Photo: ‘Barbaric’ Protest Hoax Draws Police Attention in Watsonville

A crew from KDC Construction boarded up windows at Starbucks in the Overlook Center on Main Street in Watsonville Thursday, June 4, at noon in response to rumors of planned looting and vandalism on social media.

On Wednesday and Thursday, a poster circulated on the internet announcing a “barbaric protest” at the Overlook Center, made to look as if it had been created by activists who have been organizing in response to the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis.

The image was widely denounced as a hoax almost immediately. On Thursday, a caller reported to the Watsonville police that five men dressed in black and carrying bags of bricks were headed for the shopping center. Police investigated and found the call to be a hoax.  

Police Chief and Mayor Discuss Policing as Protests Continue

0

With Black Lives Matter protesters across the nation filling the streets in daily calls to action against the killing of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police, the city of Santa Cruz and its police department have reached out directly to the public. 

On Wednesday, June 3, Mayor Justin Cummings, City Manager Martín Bernal and Police Chief Andy Mills held an online discussion titled “Changing the Culture of Policing” and looked at how it will change in the future. 

Hours later, roughly 5,000 people attended a peaceful Black Lives Matter march along West Cliff. One faction broke off and went to the police station, where they spray-painted graffiti like “Fuck Cops” and “Black Lives Matter! He Couldn’t Breathe.”

Cummings rushed to the scene to try to calm the situation. 

“‘If you’re claiming Black Lives Matter, then I’m one of those individuals you’re trying to represent,’” Cummings recalls telling the crowd. “I’ve worked really hard to be elected as the first Black male mayor of Santa Cruz, a city with less than two percent Black people, I was really trying to tell people, ‘Here’s my story, my thoughts and how I’m trying to make the community better.’”

He says that, while many members of the group listened, some did not. People yelled at and over him, he says. 

“If you are protesting to support a movement, it’s important to make sure the people you’re representing are a part of the narrative,” he tells Good Times. Cummings said the crowd was mostly white, and he said the people that he saw spray-painting the station were white.

The vandals continued downtown, marching to Pacific Avenue, where they tagged several more buildings and broke a Bank of the West window before being peacefully disassembled. Santa Cruz Police Department (SCPD) spokesperson Joyce Blaschke tells GT there have been no arrests.

Earlier in the night, Cummings opened the online discussion by saying it was Mills who reached out and initially started the dialogue.

“We decided to pull together this forum for our community, so people could speak directly to their elected officials and police chief while social distancing,” explained Cummings. 

After that, the floor opened up for a few words by local activists and organizers of the most recent local Black Lives Matter protests—one of which was happening at the same time as the webinar. Another protest happened on May 29, when a picture of Chief Mills and Mayor Cummings taking a knee together went viral. When it came Mills’ time to talk, he wasted no time discussing how he is changing the policing policies of his department. 

“Today, I issued an order to my entire department that we’ve changed our policy and will no longer use the carotid restraint, also known as the ‘choke hold,’” he said. “It’s done.” 

Floyd was killed not in the carotid restraint but with a knee on his neck, a controversial maneuver that became infamous after the 2014 killing of Eric Garner by New York City Police. Since Floyd’s death on May 25, dozens of police departments in California, including San Diego and Watsonville, have banned the technique. 

“It’s low-hanging fruit, but it’s a good place to start,” Mills said. 

He continued to say that, for the last two and a half years, the department has worked on de-escalation tactics and creating a closer community with neighborhood policing. Mills said that, as a result, there were “at least” five instances in the last year when police “would have been justified in using deadly force,” but instead, talked people down or used “other means” to de-escalate the situation. 

“This is how change happens,” he said. “It started with policy. Then, it went to training and now we have action and reward for that.”

In a move praised by the American Civil Liberties Union, the city and police will also move forward with Mayor Cummings’ surveillance accountability ordinance, legislation that prevents the government from using new technology without public debate or oversight. Several other communities—San Francisco, Oakland, Davis, Palo Alto, Berkeley, and Santa Clara County—have passed similar legislation. In addition, Mills said the city is moving forward with legislation to officially ban both predictive policing and facial recognition technology. 

When asked after the conference if the city will also ban use of possible license plate reading technology that was being evaluated earlier this year, Cummings says that the proposed legislation does not, but the technology is still “under review.”

When it came time for the public questions and comment portion of the discussion, many comments were about the viral pictures circulating online of SCPD officers in riot gear in Oakland, taken the same weekend as the picture of Mills and Cummings kneeling side-by-side in peaceful protest. The police chief responded to accusations of hypocrisy by explaining SCPD’s policy of mutual aid—sending first responders to other jurisdictions during “disasters.” Mills said that, if the response to a peaceful protest gets out of hand, he wants his officers to pull out and leave.

“It’s not to manage a protest; it’s to restore order when there’s a riot. There’s a very clear distinction,” he added. 

The city is keeping an eye on the policy, though. 

“There’s talk about what mutual aid looks like and when it should happen,” Cummings tells GT. “It’s important to discuss and know what our role is, if any.” 

Another controversy raised during the discussion was one that’s followed Chief Mills from Eureka, where he previously served as police chief. In 2017, Mills alerted the then-Humboldt Bay Fire Chief Bill Gillespie about a firefighter wearing a Black Lives Matter pin on his uniform. As GT reported last year, Mills was photographed around the same time wearing a “Police Lives Matter” bracelet during a racial equality workshop. 

When asked about the issue Wednesday night, Mills said the bracelet was under his uniform—not a part of it—and said it was in honor of the officers killed in the 2016 ambush killing of five Dallas officers. He said the firefighter’s Black Lives Matter pin was not prior-approved, and that’s why he raised the issue with Gillespie, adding that he stands by his decision. 

“A number of officers have come to me and asked to wear a variety of things to wear on their uniform, some of which I felt were inappropriate,” he said. “I did approve our officers to wear a wristband on their arm, not their uniform.” 

RTC Says ‘Yes’ to Train and Buses, ‘No’ to Trail and Pod Cars

A countywide transportation commission voted on Thursday, June 4, to move forward with in-depth analysis of four possible options for the future of Santa Cruz County’s rail trail corridor.

The leading options right now before the Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) include bus rapid transit, electric light rail, an electric commuter train, and a mix of the train and bus options.

“I think it’s going to be helpful to us all to study these four options carefully,” Commissioner and Santa Cruz County Supervisor John Leopold said, while making a motion to approve a phase of the Transit Corridor Alternatives Analysis, worked on by RTC staff and a private consultant. The commission approved the report by an 11-1 vote. The next phase of analysis should come before the RTC in September.

During Thursday’s meeting, Santa Cruz Metro CEO Alex Clifford said the local bus agency is working with the RTC on the two-year study, spurred by the two-year-long Unified Corridor Study, which grew out of the successful 2016 ballot initiative Measure D. “This has been a highly collaborative process,” Clifford said.

Clifford did not go into detail about Metro’s involvement and what’s at stake, but there is a chance that a new train would impact bus routes, ridership and revenue streams. It was partly Metro’s concerns about the Unified Corridor Study more than a year ago that paved the way for the alternatives analysis in the first place.

During Thursday’s meeting, Commissioners Sandy Brown and Mike Rotkin floated the idea of adding personal rapid transit (PRT), or pod cars, to the list of items worthy of high-level analysis. Their reasons included that smaller cars might be a safer way to move people—assuming that riders will still be concerned about the risk of airborne disease transmission in the relatively distant future—and that it might be relatively affordable, despite findings from staff. The commission did not ultimately add PRT to the list.

Although some members of the public called for more study of a trail-only solution on the corridor, Leopold and Commissioner Alternate Andy Schiffrin said that it would be wrong to do a do-over of the Unified Corridor Study, which demonstrated less value for a trail-only transportation alternative, compared with public transit options.

According to public commenters, the passenger rail options have support from a variety of groups, including the local Sierra Club chapter, Regeneración Pajaro Valley Climate Action, Bike Santa Cruz County and Friends of the Rail and Trail.

The lone dissenting vote Thursday came from Commissioner Randy Johnson, a Scotts Valley city councilmember who questioned the cost of the items being discussed. He wondered whether voters would really have the appetite for them. He said that, when voters approved Measure D in 2016, they wanted to see progress and that they wanted it quickly.

“The expectation was that things were gonna happen,” Johnson said, “and right now, we’re gonna do further studies on—in my mind—options that are infeasible and—especially with the economic situation we’re in right now—don’t hold out any hope of being implemented.” 

Santa Cruz Symphony’s Executive Director Steps Down

0

The Santa Cruz Symphony is hanging out a “help wanted” sign as it begins a search for a new executive director.

The symphony’s board announced this week that Dorothy Wise, who has held the executive director role since 2016, is leaving the position to join tech startup Mesh Communities with her daughter Jess Wise.

Linda Burroughs, the symphony’s board president, said in a statement that Wise has been wonderful “during a time of tremendous growth for the orchestra.”

“She has been instrumental in leading the symphony to artistic and financial success over the past five years, and is a valued member of our symphony family,” Burroughs said.

Wise has been involved in the administration of the symphony for nearly 30 years, serving as board president twice before taking on the executive director job.

The new executive director will have to work with music director and conductor Daniel Stewart in planning a return to a traditional symphony season in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic.

In April, the Symphony announced its upcoming 2020-21 season after it had cancelled its performances in March, April, and May. Its annual Pops concert, also cancelled, was to take place on June 6.

The Symphony is scheduling concerts for the fall for its 63rd season, but it is also designing a digital series in case some or all of those concerts cannot be held, Stewart said in a statement.

“We remain hopeful that we will be able to resume our regularly scheduled live concerts at some point in our coming season, depending on how the next several months unfold,” Stewart said.

A search committee has been formed to fill the executive director vacancy. The deadline for applications is June 30.

For details on the position, and for more on the upcoming season, go to santacruzsymphony.org.

Community-Based Social Service Providers Brace for Budget Cuts

In the newest revision of the California budget, released on May 27, Gov. Gavin Newsom proposed to eliminate funding for Community Based Adult Services (CBAS) as early as July 1.

CBAS programs aim to provide seniors with alternatives to nursing facilities and other institutions. This includes the Community Bridges organization’s Elderday Adult Day Health Care program, which supplies Santa Cruz County seniors with everything from at-home nursing care to healthy meals.

“Shutting the doors of CBAS affects all generations,” Lois Sones, Elderday’s program director, said in a press release. “CBAS serves primarily low-income, Medi-Cal eligible seniors and adults with disabilities. Families of our participants especially need CBAS now so they can return to work to contribute to our workforce and our economy.” 

Since the outbreak of Covid-19, the nonprofit sector has been hit hard—and social services, in particular, are looking at major cuts across the board. In Santa Cruz County, the city of Capitola released its proposed budget for the 2020-2021 fiscal year, which included the elimination of funding for all community-based social service providers, including Community Bridges.

It is a move that will have a big effect, as Capitola’s demographic is more than 20% of seniors.

“As we see local jurisdictions propose cuts to community-based organizations at the same time demand for food and support services is increasing, we are faced with tough choices,” said Amy Hanley, Community Bridges’ Marketing and Communications Manager. “We all need to consider the community impact if services or staff are reduced.”

This week, the city of Watsonville released the first draft of its 2020-2021 budget proposal. Funds for social services went from $200,000 to $134,000—a 33% drop. Hanley said that Scotts Valley’s proposed elimination of services is similar to Capitola’s, and the city of Santa Cruz might not be far behind. Santa Cruz County has also proposed a recommended budget for 2020-2021, and funding for its Core Investment Programs was cut by $83,220.

Karen Delaney, executive director of the Volunteer Center of Santa Cruz County, said that her organization is bracing for the impacts of such large cuts.

“Whenever there is a disaster … nonprofits like ours are called on to provide more services than ever, but if we lose funding we will be able to do less,” Delaney said. “There will likely be longer waiting lists for Lift Line rides, less meals delivered to seniors …. Why are those things less important than cleaning the streets and watering parks?”

Delaney said that jurisdictions might need to rethink how they operate. 

“We understand, as a nonprofit, what it’s like to not have enough money,” she said. “I think in the next couple of years, it’ll be time for all institutions to think more like nonprofits. To find creative ways to survive, while supporting their most vulnerable residents.”

Delaney said she has seen a lot of support and generosity on an individual level, with people continuing to volunteer and donate their own funds.

“We have a very generous community,” she said. “People have been overwhelmingly supportive and willing to help. We want to see that on the city and county level, too.”

As for Community Bridges, the organization is looking at ways it can fill the gap in funding to continue its programming, especially Meals on Wheels and Lift Line. They are also urging the community to contact their state senate and assembly members to express their opposition to the elimination of CBAS programs.

Hanley said that it was important for everyone—organizations, agencies, municipalities—to find a common ground.

“While we are all in this together, we are not all in the same boat,” Hanley said. “The people that Community Bridges serves… are disproportionately affected by the Covid-19 crisis and they are going to continue to need the support of this community in the coming months. Tough economic decisions loom ahead for all of us, but we urge our local leaders to partner and work collaboratively with nonprofits to ensure that the needs of their residents are met and the services they need survive this crisis.”

County Ramps Up Testing, Contact Tracing As Businesses Reopen

In Santa Cruz County, the beginning of June means the beginning of a new phase in the recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic.

Over the weekend, the county’s plan for moving forward was approved by the California Department of Public Health. That means county health officials are this week concentrating on efforts not only to reopen the local economy and help local businesses comply with the state’s guidelines, but also to initiate an ambitious plan for testing and contact tracing.

Margaret Lapiz, who was enlisted in April to head the SAVE Lives Santa Cruz County program, says the county has about 55 people trained and ready to go in its contact tracing program, which is well above the minimum number needed for effective tracing.

“We have a robust plan for contact tracing that is well underway,” says Lapiz, a longtime health care executive hired by the Community Foundation, which is funding the SAVE Lives effort. “But what we need to do is to ramp it up dramatically.”

Contact tracing is epidemiological detective work, a method to isolate a node or outbreak of an infection and trace it back to its source.

Professionals with backgrounds in health care have been put through a vetting and training program to engage in both contact tracing and case investigation. “This is generally expertise that has been in the domain of public health departments for a variety of communicable diseases: HIV, STDs, when we went through the H1N1 (pandemic),” Lapiz says.

Lapiz says that the program has brought in roughly half of its contact tracers from the staff of the county’s health department, and half from community groups such as Salud Para La Gente in Watsonville and Santa Cruz Community Health Centers. “We’ve had conversations with Cabrillo College to use their students in a number of their health-care disciplines. We want to make sure that we have a diverse group of contact tracers: first-in-family students, bilingual and bicultural teams.”

The program is also enlisting the efforts of promotores, lay people and volunteers with a tradition of providing health-care information and guidelines in Latino communities.

Though Lapiz is pleased with the force she and her team have compiled, she says she does not want to discourage others from volunteering. “We have other ways to deploy volunteers who we could capitalize on for expertise and availability. But we are well-positioned right now for contact tracing.”

Jen Herrera, the county’s chief of Public Health, says that contact tracing is a vital step in the control of the spread of Covid-19. The county automatically gets the result of every Covid-19 test—positive, negative or inconclusive—and from that one data point, tracers can launch an investigation.

“Once we get notified of a positive result, that immediately starts our investigation,” Herrera says. “We’ll contact the positive case and initiate the investigation within 24 hours. From there, we determine if there are contacts that need to be contacted. Our goal, our charge, is to follow up on every single positive case in the county. We have a high bar for having enough contact tracers to do containment in our community.”

According to data last updated Tuesday, June 2, 41 new cases of Covid-19 have been recorded in the county in the previous 14 days, with 219 total cases since the outbreak began. There have been no deaths in the last 14 days in the county.

In late May, four clusters of positive cases were reported in Watsonville, which were traced to large family gatherings, including many individuals who traveled in from out of the area.

“Because we know how quickly (Covid-19) spreads, we have to respond quickly,” Herrera says. “From what we learn from our initial investigation, we reach out to whoever has been in contact and, depending on their levels of exposure, we encourage testing. If they are positive, then we look at their contacts. It becomes this web of people who are connected, a cluster.”

Part of the public’s general preparedness for safety during the pandemic, said Herrera, is keep track of their own contacts, just in case that information is needed by tracers.

“How easily can you remember exactly where you’ve been and who you interacted with in the past two weeks?” she says. “That’s a nice marker (to keep track of). As we reopen, that’s just something to consider. There’s going to be a lot more movement of people, and we ask people to still maintain their social cohort bubble.”

Tara Reade on Standing Up to Joe Biden and Her Love for Santa Cruz

In the months since she came forward with a sexual assault allegation against former Vice President Joe Biden, former Santa Cruz resident Tara Reade has faced increased scrutiny.

As reported by GT last month, Pregnant Mare Rescue owner Lynn Hummer has accused Reade of being a persistent scammer, with an account corroborated by Aptos attorney Kelly Klett. Reade downplayed those accusations to GT, choosing not to address them directly. “Some particularly ugly sections of the national press came to my community to dig up as much dirt as possible and spread it across the whole country,” she says via email.  

Reade adds that she isn’t sure when or exactly how exactly her relationship with Klett soured, as the two were exchanging pleasant Facebook messages as recently as last year. Things were more complicated with Hummer, about whom Reade declined to say much, other than how she remembers the nonprofit owner being cruel around the time that Reade’s mother died in 2016. Hummer says she knows what Reade is referring to, but says that Reade has exaggerated the details to make the events sound more dramatic. This was around the same time that the dust-up over a horse doctor bill for Charm came to a head. Each of the women says they don’t want to get pulled down into the mud at the other one’s level.

Some Monterey Bay locals, however, have come to Reade’s defense.

“Tara was always kind. She was a good listener. There were many times we would get into conversations about what I was going through or what she was going through. She’s always been an animal lover,” says local horse trainer Genae Kindscher, whose mother Gina shared similar sentiments with Politico last month. 

Kindscher never heard Reade speak of Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee for president of the United States, but she believes her friend.

Reade, who still owns the horse named Charm that she adopted from Watsonville’s Pregnant Mare Rescue, says she has fond memories of her time in Santa Cruz. “Santa Cruz is a beautiful place, and I was so fortunate to live there,” Reade, who lives in northern California, writes via email. “The beaches are a treasure for everyone. The arts and music culture is so fun too. I will always consider Santa Cruz one of my favorite places.”

Reade says she is worried that the treatment she’s gotten from the media will make the decision that much harder in the future for victims who think about coming forward with their stories.

She notes that she doesn’t have her own public relations team to counter Biden’s publicists and supporters, including the pro-Biden Krassenstien brothers, who initially broke the story about Hummer on Medium

“It’s really hard that people are going to tear me apart. But it doesn’t change what happened. This happened in 1993. I was harassed, and I was assaulted, and history will look back on the journalism from this time and judge it,” she tells GT by phone.

Overwhelmed by threats and online harassment, Reade says she is “a poster child for why victims don’t want to come forward.”

“This is destroying my life,” says Reade, who did not speak with GT for our initial story. “I’m not suing Biden. I’m obviously not having any effect on his campaign. His campaign is fine. I tried to come forward in 1993 and in 2019 and now. I just hope it gets easier for the survivors.”

Some former acquaintances of Reade have taken calls from a private investigator and spoken with him. Hummer says the investigator wouldn’t say who his client was, although he insisted it wasn’t the Biden campaign.

Reade was born locally and has other ties to the Monterey Bay. As GT reported, Reade served as an expert witness in domestic violence cases in Monterey County. 

More recently, Monterey County Weekly reported that Reade had a long history as an expert witness in such cases, getting called to testify in at least 20 cases over a ten-year span, according to one court transcript.

Two weeks ago, CNN reported that Reade lied about obtaining a degree from Antioch University. That opened up questions about whether Reade had misrepresented herself on the witness stand and also prompted defense attorneys to begin reviewing convictions that had been obtained with Reade’s help. On May 21, Reade’s attorney Douglas Wigdor—who provided GT with comment for our initial story—announced that he was no longer representing Reade. On May 26, the Monterey County District Attorney’s Office announced an investigation into whether Reade had lied under oath.

Reade has gotten a new lawyer, and she says she’s looking into what she says is a miscommunication with Antioch University. Whatever happened with her undergraduate education, it did not stop her from enrolling at Seattle University School of Law and graduating, although she never became a lawyer.

Some have questioned elements of Reade’s story that have evolved over time—most notably how she initially claimed to be a victim of sexual harassment at the hands of Biden and then later came forward with claims of sexual assault in a semiprivate Senate hallway. Biden has denied all Reade’s claims. Reade says it took a long time before she felt comfortable going public with her full experience about Biden and even longer for the media to start listening.

Some skeptics have pointed out that Reade praised Biden’s work on preventing violence against women and boasted about her own part in crafting that legislation—perhaps even inflating her role. Some have asked why a victim would talk so positively about their own abuser. It’s perhaps a cruel twist of irony that Reade, in her days as a domestic violence expert witness, testified about the complexities behind why abuse victims often lie and defend their abusers for so long.

On Monday, the New York Times released an in-depth article detailing much of Reade’s life story. A culmination of more than 100 interviews, it featured many perspectives—aggrieved acquaintances who say that Reade never repaid her debts, a classmate who saw Reade’s sadness, friends who knew her kindness, those who believe her, those who don’t. “In the dramatic retelling of her life story, she has also shown a tendency to embellish,” the Times wrote.

The Washington Post interviewed Intercept Washington Bureau Chief Ryan Grim, who was instrumental in pushing journalists to take Reade’s story seriously. Grim stands behind that decision. He would not say whether he personally believed Reade’s allegation.

“That’s the wrong question to ask,” he told the Post. “The question for the media should be, ‘Do you believe she has a right to be heard?’ I think we in the media should continue to report out her story. Our job is to put the evidence in the public domain and let the public decide what to do with it.”

Transportation Commission Narrowing Options for Rail Corridor

Santa Cruz County is about to move one step closer toward figuring out what to do with its old freight rail corridor.

On Thursday, June 4, the Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) will evaluate a short list of options for the coastal corridor, a rail line that runs more than 30 miles through the county—all the way up to Davenport. When it comes to transportation policy, the most contested section stretches from Watsonville to Santa Cruz. That’s where a fight has simmered over the past few years about how best to move people to and from work. The RTC’s long-stated intention has been for a bike and pedestrian trail with a passenger train running alongside it.

Many bicycle advocates argue that there isn’t enough room or money to accommodate a fully functioning passenger train without giving the trail short shrift. Groups like Santa Cruz County Greenway and Trail Now called for the RTC to instead rip up the train tracks and replace them with trails for bikes and pedestrians only.

In January of 2019, the commission approved a 10-year contract with the freight rail company Progressive Rail. In approving the Unified Corridor Study that same day, the group all but agreed to prioritize doing public transit, like trains, on the corridor. A vote from the commission kickstarted the Transit Corridors Alternatives Analysis, which is weighing different options for the rail corridor and will be the subject of discussion on Thursday.

Three months ago, the analysis identified 25 possible transportation options to study. In advance of Thursday’s discussion, RTC staff is recommending that the commission narrow the list down to just four preferred rail trail options—bus rapid transit, electric light rail, an electric commuter train, and a mix of the train and bus options.

Together, the commission and the RTC’s staff are evaluating the various options according to a long list of criteria. Most of the criteria fall into one of three categories: “equity,” meaning that the mode of transportation is equitable, safe and reliable; “economy,” meaning that it’s fiscally sound, while supporting businesses and jobs and, lastly, the “environment.”

The commission is scheduled to see results of the high-level analysis of the pared-down options in September, according to a staff report. The full analysis is scheduled to be finished in January of 2021, two years after the study was initially approved.

Greenway and Trail Now supporters have expressed frustration that a trail-only option did not get serious consideration, although some activists have expressed openness in the past to the bus-rapid transit concept. Train supporters—from groups like Friends of the Rail and Trail and the Campaign for Sustainable Transportation—continue to advocate for the train options.  

At its March meeting, the RTC approved $1.4 million in repairs to the rail line’s train tracks. Ripping up those tracks could open up legal questions, like whether the RTC must pay back the $11 million in state money that it took to purchase the rail line several years ago.

That doesn’t mean that the leading options currently are particularly affordable. According to last year’s Unified Corridor Study, the county’s transportation strategy going forward would cost a projected $950 million. Where much of that money would come from is unclear.

Due to social distancing guidelines during the Covid-19 pandemic, Thursday’s RTC meeting will be at 9:30am via teleconference. To join, go to zoom.us/j/83234221839 or call 669-900-6833. The conference ID is 832 3422 1839.

How to Support Santa Cruz Wineries and Find A Bargain

In order to support our local wineries, purchasing their wine is essential at this time. There are many bargains out there right now. You don’t have to spend an arm and a leg to get a good bottle of wine.

Alfaro Family Vineyards and Winery is offering no-contact curbside pickup from noon to 3pm Monday to Saturday or by appointment. Try their terrific estate Gruner Veltliner—a six-pack is $132. 

Alfarowine.com.

The Vinocruz people in Soquel are happy to announce that they are now open every day from noon to 7pm for takeout or delivery (with certain restrictions). They are doing their best to serve the local community with amazing food, wine, beer and cider, and they look forward to seeing your smiling face masks! 

Vinocruz.com.

Orders for six or more bottles from Roudon Smith Winery come with a good discount. Check on delivery policies.

Roudonsmith.com.

Martin Ranch Winery says they’re “still hustling and bustling,” selling their wine at 33% off for three or more bottles with curbside pickup. 

Martinranchwinery.com.

Bargetto Winery is offering free shipping with a purchase of six or more bottles. 

Bargetto.com.

Kathryn Kennedy Winery is doing full cases at “well below retail.” Wine purchases are to be picked up at the winery by appointment only as the winery is not normally open to visitors. 

Visit kathrynkennedywinery.com or email owner Marty Mathis at ca******@******************ry.com.

Muns Vineyard is doing stay-at-home specials right now, including delivery locally at no charge. For pickup advance orders at the vineyard, it is requested that all visitors wear a mask and observe social distancing. Credit cards are charged remotely to avoid direct contact.

To order, call Mary at 408-234-2079 or visit munsvineyard.com/order

Stockwell Cellars on the Westside has ongoing case sales, including their California Quarantine Red Blend and their Rosé of Pinot Noir. And as the folks at Stockwell say: “It’s time for Rosés again. It will put the roses back in your cheeks.” 

Stockwellcellars.com.

As somebody once said, “In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is freedom, in water there is bacteria.”

Santa Cruz County to Resume Jury Trials with Social Distancing Measures

Santa Cruz County Superior Court plans to resume jury trials in late summer, a little more than two months after they were temporarily suspended due to Covid-19.

Presiding Judge Paul Burdick announced on March 17 that all jury trials—including criminal, civil and probate —would be postponed through at least April 17. 

Court officials later moved many criminal hearings to the courthouse steps as a way to further slow the spread of the virus. Those hearings have since moved back inside, and three criminal courtrooms will open next week, both part of the court’s multi-phased approach to resuming services, said Court Executive Officer Alex Calvo.

With trials now expected to resume in August, the court must find a way to impanel juries while keeping them safe, Calvo said.

A 10-member task force made up of court officials, prosecutors and defense attorneys meets weekly to hammer out the details, Calvo said.

The upcoming changes will affect most aspects of trial operations, starting with calling as few as 15 jurors for the selection process, as opposed to the 80 that normally pack the courtroom, Calvo said.

“We’re expecting the jury trial selection process to take much longer,” he said. 

Once impaneled, jurors will be spaced apart in the courtroom to comply with social distancing guidelines, he said.

The court will likely begin sending out jury summons in July.

“We need to get the word out to the jurors about the steps we’re taking to make them safe, and also the fact that jury trials are the cornerstone of our democracy,” Calvo said. “The right to a trial by one’s peers has not gone away, and will not go away. We’re going to need jurors to come in and take part in what we feel is an essential and crucial part of our democracy.”

Photo: ‘Barbaric’ Protest Hoax Draws Police Attention in Watsonville

Poster shared online widely denounced as a hoax

Police Chief and Mayor Discuss Policing as Protests Continue

Andy Mills responds to allegations of hypocrisy

RTC Says ‘Yes’ to Train and Buses, ‘No’ to Trail and Pod Cars

Metro works with commission on alternatives analysis

Santa Cruz Symphony’s Executive Director Steps Down

Dorothy Wise has held the executive director role since 2016

Community-Based Social Service Providers Brace for Budget Cuts

State, local budgets propose cutting or eliminating funds for community services

County Ramps Up Testing, Contact Tracing As Businesses Reopen

Some 55 people trained and ready for contact tracing program

Tara Reade on Standing Up to Joe Biden and Her Love for Santa Cruz

Since going public, Reade’s story has grown more complicated

Transportation Commission Narrowing Options for Rail Corridor

Possibilities include bus-rapid transit and electric light rail

How to Support Santa Cruz Wineries and Find A Bargain

See the options from Alfaro Family Vineyards and Winery, Vinocruz, Roudon Smith Winery and others

Santa Cruz County to Resume Jury Trials with Social Distancing Measures

Many criminal hearings had been temporarily moved to the courthouse steps
17,623FansLike
8,845FollowersFollow