Rob Brezsny’s Astrology: Nov. 3-9

Free will astrology for the week of Nov. 3

ARIES (March 21-April 19): Are you still hoping to heal from psychological wounds that you rarely speak about? May I suggest that you consider speaking about them in the coming weeks? Not to just anyone and everyone, of course, but rather to allies who might be able to help you generate at least a partial remedy. The moment is ripe, in my opinion. Now is a favorable time for you to become actively involved in seeking cures, fixes, and solace. Life will be more responsive than usual to such efforts.

TAURUS (April 20-May 20): “The delights of self-discovery are always available,” writes author Gail Sheehy. I will add that those delights will be extra accessible for you in the coming weeks. In my view, you’re in a phase of super-learning about yourself. You will attract help and support if you passionately explore mysteries and riddles that have eluded your understanding. Have fun surprising and entertaining yourself, Taurus. Make it your goal to catch a new glimpse of your hidden depths every day.

GEMINI (May 21-June 20): Gemini novelist and philosopher Muriel Barbery says, “I find this a fascinating phenomenon: the ability we have to manipulate ourselves so that the foundation of our beliefs is never shaken.” In the coming weeks, I hope you will overcome any tendency you might have to manipulate yourself in such a way. In my view, it’s crucial for your mental and spiritual health that you at least question your belief system‚ and perhaps even risk shaking its foundation. Don’t worry: Even if doing so ushers in a period of uncertainty, you’ll be much stronger for it in the long run. More robust and complete beliefs will be available for you to embrace.

CANCER (June 21-July 22): In her book Mathilda, novelist Mary Shelley (1797-1851) has the main character ask, “What had I to love?” And the answer? “Oh, many things: there was the moonshine, and the bright stars; the breezes and the refreshing rains; there was the whole earth and the sky that covers it.” I bring this to your attention in the hope of inspiring you to make your own tally of all the wonders you love. I trust your inventory will be at least ten times as long as Mathilda’s. Now is a favorable time for you to gather all the healing that can come from feeling waves of gratitude, even adoration, for the people, animals, experiences, situations, and places that rouse your interest and affection and devotion.

LEO (July 23-Aug. 22): Our memories are always changing. Whenever we call up a specific remembrance, it’s different from the last time we visited that same remembrance‚ colored by all the new memories we have accumulated in the meantime. Over time, an event we recall from when we were nine years old has gone through a great deal of shape-shifting in our memory so much so that it may have little resemblance to the first time we remembered it. Is this a thing to be mourned or celebrated? Maybe some of both. Right now, though, it’s to be celebrated. You have extra power to declare your independence from any memories that don’t make you feel good. Why hold onto them if you can’t even be sure they’re accurate?

VIRGO (Aug. 23-Sept. 22): In 1962, astronaut John Glenn became the first American to orbit the Earth in a spacecraft. His flight marked the first time that NASA, the agency in charge of spaceflight, had ever used electronic computers. Glenn, who was also an engineer, wanted the very best person to verify the calculations, and that was Virgo mathematician Katherine Johnson. In fact, Glenn said he wouldn’t fly without her involvement. I bring this to your attention, Virgo, because I believe the coming months will be a favorable time for you to garner the kind of respect and recognition that Katherine Johnson got from John Glenn. Make sure everyone who needs to know does indeed know about your aptitudes and skills.

LIBRA (Sept. 23-Oct. 22): According to an Apache proverb, “It is better to have less thunder in the mouth and more lightning in the hand.” If you act on that counsel in the coming weeks, you will succeed in doing what needs to be done. There is only one potential downfall you could be susceptible to, in my view, and that is talking and thinking too much about the matter you want to accomplish before you actually take action to accomplish it. All the power you need will arise as you resolutely wield the lightning in your hands.

SCORPIO (Oct. 23-Nov. 21): To encourage young people to come to its shows, the English National Opera has offered a lot of cheap tickets. Here’s another incentive: Actors sing in English, not Italian or French or German. Maybe most enticing for audiences is that they are encouraged to boo the villains. The intention is to make attendees feel relaxed and free to express themselves. I’m pleased to give you Scorpios permission to boo the bad guys in your life during the coming weeks. In fact, I will love it if you are extra eloquent and energetic about articulating all your true feelings. In my view, now is prime time for you to show the world exactly who you are.

SAGITTARIUS (Nov. 22-Dec. 21): “If we’re not careful, we are apt to grant ultimate value to something we’ve just made up in our heads,” said Zen priest Kosho Uchiyama. In my view, that’s a problem all of us should always be alert for. As I survey my own past, I’m embarrassed and amused as I remember the countless times I committed this faux pas. For instance, during one eight-month period, I inexplicably devoted myself to courting a woman who had zero interest in a romantic relationship with me. I bring this to your attention, Sagittarius, because I’m concerned that right now, you’re more susceptible than usual to making this mistake. But since I’ve warned you, maybe you’ll avoid it. I hope so!

CAPRICORN (Dec. 22-Jan. 19): Capricorn author Asha Sanaker writes, “There is a running joke about us Capricorns that we age backwards. Having been born as burdened, cranky old people, we become lighter and more joyful as we age because we have gained so much practice in wielding responsibility. And in this way we learn, over time, about what are our proper burdens to carry and what are not. We develop clear boundaries around how to hold our obligations with grace.” Sanaker’s thoughts will serve as an excellent meditation for you in the coming weeks. You’re in a phase when you can make dramatic progress in embodying the skills she articulates.

AQUARIUS (Jan. 20-Feb. 18): As author Denise Linn reminded us, “The way you treat yourself sends a very clear message to others about how they should treat you.” With that advice as your inspiration, I will ask you to deepen your devotion to self-care in the coming weeks. I will encourage you to shower yourself with more tenderness and generosity than you have ever done in your life. I will also urge you to make sure these efforts are apparent to everyone in your life. I am hoping for you to accomplish a permanent upgrade in your love for yourself, which should lead to a similar upgrade in the kindness you receive from others.

PISCES (Feb. 19-March 20): You have at your disposal a prodigiously potent creative tool: your imagination. If there’s a specific experience or object you want to bring into your world, the first thing you do is visualize it. The practical actions you take to live the life you want to live always refer back to the scenes in your mind’s eye. And so every goal you fulfill, every quest you carry out, every liberation you achieve, begins as an inner vision. Your imagination is the engine of your destiny. It’s the catalyst with which you design your future. I bring these ideas to your attention, dear Pisces, because November is Celebrate Your Imagination Month.

Homework: Describe what actions you’ll take in the next six months to make your world a funner, holier place. Newsletter.FreeWillAstrology.com

Aptos Vineyard’s 2019 Syrah Boasts Flavors of Sweet Tobacco, Plum and Licorice

Santa Cruz Cancer Benefit Group’s annual Gourmet Grazing on the Green fundraiser is a wonderful opportunity to taste superb local wines and delicious food from local vendors and restaurants while raising money for a worthy cause. This year’s Oct. 9 event was a huge success.

One of the wines I tasted was Aptos Vineyard’s 2019 Santa Cruz Mountains Syrah ($36). This superb Syrah has three exciting things going for it: It’s produced and bottled by Aptos Vineyard, the grapes are from the esteemed Lester Estate and John Benedetti is the winemaker.

Benedetti, who also makes wine under his Sante Arcangeli label, is one of the best local winemakers. I can’t say enough about his expertise when it comes to turning grapes into wine.

“This wine is an aromatic, smooth delight,” the folks at Aptos Vineyard say. “This big-bodied Syrah boasts complex, true-to-varietal flavors from start to finish.” Swirling the wine invites long, lean legs, with aromas of herbs, eucalyptus, sage, smoked meats and graphite. Full-bodied black fruit and sweet tobacco along with plum, licorice and açaí berry add a wealth of lush flavors. Aptos Vineyard was started in the ’70s by the late Judge John Marlo, so the present-day wines are given judicial names. The 2019 Syrah is called Amicus Curiae.

A pop-up release of this Syrah will be held in the Sante Arcangeli tasting room in Aptos Village 1-4pm on Sunday, Nov. 7. Alexandra Baker, family member and manager of the newly revived Aptos Vineyard (now co-owned by James Baker and Tina Cacace), says that Aptos Vineyard will be pouring flights or by the glass at Sante Arcangeli’s tasting room.

“The idea behind the pop-up,” Baker says, “is that guests are encouraged to come and go, taste our wine and also enjoy Sante Arcangeli’s wine as well.”

Sante Arcangeli’s tasting room is at 154 Aptos Village Way Unit C1, Aptos. Santewinery.com. For more info, visit aptosvineyard.com or call 831-706-6090.

Downtown Santa Cruz’s Café Gratitude Offers a 100% Vegan Menu

Manager/server Adam Lanfear had worked at a popular restaurant on the wharf, but was laid off during the pandemic. After a few months, Lanfear ended up at Café Gratitude. The downtown spot—100% vegan with an entirely plant-based menu made up of primarily local organic ingredients—is filled with cool art and laid-back vibes that pair well with the friendly service. Lanfear explains that the names of the dishes on Gratitude’s menu are as thoughtful as the food itself, such as the buffalo-sauce-tossed “Daring Cauliflower Wings” and the fried “Magical Mushrooms.” His personal favorite is the “Amore,” a Caprese-loaded sandwich. And the desserts, beginning with fresh vegan cheesecake available in different flavors, don’t disappoint. Café Gratitude is open every day, 11am-9pm, for indoor and outdoor dining and takeout. After the pandemic layoff, Lanfear feels like there isn’t a better name for the restaurant where he landed. He recently spoke to GT about his appreciation for Gratitude and why he opts for a plant-based diet.

Why did you choose to switch to a plant-based diet?

ADAM LANFEAR: I used to eat a lot of meat; I grew up in New York and worked at a lot of pizza places and ate a lot of fried, delicious and greasy food. When I came out to California to attend college, I started becoming aware of all the environmental detriments of eating meat. I slowly, over the next six years, started phasing out meats and cheeses and have now been plant-based for three years. It relieved a lot of my eco-guilt, and it’s helped me feel a lot better physically and sharper mentally.

Why are you grateful to work at Café Gratitude?

My grocery bill has gone down because I can eat everything on the menu, which I really appreciate. And also, as a queer person, I’m grateful to work at such a safe space that’s so comfortable and accepting of the LGBTQIA+ community. I find these spaces very valuable in Santa Cruz, and it’s not often that you find a place that also has such great food. I’m also happy that things are slowly returning to normal after the pandemic, or whatever normal is these days.

103 Lincoln St., Santa Cruz, 831-427-9583; cafegsc.com.

11th Hour Coffee Takes Over Former Kelly’s Space on Westside

Like many of you, I still miss Kelly’s French Bakery. It has been a beacon at the corner of Swift and Ingalls that paved the way for Westside coffee, post-yoga lunches, pastry treats and later as a platform for food trucks, wine tastings and a gateway hub for umpteen spinoff eating and drinking emporia.

Then there was the pandemic. And now, even in the midst of popular coffee and pastry depots, there’s always room for more. The Kelly’s location is now 11th Hour Coffee, which opened on Halloween with a full barrage of breakfast specialties, panini, coffees, plus local beer and wine. The area’s newest coffee center is brought to the Westside by owners/brothers Joel and Brayden Estby, who’ve won fans over for their fresh-roasted beans at the Food Lounge in downtown Santa Cruz. Be prepared to be amazed! The former Kelly’s interior has been completely and handsomely transformed—and so has the outside patio, lavish with sleek built-in wooden booths, benches and tables. Plus, plenty of tall heat lamps. Seriously, it’s a whole new planet on which to consume your Nitro coffee and avocado toast. Business hours for the attractive coffeehouse expansion are 7am-4pm Mon-Wed, until 7pm Thurs-Sun. 11thhourcoffee.com.

Will Walk for Wine

Of course you will, since it’s time once more for the oenophile’s version of a pub crawl, the Downtown Santa Cruz Fall 2021 Wine Walk, on Sunday, Nov. 14, from 2pm to 5pm.

What you do is head on over to Soif on Walnut, get your $35/$40 ticket, your glass, and your map, and then head on out to lots of different venues (the map shows you), where you’ll be able to taste pours from Assiduous, Bargetto, Birichino, Muns, Pelican Ranch, Random Ridge, Roudon-Smith, Cruz and Wrights Station. You’ll essentially be tasting your way through boutiques, retail hot spots, various salons and mercantile. Outdoor tasting? Yes! Remember: you must be 21 or older with valid ID and show proof of Covid vaccination. For tickets and info, go to eventbrite.com.

A Night at GabriellaA packed house, inside and out, greeted us last week at Gabriella Cafe—a memorable dinner. It felt like dining at the house of a good friend—as it always does, thanks to the laid-back vigilance of owner/host Paul Cocking. Great service and a relentlessly excellent kitchen served us dish after dish of distinctive flavors, including a pan-seared local coho salmon ($42) atop a bed of broccoli, baby carrots and rich, creamy polenta. On top of the moist seafood lay a thick glaze of chimichurri sauce, which I consider an excuse to visit Gabriella all by itself. Our poet companion managed to consume half the tender lamb shank on his generous entree ($42) while saving room to taste other dishes. We all three feasted on a starter of roast beets, arugula and chevre with an intriguing pistachio and candied citrus puree ($12). Outstanding. Also, a plate of perfect late-harvest tomatoes from Live Earth Farms, layered with fresh basil and slices of buffalo mozzarella—a truly satisfying Caprese ($12).
A simple dish, simple elements, but a complex whole greater than the sum of its parts. Most unexpected was an evening special of watermelon gazpacho gorgeously presented—long, crisp ribbons of tortilla, transparent slices of cucumber, radish, onion and cubes of fresh watermelon, arrayed in a wide bowl of cool crimson soup, and bites of ripe avocado in each spoonful ($11). We were all three blown away by this example of chef Gema Cruz’s ability to reinvent familiar dishes. Kudos to one of the sweetest dining spots in this or any region. Gabriella Cafe – Tues-Fri, lunch 11am; dinner 5pm. Sat/Sun brunch 10am. 910 Cedar St., gabriellacafe.com.

Home Care Is Broken. Can Congress Fix It?

By Reed Abelson, The New York Times

Spinal surgery four years ago left Alene Shaheed in a wheelchair and dependent on short daily visits from home health aides to help her get around.

But her support system fell apart this year during the prolonged coronavirus pandemic, and her routine care became unpredictable. Four agencies serving her hometown, Jacksonville, Florida, failed to provide aides regularly, due to severe shortages of the low-wage workers.

“If no one comes for three days, I don’t get a bath for three days,” said the 76-year-old. “I don’t have anyone to fix meals, so I’m eating ramen noodles until someone gets there.”

About 800,000 people are on waiting lists to receive subsidized home care. For millions of Americans, finding reliable and affordable assistance to stay at home — instead of moving into a nursing home, where COVID-19 killed tens of thousands of people — has never seemed more urgent.

Expanding home and community-based services is part of the legislative package that President Joe Biden and Democrats have proposed. At this stage of negotiations in Congress, the amount for such programs under Medicaid — partly to increase the historically low wages of home care workers — has been reduced to $150 billion from $400 billion over eight years.

“We’re going to expand services for seniors so families can get help from well-trained, well-paid professionals to help them take care of their parents at home — to cook a meal for them, to get their groceries for them, to help them get around, to help them live in their own home with the dignity they deserve to be afforded,” Biden said Thursday.

Will the amount in the current plan be enough? Supporters say the new health care money would shift Medicaid’s decadeslong bias away from nursing home care. Many experts doubt promises that this round of funding can fix a system as broken as home care, especially as the growing retirement of the boomer generation requires more assistance to stay independent and strains health care funding.

“You have to be very realistic about the amount of need you have in the system right now,” said David Grabowski, a professor of health care policy at Harvard Medical School. The $150 billion does represent a significant influx of funds, but there are limits, he said: “Once you start to do the math, the dollars don’t go as far as you’d like.”

States are required to use Medicaid funds to cover nursing home care, but states have considerable leeway under federal regulations to decide how much should be allocated to provide home and community-based services.

People who need help with tasks like feeding themselves, getting dressed or taking medication must often qualify for a Medicaid waiver to get home care. Medicaid, a federal-state program that is the primary source of coverage for long-term care, spends about $114 billion a year on these home and community-based services, representing well over half of the overall spending on long-term care. About 2.5 million people received waivers in 2018, according to the latest data available in a report by the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Medicare, the federal insurance program for older and disabled adults, does not cover long-term care, and it limits the kind of home care people can receive.

It’s well known that demand far outstrips supply for home care for those who want to live independently. Some people may have private insurance or pay for the care themselves.

Under Medicaid, the waiting lists for older and disabled Americans wanting home care keep growing because states cap enrollment. Most people on the lists live in states that did not expand Medicaid, according to a Kaiser analysis.

Benefits for home care also vary widely from state to state. For example, someone in Pennsylvania is eligible for about $50,000 a year under Medicaid for home or community services, while someone in Iowa may get only $21,000.

The lack of funding “really forces older adults into institutions,” said Amber Christ, an attorney with Justice in Aging, a nonprofit group. The new congressional package, she said, means that “we have an opportunity to flip the script.”

She and other advocates plan to push for additional money. “We’re going to keep working to increase funding because more is needed to ensure all aging adults and people with disabilities have the option to receive the care they need at home,” she said in an email.

Increasing wages for home health workers has been a contentious provision for Republicans, who see it as a giveaway to unions and would limit states’ flexibility in spending new funds.

Without detailed legislative language, calculating how the proposed $150 billion in the Democrats’ proposal will be spent is still guesswork.

Jonathan Gruber, a health economist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said the lower figure would provide home services for perhaps 1 million more people and create about 400,000 new jobs. That could include jobs for caretakers like family members who are unpaid but unable to go to work.

But if the amount gets cut further — and negotiations on the bill are far from over — supporters warn that states may be less willing to expand services.

“We need a big investment,” said Nicole T. Jorwic, senior director of public policy at The Arc, an advocacy group for people with physical and developmental disabilities. The bill has to provide at least $150 billion so “states will see the value and worth of taking it up,” she said.

Even that level of funding might not eliminate the waiting lists, but “it will help take people off,” she said.

Under the American Rescue Plan Act passed by Congress this year, all states made use of temporary funds allocated to shore up home and community-based services, Jorwic said.

Still, the issue of wages in a pandemic economy in which people are shunning lower-rung jobs bodes ill for the home health industry, whose workers have long been paid far less than others in service industries. Some businesses now pay $15 an hour or more, luring away those in underpaying jobs and leaving the vulnerable without reliable help.

About 70% of long-term care workers earn less than $30,000 a year, according to Kaiser, and they are more likely to live in poverty. “It’s the same person who is aging into poverty and who is going to get pushed into a nursing home,” said Christ of Justice in Aging.

While details are sparse, the proposed legislation would require states to prove that the funds were funneled toward higher wages. “This would be the first time that there was a large federal investment to increase wages,” Jorwic said.

Higher wages are critical to finding more aides for those like Shaheed in Florida. “They’re no longer able to find anyone willing to come in for the low wages they are paying,” she said. “Nobody is going to come and help me for $10 an hour.”

For those who have had to wait to qualify for financial aid for home care, the difference is palpable.

People like Stephen Grammer, who has cerebral palsy, were warned since childhood that they faced institutionalization if home care could not be routinely provided.

In his 20s, Grammer spent nearly a decade in a nursing home after his mother became ill. He chafed at the restrictions imposed on him while he was living with older adults with Alzheimer’s. If he left the premises, he had to be back by midnight or it would count against the 18 nights a year he was allowed to be outside.

“When I had to use the restroom, I would press the call button, and many times the workers would come and turn off my call light and would walk away even though I had to go to the bathroom,” he said by email.

Grammer, who uses an electric wheelchair and advocates for disabled individuals these days, eventually qualified for a Medicaid waiver and another state program that provides housing. Now at 41, he lives on his own in Roanoke, Virginia, and someone comes in 16 hours a day, from 6 a.m. to 2 p.m. and from 4 p.m. to midnight.

“I have the freedom to come and go as I please,” Grammer said.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

City Looks to Contract Out Recreation Services

While the majority of public recreation programs aren’t expected to return until late spring or early summer next year, the city of Scotts Valley is looking at how it could provide these community services as efficiently as possible.

At a special joint study session with the City Council and the Scotts Valley Parks & Recreation Commission, the idea of contracting out some of the programs the City used to operate in-house took center stage.

After the novel coronavirus struck, Scotts Valley laid off its entire Recreation Division (except for the recreation manager), since it was clear it wouldn’t be making any money off program fees anytime soon. But now, with most of the population vaccinated, and Skypark having just received a new carpet of grass, City planners have been looking towards a rebirth for parks and rec.

The review of a report prepared by Management Partners, held Sept. 29, took aim at the pre-pandemic average of $250,000 Scotts Valley had been investing in recreation programming. It identified opportunities to partner with neighboring municipalities for some activities, and to hand over the day-to-day provision of others to private parties.

The local government consulting firm recommended the City continue to handle facility rentals, including sport field uses and special events programming, but said it should consider contracting Siltanen Swimming Pool aquatics programs to Santa Cruz County, Boulder Creek Recreation and Park District, or the Boys and Girls Club of Santa Cruz County.

The Management Partners’ report, titled the “Recreation Services Assessment and Restoration Plan,” recommended collaborating with Capitola or Santa Cruz for classes and adult sports programs, and encouraged the creation of a separate nonprofit board to oversee the Scotts Valley Senior Center.

And how many full-time staffers should work in the Recreation Division? According to Management Partners, the answer is three—a manager, a coordinator and an administrative assistant.

Before the pandemic, the division was staffed with two senior directors, a coordinator, a secretary and a manager, who also assisted with the child care program when its staff were away.

“As a result, she spent much of her time directly involved with day-to-day programs which took time away from managing the division,” according to the consultant report.

And the City should conduct a facility fee study, Management Partners also recommended.

Interim City Manager Brian Haddix characterized the direction Scotts Valley is heading not as “privatization” but as a way for the City to serve its citizens more proficiently through a series of agreements that would cut down on overhead.

“Privatization is when you lose control—you turn over the activities to someone else entirely,” he said. “Contracting-out is when you contract with another party to do the activity, but you still have control over it.”

Public Works Director Chris Lamm said many existing recreation programs are already managed by other parties, such as little league, soccer and girls softball.

“All of those are programs that are much-beloved by the community, and utilize City facilities, but they’re not City-run programs necessarily,” he said. “As we look forward to bringing those programs that were cut back online, we’re looking at what’s the best model to do that.”

Management Partners recommended Scotts Valley “transfer responsibility” of organizing sports leagues, for both adults and youth, to local groups.

According to Lamm, for the programs that have traditionally been run by the City, Scotts Valley officials would still take “the lead” in a service restart.

“The one thing we’re looking at is whether or not it makes sense for the City to hire staff to physically run those programs directly, or, can we have the best quality of service and user experience met with a better business model to provide that service,” he said.

The Management Partners report noted that staff is dedicated to its programs and takes a hands-on approach.

“However, due to this heavy daily involvement, many of the administrative duties were difficult to complete,” it reads. “These include lack of data collection, use of technology, marketing, fee studies and cost recovery goals, training, networking within the parks and recreation profession, and use of best practices.”

It also states that the amount of time required for staff to handle work related to commissions, committees and special events was “not recognized by many City leaders.”

Haddix says contracting out could allow Scotts Valley to get high-quality programming from a provider that covers its own administrative costs by working with a variety of clients.

“By spreading those fixed costs out we pay less,” he said. “That means the savings that we get, we can apply to additional services. So, the community benefits from professional services, and the City gets a savings, allowing it to turn around and enhance the overall recreation picture it presents to the community.”

In his prior job, as assistant public works director in Menlo Park, Lamm helped manage land development, utilities and capital improvements, but recreation was in a separate department.

However, he told the Press Banner he’s seen how contracting out for professional engineering services—particularly in the design stage—could be a helpful tool for a community.

In the report, Management Partners said its recommendations “can realistically be implemented in the next six months to allow recreation services to be fully restored” in Scotts Valley.

The company said Scotts Valley should evaluate the current child care program at Brook Knoll Elementary School and consider long-term agreements with both Scotts Valley Unified School District and the Boys and Girls Club of Santa Cruz County, to allow this type of arrangement to continue.

Child Care in California hasn’t Rebounded; Why Many Workers aren’t Returning

By Grace Gedye, CalMatters

For Tonya Muhammad, who runs Lil Critters Family Daycare in Hawthorne, spring of 2020 was, in a word, “horrible.” The early rush on cleaning supplies meant that she and her husband had to criss-cross Los Angeles to find disinfectant, sourcing bottles of Lysol from a dental supply company and aloe vera from a local nursery to make homemade hand sanitizer.  

But that wasn’t the worst of it. Muhammad’s assistant left, fearing for the health of her grandmother, whom she lived with. That was in March of 2020, and Muhammad hasn’t been able to find a replacement since, despite posting the job on Indeed, Facebook Jobs and at a nearby community college. “I’ve even paid for fingerprints for a couple (of applicants) and then there’s just no follow up,” said Muhammad.

Without the watchful eyes of a second adult, she’s had to reduce the number of kids she looks after from 14 to 6, and has gone from being a 24-hour day care to operating from 6 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. She estimates that her income from the day care has fallen by more than half.

California lost about 27,800 child care workers between February and April of 2020 — or roughly a third of its workforce — according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. From then through September of 2021, about 19,600 have come back. Still, the workforce is about 10% smaller than it was pre-pandemic. 

Even before the pandemic, however, there wasn’t enough child care available in California to meet families’ needs. Labor issues that long bubbled below the surface are now driving acute staffing shortages: low pay, long hours and limited benefits. That makes it hard to earn a living in the industry that supports the rest of the economy.

Child care providers find themselves stretching across a gap between what parents are able to afford and the wages they need to offer in order to attract and retain staff.

The state of California plays a role here: It reimburses some child care providers who care for low and moderate income families, at rates advocates argue have long been too low. In June, a new union representing home child care providers who work with families receiving state subsidies won workers a 15% raise from the state.  

Still most Californian child care is provided through the private market. And that system has failed miserably, says Elena Montoya, a senior research and policy associate at UC Berkeley’s Center for the Study of Child Care Employment. “The current (labor) shortage is a result of placing the burden of paying for child care on parents, rather than acknowledging that child care is a public good.”

A pandemic was the last thing child care providers needed. Day care centers weren’t sure what the COVID-19 rules would be for them and were struggling to secure protective gear, said Cecilia Rojas, resource and referral manager at Crystal Stairs Inc., a Los Angeles-based organization that helps families find child care. Some child care workers quit to take care of their own school-aged children, who were suddenly stuck at home. Others left because they were worried about being exposed to the virus. Parents pulled their kids out of day care, leading to budget shortfalls and closures.

Federal and state relief funds did help keep child care facilities open. A survey of early childhood educators conducted by the National Association for the Education of Young Children in early summer found that nearly half of the 1,200 respondents in California said they would have had to close were it not for the aid. 

But the federal funds, said Montoya, “as important and terrific as they are, they really are a short-term stopgap to avoid the total collapse of the system.” 

California did make a large investment in transitional kindergarten in July, committing $2.7 billion to expand free transitional kindergarten to all 4-year-olds across the state by the school year that starts in 2025.  Proponents consider that a game-changer; some child care operators fear it could undercut their business model as they lose 4-year-olds whose tuition helps cover the higher cost of caring for infants. 

In the meantime, lots of child care facilities can’t fill their job openings. “Programs are actually having to close for the day or for the week, and it’s not because they don’t have children to serve,” said Nina Buthee, executive director of Every Child California, an organization that supports early childhood educators. It’s because they’re short staffed. Buthee says it’s the first time she’s heard of that happening in the 20 years she’s been working on child care issues.

Child care workers earn lower wages than pre-K teachers, who in turn make less than kindergarten teachers, according to data from the Center for the Study of Child Care Employment at Berkeley. There are several factors driving the pay gap. 

One is that kindergarten teachers are required to have bachelor’s degrees, whereas child care providers typically are not. But there are less quantifiable factors too. 

“We’ve undervalued and underpaid caregiving” said Kristin Schumacher, a senior analyst at the California Budget and Policy Center, “for as long as it’s been a career choice, and this has sexist and racist roots that can be traced back to slavery.”

The lower pay for child care workers also creates a racial pay disparity among early childhood educators, since Black and Latino women are more likely to work with infants and toddlers than their white peers, says Montoya. Researchers at the Berkeley center calculated that nationally, Black early educators are paid on average $0.78 less per hour than their white counterparts.

The wages are so low that many child care workers have side gigs or second jobs to make ends meet. Muhammad wrote a book about child care and also works as a consultant, advising other providers. She now makes about half of her income from those other endeavors.

Tonia McMillian, who owns a family child care business in Bellflower and was active in the effort to unionize child care workers, also teaches CPR classes and runs a catering business. At one point, she said, she was paying her staff minimum wage but only making $4.15 per hour herself, after covering all the costs of running the business. “Something (is) wrong with that picture,” she said.

The low wages also mean that child care workers end up on public assistance. In 2018, the Berkeley center found that 58% of child care workers families’ in California are on one or more public assistance programs, like CalFresh.

One way or the other, there’s public money going to child care workers, says Gemma DiMatteo, research director for California Child Care Resource and Referral Network. “It’s through these social support services, or you could just fund the child care and make sure that the staff is getting paid adequately.”

One factor holding down child care providers’ low wages: the state reimbursement rate for care to low and moderate income families. The state uses two rates, depending on the subsidy program. One, known as the regional market rate, is used to subsidize care for parents who have lower incomes and are working or seeking employment. That rate isn’t based on what it costs to provide high quality child care and pay staff well — it’s based on a state study of what child care providers in different regions charge families. But the market rate isn’t necessarily representative of how much child care providers actually need; it reflects what they think they can reasonably charge parents who are already, in many cases, paying more than they can afford

The regional market rate also is often out-of-date. The state conducts the market analysis every couple of years; right now, California is reimbursing some child care providers based on numbers from 2018. 

Muhammad said that for her, even that 15% increase the home-based child care providers union negotiated won’t make a meaningful difference.

Child care has been underfunded for so long, said Buthee, director of Every Child California, that rate increases need to be huge to make a difference. Making the system whole in California would cost about a billion dollars, she continued. “When you look at the budget it’s like ‘whoa whoa whoa, that’s too much money’” she said, but “that’s just how much it costs to catch up.”

Harmit Pabla, who owns Genius Kids, a child care center in Sacramento County that serves more than 100 kids, has had six of his staff of 16 leave over the last year. Three left for reasons directly related to the pandemic and three found different jobs, including at Amazon and Walmart distribution centers. Those companies offered slightly better benefits, said Pabla. As large corporations, they have more buying power to negotiate lower rates with insurance companies. “We can’t compete with the big boys,” Pabla said. 

He’s getting inquiries from parents about openings, but he said he’s not accepting more children because he can’t find staff.

Across California, 77% of early childhood educators surveyed identify wages as the main recruitment challenge. But unlike other industries, where business owners can cover increasing wages by raising prices, lots of child care owners know their customers — parents — can’t afford to pay more. 

While kids are heading back to in-person school and the coronavirus delta variant appears to be in decline, California’s child care system is not in the clear. The survey by the National Association for the Education of Young Children found that 47% of respondents in California were considering leaving their program or closing their home child care location within the next year. 

That may be especially true for workers who had just gotten their start before the virus made the job more risky and complicated. 

“Will we lose those excited new educators who could have gone on to become really seasoned, amazing contributors to the field?” asked Krista Olson, a research and policy associate at the Berkeley Center for the Study of Child Care Employment. 

McMillian, who is 62, hopes to retire from child care soon. “It’s extremely hard to walk away, especially if you don’t have a nest egg,” she said. She’s started working as a child care consultant, and just signed a lease on space to open a sports bar. 

Muhammad is planning her exit too. Once she winds down her child care business, she’ll be relying on her other gigs—her consulting, a child care course and book she wrote, a hotline she runs to answer providers’ questions, speaking gigs and more. It will take some time to make sure those projects bring in enough steady income. “I wish it was yesterday,” she said, “but I’m giving myself a year.”

Theater Guild Nearing Dress Rehearsal for Performing Arts Center Building

It scrounged-up curtains from Broadway. It sourced seating that originally came from the Bellagio in Las Vegas. And now, the Scotts Valley Community Theater Guild is nearing completion of a performing arts center at the site of the old roller rink.

It’s taken about $80,000 of concrete work and uncounted hours of volunteer sweat equity to get to this point, according to Guild board member Trish Melehan.

“It’s going to be a cultural hub of the city,” the 70-year-old local arts commissioner of 15 years said, noting their space can accommodate ballet, choral groups and bands with large followings. “We’re going to have seating for up to 500 people.”

And while the group is aiming for a soft-opening social in December, and much of the seismic retrofitting is now visible on the shell of the structure, it’s been a long journey to get here, Melehan explains.

“Our mission was to raise funds to create a performing arts space in Scotts Valley,” she said, noting local groups used to use the theater at Bethany University until it closed in 2011. “Bethany sort of went defunct and they sold to 1440 Multiversity. So that venue was not available anymore.”

When the City purchased the old roller rink building for a new library, it had to figure out what to do with the other half of the building.

“There were various proposals,” Melehan says, looking back to the community discussions around the facility’s future. “The most prominent voices were those that said we need a performing arts center.”

She remembers what it was like to step inside for the first time.

“There was all kinds of stuff in there,” she said, recalling the sunken floor, the kitchen and little cubby holes. “All that had been done was a wall had been put up to separate it from the library.”

In the end, the Guild had to demolish everything and start from scratch.

Over the years the group drummed up several thousand dollars from local arts boosters. That included a $50,000 grant and a $30,000 anonymous donation.

“We’ve raised a lot but it’s taken a long time,” she said, adding they had to assure Council at one point they were still serious about completing the center. “About two years ago they made us sign an official lease.”

The Guild got an architect to put designs together pro bono.

City officials confirmed the group successfully pulled some building permits, although it noted they are currently in the process of renegotiating a new lease.

Board members had high hopes they might attract a generous corporate backer or philanthropist to take up their cause, to turn the space into, say, the “Netflix Center for the Performing Arts.” But that never came to pass.

So, although the group had a relatively grandiose vision at the outset, it’s now proposing a phased roll-out where they would start in a more modest set-up, then improve things over time.

“We decided we had to get more realistic,” Melehan said, noting they’ve rejigged plans to be more flexible for groups that may want to rent the facility. “Everything is portable.”

According to Melehan, after the City allowed a developer to build in Santas Village, and forewent a performing arts center there, it got a million-dollar payout—and promised the Guild around $95,000 towards the Guild’s plans.

“It’s one of the hurdles we had to cross to where we are today,” she said, adding local officials didn’t seem to have faith they could actually manifest the performing arts space. “The City never wanted to give us the money.”

City officials told the group its dream would come with a $2 million price tag (which later ballooned to $4 million), she added.

“They were right about that,” she said, adding they gave the group a couple of years to figure something out. “We modified our plans for a permit.”

Since then, the Guild has been busy as bees banging out all the work that needs to be done to bring Shakespeare, along with more contemporary shows, to Scotts Valley.

Meanwhile, the City is completely overhauling the library space next door, which is expected to include a façade upgrade covering the exterior of the future performance arts venue.

That facility improvement is expected to be completed by next spring.

On the performing arts side, renovations have included moving a door, putting in fire sprinklers and ripping out an old restroom.

The entire layout can be reconfigured at will, making it a great venue for professional presentations, school groups and community gatherings, according to the Guild.

Melehan wonders if maybe they should’ve left the toilets in place, because now one obstacle to opening is figuring out how people can relieve themselves at intermission.

“We’ve had quite a bit of money in the bank, but we’ve been spending it down,” she said, adding they’re doing more fundraising, but would love to see the City pitch in the promised money. “That would be a huge boon to us.”

When asked about the funding arrangement by the Press Banner, the City confirmed it’s agreed to give the group an unspecified amount of money for the performing arts center, but says it’s holding the cash until they see more specifics.

“We want to see what the concept is and how they’d use that money,” said Administrative Services Director Casey Estorga. “We want to support this project.”

Melehan says they’re considering (upscale) porta-potties as a temporary solution to the bathroom issue, and reveals the Guild has been in talks with the high school drama department for a scaled-down Nutcracker performance in December.

Scotts Valley’s Public Works Director Chris Lamm said the City might be more likely to pay the money it owes if the Guild comes up with a long-term solution, instead of just a temporary one.

“From a building-occupancy standpoint, a building has to have restrooms,” Lamm said, confirming portable toilets could satisfy this rule, for a little while anyway. “The City would definitely be looking for something more permanent for the project completion.”

Capitola City Council Awards $174K in Grants to Nonprofits

Capitola nonprofits will see incoming money from the city government.

Nonprofits submitted applications to the city’s Community Grant Program, which awards money to nonprofits each year. After some back and forth, the City decided to award nearly all the nonprofits the total amount of money they applied for, up to $10,000. The remaining money will be given to parks and recreation.

The money comes from the City’s general fund, which provides funds for public services, and a percent that comes from the Transient Occupancy Tax. Altogether, the City had $174,000 to distribute to local nonprofits: $125,000 from the general fund and $49,000 from tax. 

But the City Council was split over how much money to award. Even though the City had enough money to cover the requests from the organizations and still have nearly $20,0000 leftover, council members Jacques Bertrand and Margaux Keiser argued for awarding nonprofits a maximum 7% increase from what they were awarded last year.

Awarding what the organizations requested, the two council members argued at Thursday’s meeting, would set a high precedent for future awards.

“Where do we go from here in the long term, and in the years to come? Is it setting us up for this position of like, ‘oh, well, they had the money last year,’” said council member Keiser. 

But Capitola Mayor Yvette Brooks pushed back, saying it’s this kind of scarcity thinking that has contributed to the City’s diminishing the amount of money budgeted for the program each year.

“When I started at the city council in 2016, we were awarding $250,000. And now we’re only looking at $125,000, and we’re not even utilizing all those dollars and that really concerns me,” the mayor said. “The further we get away from utilizing those dollars, the further we get away from supporting our social services.”

Council member Kristen Petersen and Vice Mayor Sam Storey also supported giving the organizations the amount they requested, saying that the City has more than enough funds and should distribute the money out.

Betrand and Keiser also said that not many organizations applied for the grants, and they worried some organizations would be excluded from some of these funds.

“There’s a lot of people that were left out of our process, who in the past have made applications and used our donations to further the program,” Bertrand said. “So because they didn’t have that chance, for whatever reason, I don’t want to be able to not be able to give them some money in the future.”

This year, the city received applications from 22 agencies for 24 programs. Last year, the city received applications from around 30 organizations.

But since there would be leftover cash, said Brooks, it’s important to award the organizations that did come forward.

“We should be funding all of these requests, because we can,” she said. “They are fulfilling social needs, and we have the money.”

Rob Brezsny’s Astrology: Nov. 3-9

Astrology, Horoscope, Stars, Zodiac Signs
Free will astrology for the week of Nov. 3

Aptos Vineyard’s 2019 Syrah Boasts Flavors of Sweet Tobacco, Plum and Licorice

aptos-vineyard-syrah
‘Pop-up’ release of the Syrah to be held at Sante Arcangeli’s tasting room in Aptos Village

Downtown Santa Cruz’s Café Gratitude Offers a 100% Vegan Menu

cafe-gratitude-santa-cruz
Plant-based dishes like the fried ‘Magical Mushrooms’ have built a dedicated fanbase

11th Hour Coffee Takes Over Former Kelly’s Space on Westside

11th-hour-coffee
The new Westside spot serves tasty fresh-roasted coffee, breakfast paninis and local beer and wine

Home Care Is Broken. Can Congress Fix It?

Medicare, the federal insurance program for older and disabled adults, does not cover long-term care, and it limits the kind of home care people can receive

City Looks to Contract Out Recreation Services

Scotts Valley City planners have been looking towards a rebirth for its parks and rec department

Child Care in California hasn’t Rebounded; Why Many Workers aren’t Returning

The California workforce is about 10% smaller than it was pre-pandemic

Theater Guild Nearing Dress Rehearsal for Performing Arts Center Building

The space is said to accommodate up to 500 people for everything from ballet to choral groups to bands with large followings

Halloween in Santa Cruz, 2021

Halloween 2021 in Santa Cruz as seen by photog Tarmo Hannula

Capitola City Council Awards $174K in Grants to Nonprofits

The money comes from the City’s general fund, which provides funds for public services, and a percent that comes from the Transient Occupancy Tax
17,623FansLike
8,845FollowersFollow