaccines in the U.S.,” he said.

He said that federal health agencies would continue to monitor the vaccine’s safety and that the FDA would require Pfizer to continue to study the risks of myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle, and pericarditis, an inflammation of the membrane surrounding the heart, including the long-term outcomes for recipients. The FDA in June attached warnings to the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines noting possible increased risk of those conditions after the second dose.

Although Pfizer is now free to market the drug under the name Comirnaty, the company said only the federal government will distribute doses in the United States.

Health experts and state officials welcomed the development. With the delta variant driving up caseloads across the country, “full approval could not come at a more important time,” said Dr. Richard Besser, president of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and former acting director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. He called on schools and businesses to require vaccination before allowing people to congregate indoors.

Less than two months after it appeared to have curbed the spread of the virus, the U.S. is now averaging around 150,000 new cases a day and more than 90,000 hospitalized COVID-19 patients. An average of about 1,000 a day are dying of COVID-19 — a toll that federal health experts recently dismissed as highly unlikely, before the delta variant fully took hold. Many children under 12 are also becoming infected.

Vaccination rates have also been rising in recent weeks, in part because of more fear of the virus. Providers were administering about 837,000 shots a day, a substantial jump from earlier this summer.

Some experts have estimated that full approval might convince just 5% of those who are unvaccinated to get shots. Even if that’s so, “that’s still a huge slice of people,” Dr. Thomas Dobbs, the chief health officer for Mississippi, a state that is particularly hard hit by the delta variant. He said licensure will help “shake loose this false assertion that the vaccines are an ‘experimental’ thing.”

Marks cited a series of other myths about the vaccines as a major impediment to fighting the pandemic, including false claims that the shots would cause infertility, foster rather than prevent COVID disease or had led to thousands of deaths.

“Let me be clear. These claims are simply not true,” he said.

The FDA is in the midst of a decision-making marathon related to coronavirus vaccines. The next major one looming for regulators is whether to authorize booster shots. The Biden administration said last week it plans to offer third shots to adults who got the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines eight months after their second injection, starting Sept. 20. Third shots are already authorized for some people with immune deficiencies, but the risk-benefit calculus is different for the general population.

Federal health officials said that both Pfizer-BioNTech’s and Moderna’s vaccines, which rely on similar technology, wane in potency over time. That trend, they said, is converging with the rise of the particularly dangerous delta variant, making those who completed their vaccinations at the start of the year increasingly vulnerable to infection.

Some health experts have challenged the decision to recommend booster shots as premature, saying the data shows that the vaccines are holding up well against severe disease and hospitalization, including against the delta variant. Boosters would only be warranted if the vaccines were failing to prevent hospitalizations with COVID-19, some of those experts have said.

Regulators are still reviewing Moderna’s application for full approval of its vaccine. That decision could take several weeks. Johnson & Johnson is expected to apply soon for full approval.

Copyright 2021 The New York Times Company

Organization Aims to Integrate Beneficial Songbirds on Farms

For more than 20 years, Watsonville-based organization Wild Farm Alliance (WFA) has aimed to find a sustainable balance between conservation and agriculture.

Established by a like-minded group of wildland proponents and ecological farming advocates, WFA’s primary goal is to bring nature back into the industry.

“As the planet warms, and the biodiversity crisis deepens, it’s really important for farmers to look towards nature, and hopefully benefit from it too,” said Jo Ann Baumgartner, executive director of WFA. “We want to help find that balance.”

One of WFA’s biggest projects is to reintroduce songbirds onto farms, and show farmers that many of them can be beneficial, not just destructive. Just as predatory raptors such as hawks and owls can help control rodent populations, certain songbird species can do their part by eating smaller pests, such as insects that prey on crops.

Baumgartner said she’s been interested in the topic for years. In the 1980s and ‘90s, she and husband Sam Earnshaw, a technical service provider with the National Resource Conservation Service who also runs Hedgerows Unlimited, began looking into sustainable agriculture. This led them to researching the impacts of birds on farms, with Baumgartner going back to school to study how the creatures affected apple orchards.

Over the years, the organization’s focus on birds grew. They began working on a publication on the topic, compiling first-hand stories, studies and experiments conducted across the U.S. The booklet, which was released in 2019, shows how the presence of birds can reduce farm pests while increasing crop yields and/or cost-savings.

“Supporting Beneficial Birds and Managing Pest Birds” has changed the way that farmers engage with WFA, Baumgartner said.

“There are plenty of studies out there showing that birds are doing something bad,” she said. “Once our book came out, farmers wanted to talk about it. And not just about birds who eat what they are growing—which does occur, but it’s only certain species. There are lots of birds that are partly, or very beneficial to a farm.”

Jo Ann Baumgartner, executive director of Wild Farm Alliance, photographs birds at Blue Heron Farms. PHOTO: Tarmo Hannula/The Pajaronian

WFA has worked closely with a number of scientific experts. This includes Daniel Karp, assistant professor in the Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology at UC Davis. Karp has been involved in a long-term study on strawberries, trying to quantify the amount of damages associated with birds. 

He’s found that yes, birds eat insects—many of them ones that eat crops. But certain birds also eat the insects that eat smaller pests.

“So there’s a real balance there,” he said. “There are benefits and drawbacks.”

The primary concerns from farmers, he said, are about food safety issues; questions about whether birds or other animals could be bringing food borne diseases onto farms, leading to outbreaks. If you’re a farm of a certain size, auditors are routinely sent out to make sure you have met certain standards.

“There’s incredible pressure on farmers to discourage wildlife from coming onto the fields in fear of them spreading these diseases,” Karp said. “What we’ve done is study all these things at once. We see what the farmer does to manage that farm; how that affects the wildlife, and how that in turn affects all of these issues.”

Some of the industry standards, Karp said, are “vital” and important in keeping consumers safe. Others, such as the complete removal of habitats around farms, are less science-based and can sometimes lead to more issues.

“Growers are often caught in the middle,” he said. “It can be tricky.”

This past winter, WFA and its partners held a series of Virtual Field Days, where they visited farms to do demonstrations and discuss their findings. Many were held at farms that had installed songbird nest boxes, either independently or through WFA.

“Sometimes farmers are just super busy… it’s not easy to sell to them bringing nature back to their farm,” Baumgartner said. “But putting in a bird box is super easy.”

At Blue Heron Farms in Corralitos, Baumgartner said that owner DennisTamura has installed 32 songbird boxes on his farm. This has attracted species such as western bluebirds and tree swallows, which has resulted in good pest control against beetles. 

“It’s also just delightful to see the parents feeding their young,” Baumgartner said. “A lot of farmers are just enjoying seeing these birds, while also benefiting from natural pest control.”

Farms can be added to WFA’s Songbird Farm Trail, which highlights farms and landscapes that are supporting beneficial birds by installing the boxes. 

“It’s great, because people have been encouraging each other to use them,” Baumgartner said. “We’d love to see a million of these boxes go up, and more vegetative habitats, riparian areas and hedgerows put in. We want to be a resource for people who want to do these things.”

For Karp, it’s all about looking for win-win situations for both farmers and the environment.

“Farmers are very smart, and know their land better than I do,” he said. “We don’t want to pull the wool over anyone’s eyes. We’re feeling more win-win these days, which is great. We’re seeing that there can be really cool examples of ways to integrate conservation into farming.”

Added Baumgartner: “We need to start thinking of agriculture as not only growing our food, but also supporting nature—which in turn, supports everything in the end.”

For information about WFA and their work, visit wildfarmalliance.org.

Local Author to Release First Prose and Poetry Collection

0

Author Olga Rosales Salinas remembers clearly the folklore and myths she heard growing up in Watsonville.

The Mexican legends of La Llorona and El Cucuy in particular stuck with her; stories themed around fear and often used to teach difficult lessons. 

“I’ve often thought about what these myths mean,” Salinas said. “They’ve always kept in my mind.”

Now, Salinas is set to publish her first prose and poetry collection centered around La Llorona, putting a new spin on a traditionally horrifying tale.

“La Llorona: Prose and Poetry” is a mixture of short stories and poems, following the character as if she were a mortal woman who once lived in Watsonville. Each section of the book includes letters, giving insight into how she views and now haunts the town.

LOCAL TIES Author Olga Rosales Salinas was born and raised in Watsonville. PHOTO: Contributed

“Writing this book, I looked at the themes of the La Llorona figure,” she said. “I imagined her as being a real woman, who suffered from postpartum psychosis. It’s been a real exploration of fear and anxiety.”

Salinas attended local schools, including Amesti, Rolling Hills and Aptos High. She began writing from an early age, starting with poems as far back as second grade, and dabbling in prose by fifth.

“My passion has always been writing. I was an ESL kid… at first, I saw poetry as a break from strict grammar rules… though now I understand it’s really hard,” she laughed. 

Salinas left Watsonville in 1997 and got into radio, working in traffic management until 2014. Now, married with two sons, she writes full time, including recurring columns on topics such as anxiety and toxic masculinity. 

All proceeds of “La Llorona Poetry and Prose” will go toward the Rosales Sisters’ Scholarship, which Salinas and her five sisters started in 2019. The scholarship aims to support first generation and immigrant students at Aptos High, which they all attended at one point.

“We all grew up as first generation… our parents were undocumented at that time,” she explained. “Going to an affluent school like that, being there, was very challenging. We want to give back to those kids who are in that situation.”

The scholarship has taken off. In their first round of funding, the sisters raised $800. The most recent round was close to $16,000. 

“First our focus was on first generation and immigrant students, but if we see that there’s a very strong need… we’re going to select them,” Salinas said. “We want to continue giving and make an impact.”

Read more about the scholarship at rsscholarship.com.

An event to celebrate the release of “La Llorona: Poetry and Prose,” as well as raise more money for the scholarship is scheduled for Aug. 27 at Pajaro Valley Arts, 37 Sudden St., from 6-8pm. 

A lineup of entertainment includes sets by local visual artist Jaime Sánchez, poet and filmmaker Elizabeth Gomez, and writers Martin García, Dr. Victoria Banales and Mireya Gomez-Contreras. A live musical performance will feature the trio of Belinda Elvia Cabrera, Miguel Carero and Jorge Mariscal.

Salinas will close out the show.

More fundraisers are planned for Sept. 18 at Habitat Hair Salon in San Francisco, and in Oakland on Oct. 23. 

Salinas said she was eager for her book to be released and enjoyed by readers. 

“It’s my first collection,” she said. “I’m very excited.”

For information and to order a copy of “La Llorona Poetry and Prose,” visit olgars.com.

Rob Brezsny’s Astrology: Aug. 25-31

Astrology, Horoscope, Stars, Zodiac Signs
Free will astrology for the week of August 25

2019 Arroyo Seco Sauvignon Blanc Keeps Summer Alive

Pacific Catch’s ‘Endless Summer’ menu includes mouth-watering ceviche tacos

Bruno’s Bar and Grill Keeps Scotts Valley Bellies Happy

brunos-scotts-valley
Feisty Tots, a Bruno’s original, is loaded with honey mustard pulled pork and bourbon bacon jam

Bantam Reopens; Michelin Recognizes a Pair of Santa Cruz County Restaurants

bantam
Alderwood and Mentone selected to appear in the coveted 2021 Michelin Guide

Outdoor World Closing Final Store

outdoor-world-closing
Outdoor World Sporting Goods, which has sold camping supplies in Santa Cruz County for more than a half-century, will soon close its last location in the Capitola Mall.

Can Gov. Newsom Keep His Job? A Recall Effort in California Shows a Dead Heat.

governor-gavin-newsom
The vote is expected to come down to whether Democrats can mobilize enough of the state’s enormous base to counteract Republican enthusiasm for Newsom’s ouster.

It’s ‘Back to That Isolation Bubble’ for Workers Pining for the Office

remote-work
In a survey of more than 950 workers, 31% said they would prefer to work from home full time; 45% said they wanted to be in a workplace or an office full time; 24% said they wanted to split time between work and home.

FDA Grants Full Approval to Pfizer-BioNTech Vaccine

Biden-Pfizer
The Food and Drug Administration on Monday granted full approval to Pfizer-BioNTech’s coronavirus vaccine for people 16 and older, making it the first to move beyond emergency use status in the United States.

Organization Aims to Integrate Beneficial Songbirds on Farms

tree-swallow
For more than 20 years, Watsonville-based organization Wild Farm Alliance (WFA) has aimed to find a sustainable balance between conservation and agriculture.

Local Author to Release First Prose and Poetry Collection

Author Olga Rosales Salinas remembers clearly the folklore and myths she heard growing up in Watsonville.
17,623FansLike
8,845FollowersFollow